Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

For Democrats to Win Again, They Must Learn to Lead from the Middle

Opinion

For Democrats to Win Again, They Must Learn to Lead from the Middle

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) speaks during a stop on the ‘Fighting Oligarchy’ tour at Grand Park on April 12, 2025, in Los Angeles, California.

Photo by Mario Tama/Getty Images

Lyndon B. Johnson said about advocating for civil rights reform as a Texas Representative, “I couldn’t get too far ahead of my voters.” Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez is an ambitious, forward-thinking individual. However, she should heed this advice. In 2024, Democrats lost every swing state and the popular vote. AOC, as a potential 2028 presidential candidate, needs to moderate her policies to gain a broader appeal and have any chance at wielding the power of the President.

In key states, 9-in-10 voters believe the rising debt is a critical campaign issue, and 3-in-4 voters say they want candidates to discuss the debt and their plans to address it—Michael Peters, CEO of the Peterson Foundation, found that voters’ “key economic priorities” include inflation, and securing programs like Medicare and Social Security. In a post-election poll, one-third of swing-state Trump voters cited the economy as the primary reason they voted for him, and 86 percent of Trump voters expected his presidency to improve their finances. The Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget found that Harris’s plan would increase the debt by $3.5 trillion over the next decade. Furthermore, when Democrats controlled both Houses of Congress, the deficit increased from pre-pandemic levels of $779 billion in 2018 to $1.7 trillion in 2023. Democrats need to combat the narrative that they are the party of waste and overspending, and AOC needs to present a plan for dealing with the deficit.


A Cato Poll found that most voters in Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, and Michigan think the US is “too involved” in foreign conflicts and would not vote for candidates who do not align with their opinions on foreign policy. This favors her because she is a non-interventionist and has consistently opposed the “Monroe Doctrine,” however, she has voted for significant aid packages to support Ukraine against the Russian invasion. Furthermore, according to the Washington Post-Schar School Poll, 6-in-10 swing state voters supported mass deportation. She should adopt moderate policies on immigration and avoid demonizing Trump supporters—she needs Trump voters and undecideds to win. For example, AOC has endorsed Minnesota Governor Tim Walz as a “uniter.” However, during a commencement speech at the University of Minnesota Law School, he said ICE was “Donald Trump’s modern-day Gestapo,” and AOC has actively led the “Abolish ICE” movement. These are not winning policies or rhetoric to gain support from swing states or moderate Democrats.

According to the Youth Battleground State Poll, 40 percent of 18-34-year-old voters said they would only support candidates that address climate change. This contributes to her appeal because she has supported and sponsored legislation addressing climate change. For example, Rep. AOC sponsored the Green New Deal for Public Housing Act, which funds public housing and transitions to zero-carbon homes. Furthermore, the majority of voters in Battleground States oppose defunding the Department of Education and repealing the Affordable Care Act. Trump supported the “Responsible Path to Full Obamacare Repeal Act,” which would repeal the ACA, and directed the Education Secretary to facilitate the closure of the Department of Education.

According to Pew research, a majority of Americans “always or often feel angry when thinking about politics,” 84 percent believe that political debate has become less respectful, and 57 percent say that partisan disagreements receive too much attention. This is a problem for AOC. She has, more than other representatives, launched attacks against the Republicans and Trump. AOC proclaimed that “there are legitimate white supremacist sympathizers that sit at heart and at the core of the Republican caucus” and the “right-wing… prey on racism, bigotry, anti-trans panic, and fear.” She has also aligned herself with Congresswomen like Ilhan Omar—Representative Omar has compared the US’ actions in Israel to the actions of terrorist organizations like Hamas or the Taliban and has repeated anti-Semitic tropes like questioning Jews’ loyalty to America. AOC and Representative Omar are also members of “the Squad,” a group of progressive democrats who supported the “defund the police” movement. She needs to tone down her extreme partisanship, stop resorting to demagoguery, and disassociate from far-left Representatives. Accusing Republicans and Trump of being racists and white supremacists alienates Trump voters, undecided voters, and even moderate Democrats.

Democrats have received less support from African Americans in recent years. Economic concerns, such as wealth inequality and job opportunities, as well as the issue of police reform, could contribute to this. African Americans are still disproportionately represented in the lower-income brackets and affected by police violence and higher rates of incarceration. AOC cannot take the black vote for granted and needs to address these issues and evaluate why Democratic support has dwindled among Black voters.

