Paul Norris, who helps lead Braver Angels' Red Caucus, convenes an all-red panel to discuss what liberals, academia, and the mainstream media miss about conservatives. Featuring Mark Reinecke, Elizabeth Doll, and Barbara Farmer.
Site Navigation
Search
Latest Stories
Start your day right!
Get latest updates and insights delivered to your inbox.
Top Stories
Latest news
Read More
Local News Outlets Begin Next Phase of Engagement Reporting
Mar 24, 2025
Following months of research, canvassing, and listening to community needs, journalists are poised to bring solutions-based stories to the Berwyn community in Chicagoland.
Local journalists Calvin Krippner and Santiago Posada-Jaramillo were enlisted to a fellowship last fall by News Ambassadorsin collaboration with Illinois Latino News, Cicero Independiente, and WBEZ. Through engagement reporting strategies, they sought to find out what the Berwyn community wanted to see covered in local news.
News Ambassadors enlists college-aged journalists to help local newsrooms fill gaps in coverage of underreported communities with rigorously reported stories that uplift solutions and common ground – and are responsive to the needs of local community members themselves.
SUGGESTION: Berwyn Collaborative: Understanding Community Needs
Following their community survey and a community listening event, Krippner and Posada-Jaramillo put together a shareable Information Ecosystem Assessment reportto share their findings, which can help inform reporting by newsroom partners and student reporting fellows in the News Ambassadors/Illinois Latino News cohort.
Berwyn is a Chicago suburb with a strong Latine population but little local news coverage. One of the reasons for this lack of coverage may be that other populations (particularly traditional Latine neighborhoods like Little Village or Pilsen) tend to take the coverage spotlight.
The community engagement findings in Berwyn revealed a desire for enhanced reporting on public safety, health, school, and taxes/government spending.
When Berwyn residents were asked to select their top three primary news interests in a local news survey, 66% included public safety, 33% included health, 30% included schools, and 40% included taxes and government spending.
Asked about their top three preferred methods of receiving news, 85% of respondents mentioned social media, 37% mentioned friends and family, and 35% mentioned television broadcasts.
Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter
Around 56.5% of respondents said they were either somewhat dissatisfied or dissatisfied with current local news coverage, while only about 19% said they were somewhat satisfied or satisfied. The remaining 24.5% said they were neutral.
“Quantitative and qualitative data is helping us better understand the needs of the Hispanic, Latino community in Berwyn and shaping the stories we produce – from pitching story ideas to stories being published,” said Hugo Balta, publisher of Illinois Latino News and executive editor of the Fulcrum.
Last November, Krippner and Posada-Jaramillo co-hosted a Berwyn community listening session with newsroom partners at Berwyn’s Liberty Cultural Center. The agenda? To give attendees a chance to speak with journalists and each other about the specific local concerns and stories they want to see covered in local news.
Attendees revealed a desire for more transparency from their local government and for journalists to shine a light on how public policy decisions are made. Their concerns will help to inform reporters’ Solutions Journalism stories this spring. While some concerns were raised, attendees also pointed out that grassroots efforts like the organizing of green spaces, community-based farming practices, and gardening/nutritional education were becoming more prominent and that those efforts deserved news coverage as well.
“Politics isn’t everything for the Berwyn community,” said one survey respondent. “Many are taking action to help their neighbors and to create the neighborhood they wish to have. This isn’t a ‘wait and see what happens’ community.”
This cohort of journalists will pursue engagement stories this spring through the lens of Solutions Journalism. Solutions Journalism often focuses on pointing out specific challenges or injustices within a particular community and covering ongoing efforts to address those challenges or injustices.
This past fall, Krippner and Posada-Jaramillo trained in Solutions Journalism strategies with News Ambassadors. In early 2025, they were joined by Mariana Bermudez, and Britton Struthers in order to enlist in Solutions Journalism strategies in the Berwyn community. The Chicago cohort is also working alongside a cohort in Prairie View, Texas who are engaging in their community with the same solutions-based reporting strategies.
The idea of Solutions Journalism is that how people respond to problems is newsworthy and deserves attention, too. “Too often, news coverage focuses on problems without mentioning how people can respond or be resilient in the face of those challenges,” said director of News Ambassadors, Shia Levitt. Solutions Journalism is rigorous, evidence-based reporting in response to social problems. “When done well, Solutions Journalism can bring local communities tools they can use to address wide-facing local problems.”
