Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Your Take: The debt ceiling

Your Take: The debt ceiling
Getty Images

Earlier this week we asked the following questions of our Bridge Alliance, Coffee Party and Fulcrum communities regarding ripples in the financial sector over concerns with the debt ceiling:

  • Now that the country already possesses extensive debt, what is the best approach towards properly balancing budget and spending priorities?
  • Is the debt ceiling a practical apparatus by which to assess the national debt in our modern day financial system?

With the “debt crisis” averted for now, many have turned their eyes towards the future of our economy. With the vitality of our current economic system being called into question, there are indeed opportunities for adjustment in order to properly secure the country’s future. And, while many of us would love for fiscal policy to be independent of political ideology, the two are inextricably linked; highlighting some of the dangers present in our highly polarized political puzzle. Regardless, as the saying goes, “victory has 100 fathers, while defeat is an orphan”; the debt ceiling agreement was a win, at least for now. The negotiations that led to the appeasement of debt ceiling constraints were effective. In this case, our elected officials displayed an almost shockingly tactful level of coordination as they compromised their own ideology for the welfare of the American people. I repeat, this is a win, for now.


Many of your thoughts reflected a similar level of tempered optimism. But, as most of us don’t have a degree in finance, the ease with which the average American can denote issues within an economic system often deemed as “complicated”, speaks volumes to the issues that exist. It is fair to say that reports of the proverbial sky falling were a bit overplayed. Regardless, even if the sky is not falling, it may have begun to drizzle. Lawmakers must ensure the roof is tarred and sealed; or we should grab an umbrella just in case.

Here is a sampling of your thoughts. Responses have been edited for length and clarity.

Yes, the debt ceiling is still a practical tool. Anything that can be done to focus the nation's attention on huge annual deficits and rising debt should be considered. However, the latest debt ceiling agreement did very little to reduce deficits and nothing to reduce debt. Both parties continue to kick the can down the road. The 2018 Trump tax cuts cut revenue, while the Biden Administration continues to support increased spending. With rising interest rates, the cost of servicing federal debt continues to rise. - Richard Davies

Debt is not a bad thing, by itself. Whether or not an entity, whether government or individual, has too much dept is a concern but just how much is too much is complicated. Government expenses, or debt, can only be properly understood by looking at things over the long run. - Fred

The debt ceiling is impractical. We are the only country in the world with this exact "debt ceiling" thing that hangs out there as a tempting hostage for either party to take advantage of, depending on which is in power. - Gerry Langeler

We need comprehensive fiscal reform. Taxes must rise and major business exemptions must be trimmed back. Social Security and Medicare must be overhauled. These are major reforms and I don’t know how we will actually accomplish them. - Richard W Sinclair

We need to substantially increase revenue and scale back defense spending. Others may disagree, but those disagreements should be hashed out in the budget process. It’s absurd to either revisit them when deciding whether to pay our debts. - Chris Goelz

Many government outlays are investing, with some reasonable expectation of a predictable positive return. Money for health care, education, environmental protections, etc., is investing for the well-being of individuals and society. Other outlays are speculating, merely assuming that the people who get the funds will use it for productive purposes. This category includes nearly all programs "to create jobs," tax cuts and subsidies to corporations and wealthy individuals. Yet nearly everyone lumps it all together as "spending." Going forward, analyzing government expenditure through these distinctions, we can cut superfluous programs, minimize wealthy tax breaks, etc. - Steven Shafarman

We need a fundamental overhaul of our budgeting process. Congressional reforms made in 1974 have made us significantly less effective when it comes to budgeting. Prior to 1976, the government didn't shut down over funding issues, since then it has shut down 22 times. We need to simplify and reevaluate the role congressional committees play in the budget process, eliminating excess and redundancy. Finally, I think we should spend time and resources evaluating the efficiency of federal programs. We fund many programs that underperform, but we continue funding them because we don't evaluate them based on outcome. The alternative would be to raise taxes. It just isn't sustainable to keep the same amount of income but increase spending levels. Without addressing these structural issues, we will continue to live in this debt limit death spiral. - Hillari Lombard

We need to take a look at the biggest drivers of our debt - defense spending, Medicare, and Social Security spending. Medicare and Social Security can be made solvent with no impact on current beneficiaries and minimal impact on future beneficiaries. We can continue to devote sufficient resources to ensure we have the best military in the world, but we should be able to do that while keeping overall outlays flat. - Allan Cohn

There is nothing wrong with the debt ceiling apparatus itself, it should not be treated as some terrible financial catastrophe. Rather, it could be used to force the kind of fiscal restraint that is necessary to address the outstanding debt problem. - David Butler

The only good the debt ceiling accomplishes is to compel periodic, transitory and superficial attention to the consequences of years of irresponsible neglect by all American stakeholders, especially the voters and their representatives. - Bernard Sucher

The debt ceiling is an obsolete mechanism and should be eliminated through legislation. - Bob Meyer

Any financial or economic system is made possible by government policies and infrastructure (upholding contracts, the court system, regulatory mechanisms, etc.). The debt ceiling is one more policy that has created the existing system. It does appear to be a very effective tool for certain political goals that align, broadly, with the goals of the financial system, with some risk attached. - Daniel Pritchard


Read More

A male senior stands in the shadow of a Social Security card with bite missing.

