Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Your Take: Better primary elections

Opinion

Your Take: Better primary elections

Earlier this week we asked the following questions of our Bridge Alliance, Coffee Party and Fulcrum communities regarding the complicated primary elections system:

  • Do you vote in the primary? Why or why not?
  • Do presidential primaries in particular properly reflect the voice of the American people?

At this juncture, the American elections system is under a microscope; with many voters anticipating the significance of the upcoming presidential election, the effectiveness of our system in how it represents We the People is of utmost importance. There have been other major elections. There have been many other points of contention. But what is unique about our current political predicament is the level of polarization that has bloomed underneath the overall political landscape. Thus, the effectiveness of electoral processes, like primary elections, is often strained through this lens.


As your thoughts indicate, the value of primary elections can be a mixed bag. Factors such as party affiliation and the type of primary often color the perceived level of representation that these electoral vehicles offer. What is most interesting about this though is the quantity of voters who participate. While many are critical of the widespread use of primary elections, especially closed primaries, they continue to participate as to avoid having their voices “left out”. But, isn’t the reason we vote centered around our desire to wholly contribute our perspectives to the turning wheels of democracy? If our individual perspectives are watered down for the pure purposes of participating, then we lose the genuine ability to be represented earnestly. While the upcoming presidential primaries are likely to come and go, with millions across the country participating, we may still be leaving much to be desired from the elections process. In any case, a hat in the ring is worth much more than a white flag on the ground.

Here is a sampling of your thoughts. Responses have been edited for length and clarity:

Yes, I vote in the primary. But, the reason is because that is the only option we really have today. There are huge problems with presidential primaries. - Jerry Henige

I always vote in primaries because I care about who gets nominated to reflect my party’s positions. Regardless, they’re only partly representative of the American people because turnout is notoriously low overall. - Gerry Langeler

I’ve always wondered whether these primaries are genuinely reflective of the American voice and have been leaning towards ranked voting as a better way in my opinion. - Nancy Boyd

I don’t vote in the primaries because I am an unaffiliated voter and the primaries are closed in New Jersey. So not it is not representative when millions of people cannot participate. - Steve Barratt

Primaries don’t reflect the voice of the American people but that isn’t the point. The point of primaries is to reflect the voice of party aficionados. - Steve Yaffe

I always vote in the primaries because without a vote, there is no choice, and subsequently no voice. But whether they represent America’s voice is a hard issue. Do most voters vote based on studying the issues? No. Do candidates lie about their stances and plans? Yes, So it’s hard to say the voice of the people is reflected in any of it at times. - Fredrick R. O'Keefe

I don’t vote in the presidential primaries because they’re closed in Pennsylvania. I am not registered with any party. The Republican and Democratic parties should open the presidential primaries to all voters (in order to represent more voices). - D.D.

I vote in the primaries sometimes, and would if I could. I live in Oregon. I register as a Democrat but am not committed to that affiliation. I simply provide the closest positions I support. - Jed

Yes, I vote in the primaries quite often, but just against the person I least want. - David Hudelson

Read More

Iguanas on the Tombstones: A Poet's Metaphor for Colonialism​
Photo illustration by Yunuen Bonaparte for palabra

Iguanas on the Tombstones: A Poet's Metaphor for Colonialism​

Iguanas may seem like an unconventional subject for verse. Yet their ubiquitous presence caught the attention of Puerto Rican poet Martín Espada when he visited a historic cemetery in Old San Juan, the burial place of pro-independence voices from political leader Pedro Albizu Campos to poet and political activist José de Diego.

“It was quite a sight to witness these iguanas sunning themselves on a wall of that cemetery, or slithering from one tomb to the next, or squatting on the tomb of Albizu Campos, or staring up at the bust of José de Diego, with a total lack of comprehension, being iguanas,” Espada told palabra from his home in the western Massachusetts town of Shelburne Falls.

Keep ReadingShow less
Does One Battle After Another Speak to Latino Resistance?

Leonardo DiCaprio, Benicio del Toro, Chase Infiniti, and Paul Thomas Anderson pose during the fan event for the movie 'One Battle After Another' at Plaza Toreo Parque Central on September 18, 2025 in Naucalpan de Juarez, Mexico.

(Photo by Eloisa Sanchez/Getty Images)

Does One Battle After Another Speak to Latino Resistance?

