Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Your Take: Judges and impartiality

Your Take: Judges and impartiality
Getty Images

Earlier this week we asked the following questions of our Bridge Alliance, Coffee Party and Fulcrum communities regarding troubling ethics considerations in the case against former President Trump:

  • Is there a true ethical conundrum with sitting judges presiding over a case against the president who appointed them?
  • Are occurrences like this due to the political and governmental breakdowns of our time or merely arbitrary disruptions in an otherwise functional division of power?

As of this week, the date has been set for the trial against former President Trump. Just as a boxing promoter pulls out all the stops to ensure the most captivating showdown, it is now time for both the prosecution and the defense to begin their preliminary maneuvers. And, thus far, the gears of democracy have turned properly; Judge Aileen M. Cannon rang the starting bell by setting up an early trial date, which may actually benefit the prosecution, and avoid the political theater. How she aligns with the balls and strikes of this case remains to be seen.


The real question is not whether the presiding judge can be impartial after being appointed by then President Trump in 2020. Rather, it is about how the questions regarding her impartiality highlight vulnerabilities in our political system. Would I recuse myself from the case if I were her? Yes. Is it likely that she is able to holistically separate herself from her own support of the embattled defendant? No. But, when the role of the judiciary is considered, Judge Cannon’s decision to remain a part of this particular case alludes to how we have gone too far in attempting to bend the will of necessarily impartial entities to act in partisanship performances. This saga could all end as swiftly as it began, a small brush fire struggling to maintain its flames. But, if the wind turns, the whole forest might burn.

Here is a sampling of your thoughts. Responses have been edited for length and clarity:

It is the perception of a conflict of interest that must be considered. As a municipal employee, I have to take an ethics test EVERY year. If I fail to follow the tenets of those ethics, I would potentially be terminated. How is it that our elected/appointed officials are not held to the same standards? - Charlotte Underwood-Miller

The question to me is not about conundrum but rather conflict. When a person is sponsored for a life-critical appointment by another person they have entered into an arena where character and personal attributes are discussed and debated. Naturally, your relationship with your sponsor cannot be neutral from that point on. You have a conflict of interest as your unique, personal history with that individual naturally clouds human judgment. These occurrences are made possible by the growing ignorance of the difference between personal and public interests. The functional division of power in government cannot survive the inability of people in public positions to exercise the public roles of their positions. - Robert Jahner

The breakdowns occur because lobbying has morphed over time into a greed fueled political marketplace that has changed Congress from a body for the people to one for corporate interests. - Randall Frye

I believe our Founding Fathers meant for all judges to show impartiality towards the law. But, even at the inception of our country, this has never truly happened. - Lloyd LaTour

Regardless of this particular case, the judicial process is pretty resilient. At no point in our history has everyone agreed with every important judicial decision. - Craig Ansky

Appointments are fraught with biases, thus, subsequent rulings may not necessarily be based upon qualifications and independence from biases. - Catherine Mott

There is indeed a true ethical conundrum. However, the same conundrum exists in the opposite direction for those appointed by other presidents. While Cannon is a Trump appointee, and many are concerned she may be biased FOR him, many Americans would view an Obama or Biden appointee the same except biased AGAINST him. Ultimately, the most important aspect will be the overall public's perception of bias that will matter. - James Morphew

Regardless of this in particular, hopefully voters are much more sensitive to the power of our elected officials to fill judicial positions, and it will impact how they vote. - John Wright

This is not a true ethical conundrum. Otherwise that ethical conundrum would extend to every senator that confirmed that judge’s appointment and possibly those that coached the appointee through the appointment process. Where would that end? - Steve Yaffe

A judge in this position should recuse him or herself. But, I think that this is more a case of bad luck than a systemic breakdown. - Susan Tannenbaum

Read More

How Pop Culture Can Save Democracy: Lessons From Just Do It to Designated Drive

Shoppers stand in line at a Nike outlet store on May 3, 2025 in San Diego, California.

Getty Images, Kevin Carter

How Pop Culture Can Save Democracy: Lessons From Just Do It to Designated Drive

In the late 1980s, the Harvard Alcohol Project did just that. By embedding the term designated driver into prime-time television—from Cheers to L.A. Law—they didn’t just coin a phrase. They changed people’s behavior. The campaign was credited with helping reduce alcohol-related traffic fatalities by nearly 30% over the following decade. President George H.W. Bush and Bill Clinton, along with organizations like Mothers Against Drunk Driving, endorsed the movement, amplifying its reach.

They made sober driving socially admirable, not awkward. And they proved that when language meets culture, norms shift.

Keep ReadingShow less
La Ventanita: Uniting Conservative Mothers and Liberal Daughters

Steph Martinez and Rachel Ramirez with their mothers after their last performance

Photo Provided

La Ventanita: Uniting Conservative Mothers and Liberal Daughters

When Northwestern theater and creative writing junior Lux Vargas wrote and brought to life La Ventanita, she created a space of rest and home for those who live in the grief of not belonging anywhere, yet still yearn for a sense of belonging together. By closing night, Vargas had mothers and daughters, once splintered by politics, in each other's arms. In a small, sold-out theater in Evanston, the story on stage became a mirror: centering on mothers who fled the country and daughters who left again for college.

Performed four times on May 9 and 10, La Ventanita unfolds in a fictional cafecito window inspired by the walk-up restaurant counters found throughout Miami. “The ventanita breeds conversations and political exchange,” said Vargas.

Keep ReadingShow less
A Cruel Season at the Bus Stop

File: ICE agents making arrests

A Cruel Season at the Bus Stop

The poem you’re about to read is not a quiet reflection—it’s a flare shot into the night. It emerges from a moment when the boundaries between surveillance and censorship feel increasingly porous, and when the act of reading itself can be seen as resistance. The poet draws a chilling parallel between masked agents detaining immigrants and the quiet erasure of books from our schools and libraries. Both, he argues, are expressions of unchecked power—one overt, the other insidious.

This work invites us to confront the slippery slope where government overreach meets cultural suppression. It challenges us to ask: What happens when the stories we tell, the knowledge we share, and the communities we protect are deemed threats? And who gets to decide?

Keep ReadingShow less