Social Security faces automatic cuts in 2032 and Medicare in 2033. New polling suggests that gives Democrats a powerful election issue. Here’s the case.

DNY59 / Getty Images

Will the Debt Crisis Engineered by Republicans Succeed in Cutting Social Security and Medicare?

Overview

The Republican Party’s long game to reduce administrative state entitlement spending centers on creating a debt crisis to provide an excuse for limiting such spending. It may soon pay off. That strategy involved a quarter-century of engineered tax cuts responsible for the stunning rise in sovereign U.S. debt, threatening an eventual economic crisis.

Social Security benefits are projected under current law to be automatically cut in 2032. And Medicare benefits are projected to be automatically cut in 2033. Congressional Republicans intend for those automatic cuts to occur, opposing new taxes to prevent cuts. And they are using the ballooning national debt as an excuse to also oppose new general revenue spending to prevent benefit cuts.

Keep ReadingShow less
​Chinese President Xi Jinping (L) and U.S. President Donald Trump followed by Chinese first lady Peng Liyuan and U.S. first lady Melania Trump arrive for a state dinner at the White House.

Chinese President Xi Jinping (L) and U.S. President Donald Trump followed by Chinese first lady Peng Liyuan and U.S. first lady Melania Trump arrive for a state dinner in the East Room of the White House on September 24, 2026 in Washington, DC.

Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images

When Leaders Disagree, Ceremony Plays an Important Role

When Chinese President Xi Jinping arrived at the White House on 24 September, the U.S. welcomed him with an elaborate display of ceremony. The Army Herald Trumpets sounded a fanfare, the Chinese and American national anthems were played, and the Old Guard Fife and Drum Corps performed. A military review was followed by a flyover involving a B-2 bomber and four F-22 fighter jets, according to the White House. It was an extraordinary production for two countries that still disagree on some of the most important issues in international politics.

Talks between President Donald Trump and Xi touched on trade, artificial intelligence and Taiwan. The visit was marked by warm words and some signs of cooperation, but it did not erase the fundamental competition between the United States and China. So why was all this ceremony staged? It is tempting to dismiss political pomp as mere window dressing: an expensive historical relic surrounding the serious business taking place behind closed doors. As a music historian, however, I think this misunderstands what ceremony does. Ceremony can become particularly valuable when words alone are not enough.

Keep ReadingShow less
Americans Voting in an Election

Americans Voting in an Election

Getty Images

Voting Is Not Just a Privilege It Is Every Citizens’ Responsibility

Despite the consistent determinations that US elections are secure across the country and there is virtually no evidence of non-citizens voting, in reports released as recently as September 2026; President Trump has doubled down on his claims that voter fraud is a major problem in America and on October 20th, he announced a new $25 Million Fraud Whistleblower program to be administered by the Department of Justice.

This announcement achieves a variety of the president’s goals: (i) It intentionally perpetuates the misinformation, that voter fraud is a serious problem in the United States; (ii) it undermines the trust in the voting systems, as well as in the states administering the elections; (iii) it fosters distrust amongst neighbors, who are more likely to suspect people of color and report them for a reward. This has the concomitant benefit of (iv) intimidating people who are in fear of going to the polls and (v) It gives the illusion that the federal government is prepared to give away more free money (along with the Tariff rebate checks, the Trump Accounts, the DOGE dividend, the direct payments for healthcare and the $5,000 for supporting GOP midterm candidates.)

Keep ReadingShow less
Capitol building with American flag behind it

Political Polarization and Extremism

Getty Images

Both Parties Have Forgotten How to Lose: It’s Time for Guardrails

On November 3 Americans vote in the midterm elections, and the most important question may be whether the losers accept the result. A Pew survey this summer found that just 55 percent of Americans are confident the midterms will be run fairly and accurately, down from 64 percent in 2022. The partisan detail is more revealing. Since 2024, Republican confidence has risen and Democratic confidence has fallen from 77 percent to 58 percent. Trust in the referee now depends on who holds power.

Democracy rests on a kind of sportsmanship agreement. The theologian Reinhold Niebuhr put it well: man’s capacity for justice makes democracy possible, but his inclination to injustice makes it necessary. B. R. Ambedkar, the chief architect of India’s constitution, called democracy a method of bringing revolutionary change without bloodshed. Both understood that the system works only if the losing side agrees to try again next time instead of burning down the field. Americans in both parties are forgetting how to do that.

Keep ReadingShow less