Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Your Take: The debt ceiling

Your Take: The debt ceiling
Getty Images

Earlier this week we asked the following questions of our Bridge Alliance, Coffee Party and Fulcrum communities regarding ripples in the financial sector over concerns with the debt ceiling:

  • Now that the country already possesses extensive debt, what is the best approach towards properly balancing budget and spending priorities?
  • Is the debt ceiling a practical apparatus by which to assess the national debt in our modern day financial system?

With the “debt crisis” averted for now, many have turned their eyes towards the future of our economy. With the vitality of our current economic system being called into question, there are indeed opportunities for adjustment in order to properly secure the country’s future. And, while many of us would love for fiscal policy to be independent of political ideology, the two are inextricably linked; highlighting some of the dangers present in our highly polarized political puzzle. Regardless, as the saying goes, “victory has 100 fathers, while defeat is an orphan”; the debt ceiling agreement was a win, at least for now. The negotiations that led to the appeasement of debt ceiling constraints were effective. In this case, our elected officials displayed an almost shockingly tactful level of coordination as they compromised their own ideology for the welfare of the American people. I repeat, this is a win, for now.


Many of your thoughts reflected a similar level of tempered optimism. But, as most of us don’t have a degree in finance, the ease with which the average American can denote issues within an economic system often deemed as “complicated”, speaks volumes to the issues that exist. It is fair to say that reports of the proverbial sky falling were a bit overplayed. Regardless, even if the sky is not falling, it may have begun to drizzle. Lawmakers must ensure the roof is tarred and sealed; or we should grab an umbrella just in case.

Here is a sampling of your thoughts. Responses have been edited for length and clarity.

Yes, the debt ceiling is still a practical tool. Anything that can be done to focus the nation's attention on huge annual deficits and rising debt should be considered. However, the latest debt ceiling agreement did very little to reduce deficits and nothing to reduce debt. Both parties continue to kick the can down the road. The 2018 Trump tax cuts cut revenue, while the Biden Administration continues to support increased spending. With rising interest rates, the cost of servicing federal debt continues to rise. - Richard Davies

Debt is not a bad thing, by itself. Whether or not an entity, whether government or individual, has too much dept is a concern but just how much is too much is complicated. Government expenses, or debt, can only be properly understood by looking at things over the long run. - Fred

The debt ceiling is impractical. We are the only country in the world with this exact "debt ceiling" thing that hangs out there as a tempting hostage for either party to take advantage of, depending on which is in power. - Gerry Langeler

We need comprehensive fiscal reform. Taxes must rise and major business exemptions must be trimmed back. Social Security and Medicare must be overhauled. These are major reforms and I don’t know how we will actually accomplish them. - Richard W Sinclair

We need to substantially increase revenue and scale back defense spending. Others may disagree, but those disagreements should be hashed out in the budget process. It’s absurd to either revisit them when deciding whether to pay our debts. - Chris Goelz

Many government outlays are investing, with some reasonable expectation of a predictable positive return. Money for health care, education, environmental protections, etc., is investing for the well-being of individuals and society. Other outlays are speculating, merely assuming that the people who get the funds will use it for productive purposes. This category includes nearly all programs "to create jobs," tax cuts and subsidies to corporations and wealthy individuals. Yet nearly everyone lumps it all together as "spending." Going forward, analyzing government expenditure through these distinctions, we can cut superfluous programs, minimize wealthy tax breaks, etc. - Steven Shafarman

We need a fundamental overhaul of our budgeting process. Congressional reforms made in 1974 have made us significantly less effective when it comes to budgeting. Prior to 1976, the government didn't shut down over funding issues, since then it has shut down 22 times. We need to simplify and reevaluate the role congressional committees play in the budget process, eliminating excess and redundancy. Finally, I think we should spend time and resources evaluating the efficiency of federal programs. We fund many programs that underperform, but we continue funding them because we don't evaluate them based on outcome. The alternative would be to raise taxes. It just isn't sustainable to keep the same amount of income but increase spending levels. Without addressing these structural issues, we will continue to live in this debt limit death spiral. - Hillari Lombard

We need to take a look at the biggest drivers of our debt - defense spending, Medicare, and Social Security spending. Medicare and Social Security can be made solvent with no impact on current beneficiaries and minimal impact on future beneficiaries. We can continue to devote sufficient resources to ensure we have the best military in the world, but we should be able to do that while keeping overall outlays flat. - Allan Cohn

There is nothing wrong with the debt ceiling apparatus itself, it should not be treated as some terrible financial catastrophe. Rather, it could be used to force the kind of fiscal restraint that is necessary to address the outstanding debt problem. - David Butler

