Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Your Take: Mass shootings in the U.S.

Your Take: Mass shootings in the U.S.

Earlier this week we asked the following questions of our Bridge Alliance, Coffee Party and Fulcrum communities regarding the ongoing prevalence of mass shooting events that have puzzled the country’s socio-political psyche, perpetually searching for solutions:

  • How do we better unify behind solving the issue of gun violence, without inserting our own ideological biases?
  • Is gun violence an inherently political issue? Are non-political solutions potentially more effective?

Since posing these questions earlier in the week, there have been multiple mass shootings. An almost unavoidable sense of tragedy is sweeping across much of the country, while Congress lacks momentum on legislative solutions. It has become apparent that, regardless of political affiliation, many have accepted the truth that a need for a fundamental adjustment in our country’s relationship with guns is necessary. Jointly, this adjustment is necessary in short order, as the U.S. marches toward a record for mass shooting events in a single year, according to The Guardian.


Your responses indicated the urgency this issue requires. In many ways, there is no such thing as a dumb idea, evidenced by the creative and thought provoking ideas you all shared. From suggestions for our legislative bodies to thoughts on increased visibility for mental health resources, the perspectives represented in this week’s piece are the epitome of productive dialogue. This conversation reveals the influential ability for each of us to make a palpable difference. Now the spotlight turns to our democracy’s biggest decision-makers and whether they can muster the collective will and strength to make progress in defeating a menacingly relentless opponent.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

Here is a sampling of your thoughts. Responses have been edited for length and clarity.

Perhaps the violence of mass murders is more a social or public health issue, than a purely political one. There needs to be more focus on prevention. Think about it this way: those committing mass murders have given up hope and live in fear of always losing with no way out except for destruction. Not purely mental illness, but depression and hopelessness, with an overriding fear that nothing will ever get better. Public health tries to deal with anger management as a subset of depression, suicide prevention and/or substance abuse; which may be the proper solution. But public health departments are not equipped to take this on in depth. After a number of years in school nursing and coordinating closely with public health departments, it is easy to see their efforts are often disjointed and lack the focus necessary. - Brenda Marinace

We should focus on various options, including limiting bullet magazines, deeper gun safety training to protect minors and the mentally ill, changes in gun manufacturer liability laws, etc. Both political and civic solutions are necessary. - Steve Yaffe

I believe that gun violence is principally a mental health issue, whether suicide, low-intensity homicide or mass shootings. In this sense, solutions should be essentially non-political, including "Red Flag Laws", more resources for patient referrals, and any other feasible means of screening for mental instability prior to firearm purchases. - David Hudelson

Violence is not an inherently political issue, but guns are. Those that argue for better identification and treatment for mental illness are trying to treat the causes of “violence” (although the mentally ill are statistically more likely to be the victims of violence rather than the perpetrators). It is not a bad approach, but it is insufficient. The guns have to be treated as a huge part of the problem, and that is a political issue that our politicians can’t continue to pawn off on other parts of society. - Kathy Rondon

Of course non-political solutions would be more effective, but there is extreme power and money behind making this a political issue. - Becky Foster

Guns are not the problem. The people that use them are the problem. Guns just make it worse. Restricting access to guns will help with that but the problem needs addressed at a social level. - John Ruble

I fundamentally believe that the majority of citizens in our nation can agree that guns that are manufactured specifically to kill or harm people, and not animals, should not be able to be purchased as easily as they currently are. I'm a hunter myself and I don't know anyone who hunts with an assault weapon. Laws differ from state to state but common sense would dictate to me that someone who isn't legally old enough to purchase alcohol shouldn't be able to legally purchase an assault weapon. I believe common sense is a great way to get beyond political biases. - Deke Copenhaver

Logically, we should look at how other nations succeeded in curbing gun violence and make a model from that. While I believe this is a humanitarian issue, almost anything can be turned into a political one. - Jennifer

Gun violence is an inherently political issue because the most effective way to address it is through legislative limits, as demonstrated by other world democracies. To reframe the dialogue in the US, we might start by having gun enthusiasts share personal stories of how current laws have brought tragedy to their lives, and why they therefore support essential limits (e.g. banning assault weapons, red flag laws, purchaser checks). - Morris Effron

People can reach mutual understanding, they can repair the trust, they can collaborate across their differences. The gridlock we see at the national level, however, can only be fought where we live, work, worship, and learn. Changing the discourse in those spaces is what will break the larger cycle of polarization. Open, healthy dialogue, in cornerstone spaces like schools and churches can make a whole community more resistant to polarizing forces. It's not easy. It means deliberately including people who are currently left out—because of their identities or values, because they hold moderate views, or because they're not certain how they feel. And not just including them, but creating opportunities again and again for each person to share what matters most to them and to be truly heard. Those opportunities let us build the relationships that will interrupt polarization and reveal new paths forward together. When communities can do that, the “us versus them” tactics will stop working, polarization will stop being rewarded at the ballot box and in the media cycle, and our democracy can start working again as it should. - Katie Hyten

In order to unify behind solutions, we have to make this about the people who are being killed, randomly in most cases. We have to make it particularly about the children being lost and traumatized, and the impact on the families. - Jim Wooley

