Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Your Take: Judges and impartiality

Your Take: Judges and impartiality
Getty Images

Earlier this week we asked the following questions of our Bridge Alliance, Coffee Party and Fulcrum communities regarding troubling ethics considerations in the case against former President Trump:

  • Is there a true ethical conundrum with sitting judges presiding over a case against the president who appointed them?
  • Are occurrences like this due to the political and governmental breakdowns of our time or merely arbitrary disruptions in an otherwise functional division of power?

As of this week, the date has been set for the trial against former President Trump. Just as a boxing promoter pulls out all the stops to ensure the most captivating showdown, it is now time for both the prosecution and the defense to begin their preliminary maneuvers. And, thus far, the gears of democracy have turned properly; Judge Aileen M. Cannon rang the starting bell by setting up an early trial date, which may actually benefit the prosecution, and avoid the political theater. How she aligns with the balls and strikes of this case remains to be seen.


The real question is not whether the presiding judge can be impartial after being appointed by then President Trump in 2020. Rather, it is about how the questions regarding her impartiality highlight vulnerabilities in our political system. Would I recuse myself from the case if I were her? Yes. Is it likely that she is able to holistically separate herself from her own support of the embattled defendant? No. But, when the role of the judiciary is considered, Judge Cannon’s decision to remain a part of this particular case alludes to how we have gone too far in attempting to bend the will of necessarily impartial entities to act in partisanship performances. This saga could all end as swiftly as it began, a small brush fire struggling to maintain its flames. But, if the wind turns, the whole forest might burn.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

Here is a sampling of your thoughts. Responses have been edited for length and clarity:

It is the perception of a conflict of interest that must be considered. As a municipal employee, I have to take an ethics test EVERY year. If I fail to follow the tenets of those ethics, I would potentially be terminated. How is it that our elected/appointed officials are not held to the same standards? - Charlotte Underwood-Miller

The question to me is not about conundrum but rather conflict. When a person is sponsored for a life-critical appointment by another person they have entered into an arena where character and personal attributes are discussed and debated. Naturally, your relationship with your sponsor cannot be neutral from that point on. You have a conflict of interest as your unique, personal history with that individual naturally clouds human judgment. These occurrences are made possible by the growing ignorance of the difference between personal and public interests. The functional division of power in government cannot survive the inability of people in public positions to exercise the public roles of their positions. - Robert Jahner

The breakdowns occur because lobbying has morphed over time into a greed fueled political marketplace that has changed Congress from a body for the people to one for corporate interests. - Randall Frye

I believe our Founding Fathers meant for all judges to show impartiality towards the law. But, even at the inception of our country, this has never truly happened. - Lloyd LaTour

Regardless of this particular case, the judicial process is pretty resilient. At no point in our history has everyone agreed with every important judicial decision. - Craig Ansky

Appointments are fraught with biases, thus, subsequent rulings may not necessarily be based upon qualifications and independence from biases. - Catherine Mott

There is indeed a true ethical conundrum. However, the same conundrum exists in the opposite direction for those appointed by other presidents. While Cannon is a Trump appointee, and many are concerned she may be biased FOR him, many Americans would view an Obama or Biden appointee the same except biased AGAINST him. Ultimately, the most important aspect will be the overall public's perception of bias that will matter. - James Morphew

Regardless of this in particular, hopefully voters are much more sensitive to the power of our elected officials to fill judicial positions, and it will impact how they vote. - John Wright

This is not a true ethical conundrum. Otherwise that ethical conundrum would extend to every senator that confirmed that judge’s appointment and possibly those that coached the appointee through the appointment process. Where would that end? - Steve Yaffe

A judge in this position should recuse him or herself. But, I think that this is more a case of bad luck than a systemic breakdown. - Susan Tannenbaum

Read More

Megan Thee Stallion in front of an audience waving "Kamala" signs

Singer Megan Thee Stallion performs at a Kamala Harris rally in Atlanta on July 30.

