Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

America’s Boiling Frog

Why defending democracy starts with recognizing the heat

Opinion

America’s Boiling Frog
a red white and blue flag
Photo by Jon Sailer on Unsplash

The myth goes that a frog sitting in slowly heating water won’t notice until it boils alive. Americans know better—or we should. A recent Pew poll found that 72% of us already believe the U.S. is no longer a good example of democracy. We see the heat. The question is whether we’ll jump.

If you’re like most people, the thought of boiling a live frog seems cruel and purposeless. Even if you happen to enjoy frog legs—cuisses de grenouilles, as the French call them—it’s still a gruesome image. What’s more, the myth that frogs won’t notice a gradual rise in temperature isn’t even true. If given the chance, frogs will jump out, as proven decades ago by Dr. Victor Hutchison, a professor of zoology at the University of Oklahoma.


So yes—frogs will jump if they can. But will we?

I, for one, lose sleep over the fact that Americans may be sitting in a pot of our own making—and the water’s getting dangerously hot.

Instead of leaping out, we’re lounging like it’s a spa. Except this isn’t relaxation—it’s collapse. Our government has been cranking up the temperature a little more each day—by attacking individuals and institutions—whether attempting to fire a member of the Federal Reserve Board of Governors, or firing inspectors general who expose fraud, threatening judges who rule against the administration, or pressuring universities to silence dissent. Each step is justified as routine. Each step raises the heat.

And this didn’t start yesterday. The warming began years ago—with the normalization of lies about election fraud, the erosion of the rule of law through defiance of congressional subpoenas, and the resurrection of racial and gender hate in official rhetoric and policy. We tolerated the rising temperature, from denial to dissonance to disinterest. From “this can’t be happening” to “meh, it could be worse.” Some take it even a step further, decrying "you're overreacting" when someone draws attention to the gradual but steady march towards tyranny. This is what historian Timothy Snyder calls obeying in advance—the habit of accommodating power before we’re forced to, normalizing each new abuse by treating it as inevitable.

Today, corporations and public institutions are paying settlements, networks are canceling shows that challenge the administration, and a country once proud of its moral values now shrugs at open dehumanization based on a person’s (perceived) country of origin. Snyder reminds us: institutions “do not protect themselves.” Courts, universities, and the press only hold if people actively defend them.

We don’t have to look far—Russia, Hungary, Turkey—to see how rational people accepted slow decay: courts packed with loyalists, independent media shuttered, opposition candidates banned from ballots. Step by step, the abnormal became the new normal. Snyder cautions us to beware the one-party state. It rarely arrives in one sweep—it’s built election by election, map by map, until competition itself seems obsolete.

And it’s not just laws or maps—it’s symbols, slogans, and the face of the world. Snyder urges us to take responsibility for the public space around us. Every poster, meme, and chant that goes unchallenged becomes the new vocabulary of tolerance.

At the same time, truth itself is under siege. Leaders and their allies repeat lies until they no longer shock, teaching us to treat facts as subjective. Snyder warns that once citizens stop believing in truth, they stop believing they can resist at all.

Listen closely, too, for the dangerous words. “Emergency.” “Exception.” “Enemy within.” They may sound like common sense, but they’re the oldest trick in the authoritarian playbook—framing the expansion of extraordinary power as ordinary necessity.

History has already shown us what is to come. What once felt unimaginable is now routine—tossed from the Overton Window like yesterday’s news.

But here’s the good news: we can still jump. The choice is ours—to defend institutions, to refuse to obey in advance, to believe in truth, and to stop treating each new degree of heat as normal.

The time to leap is now.

Craig Robinson is an experienced business leader and advisor, currently serving on multiple boards and providing strategic counsel to private investment firms, with a focus on commercial real estate, technology, and leadership. As a founding member of the Leadership Now Project, he brings a unique perspective to discussions on the positive role of business in society and democracy.


Read More

Post office trucks parked in a lot.

Changes to USPS postmarking, ranked choice voting fights, costly runoffs, and gerrymandering reveal growing cracks in U.S. election systems.

Photo by Sam LaRussa on Unsplash.

2026 Will See an Increase in Rejected Mail-In Ballots - Here's Why

While the media has kept people’s focus on the Epstein files, Venezuela, or a potential invasion of Greenland, the United States Postal Service adopted a new rule that will have a broad impact on Americans – especially in an election year in which millions of people will vote by mail.

The rule went into effect on Christmas Eve and has largely flown under the radar, with the exception of some local coverage, a report from PBS News, and Independent Voter News. It states that items mailed through USPS will no longer be postmarked on the day it is received.

Keep ReadingShow less
Congress Must Stop Media Consolidation Before Local Journalism Collapses
black video camera
Photo by Matt C on Unsplash

Congress Must Stop Media Consolidation Before Local Journalism Collapses

This week, I joined a coalition of journalists in Washington, D.C., to speak directly with lawmakers about a crisis unfolding in plain sight: the rapid disappearance of local, community‑rooted journalism. The advocacy day, organized by the Hispanic Technology & Telecommunications Partnership (HTTP), brought together reporters and media leaders who understand that the future of local news is inseparable from the future of American democracy.

- YouTube www.youtube.com

Keep ReadingShow less
People wearing vests with "ICE" and "Police" on the back.

The latest shutdown deal kept government open while exposing Congress’s reliance on procedural oversight rather than structural limits on ICE.

Getty Images, Douglas Rissing

A Shutdown Averted, and a Narrow Window Into Congress’s ICE Dilemma

Congress’s latest shutdown scare ended the way these episodes usually do: with a stopgap deal, a sigh of relief, and little sense that the underlying conflict had been resolved. But buried inside the agreement was a revealing maneuver. While most of the federal government received longer-term funding, the Department of Homeland Security, and especially Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), was given only a short-term extension. That asymmetry was deliberate. It preserved leverage over one of the most controversial federal agencies without triggering a prolonged shutdown, while also exposing the narrow terrain on which Congress is still willing to confront executive power. As with so many recent budget deals, the decision emerged less from open debate than from late-stage negotiations compressed into the final hours before the deadline.

How the Deal Was Framed

Democrats used the funding deadline to force a conversation about ICE’s enforcement practices, but they were careful about how that conversation was structured. Rather than reopening the far more combustible debate over immigration levels, deportation priorities, or statutory authority, they framed the dispute as one about law-enforcement standards, specifically transparency, accountability, and oversight.

Keep ReadingShow less
ICE Monitors Should Become Election Monitors: And so Must You
A pole with a sign that says polling station
Photo by Phil Hearing on Unsplash

ICE Monitors Should Become Election Monitors: And so Must You

The brutality of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and the related cohort of federal officers in Minneapolis spurred more than 30,000 stalwart Minnesotans to step forward in January and be trained as monitors. Attorney General Pam Bondi’s demands to Minnesota’s Governor demonstrate that the ICE surge is linked to elections, and other ICE-related threats, including Steve Bannon calling for ICE agents deployment to polling stations, make clear that elections should be on the monitoring agenda in Minnesota and across the nation.

A recent exhortation by the New York Times Editorial Board underscores the need for citizen action to defend elections and outlines some steps. Additional avenues are also available. My three decades of experience with international and citizen election observation in numerous countries demonstrates that monitoring safeguards trustworthy elections and promotes public confidence in them - both of which are needed here and now in the US.

Keep ReadingShow less