Stories from this cohort of journalists will be published later this spring in audio, video, or written form.
To read the Berwyn Information Ecosystem Assessment, click HERE.
Editor’s Notes: News Ambassadors is funded in part by the Bridge Alliance Education Fund (BAEF). BAEF also sponsors the Fulcrum. Hugo Balta is the executive editor of the Fulcrum and a board member of the Bridge Alliance Education Fund. He is the publisher of the Latino News Networkand a trainer with the Solutions Journalism Network. The articles produced by the Chicago cohort will selectively be published on Illinois Latino News, Latino News Network, and the Fulcrum.
Keep ReadingShow less
Recommended
Money & Politics
Project 2025: Trump strikes at the Federal Reserve and financial protection
16 March
A microphone.
Getty Images, Carmen Vlasceanu / 500px
Luke Combs, Taylor Swift & All American Artists—Where Are You?
Mar 24, 2025
On March 12, French artists, DJs, and musicians united to fight the threat of the far-right government in France that they felt was a threat to democracy in their country.
More than 1,200 artists, DJs, and promoters from the French music industry came together to galvanize “the world of the night” into political action and to protest the possibility of the first far-right French government since the Second World War.
As well as performing, many of the artists gave voice to why they felt compelled to perform.
Lucas Langlais—founder of record label Unfair Music and a member of the Front Électronique (FE)—stated, “Our culture has remained silent for too long. We can no longer stand idly by without acting to defend who we are and the people we love.”
“The electronic scene has always been a refuge for diversity, whether it be sexual orientation, ethnic origin, or individual beliefs. We believe that music and dance are powerful means to resist intolerance and celebrate freedom of expression.”
The artists came together to ask fellow citizens to combat the “dangerous wave of racism and homophobia in response to the rise of the far-right in France.”
So, where are American artists today in America?
Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter
Where is Luke Combs, who so eloquently performed “Love Can Build a Bridge” in 2023 at the Grammys?
Given the divided times we live in and the heated rhetoric in American politics, an inclusive and healing message is needed now more than ever. The lyrics that Luke Combs sang should be heeded by all Americans and all politicians today:
Love can build a bridge
Between your heart and mine
Love can build a bridge
Don't you think it's time?
Don't you think it's time?
I would whisper love so loudly
Every heart could understand
That love and only love
Can join the tribes of man
I would give my heart's desire
So that you might see
The first step is to realize
That it all begins with you and me
And where is Taylor Swift today? In the fall of 2024, she stepped into the fray, endorsing Kamala Harris for President, and announced she would be voting for Harris because she believes “we can accomplish so much more in this country if we are led by calm and not chaos.”
There is a long history in America of artists stepping forward when the principles of our nation are challenged, but where are the artists, songwriters, and performers in America today?
They are strangely silent.
If today’s stars come together like they did in France last week, they can build a movement for Democracy; A movement that is not Democrat or Republican but one that dismisses old definitions of right and left and instead focuses on values, and blossoms into an optimistic vision for the future of America. As “We Are the World” did in the 1980s, today's artists can inspire citizens to become active participants in healing and change.
Imagine the passion and positive impact that celebrities could inspire in this time of social media and internet-driven divisiveness. Imagine the power of music and celebrities coming together, demonstrating unity for democracy.
I urge artists from across the political spectrum—right, left, and center—and across all genres, representing the diversity of music and people in America, to raise their voices for democracy.
This is not about being a Democrat, Republican, or Independent. It is about using the power of music to speak to the principles of Democracy—a democracy that builds on the pluralistic values that define our nation.
Music, theater, poetry, and all forms of pop culture have amazing healing and connecting powers. We know that when we join people together, their energy for good can be amplified to help power change. Music, in particular, can play an important role in celebrating what unites us—rather than dividing us—and in activating millions of Americans in a movement.
Our pop culture stars can make a difference. And now is the time to do so.
David Nevins is co-publisher of The Fulcrum and co-founder and board chairman of the Bridge Alliance Education Fund.
