Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

'Stakeholder capitalism' is part of a sea change in boardrooms

Jamie Dimon, chairman and CEO of JPMorgan Chase & Co. and chairman of Business Roundtable

JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon is one of the leaders when it comes to stakeholder capitalism, writes Nevins.

Alex Wroblewski/Getty Images
Nevins is co-founder and board chairman of the Bridge Alliance Education Fund, is a 501(c)(3) organization that houses The Fulcrum.

As a businessman and entrepreneur, I never considered the intersection of my professional experience with the work I do to help support and create healthy self-governance in our nation as co-founder of the Bridge Alliance.

But that perspective has changed dramatically in recent months.

The concepts of "stakeholder capitalism" and "corporate responsibility" are coming to the forefront of the news as unprecedented actions are being taken by businesses across the country to change the very nature of their role in society.

A sea change of activity is occurring before our eyes.

In 2019, 181 CEOs announced a commitment to lead their companies for the benefit of all stakeholders rather than just their shareholders. Stakeholders consist of customers, employees, suppliers, communities and of course shareholders.

Jamie Dimon, chairman and CEO of JPMorgan Chase & Co. and chairman of Business Roundtable said:

"The American dream is alive, but fraying. Major employers are investing in their workers and communities because they know it is the only way to be successful over the long term. These modernized principles reflect the business community's unwavering commitment to continue to push for an economy that serves all Americans."

As a lifelong proud capitalist, Dimon's proclamation resonated with me deeply. The concept that each individual company can serve its own corporate purpose, but also share a fundamental commitment to all society, is becoming more important to consumers as well and perhaps one reason boardrooms across the country are changing corporate policies and investments.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

And doing so can also be good for business. Recent studies show that it pays to connect with customers and connecting means caring about the world we live in. The growth of "socially responsible investing" through mutual funds allows everyday citizens to align their values with their investments. The opportunity now exists for investors to design their portfolio allocation around goals that are meaningful to them whether it is our planet, our cities or around faith-based goals.

Some of the specifics of stakeholder capitalism is and what the 181 CEOs committed to on behalf of their customers, employees and communities include:

  • Delivering value to our customers. We will further the tradition of American companies leading the way in meeting or exceeding customer expectations.
  • Investing in our employees. This starts with compensating them fairly and providing important benefits. It also includes supporting them through training and education that help develop new skills for a rapidly changing world. We foster diversity and inclusion, dignity and respect.
  • Dealing fairly and ethically with our suppliers. We are dedicated to serving as good partners to the other companies, large and small, that help us meet our missions.
  • Supporting the communities in which we work. We respect the people in our communities and protect the environment by embracing sustainable practices across our businesses.
  • Generating long-term value for shareholders, who provide the capital that allows companies to invest, grow and innovate. We are committed to transparency and effective engagement with shareholders.

Admittedly, some of the above language is vague but the general goals are being backed up with concrete actions by corporations.

For example BlackRock CEO Larry Fink pledged a "Net Zero" fiduciary approach to climate change.

As reported yesterday in The Fulcrum, companies including HP, Microsoft and Unilever are calling for expanded voting access in Texas. And a few weeks ago corporations such as Coca-Cola and Delta Airlines took forceful stances against Georgia's new restrictive election law.

PricewaterhouseCoopers, a huge multinational professional services network of firms, is made up of 55,000 people of all races, ethnicities, genders and backgrounds and has instituted a diversity program "to build a culture of belonging — one where we move from awareness to empathy and demonstrate inclusive leadership."

These are just a few examples of the change in the very nature of corporate responsibility sweeping across America. More and more corporations realize that socially responsible policies that do what is best for humanity should be at the core of every decision they make, because ultimately their customers and their shareholders are humans too.

Read More

Podcast: How do police feel about gun control?

Podcast: How do police feel about gun control?

Jesus "Eddie" Campa, former Chief Deputy of the El Paso County Sheriff's Department and former Chief of Police for Marshall Texas, discusses the recent school shooting in Uvalde and how loose restrictions on gun ownership complicate the lives of law enforcement on this episode of YDHTY.

Listen now

Podcast: Why conspiracy theories thrive in both democracies and autocracies

Podcast: Why conspiracy theories thrive in both democracies and autocracies

There's something natural and organic about perceiving that the people in power are out to advance their own interests. It's in part because it’s often true. Governments actually do keep secrets from the public. Politicians engage in scandals. There often is corruption at high levels. So, we don't want citizens in a democracy to be too trusting of their politicians. It's healthy to be skeptical of the state and its real abuses and tendencies towards secrecy. The danger is when this distrust gets redirected, not toward the state, but targets innocent people who are not actually responsible for people's problems.

On this episode of "Democracy Paradox" Scott Radnitz explains why conspiracy theories thrive in both democracies and autocracies.

Your Take:  The Price of Freedom

Your Take: The Price of Freedom

Our question about the price of freedom received a light response. We asked:

What price have you, your friends or your family paid for the freedom we enjoy? And what price would you willingly pay?

It was a question born out of the horror of images from Ukraine. We hope that the news about the Jan. 6 commission and Ketanji Brown Jackson’s Supreme Court nomination was so riveting that this question was overlooked. We considered another possibility that the images were so traumatic, that our readers didn’t want to consider the question for themselves. We saw the price Ukrainians paid.

One response came from a veteran who noted that being willing to pay the ultimate price for one’s country and surviving was a gift that was repaid over and over throughout his life. “I know exactly what it is like to accept that you are a dead man,” he said. What most closely mirrored my own experience was a respondent who noted her lack of payment in blood, sweat or tears, yet chose to volunteer in helping others exercise their freedom.

Personally, my price includes service to our nation, too. The price I paid was the loss of my former life, which included a husband, a home and a seemingly secure job to enter the political fray with a message of partisan healing and hope for the future. This work isn’t risking my life, but it’s the price I’ve paid.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

Given the earnest question we asked, and the meager responses, I am also left wondering if we think at all about the price of freedom? Or have we all become so entitled to our freedom that we fail to defend freedom for others? Or was the question poorly timed?

I read another respondent’s words as an indicator of his pacifism. And another veteran who simply stated his years of service. And that was it. Four responses to a question that lives in my heart every day. We look forward to hearing Your Take on other topics. Feel free to share questions to which you’d like to respond.

Keep ReadingShow less
No, autocracies don't make economies great

libre de droit/Getty Images

No, autocracies don't make economies great

Tom G. Palmer has been involved in the advance of democratic free-market policies and reforms around the globe for more than three decades. He is executive vice president for international programs at Atlas Network and a senior fellow at the Cato Institute.

One argument frequently advanced for abandoning the messy business of democratic deliberation is that all those checks and balances, hearings and debates, judicial review and individual rights get in the way of development. What’s needed is action, not more empty debate or selfish individualism!

In the words of European autocrat Viktor Orbán, “No policy-specific debates are needed now, the alternatives in front of us are obvious…[W]e need to understand that for rebuilding the economy it is not theories that are needed but rather thirty robust lads who start working to implement what we all know needs to be done.” See! Just thirty robust lads and one far-sighted overseer and you’re on the way to a great economy!

Keep ReadingShow less