Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

North Carolina voters return to the polls Tuesday for runoff elections

North Carolina primary voting

A man casts a primary ballot in Norwood, N.C., on May 17. The state is conducting runoff elections Tuesday.

Sean Rayford/Getty Images

It’s a slow week for elections, with North Carolina the only state hosting voters on Tuesday – and mostly for municipal elections. Without any statewide or legislative races on the ballot, expect minimal turnout. In fact, the average turnout drop off for North Carolina federal runoffs is around 54 percent.

Fewer than a dozen states require runoffs when no candidate in a race receives a majority of the vote. But North Carolina’s version is different. A runoff is only necessary if no candidate receives a “substantial” plurality of votes, meaning 30 percent plus one. Additionally, a runoff is not required unless the candidate with the second most votes asks for one.


The election will include 10 municipality races, two board of education elections, and at least two counties' — Graham and Wake — races for sheriff. The biggest races include mayoral and city council contests in Charlotte, Fayetteville and Greensboro.

On Nov. 8, North Carolina voters will decide 14 seats in the House of Representatives — most of which are currently held by Republicans — and one Senate seat. On May 17, Cheri Beasley won the Democratic nomination for the Senate seat and she will face off against Republican Rep. Ted Budd.

In the 2020 election, Republicans won the majority of seats without much trouble. Former President Donald Trump won North Carolina with 49.9% of the votes compared to Biden’s 48.6%.

Cooper has been facing off against a Republican-led legislature, which means there’s been little action on election laws in the battleground states.

There have been few changes to the battleground state’s election law in recent years, with Democratic Gov. Roy Cooper and the Republican-led General Assembly working at odds.

Through a ballot initiative, voters approved a strict photo ID requirement that has been challenged in court by groups claiming it discriminates against Black people. The law remains on hold.

In fact, the courts have been the main source of changes to election policy in recent years:

A federal court in 2020 decided absentee ballots without the required voter information could not be rejected without allowing the individual sufficient time to fix the issues with their ballot. This process still stands.

A budget bill passed under the state’s governor would allow North Carolina to join the Electronic Registration Information Center, an interstate system for sharing voter registration data. ERIC helps states maintain accurate voter lists. The bill only provides enough funding for one year.

Read about additional changes in North Carolina.

This article was updated on July 26, 2022.


Read More

Trump’s Anti-Latino Racism is a Major Liability for Democracy

Close-up of sign reading 'Immigrants Make America Great' at a Baltimore rally.

Trump’s Anti-Latino Racism is a Major Liability for Democracy

Donald Trump’s second administration has fully clarified Latinos’ racial position in America: our ethnic group’s labor, culture, and aspirations are too much for his supporters to stomach. The Latino presence in America triggers too many uneasy questions (are they White?), too many doubts (are they really American?), and too much resentment (why are they doing better than me?).

Trump’s targeted deportations of undocumented Latinos, unwarranted arrests of Latino citizens, and heightened ICE presence in Latino neighborhoods address these worries by lumping Latinos with Black people. Simply put, we have become yet another visible population that America socially stigmatizes, economically exploits, and politically terrorizes because aggrieved White adults want to preserve their rank as our nation’s premier racial group. The cumulative impacts are serious: just yesterday, an international panel of investigators on human rights and racism, backed by the U.N., found that such actions have resulted in “grave human rights violations.”

Keep ReadingShow less
Just the Facts: The SAVE Act and the Future of Voter ID Rules
A close up of a window with a sticker on it
Photo by Zach Wear on Unsplash

Just the Facts: The SAVE Act and the Future of Voter ID Rules

Last week, I wrote a column in the Fulcrum entitled “Just the Facts: Voter ID, States’ Powers, and Federal Limits.” The facts presented in that writing made it clear that the U.S. Constitution does not require voter ID and left almost all election administration—including voter qualifications—to the states. However, over time, constitutional amendments and federal statutes have restricted states’ ability to impose discriminatory voting rules, but they have never mandated voter ID.

The SAVE America Act

The national debate over voter ID has entered a new phase with the introduction of the SAVE America Act, the most sweeping federal voter‑identification and citizenship‑documentation proposal in modern history. For more than two centuries, voter eligibility rules—ID included—have been primarily a matter of state authority, bounded by constitutional protections against discrimination. The SAVE America Act would shift that balance by imposing federal requirements for both photo identification and documentary proof of citizenship in federal elections.

Keep ReadingShow less
Posters are displayed next to Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) as he speaks at a news conference to unveil the Take It Down Act to protect victims against non-consensual intimate image abuse, on Capitol Hill on June 18, 2024 in Washington, DC.

A lawsuit against xAI over AI-generated deepfakes targeting teenage girls exposes a growing crisis in schools. As laws struggle to keep up, this story explores AI accountability, teen safety, and what educators and parents must do now.

Getty Images, Andrew Harnik

Deepfakes: The New Face of Cyberbullying and Why Parents, Schools, and Lawmakers Must Act

As a former teacher who worked in a high school when Snapchat was born, I witnessed the birth of sexting and its impact on teens. I recall asking a parent whether he was checking his daughter’s phone for inappropriate messages. His response was, “sometimes you just don’t want to know.” But the federal lawsuit filed last week against Elon Musk's xAI has put a national spotlight on AI-generated deepfakes and the teenage girls they target. Parents and teachers can’t ignore the crisis inside our schools.

AI Companies Built the Tool. The Grok Lawsuit Says They Own the Damage.

Whether the theory of French prosecutors–that Elon Musk deliberately allowed the sexualized image controversy to grow so that it would drive up activity on the platform and boost the company’s valuation–is true or not, when a company makes the decision to build a tool and knows that it can be weaponized but chooses to release it anyway, they are making a risk-based decision believing that they can act without consequence. The Grok lawsuit could make these types of business decisions much more costly.

Keep ReadingShow less