Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Amid the storm of conflict, new evidence there's a place for calm

Partisanship

FixUS has sponsored a new national poll which confirms the huge partisan divide in the country but points the way to areas of agreement that can be the subject of dialogue.

wildpixel/Getty Images

At the end of what has been the most tumultuous campaign season in recent history, a national good governance group is launching a new effort to tackle what appears to be the impossible:

Bridging the enormous partisan divide that has set neighbor against neighbor and made governing the country so difficult.

FixUs, an initiative to help Americans better understand our differences, announced Thursday the results of a national survey outlining these differences — and some areas of agreement — that will serve as a springboard to the program called "A National Dialogue on Common Values, Goals and Aspirations."


The poll vividly captures the divide between Republicans and Democrats on what the priorities for the country should be.

Democrats ranked as their top policy goals: health care affordability (64 percent) and improving racial justice (51 percent).

Republicans said their top goals were a strong and growing economy (68 percent) and putting America first (54 percent).

Areas where the parties differ by a wide margin include Democrats' focus on reducing income and wealth inequality (46 percent to just 15 percent for Republicans), and addressing climate change (43 percent to just 16 percent for Republicans.)

Republicans prioritize personal freedom (46 percent to 24 percent for Democrats).

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

Members of the two parties also have widely divergent views of where the county stands, with Republicans much more positive than Democrats.

For example, 81 percent of Republicans said the American economy was strong and growing while only 37 percent of Democrats said that. Also 65 percent of Republicans believe the country ensures racial justice while only 22 percent of Democrats believe that.

There is strong agreement, and perhaps the meeting ground for productive dialogue, on national and individual values and goals, the survey found. Lopsided majorities of both parties described these national values as extremely or very important:

  • Free speech: 81 percent
  • Equal justice under law: 80 percent
  • Ensuring everyone has the opportunity to succeed: 80 percent
  • Individual freedom: 78 percent

Individual values where there is strong bipartisan agreement include being honest, hard-working and independent. Conversely, only a fourth of respondents listed being wealthy as extremely or very important.

The common areas on which most agree are a starting point for the dialogue FixUS hopes to create.

"Americans feel divided and alienated from one another and from the political process," said Maya MacGuineas, the founder of FixUs, a project of the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget that has also has been acting as an informal coordinator of disparate players in the world of democracy reform. "It is important that no matter the outcome of the election, we remain focused on what will be the long and difficult work of reuniting the country."

The next step is for people to participate in small group discussions and focus groups to better understand the differences and similarities and attempt to find ways forward.

The Ipsos poll of 1,005 adults was conducted Sept. 2-3 and has a 3.5 percentage point margin of sampling error.

Read More

Podcast: How do police feel about gun control?

Podcast: How do police feel about gun control?

Jesus "Eddie" Campa, former Chief Deputy of the El Paso County Sheriff's Department and former Chief of Police for Marshall Texas, discusses the recent school shooting in Uvalde and how loose restrictions on gun ownership complicate the lives of law enforcement on this episode of YDHTY.

Listen now

Podcast: Why conspiracy theories thrive in both democracies and autocracies

Podcast: Why conspiracy theories thrive in both democracies and autocracies

There's something natural and organic about perceiving that the people in power are out to advance their own interests. It's in part because it’s often true. Governments actually do keep secrets from the public. Politicians engage in scandals. There often is corruption at high levels. So, we don't want citizens in a democracy to be too trusting of their politicians. It's healthy to be skeptical of the state and its real abuses and tendencies towards secrecy. The danger is when this distrust gets redirected, not toward the state, but targets innocent people who are not actually responsible for people's problems.

On this episode of "Democracy Paradox" Scott Radnitz explains why conspiracy theories thrive in both democracies and autocracies.

Your Take:  The Price of Freedom

Your Take: The Price of Freedom

Our question about the price of freedom received a light response. We asked:

What price have you, your friends or your family paid for the freedom we enjoy? And what price would you willingly pay?

It was a question born out of the horror of images from Ukraine. We hope that the news about the Jan. 6 commission and Ketanji Brown Jackson’s Supreme Court nomination was so riveting that this question was overlooked. We considered another possibility that the images were so traumatic, that our readers didn’t want to consider the question for themselves. We saw the price Ukrainians paid.

One response came from a veteran who noted that being willing to pay the ultimate price for one’s country and surviving was a gift that was repaid over and over throughout his life. “I know exactly what it is like to accept that you are a dead man,” he said. What most closely mirrored my own experience was a respondent who noted her lack of payment in blood, sweat or tears, yet chose to volunteer in helping others exercise their freedom.

Personally, my price includes service to our nation, too. The price I paid was the loss of my former life, which included a husband, a home and a seemingly secure job to enter the political fray with a message of partisan healing and hope for the future. This work isn’t risking my life, but it’s the price I’ve paid.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

Given the earnest question we asked, and the meager responses, I am also left wondering if we think at all about the price of freedom? Or have we all become so entitled to our freedom that we fail to defend freedom for others? Or was the question poorly timed?

I read another respondent’s words as an indicator of his pacifism. And another veteran who simply stated his years of service. And that was it. Four responses to a question that lives in my heart every day. We look forward to hearing Your Take on other topics. Feel free to share questions to which you’d like to respond.

Keep ReadingShow less
No, autocracies don't make economies great

libre de droit/Getty Images

No, autocracies don't make economies great

Tom G. Palmer has been involved in the advance of democratic free-market policies and reforms around the globe for more than three decades. He is executive vice president for international programs at Atlas Network and a senior fellow at the Cato Institute.

One argument frequently advanced for abandoning the messy business of democratic deliberation is that all those checks and balances, hearings and debates, judicial review and individual rights get in the way of development. What’s needed is action, not more empty debate or selfish individualism!

In the words of European autocrat Viktor Orbán, “No policy-specific debates are needed now, the alternatives in front of us are obvious…[W]e need to understand that for rebuilding the economy it is not theories that are needed but rather thirty robust lads who start working to implement what we all know needs to be done.” See! Just thirty robust lads and one far-sighted overseer and you’re on the way to a great economy!

Keep ReadingShow less
Podcast: A right-wing perspective on Jan. 6th and the 2020 election

Podcast: A right-wing perspective on Jan. 6th and the 2020 election

Peter Wood is an anthropologist and president of the National Association of Scholars. He believes—like many Americans on the right—that the 2020 election was stolen from Donald Trump and the January 6th riots were incited by the left in collusion with the FBI. He’s also the author of a new book called Wrath: America Enraged, which wrestles with our politics of anger and counsels conservatives on how to respond to perceived aggression.

Where does America go from here? In this episode, Peter joins Ciaran O’Connor for a frank conversation about the role of anger in our politics as well as the nature of truth, trust, and conspiracy theories.

Keep ReadingShow less