Skip to content

Latest Stories

Top Stories

To protect democracy, voters should reject conspiracy theorists seeking to run elections

Jim Marchant

Jim Marchant, the Republican candidate for Nevada secretary of state, claimed that Nevadans’ votes haven’t counted “for decades” because a “deep state cabal” has been rigging elections.

Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images

Grayson, a Republican, is a former secretary of state of Kentucky. McReynolds, a former election official, serves on the board of governors of the U.S. Postal Service. Both are members of Issue One's bipartisanNational Council on Election Integrity.

As voters head to the polls in the midterm elections, their choices up and down the ballot will determine whether our democracy thrives or backslides.

Among the most important races this year are those for secretary of state — contests that historically have not commanded news headlines or much fanfare. Yet the outcomes in the races for the relatively obscure office will be crucial to maintaining and strengthening our representative democracy as we know it.

By and large, secretaries of state are administrative in that in most states they oversee the conduct of elections that usually occurs at the local level, within a county or city. Typically, administering elections at the state and local level are noncontroversial tasks, which we both know from experience. Trey, a Republican, served as the secretary of state of Kentucky for seven years, and Amber, an independent, served as a local election official and the director of elections for the city and county of Denver for 13 years.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

But today’s political environment is anything but typical. This year, in roughly a dozen states — including the battleground states of Arizona, Michigan and Nevada — the secretary of state races feature candidates with little regard for democratic norms who deny the legitimate results of the 2020 presidential election and peddle disinformation about our elections.

These individuals may not follow the rules or uphold the will of the people in future elections. Should they prevail, they could attempt to use the administrative levers of government to put their thumb on the scale to favor their preferred candidates.

For instance, Republican Jim Marchant of Nevada, a former state assemblyman running for secretary of state, has expressed openness to sending an alternative slate of electors to Congress that would not support the winner of the popular vote in Nevada in 2024. He has wildly claimed that Nevadans’ votes haven’t counted “for decades” because a “deep state cabal” has been rigging elections.

Similarly, Republican Mark Finchem of Arizona, a state legislator running for secretary of state, has called for the 2020 election results in several Arizona counties to be “decertified” — an act that isn’t legally possible. Finchem has links to the Oath Keepers, a right-wing militia, and he was part of the crowd outside the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, when rioters stormed the building in an attempt to disrupt the peaceful transfer of presidential power.

That’s in stark contrast to the approaches taken by numerous Republican officials who worked with Democrats and independents in 2020 to defend the integrity of the election and stand up to pressure from then-President Donald Trump, who sought to overturn the election and remain in power.

For instance, as has been widely reported, Republican Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger of Georgia resisted immense pressure from the former president, who personally urged Raffensperger to “find” the votes necessary for him to win Georgia. And in Michigan, Republican Aaron Van Langevelde, a member of the board of state canvassers, cast a critical vote to certify the state’s election results.

Interference with the electoral process is not only dangerous, it poses a direct threat to U.S. democracy.

Secretary of states must be responsible for serving all voters, regardless of their party affiliation or political ideology, and they must ensure that elections are conducted in a fair, efficient and transparent manner. That means not engaging in partisan gamesmanship. Secretaries of state need to be serious and capable people who are ready and willing to take up the challenge of protecting democracy. There is no room in this office for those who don’t respect the rule of law or the will of the voters.

The American people ought to reject these conspiracy theorists and election deniers who don't want our votes to count. If somebody doesn't want your vote to count, or doesn't think your previous vote should have counted, then we should not elect them to be responsible for administering elections.

Secretaries of state must not undermine the bipartisan apparatus that undergirds our elections. They need to be impartial referees and respect the will of the people, no matter the outcome of the election.

Across the world, people look to American elections as models of freedom, fairness and choice. We are lucky to live in a country where we can disagree with one another on a host of policy debates, but our democracy is a red line issue. Refusing to accept the legitimate outcomes of elections should be a disqualifier for anyone who wants the job of administering them.

There are no two ways about it. We need election officials who put voters first, not their political party. If we make the mistake of electing individuals who are willing to hijack the management of elections for partisan gain and enact changes that could lead to an outright reversal of the will of voters, we will have jeopardized the future of our experiment in self-government. Let’s not make that mistake.

Read More

majority vs minority
Sanga Park/Getty Images

Make a choice: majoritarian democracy or minority tyranny?