Keep ReadingShow less
People reading in a religious setting.
Getty Images, Maskot
Finding Common Ground in America's Religious Realignment
Mar 24, 2025
In a moment defined by fracture and division, a surprising development has emerged in America's religious landscape. The decades-long decline of Christianity is leveling off. According to new research from the Pew Research Center, the share of Americans identifying as Christian has stabilized at around 62%—a dramatic shift from previous trends that saw consistent year-over-year drops in religious affiliation. This "pause" in religious decline offers a unique opportunity to examine whether faith communities might help heal our nation's deep sociopolitical wounds.
The timing of this latest phenomenon could not be more apropos. As America grapples with unprecedented polarization and the fraying of civic bonds, religious institutions—despite their internal struggles—may be uniquely positioned to foster dialogue, understanding, and responsiveness across divides.
Research shows that spirituality remains resilient even as traditional religious participation wanes. A striking 86% of Americans believe that people have souls beyond their physical bodies, while 79% believe in something spiritual beyond the natural world. The emergence of a shared spiritual foundation, transcending political and denominational boundaries, offers a common grounding for meaningful dialogue. More intriguingly, younger Americans, while less traditionally religious, maintain strong spiritual sensibilities. Among adults aged 18-24, 82% believe in the existence of the soul—nearly matching their grandparents' generation. This spiritual continuity amid institutional change hints at possibilities for intergenerational bridge-building that could help ease sociopolitical tensions.
Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter
Religious communities remain among the few spaces where Americans of different political persuasions interact regularly. While political segregation increasingly defines our neighborhoods, workplaces, and social circles, houses of worship continue to bring together people across ideological lines—particularly in racially diverse congregations, which have grown significantly in
recent years. However, leveraging these opportunities requires religious institutions to embrace shifts in their approach to civic engagement:
- Faith communities must move beyond the polarizing rhetoric that is often characterized by religious political engagement. The data shows that religious Americans span the political spectrum, particularly across racial and ethnic lines. Spiritual leaders who acknowledge and celebrate this diversity, rather than advance partisan agendas, can help model healthy political dialogue.
- Religious institutions should focus on their unique capacity to foster what sociologist Robert Putnam calls "bridging social capital"—connections that link different communities. While many churches have become ideologically homogeneous, those that intentionally create spaces for cross-cultural and cross-political relationship building can help rebuild civic trust.
- Faith communities must engage rising generations on their terms, recognizing that spiritual seeking often looks different today than in previous eras. Young adults' strong spiritual inclinations and skepticism of institutions suggest an opportunity to reimagine religious communities that resonate with contemporary sensibilities while preserving ancient wisdom about human flourishing and social harmony.
Additional strategies might include:
- Establishing interfaith and cross-ideological dialogue programs that bring together diverse congregations for relationship-building and standard action on shared concerns.
- Creating intergenerational initiatives that pair spiritually-minded emergent leaders with "seasoned" religious practitioners in ways that enable mutual learning and understanding.
- Cultivating new models of spiritual community that combine traditional practices with contemporary approaches to meaning-making and social engagement.
- Training religious leaders in the art of facilitating difficult conversations across political and cultural divides.
Stabilizing America's religious landscape is crucial for reimagining faith's role in democracy. Despite their imperfections, religious institutions remain repositories of social capital and ethical wisdom that our fractured society desperately needs.
By embracing their potential as guides or facilitators in navigating contemporary realities, they can help weave our tattered civic fabric together. Such work will require humility and creativity from spiritual guides and facilitators of faith. We must remain open to skepticism while exchanging in good faith among all parties. When many traditional sources of social cohesion have eroded, the persistent spiritual longings revealed in this research—and the institutional networks that have historically nurtured them—may offer essential resources for rebuilding American democracy.
No one faithful institution or individual is charged with reversing secularization or restoring religious dominance. Instead, at best, such institutions and their disciples ought to channel spiritual energy toward healing our divisions and respecting plurality. In this light, the pause in religious decline is an invitation to reimagine how faith can serve the common good in an increasingly diverse society.
Rev. Dr. F. Willis Johnson is a spiritual entrepreneur, author, and scholar-practitioner whose leadership and strategies around social and racial justice issues are nationally recognized and applied.