After decades of work, Angeleno director P.T. Anderson has scored his highest-grossing film with his recent One Battle After Another. Having opened on the weekend of September 26, the film follows the fanatical, even surrealistic, journey of washed-up revolutionary Bob Ferguson (Leonardo DiCaprio), who lives in hiding with his teenage daughter, Willa (Chase Infiniti), some fifteen years after his militant group, French 75, went underground. When their nemesis Colonel Lockjaw (Sean Penn) resurfaces, Bob and Wila again find themselves running from the law. When Wila goes AWOL, her karate teacher, Sensei Sergio St. Carlos (Benicio del Toro), is enlisted to help Bob find his daughter. Although ambitious, edgy, and fun, the political message of the hit film is generally muddled. The immensely talented director did not make a film matching the Leftist rigor of, say, Battleship Potemkin. Nor can the film be grouped among a veritable cavalcade of fictional and non-fictional films produced during the last twenty years that deal with immigrant issues along the U.S.-Mexico Border. Sleep Dealer, El Norte, and Who is Dayani Cristal? are but a few of the stronger offerings of a genre of filmmaking that, for both good and bad, may constitute a true cinematic cottage industry.

Nevertheless, the film leans heavily into Latino culture in terms of themes, setting, and characters. Filmed largely in the U.S.’s Bordertown par excellence—El Paso, Texas—we meet the martial arts teacher Sergio, who describes his work helping migrants cross the border as a “Latino Harriet Tubman situation.” We learn that the fugitive revolutionary, Bob, is known by several aliases, including “The Gringo Coyote.” His savior, Sensei Sergio, explains to him outrightly that he’s “a bad hombre”—cheekily invoking the hurtful bon mots used by then-candidate Donald Trump in a 2016 debate with Hilary Clinton. The epithet is repeated later on in the film when Bob, under police surveillance in the hospital, is tipped off to an exit route by a member of the French 75 disguised as a nurse: “Are you diabetic? You’re a bad hombre, Bob. You know, if you’re a bad hombre, you make sure you take your insulin on a daily basis, right?” All this, plus the fact that the film’s denouement begins with a raid on a Mexican Restaurant in Northern California.

Keep ReadingShow less
​Jimmy Kimmel onstage during the 67th GRAMMY Awards

Jimmy Kimmel onstage during the 67th GRAMMY Awards on February 01, 2025, in Los Angeles, California

Getty Images, Johnny Nunez

Why the Fight Over Jimmy Kimmel Matters for Us All

There are moments in a nation’s cultural life that feel, at first, like passing storms—brief, noisy, and soon forgotten. But every so often, what begins as a squall reveals itself as a warning: a sign that something far bigger is at stake. The initial cancellation of Jimmy Kimmel by Disney, along with the coordinated blackout from network affiliates like Nexstar and Sinclair, is one of those moments. It’s not merely another skirmish in the endless culture wars. Actually, it is a test of whether we, as a society, can distinguish between the discomfort of being challenged and the danger of being silenced.

The irony is rich, almost to the point of being absurd. Here is a late-night comedian, a man whose job is to puncture the pompous and needle the powerful, finding himself at the center of a controversy. A controversy bigger than anything he’d ever lampooned. Satire that, depending on your perspective, was either too pointed or simply pointed in the wrong direction. Yet, that was not the ostensible reason.

Keep ReadingShow less
Bad Bunny preforming on stage alongside two other people.

Bad Bunny performs live during "No Me Quiero Ir De Aquí; Una Más" Residencia at Coliseo de Puerto Rico José Miguel Agrelot on September 20, 2025 in San Juan, Puerto Rico

Getty Images, Gladys Vega

From Woodstock to Super Bowl: Bad Bunny and the Legacy of Musical Protest

As Bad Bunny prepares to take the Super Bowl stage in February 2026—and grassroots rallies in his honor unfold across U.S. cities this October—we are witnessing a cultural moment that echoes the artist-led protests of the 1960s and 70s. His decision to exclude U.S. tour dates over fears of ICE raids is generating considerable anger amongst his following, as well as support from MAGA supporters. The Trump administration views his lyrics and his fashion as threats. As the story unfolds, it is increasingly becoming a political narrative rather than just entertainment news.

Music has long been a part of the American political scene. In 1969, Crosby, Stills, Nash & Young released “Ohio,” a response to the Kent State shootings that galvanized antiwar sentiment.

Keep ReadingShow less