The only good the debt ceiling accomplishes is to compel periodic, transitory and superficial attention to the consequences of years of irresponsible neglect by all American stakeholders, especially the voters and their representatives. - Bernard Sucher

The debt ceiling is an obsolete mechanism and should be eliminated through legislation. - Bob Meyer

Any financial or economic system is made possible by government policies and infrastructure (upholding contracts, the court system, regulatory mechanisms, etc.). The debt ceiling is one more policy that has created the existing system. It does appear to be a very effective tool for certain political goals that align, broadly, with the goals of the financial system, with some risk attached. - Daniel Pritchard


Read More

Postal Service Changes Mean Texas Voters Shouldn’t Wait To Mail Voter Registrations and Ballots

A voter registration drive in Corpus Christi, Texas, on Oct. 5, 2024. The deadline to register to vote for Texas' March 3 primary election is Feb. 2, 2026. Changes to USPS policies may affect whether a voter registration application is processed on time if it's not postmarked by the deadline.

Gabriel Cárdenas for Votebeat

Postal Service Changes Mean Texas Voters Shouldn’t Wait To Mail Voter Registrations and Ballots

Texans seeking to register to vote or cast a ballot by mail may not want to wait until the last minute, thanks to new guidance from the U.S. Postal Service.

The USPS last month advised that it may not postmark a piece of mail on the same day that it takes possession of it. Postmarks are applied once mail reaches a processing facility, it said, which may not be the same day it’s dropped in a mailbox, for example.

Keep ReadingShow less
The Many Victims of Trump’s Immigration Policy–Including the U.S. Economy

Messages of support are posted on the entrance of the Don Julio Mexican restaurant and bar on January 18, 2026 in Forest Lake, Minnesota. The restaurant was reportedly closed because of ICE operations in the area. Residents in some places have organized amid a reported deployment of 3,000 federal agents in the area who have been tasked with rounding up and deporting suspected undocumented immigrants

Getty Images, Scott Olson

The Many Victims of Trump’s Immigration Policy–Including the U.S. Economy

The first year of President Donald Trump’s second term resulted in some of the most profound immigration policy changes in modern history. With illegal border crossings having dropped to their lowest levels in over 50 years, Trump can claim a measure of victory. But it’s a hollow victory, because it’s becoming increasingly clear that his immigration policy is not only damaging families, communities, workplaces, and schools - it is also hurting the economy and adding to still-soaring prices.

Besides the terrifying police state tactics, the most dramatic shift in Trump's immigration policy, compared to his presidential predecessors (including himself in his first term), is who he is targeting. Previously, a large number of the removals came from immigrants who showed up at the border but were turned away and never allowed to enter the country. But with so much success at reducing activity at the border, Trump has switched to prioritizing “internal deportations” – removing illegal immigrants who are already living in the country, many of them for years, with families, careers, jobs, and businesses.

Keep ReadingShow less
Close up of stock market chart on a glowing particle world map and trading board.

Democrats seek a post-Trump strategy, but reliance on neoliberal economic policies may deepen inequality and voter distrust.

Getty Images, Yuichiro Chino

After Trump, Democrats Confront a Deeper Economic Reckoning

For a decade, Democrats have defined themselves largely by their opposition to Donald Trump, a posture taken in response to institutional crises and a sustained effort to defend democratic norms from erosion. Whatever Trump may claim, he will not be on the 2028 presidential ballot. This moment offers Democrats an opportunity to do something they have postponed for years: move beyond resistance politics and articulate a serious, forward-looking strategy for governing. Notably, at least one emerging Democratic policy group has begun studying what governing might look like in a post-Trump era, signaling an early attempt to think beyond opposition alone.

While Democrats’ growing willingness to look past Trump is a welcome development, there is a real danger in relying too heavily on familiar policy approaches. Established frameworks offer comfort and coherence, but they also carry risks, especially when the conditions that once made them successful no longer hold.

Keep ReadingShow less
Autocracy for Dummies

U.S. President Donald Trump on February 13, 2026 in Fort Bragg, North Carolina.

(Photo by Nathan Howard/Getty Images)

Autocracy for Dummies

Everything Donald Trump has said and done in his second term as president was lifted from the Autocracy for Dummies handbook he should have committed to memory after trying and failing on January 6, 2021, to overthrow the government he had pledged to protect and serve.

This time around, putting his name and face to everything he fancies and diverting our attention from anything he touches as soon as it begins to smell or look bad are telltale signs that he is losing the fight to control the hearts and minds of a nation he would rather rule than help lead.

Keep ReadingShow less