Keep ReadingShow less
President-elect Donald Trump, Elon Musk and Kid Rock watch a UFC event at Madison Square Garden on Nov. 16.
Chris Unger/Zuffa LLC
The Care and Feeding of a Superpower
Mar 23, 2025
The Department of Government Efficiency, DOGE, led by an unelected billionaire and supported by the Donald Trump administration, continues its bulldozer approach to our federal government. As we careen forward, an essential food for thought is an awareness of the global and historical perspectives that underscore how our current leaders' strategies align with a playbook for the final chapter of previous global powers.
When we think of global dominance, we often think of military strength and the size of a superpower’s budget. What we think less of is the importance of perception or the significance of the cultural aspects of power. The USAID spreads the impression of a peaceful and protective United States, dispersing resources and building a global community with the US at the helm. President Kennedy began the USAID in 1961 with an Executive order. Research shows that USAID has continuously had bipartisan support and a tremendous impact, makes up less than 1 percent of our budget, and is a major player within the United Nations Developmental Programme.
Military and financial power alone does not make a global power. To preserve a respectable image, we need soft power. We need to be viewed as morally good, akin to what public intellectual Slavoj Žižek calls global capitalism with a human face. The United States has leaned into this strategy. We are a military giant, and still, people worldwide view us as democratic and politically stable.
Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter
Sociologists have long shown the importance of this balancing act. When antagonistic forces are the foundation of a system, something must entice those with less power to cooperate or submit rather than revolt. Workers who receive benefits are less likely to strike. Those living in proximity to the toxic outputs of oil refineries are less likely to critique the company when it also invests in healthcare and education for the community.
The United States grew into its role as a world power politically and economically, and, like the British, Dutch, and Spanish empires before it, may be destined to lose this status eventually. In The Long Twentieth Century, the late scholar Giovanni Arrighi analyzed empires and how they transition. Their decline follows a pattern. One part of this order is that an empire’s ambitions exceed its tangible resources, and over-extension predates its decline. Trump’s colonial tendencies, for example, when he states he wants to take over Greenland, The Panama Canal, and Gaza, echo exactly the overextending vibe of world leaders pre-collapse.
We are the emperor who quickly drops clothing. It’s inefficient to waste food, medical trials, people, or allies. As a superpower, appearing secure, functional, and stable is valuable. The United States is seeking expansion, and at the same time, its leaders are dismantling its systems internally. And these things matter. We don’t live in a peaceful world, and global leaders vie for power. There are those who would appreciate the internally initiated demise of the United States.
To be sure, the waning of US global dominance is likely inevitable. The contradictions of Trump and Musk’s decisions to eliminate USAID inefficiently and dismantle the federal workforce while simultaneously making large power grabs, such as seeking additional territories and mineral rights, could speed up this descent.
There may be nothing that can make a superpower become self-reflective enough to be sustainable. It is unlikely that the Trump administration will reinstate robust foreign aid and federal workers nor invest in sustainability-oriented policies such as the Green New Deal. But we live in an era where we are increasingly aware of Adrienne Marie Brown’s emergent strategy. What if our leaders could turn towards more evolved skills and sustainable actions, such as prioritizing the care of people and our planet overfeeding a no-boundary endless treadmill of greed chasing? Perhaps the asymmetry inherent to empires is not meant to last, but perhaps humanity can. We need leaders who understand that global sustainability, and thus solidarity, are the best renewable resources.
The global political economy is not a high-stakes card game. It is the context and backbone of our only shared reality. And it’s time for its parameters to evolve from a dog-eat-dog mentality to a regenerative one. We need leaders who value non-alternative facts and our future, who believe in diversity, equity, and inclusion, and who trust our scientists. We need a government that can imagine and work towards a better world where education is broadly funded, federal employees keep their jobs, we appropriately tax our wealth hoarders, and at our core, we strategize for liberation for all rather than domination for some.
Our world's systems may not be a card game, but it would behoove our leaders to understand not only the art, but also the science and history of their dealings and the systemic risks of bad faith plays.
Megan Thiele Strong is a Sociology professor at San José State University, a Public Voices Fellow at The OpEd Project, and a member of the Scholars Strategy Network.
Keep ReadingShow less
Load More