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez has won four elections in the 14th District of New York—gaining 64 percent of the vote in her campaign against Republican Anthony Pappas. However, 70 percent of voters in the 14th District are Democrat-affiliated. In a national election, she must appeal to a more diverse electorate—moderate democrats, the far left, and undecideds. AOC should focus on the economy and climate change, rely less on extreme partisan appeals, advocate for a non-interventionist foreign policy, adopt more moderate views on immigration, and attack the Republican agenda (like efforts to repeal the Affordable Care Act).

Luke Harris is an op-ed author who writes about the US, UK, and international politics, policy, and culture. He has been published in outlets like the North American Anglican and the Conservative Woman.


Read More

Reclaiming Patriotism: Between Nationalism and Pessimism

People gather over a giant Declaration of Independence

Photo by Mario Tama/Getty Images.

Reclaiming Patriotism: Between Nationalism and Pessimism

As America approaches the 250th anniversary of its independence, I am more in the mood to protest than to celebrate. Does that make me unpatriotic? The answer depends on how we understand “patriotism.” For a nation that is founded in revolution, let’s affirm a deeper and more profound love of country, a civic patriotism celebrative of our larger ideals including pluralism, dissent, and a commitment to social change.

Two Types of Patriotism

Keep ReadingShow less
A New Path to Depolarization: Media That Brings Us Together
Political polarization
Polarization and the politics of love

A New Path to Depolarization: Media That Brings Us Together

As we face ever-growing partisan polarization in American society, the need for large-scale action becomes increasingly urgent. As James Coan and I have written about in the Fulcrum during my time at More Like US, there are approaches grounded in a significant body of social psychological research that can help address this rapidly growing problem, namely different variations of social contact theory, especially vicarious contact. Until recently, much of the research and thus much of the basis for our articles has been focused on applying social contact theory to other problems facing society: prejudice against members of the LGBTQ community, individuals with autism, and immigrant schoolchildren, among other examples.

It was therefore exciting when last fall I saw the publication of an article in Political Science Research and Methods titled "Content That's as Good as Contact?: Vicarious Intergroup Contact and the Promise of Depolarization at Scale." The study, conducted in 2022 in conjunction with YouGov, finally attempted to measure the effectiveness of indirect contact as a path to depolarization, primarily through the vicarious experience of productive political conversation. Encompassing over 2,000 participants gathered from a nationally representative sample recruited by YouGov’s online panel, the study looked to test affective polarization, measured attitudinally, and interest and investment in depolarization, measured behaviorally. To this end, the study tested multiple media interventions, namely a 50-minute Braver Angels documentary featuring a “Red-Blue” depolarization workshop; a 50-minute placebo nature documentary about wildebeest migration; a 5-minute version of the Braver Angels documentary; a second 5-minute version that emphasized partisan misperception correction; and a pure control group, with no treatment.

Keep ReadingShow less
How Red and Blue America Can Stay Together by Pulling Apart

United States Marine Corps Lockheed Martin F-35B Lightning II STOVL stealth multirole fighters belonging to the VMFA-121 "Green Knights" taxiing at the MCAS Iwakuni in Yamaguchi, Japan, on March 23, 2017.

(viper-zero / Getty Images)

How Red and Blue America Can Stay Together by Pulling Apart

In earlier essays, I argued that America’s political division has grown so deep that a peaceful “American Union” of two sovereign nations — one broadly red, one broadly blue — is worth considering. I also argued that relocation fears are overstated, that cooperation could increase economic prosperity, and that separation could help heal the lingering wounds of the Civil War.

But how would this all actually work? What happens to the national debt? Who gets the military bases, federal lands, and nuclear weapons? Will Social Security be protected? Could two nations share the dollar, defend themselves together, and resolve their disagreements?

Keep ReadingShow less
Rear view of teenage boy walking with arm around friends

Why many young men feel politically and socially adrift, how changing gender roles affect masculinity, self-esteem, relationships, and the future of society.

Maskot / Getty Images

Lost Boys - What Is the Role of a Man in Today's Society?

A recent New York Times article stated that young males who provided an important swing vote for Trump in 2024 are discouraged by what Trump has done and not done while in office. But they are nevertheless not particularly inclined to vote Democratic because they don't see the Party as welcoming their view of masculinity and they don't know where they fit in this society.

These young men assume that because the Party supports equality for women in the workplace and because many young women no longer have marriage and having children at the top of their agenda, the Party would not be a welcoming home for them. They see themselves as striving for the masculinity of their fathers' or grandfathers' day, where the man was the breadwinner in the family and had respect and authority. Not the weaker half in relationships with women.

Keep ReadingShow less