Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Your Take: Better primary elections

Opinion

Your Take: Better primary elections

Earlier this week we asked the following questions of our Bridge Alliance, Coffee Party and Fulcrum communities regarding the complicated primary elections system:

  • Do you vote in the primary? Why or why not?
  • Do presidential primaries in particular properly reflect the voice of the American people?

At this juncture, the American elections system is under a microscope; with many voters anticipating the significance of the upcoming presidential election, the effectiveness of our system in how it represents We the People is of utmost importance. There have been other major elections. There have been many other points of contention. But what is unique about our current political predicament is the level of polarization that has bloomed underneath the overall political landscape. Thus, the effectiveness of electoral processes, like primary elections, is often strained through this lens.


As your thoughts indicate, the value of primary elections can be a mixed bag. Factors such as party affiliation and the type of primary often color the perceived level of representation that these electoral vehicles offer. What is most interesting about this though is the quantity of voters who participate. While many are critical of the widespread use of primary elections, especially closed primaries, they continue to participate as to avoid having their voices “left out”. But, isn’t the reason we vote centered around our desire to wholly contribute our perspectives to the turning wheels of democracy? If our individual perspectives are watered down for the pure purposes of participating, then we lose the genuine ability to be represented earnestly. While the upcoming presidential primaries are likely to come and go, with millions across the country participating, we may still be leaving much to be desired from the elections process. In any case, a hat in the ring is worth much more than a white flag on the ground.

Here is a sampling of your thoughts. Responses have been edited for length and clarity:

Yes, I vote in the primary. But, the reason is because that is the only option we really have today. There are huge problems with presidential primaries. - Jerry Henige

I always vote in primaries because I care about who gets nominated to reflect my party’s positions. Regardless, they’re only partly representative of the American people because turnout is notoriously low overall. - Gerry Langeler

I’ve always wondered whether these primaries are genuinely reflective of the American voice and have been leaning towards ranked voting as a better way in my opinion. - Nancy Boyd

I don’t vote in the primaries because I am an unaffiliated voter and the primaries are closed in New Jersey. So not it is not representative when millions of people cannot participate. - Steve Barratt

Primaries don’t reflect the voice of the American people but that isn’t the point. The point of primaries is to reflect the voice of party aficionados. - Steve Yaffe

I always vote in the primaries because without a vote, there is no choice, and subsequently no voice. But whether they represent America’s voice is a hard issue. Do most voters vote based on studying the issues? No. Do candidates lie about their stances and plans? Yes, So it’s hard to say the voice of the people is reflected in any of it at times. - Fredrick R. O'Keefe

I don’t vote in the presidential primaries because they’re closed in Pennsylvania. I am not registered with any party. The Republican and Democratic parties should open the presidential primaries to all voters (in order to represent more voices). - D.D.

I vote in the primaries sometimes, and would if I could. I live in Oregon. I register as a Democrat but am not committed to that affiliation. I simply provide the closest positions I support. - Jed

Yes, I vote in the primaries quite often, but just against the person I least want. - David Hudelson


Read More

Bruce Springsteen In Concert, facing his audience.

Bruce Springsteen and the E Street Band in concert at Nationals Park on May 27, 2026 in Washington, DC.

Paul Morigi / Getty Images

Springsteen’s October D.C. Festival Pushes Music Into Democracy Fight

Bruce Springsteen has always spoken his mind through politics and expressed it through his music. For decades, he has treated the stage as a platform for the causes he believes in — a place where songs become arguments, and performance becomes a form of public conscience. His work has long insisted that American culture and American democracy are intertwined, that the stories we tell ourselves shape the country we become. So when he steps onstage in October for the “Power to the People Festival” in Washington, D.C., it is likely that this will just be the next chapter in his lifelong effort to defend democratic values through art.

Bruce Springsteen has spent the past year making no secret of his views on the current administration, expressing them with increasing bluntness from the stage. His recent performances have shown that when he believes democracy is at risk, he does not whisper — he raises his voice. Given that history, no one should expect him to be quiet in October. So when he stepped onstage in Washington, D.C., and previewed the upcoming “Power to the People Festival,” it felt less like a surprise and more like the next verse in a long American tradition of artists using their platforms to defend democratic values.

Keep ReadingShow less
A Hollow Song for a Hollow Patriotism: Reclaiming the Real Patriotic Ballads
Imagine a democracy concert followed by a yearlong democracy call to action roadshow—designed to build a new civic movement
Getty Images, gilaxia

A Hollow Song for a Hollow Patriotism: Reclaiming the Real Patriotic Ballads

After musician after musician pulled out from Trump’s June 24 “Freedom 250” concert, we’re left with Lee Greenwood and an opera tenor. The anthem that made Greenwood a star, “God Bless the USA,” was written in 1985 during the height of the Cold War. It begins with the specter of loss—“If tomorrow—all the things were gone, I’d worked for all my life / And I had to start all over with my children and my wife.” Then the wounds disappear before they’re felt: “I’d thank my lucky stars to be living here today / Because the flag still stands for freedom and they can’t take that away.”

Ronald Reagan made the song his campaign theme while launching a new age of American inequality by systematically busting unions and cutting taxes for the wealthiest. Greenwood treats layoffs and the resulting toll on ordinary lives as a mere inconvenience. As the refrain shifts from violins and a church organ to a military march, he repeats, “I’m proud to be an American, where at least I know I’m free / And I won’t forget the men who died who gave that right to me.”

Keep ReadingShow less
Colbert’s Final Late Show Reveals What We’re Losing in Public Dialogue

Stephen Colbert attends the 51st Chaplin Award Gala honoring George Clooney at Alice Tully Hall, Lincoln Center on April 27, 2026 in New York City.

(Photo by Gilbert Carrasquillo/GC Images)

Colbert’s Final Late Show Reveals What We’re Losing in Public Dialogue

Stephen Colbert hosted The Late Show for the last time last week.

Tributes have been pouring in for Colbert’s nightly monologue and comedic genius. And rightly so. He has a unique and deeply humane way of making the unbearable bearable, giving us a little light and lift on our darkest days.

Keep ReadingShow less
Stapleton’s Colbert Performance Shows Power of Nonpolitical Messages

Chris Stapleton performs onstage during the 59th Annual CMA Awards at Bridgestone Arena on November 19, 2025 in Nashville, Tennessee..

(Photo by Astrida Valigorsky/WireImage)

Stapleton’s Colbert Performance Shows Power of Nonpolitical Messages

On May 6th, I watched Chris Stapleton perform “Living in the Promiseland” on The Late Show with Stephen Colbert. The song, a Willie Nelson classic from 1985, hit me hard. Originally, Nelson released it at a time when debates about immigration and the American dream were in the headlines, and the song became an anthem of hope and inclusivity. These days, almost everything gets viewed through a political lens, but the song’s opening lines felt powerful without being political:

Give us your tired and weak, and we will make them strong
Bring us your foreign songs, and we will sing along
Leave us your broken dreams, we'll give them time to mend
There's still a lot of love living in the promised land

Keep ReadingShow less