Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

America’s Boiling Frog

Why defending democracy starts with recognizing the heat

Opinion

America’s Boiling Frog
a red white and blue flag
Photo by Jon Sailer on Unsplash

The myth goes that a frog sitting in slowly heating water won’t notice until it boils alive. Americans know better—or we should. A recent Pew poll found that 72% of us already believe the U.S. is no longer a good example of democracy. We see the heat. The question is whether we’ll jump.

If you’re like most people, the thought of boiling a live frog seems cruel and purposeless. Even if you happen to enjoy frog legs—cuisses de grenouilles, as the French call them—it’s still a gruesome image. What’s more, the myth that frogs won’t notice a gradual rise in temperature isn’t even true. If given the chance, frogs will jump out, as proven decades ago by Dr. Victor Hutchison, a professor of zoology at the University of Oklahoma.


So yes—frogs will jump if they can. But will we?

I, for one, lose sleep over the fact that Americans may be sitting in a pot of our own making—and the water’s getting dangerously hot.

Instead of leaping out, we’re lounging like it’s a spa. Except this isn’t relaxation—it’s collapse. Our government has been cranking up the temperature a little more each day—by attacking individuals and institutions—whether attempting to fire a member of the Federal Reserve Board of Governors, or firing inspectors general who expose fraud, threatening judges who rule against the administration, or pressuring universities to silence dissent. Each step is justified as routine. Each step raises the heat.

And this didn’t start yesterday. The warming began years ago—with the normalization of lies about election fraud, the erosion of the rule of law through defiance of congressional subpoenas, and the resurrection of racial and gender hate in official rhetoric and policy. We tolerated the rising temperature, from denial to dissonance to disinterest. From “this can’t be happening” to “meh, it could be worse.” Some take it even a step further, decrying "you're overreacting" when someone draws attention to the gradual but steady march towards tyranny. This is what historian Timothy Snyder calls obeying in advance—the habit of accommodating power before we’re forced to, normalizing each new abuse by treating it as inevitable.

Today, corporations and public institutions are paying settlements, networks are canceling shows that challenge the administration, and a country once proud of its moral values now shrugs at open dehumanization based on a person’s (perceived) country of origin. Snyder reminds us: institutions “do not protect themselves.” Courts, universities, and the press only hold if people actively defend them.

We don’t have to look far—Russia, Hungary, Turkey—to see how rational people accepted slow decay: courts packed with loyalists, independent media shuttered, opposition candidates banned from ballots. Step by step, the abnormal became the new normal. Snyder cautions us to beware the one-party state. It rarely arrives in one sweep—it’s built election by election, map by map, until competition itself seems obsolete.

And it’s not just laws or maps—it’s symbols, slogans, and the face of the world. Snyder urges us to take responsibility for the public space around us. Every poster, meme, and chant that goes unchallenged becomes the new vocabulary of tolerance.

At the same time, truth itself is under siege. Leaders and their allies repeat lies until they no longer shock, teaching us to treat facts as subjective. Snyder warns that once citizens stop believing in truth, they stop believing they can resist at all.

Listen closely, too, for the dangerous words. “Emergency.” “Exception.” “Enemy within.” They may sound like common sense, but they’re the oldest trick in the authoritarian playbook—framing the expansion of extraordinary power as ordinary necessity.

History has already shown us what is to come. What once felt unimaginable is now routine—tossed from the Overton Window like yesterday’s news.

But here’s the good news: we can still jump. The choice is ours—to defend institutions, to refuse to obey in advance, to believe in truth, and to stop treating each new degree of heat as normal.

The time to leap is now.

Craig Robinson is an experienced business leader and advisor, currently serving on multiple boards and providing strategic counsel to private investment firms, with a focus on commercial real estate, technology, and leadership. As a founding member of the Leadership Now Project, he brings a unique perspective to discussions on the positive role of business in society and democracy.

Read More

Nationalization by Stealth: Trump’s New Industrial Playbook

The White House and money

AI generated image

Nationalization by Stealth: Trump’s New Industrial Playbook

In the United States, where the free market has long been exalted as the supreme engine of prosperity, a peculiar irony is taking shape. On August 22, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick announced that the federal government had acquired a stake of just under 10% in Intel, instantly making itself the company’s largest shareholder. The stake - roughly 433 million shares, valued at about $8.9 billion, purchased at $20.47 each - was carved out of the Biden-era CHIPS Act subsidies and repackaged as equity. Formally, it is a passive, non-voting stake, with no board seat or governance rights. Yet symbolism matters: Washington now sits, however discreetly, in Intel’s shareholder register. Soon afterward, reports emerged that Samsung, South Korea’s industrial giant, had also been considered for similar treatment. What once would have been denounced as creeping socialism in Washington is now unfolding under Donald Trump, a president who boasts of his devotion to private enterprise but increasingly embraces tactics that blur the line between capitalism and state control.

The word “nationalization,” for decades associated with postwar Britain, Latin American populists, or Arab strongmen, is suddenly back in circulation - but this time applied to the citadel of capitalism itself. Trump justifies the intervention as a matter of national security and economic patriotism. Subsidies, he argues, are wasteful. Tariffs, in his view, are a stronger tool for forcing corporations to relocate factories to U.S. soil. Yet the CHIPS Act, that bipartisan legacy of the Biden years, remains in force and politically untouchable, funneling billions of dollars into domestic semiconductor projects. Rather than scrap it, Trump has chosen to alter the terms: companies that benefit from taxpayer largesse must now cede equity to the state. Intel, heavily reliant on those funds, has become the test case for this new model of American industrial policy.

Keep ReadingShow less
Impartiality Under Fire: A Federal Judge’s Warning on Judicial Independence
brown mallet on gray wooden surface
Photo by Wesley Tingey on Unsplash

Impartiality Under Fire: A Federal Judge’s Warning on Judicial Independence

In times of democratic strain, clarity must come not only from scholars and journalists but also from those who have sworn to uphold the Constitution with impartiality and courage.

This second piece in a series in The Fulcrum, “Judges on Democracy,” where we invite retired federal judges to speak directly to the American public about the foundational principles of our legal system: the separation of powers, the rule of law, and the indispensable role of an independent judiciary to our democratic republic.

Keep ReadingShow less
Could Trump’s campaign against the media come back to bite conservatives?

US President Donald Trump reacts next to Erika Kirk, widow of Charlie Kirk, after speaking at the public memorial service for right-wing activist Charlie Kirk at State Farm Stadium in Glendale, Arizona, on September 21, 2025.

(Photo by Mandel NGAN / AFP) (Photo by MANDEL NGAN/AFP via Getty Images)

Could Trump’s campaign against the media come back to bite conservatives?

In the wake of Jimmy Kimmel’sapparently temporary— suspension from late-night TV, a (tragically small) number of prominent conservatives and Republicans have taken exception to the Trump administration’s comfort with “jawboning” critics into submission.

Sen. Ted Cruz condemned the administration’s “mafioso behavior.” He warned that “going down this road, there will come a time when a Democrat wins again — wins the White House … they will silence us.” Cruz added during his Friday podcast. “They will use this power, and they will use it ruthlessly. And that is dangerous.”

Keep ReadingShow less