Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Bipartisan group offers free legal aid to election workers facing intimidation

Election workers

Election workers across the country have faced a heightened number of threats since the 2020 election.

Justin Sullivan/Getty Images

During the 2020 presidential contest, election workers had to navigate a host of new challenges caused by the Covid-19 pandemic. As if that wasn't enough of a burden on civil servants, temporary workers and volunteers, they also faced heightened threats from partisan extremists.

And now, even 10 months after the election, officials are still at risk of physical and verbal assault, as well as new rules that limit their authority.

To help protect election workers from these intimidations, the Center for Election Innovation and Research announced Wednesday the launch of a bipartisan initiative to provide pro bono legal assistance and advice. The Election Official Legal Defense Network is led by David Becker, executive director of CEIR; Bob Bauer, former White House counsel during the Obama administration; and Ben Ginsberg, counsel to the George W. Bush campaign and Republican candidates.


Local and state election workers, from any jurisdiction in the country, can contact the legal defense network via an online form or a 24-hour hotline to request legal help at no cost. The network is also actively recruiting lawyers to grow its outreach and assistance to election officials.

"It's very important for this project going forward to send a clear message to election officials that what they do is absolutely critical for democracy," Ginsberg said. "We will do anything that we can, with the help of our volunteer lawyers ... to help out in any untoward attempts to intimidate and influence elections."

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

This year, new laws have been enacted by Republican-led Legislatures in Iowa, Georgia, Florida and Texas that prevent election officials from expanding voter access, like they did during last year's pandemic election. For instance, these states now have rules preventing election workers from proactively sending voters mail ballot applications, unless the voter has explicitly requested one.

Other recently enacted laws could penalize election officials with hefty fines or jail time for technical infractions of election rules, like opening a polling place late or leaving a ballot drop box unsupervised. Some states have also given more authority to partisan poll watchers, which could lead to increased tensions during elections and put the burden on election administrators to mitigate any issues.

Bauer and Ginsberg fear these types of laws could have a chilling effect on election officials, preventing them from carrying out their duties and impacting the integrity of elections.

"What we are seeing developing now is a huge step backward from a focus on professionalized election administration to a heavy level of political interference in the work of trained election professionals," Bauer said.

Brian Corley, supervisor of elections for Pasco County, Fla., said during a press call announcing the legal defense network that he and his colleagues have been subjected to a deluge of threats during and since the 2020 election.

"I can tell you that my staff was called racial slurs, not just once or twice — once or twice is already too many — we're talking 30, 40, 50 times. I had a staff member that was threatened to be shot, threatened to be beaten," Corley said. "I was called an enemy of the state, part of the deep state conspiracy, and that I was pulling for Joe Biden. What was my crime? Encouraging voters to consider voting by mail during a pandemic."

Corley said he also had to contact the Department of Homeland Security and the FBI after people showed up at his house to threaten him.

The continued intimidation of election workers this year has also led many to resign from their positions, which could spell staffing shortages for upcoming elections. Michael Winn, chief deputy clerk for Harris County, Texas, said during the press call that many of his colleagues have resigned recently over these issues.

"This is a national problem that needs to be addressed head on. This is not a set of isolated incidents or just the byproduct of a particularly complex and difficult election," Bauer said. "This has now become a concern for the electoral process."

Through the legal defense network, the co-chairs hope to provide election officials with the support system they need to mitigate these issues. Whether an administrator is threatened by someone or has concerns about a new law, they can contact one of the volunteer attorneys for assistance.

The Justice Department also announced in July the formation of a task force to address the increased threats against election workers.

Read More

Podcast: How do police feel about gun control?

Podcast: How do police feel about gun control?

Jesus "Eddie" Campa, former Chief Deputy of the El Paso County Sheriff's Department and former Chief of Police for Marshall Texas, discusses the recent school shooting in Uvalde and how loose restrictions on gun ownership complicate the lives of law enforcement on this episode of YDHTY.

Listen now

Podcast: Why conspiracy theories thrive in both democracies and autocracies

Podcast: Why conspiracy theories thrive in both democracies and autocracies

There's something natural and organic about perceiving that the people in power are out to advance their own interests. It's in part because it’s often true. Governments actually do keep secrets from the public. Politicians engage in scandals. There often is corruption at high levels. So, we don't want citizens in a democracy to be too trusting of their politicians. It's healthy to be skeptical of the state and its real abuses and tendencies towards secrecy. The danger is when this distrust gets redirected, not toward the state, but targets innocent people who are not actually responsible for people's problems.

On this episode of "Democracy Paradox" Scott Radnitz explains why conspiracy theories thrive in both democracies and autocracies.

Your Take:  The Price of Freedom

Your Take: The Price of Freedom

Our question about the price of freedom received a light response. We asked:

What price have you, your friends or your family paid for the freedom we enjoy? And what price would you willingly pay?

It was a question born out of the horror of images from Ukraine. We hope that the news about the Jan. 6 commission and Ketanji Brown Jackson’s Supreme Court nomination was so riveting that this question was overlooked. We considered another possibility that the images were so traumatic, that our readers didn’t want to consider the question for themselves. We saw the price Ukrainians paid.

One response came from a veteran who noted that being willing to pay the ultimate price for one’s country and surviving was a gift that was repaid over and over throughout his life. “I know exactly what it is like to accept that you are a dead man,” he said. What most closely mirrored my own experience was a respondent who noted her lack of payment in blood, sweat or tears, yet chose to volunteer in helping others exercise their freedom.

Personally, my price includes service to our nation, too. The price I paid was the loss of my former life, which included a husband, a home and a seemingly secure job to enter the political fray with a message of partisan healing and hope for the future. This work isn’t risking my life, but it’s the price I’ve paid.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

Given the earnest question we asked, and the meager responses, I am also left wondering if we think at all about the price of freedom? Or have we all become so entitled to our freedom that we fail to defend freedom for others? Or was the question poorly timed?

I read another respondent’s words as an indicator of his pacifism. And another veteran who simply stated his years of service. And that was it. Four responses to a question that lives in my heart every day. We look forward to hearing Your Take on other topics. Feel free to share questions to which you’d like to respond.

Keep ReadingShow less
No, autocracies don't make economies great

libre de droit/Getty Images

No, autocracies don't make economies great

Tom G. Palmer has been involved in the advance of democratic free-market policies and reforms around the globe for more than three decades. He is executive vice president for international programs at Atlas Network and a senior fellow at the Cato Institute.

One argument frequently advanced for abandoning the messy business of democratic deliberation is that all those checks and balances, hearings and debates, judicial review and individual rights get in the way of development. What’s needed is action, not more empty debate or selfish individualism!

In the words of European autocrat Viktor Orbán, “No policy-specific debates are needed now, the alternatives in front of us are obvious…[W]e need to understand that for rebuilding the economy it is not theories that are needed but rather thirty robust lads who start working to implement what we all know needs to be done.” See! Just thirty robust lads and one far-sighted overseer and you’re on the way to a great economy!

Keep ReadingShow less