We need to start by agreeing on the facts. We are in the midst of an inflationary spiral of gun violence. The number of shootings, both casual and planned/mass, is escalating. This leads to more people buying guns, which only leads to more shootings. This is becoming its own pandemic, in which innocent citizens are swept up on a daily basis. For an epidemic, we need to try everything until the fever breaks. Americans, by a wide margin across ideological lines, favor tightening gun laws (i.e. banning high-capacity magazines, increasing red-flag laws, etc.).These facts have been well-established by Pew Research, a non-political organization. - Ken Lawler

Most polls I have heard of indicate the vast majority of Americans want some kind of gun control. Our politicians are unable to work together to define what that means. I believe the Supreme Court should interpret and clarify what the 2nd Amendment means in today's America and that states should follow that interpretation and implement gun control accordingly. - Patrick Baldwin

Read More

Joe Biden being interviewed by Lester Holt

The day after calling on people to “lower the temperature in our politics,” President Biden resort to traditionally divisive language in an interview with NBC's Lester Holt.

YouTube screenshot

One day and 28 minutes

Breslin is the Joseph C. Palamountain Jr. Chair of Political Science at Skidmore College and author of “A Constitution for the Living: Imagining How Five Generations of Americans Would Rewrite the Nation’s Fundamental Law.”

This is the latest in “A Republic, if we can keep it,” a series to assist American citizens on the bumpy road ahead this election year. By highlighting components, principles and stories of the Constitution, Breslin hopes to remind us that the American political experiment remains, in the words of Alexander Hamilton, the “most interesting in the world.”

One day.

One single day. That’s how long it took for President Joe Biden to abandon his call to “lower the temperature in our politics” following the assassination attempt on Donald Trump. “I believe politics ought to be an arena for peaceful debate,” he implored. Not messages tinged with violent language and caustic oratory. Peaceful, dignified, respectful language.

Keep ReadingShow less

Project 2025: The Department of Labor

Hill was policy director for the Center for Humane Technology, co-founder of FairVote and political reform director at New America. You can reach him on X @StevenHill1776.

This is part of a series offering a nonpartisan counter to Project 2025, a conservative guideline to reforming government and policymaking during the first 180 days of a second Trump administration. The Fulcrum's cross partisan analysis of Project 2025 relies on unbiased critical thinking, reexamines outdated assumptions, and uses reason, scientific evidence, and data in analyzing and critiquing Project 2025.

The Heritage Foundation’s Project 2025, a right-wing blueprint for Donald Trump’s return to the White House, is an ambitious manifesto to redesign the federal government and its many administrative agencies to support and sustain neo-conservative dominance for the next decade. One of the agencies in its crosshairs is the Department of Labor, as well as its affiliated agencies, including the National Labor Relations Board, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation.

Project 2025 proposes a remake of the Department of Labor in order to roll back decades of labor laws and rights amidst a nostalgic “back to the future” framing based on race, gender, religion and anti-abortion sentiment. But oddly, tucked into the corners of the document are some real nuggets of innovative and progressive thinking that propose certain labor rights which even many liberals have never dared to propose.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

Keep ReadingShow less
Donald Trump on stage at the Republican National Convention

Former President Donald Trump speaks at the 2024 Republican National Convention on July 18.

J. Conrad Williams Jr.

Why Trump assassination attempt theories show lies never end

By: Michele Weldon: Weldon is an author, journalist, emerita faculty in journalism at Northwestern University and senior leader with The OpEd Project. Her latest book is “The Time We Have: Essays on Pandemic Living.”

Diamonds are forever, or at least that was the title of the 1971 James Bond movie and an even earlier 1947 advertising campaign for DeBeers jewelry. Tattoos, belief systems, truth and relationships are also supposed to last forever — that is, until they are removed, disproven, ended or disintegrate.

Lately we have questioned whether Covid really will last forever and, with it, the parallel pandemic of misinformation it spawned. The new rash of conspiracy theories and unproven proclamations about the attempted assassination of former President Donald Trump signals that the plague of lies may last forever, too.

Keep ReadingShow less
Painting of people voting

"The County Election" by George Caleb Bingham

Sister democracies share an inherited flaw

Myers is executive director of the ProRep Coalition. Nickerson is executive director of Fair Vote Canada, a campaign for proportional representations (not affiliated with the U.S. reform organization FairVote.)

Among all advanced democracies, perhaps no two countries have a closer relationship — or more in common — than the United States and Canada. Our strong connection is partly due to geography: we share the longest border between any two countries and have a free trade agreement that’s made our economies reliant on one another. But our ties run much deeper than just that of friendly neighbors. As former British colonies, we’re siblings sharing a parent. And like actual siblings, whether we like it or not, we’ve inherited some of our parent’s flaws.

Keep ReadingShow less
Constitutional Convention

It's up to us to improve on what the framers gave us at the Constitutional Convention.

Hulton Archive/Getty Images

It’s our turn to form a more perfect union

Sturner is the author of “Fairness Matters,” and managing partner of Entourage Effect Capital.

This is the third entry in the “Fairness Matters” series, examining structural problems with the current political systems, critical policies issues that are going unaddressed and the state of the 2024 election.

The Preamble to the Constitution reads:

"We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America."

What troubles me deeply about the politics industry today is that it feels like we have lost our grasp on those immortal words.

Keep ReadingShow less