Julia Beverly/Getty Images

Do Charli XCX’s and Kid Rock’s endorsements make a difference? 19% of young people admit they might.

Longoria is an associate professor of political science at the University of Texas Rio Grande Valley.

British pop star Charli XCX sent many young people’s group text chats and social media feeds wild when she endorsed Kamala Harris by playing off a term she coined in a song, and posted on X, that “kamala IS brat.”

While this endorsement, which happened in July 2024, likely means very little to most adults who don’t follow the singer’s music, it is considered high praise among young people. Harris’ campaign astutely embraced Charli XCX’s support – temporarily changing the background of its X profile to the same shade of lime green that Charlie XCX favors.

Keep ReadingShow less
Ariana Grande

Ariana Grande

Sarah Morris/WireImage/Getty Images

Ariana Grande for Harris. Kanye West for Trump. Does it matter?

Nevins is co-publisher of The Fulcrum and co-founder and board chairman of the Bridge Alliance Education Fund.

It didn’t take long after Joe Biden dropped out of the presidential race and Kamala Harris became the odds-on favorite to be the Democratic Party's nominee for the celebrity endorsements to follow. Within a few days, Ariana Grande, Cardi B and John Legend all publicly announced their support for Harris.

Of course, not all celebrities are Democrats and Donald Trump has his share of celebrity support as well — people like Ye (Kanye West), Jason Aldean and Kid Rock, who endorsed Trump in the past and are likely to endorse him once again.

Keep ReadingShow less
Jay-Z on stage

Hip-hop legend Jay-Z performs at a 2012 rally for President Barack Obama, who changed how politicans connect with pop culture icons.

Brooks Kraft LLC/Corbis via Getty Images

From Rock the Vote to TikTok: Pop culture’s political influence

Johnson is a United Methodist pastor, the author of "Holding Up Your Corner: Talking About Race in Your Community" and program director for the Bridge Alliance, which houses The Fulcrum.

In 1992, a young Bill Clinton tried to connect with Generation X by joking around and soulfully playing the sax on “The Arsenio Hall Show.” It was a game-changer that forever shifted how presidential candidates court younger voters.

Nowadays, it's not about late-night talk shows but about getting attention on social media platforms like TikTok. The relationship between pop culture and politics has evolved with each generation, keeping pace with the changing times and new technologies. It's crucial to understand this evolution and what it means for how future generations will engage with politics.

Keep ReadingShow less
Simone Biles
Tom Weller/VOIGT/GettyImages

Simone Biles wins gold in life’s balancing act

Lockard is an Iowa resident who regularly contributes to regional newspapers and periodicals. She is working on the second of a four-book fictional series based on Jane Austen’s “Pride and Prejudice."

The closing ceremonies of the 2024 Summer Olympics in Paris will take place this Sunday, Aug. 11. Officially called the Games of the XXXIII Olympiad, they have provided a thrilling spectacle, a glimpse of the world together and on its best behavior.

Team USA’s Simone Biles will leave the City of Lights with an additional four Olympic medals, three gold (the team event, all around and vault) plus a silver in floor exercise, bringing her Olympic treasure trove to 11. Added to her 30 world championship medals, Biles is the most decorated gymnast ever. With five awe-inspiring skills named for her, she dominates the sport — truly the Greatest of All Time.

Keep ReadingShow less
Man in red and blue outfit walking in front of the Capitol.

Tony Zorc is bringing is "Congressman Curly" show to Washington, D.C.

Tony Zorc

Congressman Curly brings rockin' comedy to democracy

The Fulcrum has published many writings over the years about how pop culture in America has amazing healing and connecting powers. Our nation’s history is rich with examples of how artists, entertainers, athletes and creators of every kind invite us into a space of transcendence that leads to connectivity. We see that when we join people together their energy can be harnessed for good, and then amplified and scaled.

Certainly comedy fits in perfectly. Laughter is the embodiment of depolarization. Just consider that in order for something to evoke laughter, it has to have the capacity to both hold tension and release tension at the same time.

Keep ReadingShow less