Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Looking for Black women candidates? Here’s how to find them.

Jennfer Ruth-Green

Jennifer Ruth-Green is the Republican candidate for Indiana's 1st congressional district.

Ruth-Green campaign

Black women running for office have been breaking records this year, and Glynda Carr is trying to help them go beyond the candidacy stage to become officeholders at all levels of government.

Carr is president and CEO of Higher Heights for America, a national organization advocating for the collective political power of Black women, and the group’s #BlackWomenRun database is designed to support candidates for federal, state and local offices regardless of party.

“We are building a network of Black women and allies, donors and members to harness the power of Black women,” Carr said.


The database – which Carr describes as “comprehensive but not complete” – provides links to social media accounts and websites for Black women (regardless of party) seeking federal and state offices, as well as mayoral positions in the nation’s 100 largest cities. For candidates who do not have the resources to build their own campaign websites, the database can serve as a portal to other information.

“We look forward to continuing to grow it robustly in out years with more information,” said Carr, who explained that they hope to expand the database in the out years. And while Higher Heights and its partners do the bulk of the data collection, candidates are able to submit their own information, subject to verification.

Now in its second election cycle, the database only provides information for general elections, but Carr hopes to be able to expand to primaries in the future.

“We hope that it’s a resource for voters, media and people who want to support Black women,” she said.

Higher Heights database

More Black women are running for Congress and governor than ever before, according to Rutgers University’s Center for American Women and Politics.

  • In House campaigns, 105 Black women are the Democratic nominees (up from the previous record of 89, set in 2020) along with 29 Republicans (up one from 2020).
  • Among Senate nominees, 16 Democrats are Black women (up from nine in 2020) to go along with six Republicans (up two from 2020).
  • And in the gubernatorial races, 11 Democratic nominees are Black women (up from five in 2018), along with one Republican (there were two in 2014).

Black women fill just 5 percent of Congress, 3 percent of statewide offices and 5 percent of state legislatures – slightly below their overall share of the U.S. population (seven percent).

“Black women across the country ... are uniquely connected to the power of the voting booth but severely underrepresented,” Carr said.

But at a time when Black women in office are the subject of racism and sexism, the database could be used for nefarious means.

“At the end of the day Black women in this democracy have been negatively targeted,” Carr said. “Historically women and women of color are actively discouraged from running for office.

They are targeted by well funded mis- and disinformation, and they have had to start having security because of death threats.”

All that said, Higher Heights has not received any reports of the database being used for such purposes.

“A lot of work is based on amplifying Black women’s voices,” Carr said. “We also want to be the trusteed, reliable source for information and to combat mis- and disinformation.”

Read More

When Good Intentions Kill Cures: A Warning on AI Regulation

Kevin Frazier warns that one-size-fits-all AI laws risk stifling innovation. Learn the 7 “sins” policymakers must avoid to protect progress.

Getty Images, Aitor Diago

When Good Intentions Kill Cures: A Warning on AI Regulation

Imagine it is 2028. A start-up in St. Louis trains an AI model that can spot pancreatic cancer six months earlier than the best radiologists, buying patients precious time that medicine has never been able to give them. But the model never leaves the lab. Why? Because a well-intentioned, technology-neutral state statute drafted in 2025 forces every “automated decision system” to undergo a one-size-fits-all bias audit, to be repeated annually, and to be performed only by outside experts who—three years in—still do not exist in sufficient numbers. While regulators scramble, the company’s venture funding dries up, the founders decamp to Singapore, and thousands of Americans are deprived of an innovation that would have saved their lives.

That grim vignette is fictional—so far. But it is the predictable destination of the seven “deadly sins” that already haunt our AI policy debates. Reactive politicians are at risk of passing laws that fly in the face of what qualifies as good policy for emerging technologies.

Keep ReadingShow less
President Donald Trump standing next to a chart in the Oval Office.

U.S. President Donald Trump discusses economic data with Stephen Moore (L), Senior Visiting Fellow in Economics at The Heritage Foundation, in the Oval Office on August 07, 2025 in Washington, DC.

Getty Images, Win McNamee

Investor-in-Chief: Trump’s Business Deals, Loyalty Scorecards, and the Rise of Neo-Socialist Capitalism

For over 100 years, the Republican Party has stood for free-market capitalism and keeping the government’s heavy hand out of the economy. Government intervention in the economy, well, that’s what leaders did in the Soviet Union and communist China, not in the land of Uncle Sam.

And then Donald Trump seized the reins of the Republican Party. Trump has dispensed with numerous federal customs and rules, so it’s not too surprising that he is now turning his administration into the most business-interventionist government ever in American history. Contrary to Adam Smith’s “invisible hand” in the economy, suddenly, the signs of the White House’s “visible hand” are everywhere.

Keep ReadingShow less
Cuando El Idioma Se Convierte En Blanco, La Democracia Pierde Su Voz

Hands holding bars over "Se Habla Español" sign

AI generated

Cuando El Idioma Se Convierte En Blanco, La Democracia Pierde Su Voz

On Monday, the Supreme Court issued a 6–3 decision from its “shadow docket” that reversed a lower-court injunction and gave federal immigration agents in Los Angeles the green light to resume stops based on four deeply troubling criteria:

  • Apparent race or ethnicity
  • Speaking Spanish or accented English
  • Presence in a particular location
  • Type of work

The case, Noem v. Vasquez Perdomo, is still working its way through the courts. But the message from this emergency ruling is unmistakable: the constitutional protections that once shielded immigrant communities from racial profiling are now conditional—and increasingly fragile.

Keep ReadingShow less