Nelson is a retired attorney and served as an associate justice of the Montana Supreme Court from 1993 through 2012.

What is more American than majority rule — the principle that 50.1 percent carries the day when decisions affecting all of us are made? The majority wins, and the minority has to accept, even if not graciously, the decision of the greater number. That’s how decisions are made in this country. Right?

Not necessarily!

Keep ReadingShow less
Donald Trump

Former President Donald Trump

Jabin Botsford/Getty Images

Scholars unmask Trump election lawyers’ use of falsified evidence

Rosenfeld is the editor and chief correspondent of Voting Booth, a project of the Independent Media Institute.

After 2022’s midterm election, I had an email exchange with Robert Beadles, a combative northern Nevada businessman and Donald Trump devotee. His post-2020 hounding of Reno’s top election official had pushed her to resign. Beadles didn’t trust the midterm results either and offered a $50,000 reward to anyone who’d prove that it was not stolen.

Easy money, right? Beadles’ distrust was tribal. But his reward hinged on refuting a statistical analysis that he waved like the flag. His statistician, Edward Solomon, who lived halfway across the country, found mathematical aberrations in the results that he didn’t like. The men claimed that was proof enough that the announced election results were dishonest.

I, and several experienced analysts — a math PhD, a computer scientist, and an election auditor who had spent years studying election systems, voting data, and procedures — tried to explain why the statistics, alone, did not prove anything. We politely told him what records to obtain, why they mattered, what methodologies to use. Beadles didn’t care and soon lashed out.

Keep ReadingShow less
D.C. Police Officer Daniel Hodges shakes hands with Rep. Liz Cheney at a hearing

Officer Daniel Hodges of the D.C. police force shakes hands with then-Rep. Liz Cheney at a July 21, 2022, House committee hearing investigating the Jan. 6, 2021 attack on the Capitol.

Jabin Botsford/The Washington Post via Getty Images

Remembering Jan. 6 with an officer injured in the line of duty

To mark the third anniversary of the attacks on the Capitol, the hosts of the “Politics Is Everything” podcast talked with D.C. Metropolitan Police Officer Daniel Hodges, who was beaten by rioters that day.

Keep ReadingShow less
Election challengers in Detroit in 2020

Election challengers demand to observe the counting of absentee ballots in Detroirt in 2020. The room had reached capacity.

Salwan Georges/The Washington Post via Getty Images

It's 2024 and the battle for democracy in the U.S. continues

Merloe provides strategic advice on democracy and elections to U.S. and international organizations. He is a former director of election integrity programs at the nonpartisan National Democratic Institute for International Affairs.

The U.S. political environment is suffering from toxic polarization, with election deniers constantly spewing noxious vapors to negate belief in the legitimacy of the 2020 presidential election, the integrity of election administration, and the honorableness of their political opponents. The constant pollution has blinded many from seeing the real state of things and is causing others to close their eyes to avoid the irritation. The resulting diminished public confidence and perhaps participation in elections creates more precarious conditions in 2024 than it faced in 2020 and 2022.

I’ve learned an important lesson from observing elections in more than 50 countries: Even when elections are credible, if a large segment of the population is made to believe otherwise their outcome and the fate of democracy can easily be placed in jeopardy. Unfortunately, that is a central feature of the present electoral circumstance, and concerted action is needed to mitigate that damage and prevent it from worsening.

Keep ReadingShow less
Americans wrapped in a flag

"We must reaffirm the principles under which our country will function," writes Goodrich.

SeventyFour/Getty Images

Together, we can save our democracy

Goodrich is the president and CEO of The Center for Organizational Excellence.

Our democracy is being challenged and, if lost, will impact our way of life in more ways than most may realize. I have given a lot of thought as to why our country’s political environment is in such chaos, facing significant turmoil that challenges our present and our future.

It is important to note that I am truly politically independent. I do not carry the water of any political party and always attempt to consider what is in the best interest of our country. I can have both conservative and liberal tendencies, depending on the issue being addressed, and believe at times each party goes to unhelpful extremes. Occasionally they get it right, but perhaps it’s time to rethink our two-party model.

The foundation of our democracy is the Constitution. I believe it is an imperfect document but provides a strong foundation for the democracy it established. I am in awe that the Founding Fathers thought so much through that it is still applicable today. Every American should read it, and there are “plain language” versions online if it helps. While still strong, it perhaps needs some updating, expanded explanation and more precise language.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

Keep ReadingShow less