Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Facebook won't allow Trump or Biden to declare victory online — unless it's true

Facebook
Budrul Chukrut/Getty Images
Preemptive and premature declarations of presidential victory won't be possible on Facebook anymore.

The company announced Wednesday that it will start blocking issue advocacy, electoral and political advertisements as soon as the polls close on Election Day "to reduce opportunities for confusion and abuse." It also said that, until a victor is declared by news outlets, it will have banners atop its News Feed alerting viewers that no winner has been decided.

It's the latest move by the social media giant to be more assertive in repelling those, both foreign adversaries and American candidates, who might seek to spread disinformation online in hopes of manipulating the national election outcome and its aftermath.


Facebook signaled the ad ban will stay in effect until either President Trump or former Vice President Joe Biden has emerged decisively as the winner. Unless their contest ends up in an Electoral College rout, that could be days or weeks after the last vote is cast — because of the time needed to tabulate an unprecedented number of absentee ballots thanks to the coronavirus pandemic.

Several of the biggest tossup states have rules against counting while the mail flows in, but in favor of counting envelopes delayed in the mail and arriving days late.

Trump says he expects to declare victory the night of Nov. 3 based on the mostly in-person vote totals — baselessly claiming that states changing color from red to blue after that will have been caused by election fraud. But polling shows most Democrats plan to vote by mail and most Republicans in person, so the later numbers are likely to favor Biden.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

Facebook's latest move builds on several others this fall designed to protect its platform from electoral abuse. Last month it introduced measures to reduce election misinformation and interference, and also banned political ads the week leading up to Election Day. Google has also decided to block election ads after Nov. 3. The companies say these efforts will help protect the integrity of the election by combating the spread of misinformation.

In addition to ad cutoff, Facebook says it will be monitoring content from candidates and regular users to keep people up to date on the election and prevent the spread of false or misleading information.

When polls close, Facebook will send notifications to users and add labels to candidates' posts to share information about the counting process. If Biden or Trump, or the Democratic or Republican parties, declares victory before major media outlets says that's justified, Facebook will go a step further and alert users that counting is still in progress and a winner has not yet been determined.

Once a victor has been declared by major media outlets, Facebook will display the winner's name at the top of Facebook and Instagram and add a label to relevant posts.

Since Trump's call to his supporters "to go into the polls and watch very carefully," voting rights groups have raised concerns about voter intimidation. Facebook said it will remove content that encourages poll watching "when those calls use militarized language or suggest that the goal is to intimidate, exert control or display power over election officials or voters."

The company said it will continue to work with federal and state law enforcement and election officials to fight against voter intimidation and interference.

"These are important steps for Facebook to take to combat disinformation and the premature calling of election results before every vote is counted," said Vanita Gupta, president of the Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights. She added that her organization "will continue to press Facebook and other social media platforms to take every possible step to protect a free and fair election and our imperiled democracy."

Read More

Podcast: How do police feel about gun control?

Podcast: How do police feel about gun control?

Jesus "Eddie" Campa, former Chief Deputy of the El Paso County Sheriff's Department and former Chief of Police for Marshall Texas, discusses the recent school shooting in Uvalde and how loose restrictions on gun ownership complicate the lives of law enforcement on this episode of YDHTY.

Listen now

Podcast: Why conspiracy theories thrive in both democracies and autocracies

Podcast: Why conspiracy theories thrive in both democracies and autocracies

There's something natural and organic about perceiving that the people in power are out to advance their own interests. It's in part because it’s often true. Governments actually do keep secrets from the public. Politicians engage in scandals. There often is corruption at high levels. So, we don't want citizens in a democracy to be too trusting of their politicians. It's healthy to be skeptical of the state and its real abuses and tendencies towards secrecy. The danger is when this distrust gets redirected, not toward the state, but targets innocent people who are not actually responsible for people's problems.

On this episode of "Democracy Paradox" Scott Radnitz explains why conspiracy theories thrive in both democracies and autocracies.

Your Take:  The Price of Freedom

Your Take: The Price of Freedom

Our question about the price of freedom received a light response. We asked:

What price have you, your friends or your family paid for the freedom we enjoy? And what price would you willingly pay?

It was a question born out of the horror of images from Ukraine. We hope that the news about the Jan. 6 commission and Ketanji Brown Jackson’s Supreme Court nomination was so riveting that this question was overlooked. We considered another possibility that the images were so traumatic, that our readers didn’t want to consider the question for themselves. We saw the price Ukrainians paid.

One response came from a veteran who noted that being willing to pay the ultimate price for one’s country and surviving was a gift that was repaid over and over throughout his life. “I know exactly what it is like to accept that you are a dead man,” he said. What most closely mirrored my own experience was a respondent who noted her lack of payment in blood, sweat or tears, yet chose to volunteer in helping others exercise their freedom.

Personally, my price includes service to our nation, too. The price I paid was the loss of my former life, which included a husband, a home and a seemingly secure job to enter the political fray with a message of partisan healing and hope for the future. This work isn’t risking my life, but it’s the price I’ve paid.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

Given the earnest question we asked, and the meager responses, I am also left wondering if we think at all about the price of freedom? Or have we all become so entitled to our freedom that we fail to defend freedom for others? Or was the question poorly timed?

I read another respondent’s words as an indicator of his pacifism. And another veteran who simply stated his years of service. And that was it. Four responses to a question that lives in my heart every day. We look forward to hearing Your Take on other topics. Feel free to share questions to which you’d like to respond.

Keep ReadingShow less
No, autocracies don't make economies great

libre de droit/Getty Images

No, autocracies don't make economies great

Tom G. Palmer has been involved in the advance of democratic free-market policies and reforms around the globe for more than three decades. He is executive vice president for international programs at Atlas Network and a senior fellow at the Cato Institute.

One argument frequently advanced for abandoning the messy business of democratic deliberation is that all those checks and balances, hearings and debates, judicial review and individual rights get in the way of development. What’s needed is action, not more empty debate or selfish individualism!

In the words of European autocrat Viktor Orbán, “No policy-specific debates are needed now, the alternatives in front of us are obvious…[W]e need to understand that for rebuilding the economy it is not theories that are needed but rather thirty robust lads who start working to implement what we all know needs to be done.” See! Just thirty robust lads and one far-sighted overseer and you’re on the way to a great economy!

Keep ReadingShow less
Podcast: A right-wing perspective on Jan. 6th and the 2020 election

Podcast: A right-wing perspective on Jan. 6th and the 2020 election

Peter Wood is an anthropologist and president of the National Association of Scholars. He believes—like many Americans on the right—that the 2020 election was stolen from Donald Trump and the January 6th riots were incited by the left in collusion with the FBI. He’s also the author of a new book called Wrath: America Enraged, which wrestles with our politics of anger and counsels conservatives on how to respond to perceived aggression.

Where does America go from here? In this episode, Peter joins Ciaran O’Connor for a frank conversation about the role of anger in our politics as well as the nature of truth, trust, and conspiracy theories.

Keep ReadingShow less