Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

For Democrats to Win Again, They Must Learn to Lead from the Middle

Opinion

For Democrats to Win Again, They Must Learn to Lead from the Middle

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) speaks during a stop on the ‘Fighting Oligarchy’ tour at Grand Park on April 12, 2025, in Los Angeles, California.

Photo by Mario Tama/Getty Images

Lyndon B. Johnson said about advocating for civil rights reform as a Texas Representative, “I couldn’t get too far ahead of my voters.” Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez is an ambitious, forward-thinking individual. However, she should heed this advice. In 2024, Democrats lost every swing state and the popular vote. AOC, as a potential 2028 presidential candidate, needs to moderate her policies to gain a broader appeal and have any chance at wielding the power of the President.

In key states, 9-in-10 voters believe the rising debt is a critical campaign issue, and 3-in-4 voters say they want candidates to discuss the debt and their plans to address it—Michael Peters, CEO of the Peterson Foundation, found that voters’ “key economic priorities” include inflation, and securing programs like Medicare and Social Security. In a post-election poll, one-third of swing-state Trump voters cited the economy as the primary reason they voted for him, and 86 percent of Trump voters expected his presidency to improve their finances. The Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget found that Harris’s plan would increase the debt by $3.5 trillion over the next decade. Furthermore, when Democrats controlled both Houses of Congress, the deficit increased from pre-pandemic levels of $779 billion in 2018 to $1.7 trillion in 2023. Democrats need to combat the narrative that they are the party of waste and overspending, and AOC needs to present a plan for dealing with the deficit.


A Cato Poll found that most voters in Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, and Michigan think the US is “too involved” in foreign conflicts and would not vote for candidates who do not align with their opinions on foreign policy. This favors her because she is a non-interventionist and has consistently opposed the “Monroe Doctrine,” however, she has voted for significant aid packages to support Ukraine against the Russian invasion. Furthermore, according to the Washington Post-Schar School Poll, 6-in-10 swing state voters supported mass deportation. She should adopt moderate policies on immigration and avoid demonizing Trump supporters—she needs Trump voters and undecideds to win. For example, AOC has endorsed Minnesota Governor Tim Walz as a “uniter.” However, during a commencement speech at the University of Minnesota Law School, he said ICE was “Donald Trump’s modern-day Gestapo,” and AOC has actively led the “Abolish ICE” movement. These are not winning policies or rhetoric to gain support from swing states or moderate Democrats.

According to the Youth Battleground State Poll, 40 percent of 18-34-year-old voters said they would only support candidates that address climate change. This contributes to her appeal because she has supported and sponsored legislation addressing climate change. For example, Rep. AOC sponsored the Green New Deal for Public Housing Act, which funds public housing and transitions to zero-carbon homes. Furthermore, the majority of voters in Battleground States oppose defunding the Department of Education and repealing the Affordable Care Act. Trump supported the “Responsible Path to Full Obamacare Repeal Act,” which would repeal the ACA, and directed the Education Secretary to facilitate the closure of the Department of Education.

According to Pew research, a majority of Americans “always or often feel angry when thinking about politics,” 84 percent believe that political debate has become less respectful, and 57 percent say that partisan disagreements receive too much attention. This is a problem for AOC. She has, more than other representatives, launched attacks against the Republicans and Trump. AOC proclaimed that “there are legitimate white supremacist sympathizers that sit at heart and at the core of the Republican caucus” and the “right-wing… prey on racism, bigotry, anti-trans panic, and fear.” She has also aligned herself with Congresswomen like Ilhan Omar—Representative Omar has compared the US’ actions in Israel to the actions of terrorist organizations like Hamas or the Taliban and has repeated anti-Semitic tropes like questioning Jews’ loyalty to America. AOC and Representative Omar are also members of “the Squad,” a group of progressive democrats who supported the “defund the police” movement. She needs to tone down her extreme partisanship, stop resorting to demagoguery, and disassociate from far-left Representatives. Accusing Republicans and Trump of being racists and white supremacists alienates Trump voters, undecided voters, and even moderate Democrats.

Democrats have received less support from African Americans in recent years. Economic concerns, such as wealth inequality and job opportunities, as well as the issue of police reform, could contribute to this. African Americans are still disproportionately represented in the lower-income brackets and affected by police violence and higher rates of incarceration. AOC cannot take the black vote for granted and needs to address these issues and evaluate why Democratic support has dwindled among Black voters.

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez has won four elections in the 14th District of New York—gaining 64 percent of the vote in her campaign against Republican Anthony Pappas. However, 70 percent of voters in the 14th District are Democrat-affiliated. In a national election, she must appeal to a more diverse electorate—moderate democrats, the far left, and undecideds. AOC should focus on the economy and climate change, rely less on extreme partisan appeals, advocate for a non-interventionist foreign policy, adopt more moderate views on immigration, and attack the Republican agenda (like efforts to repeal the Affordable Care Act).

Luke Harris is an op-ed author who writes about the US, UK, and international politics, policy, and culture. He has been published in outlets like the North American Anglican and the Conservative Woman.


Read More

Building a Stronger “We”: How to Talk About Immigrant Youth

Person standing next to a "We Are The Future" sign

Photo provided

Building a Stronger “We”: How to Talk About Immigrant Youth

The speed and severity with which the Trump administration has enacted anti-immigrant policies have surpassed many of our expectations. It’s created upheaval not just among immigrant communities but across our society. This upheaval is not incidental; it is part of a deliberate and consistent strategy to activate anti-immigrant sentiment and deeply entrenched, xenophobic Us vs. Them mindsets. With everything from rhetoric to policy decisions, the Trump administration has employed messaging aimed at marking immigrants as “dangerously other,” fueling division, harmful policies, and the deployment of ICE in our communities.

For those working to support immigrant adolescents and youth, the challenges are compounded by another pervasive mindset: the tendency to view adolescents as inherently “other.” FrameWorks Institute’s past research has shown that Americans often perceive adolescents as wild, out of control, or fundamentally different from adults. This lens of otherness, when combined with anti-immigrant sentiment, creates a double burden for immigrant youth, painting them as doubly removed from societal norms and belonging.

Keep ReadingShow less
Our Doomsday Machine

Two sides stand rigidly opposed, divided by a chasm of hardened positions and non-relationship.

AI generated illustration

Our Doomsday Machine

Political polarization is only one symptom of the national disease that afflicts us. From obesity to heart disease to chronic stress, we live with the consequences of the failure to relate to each other authentically, even to perceive and understand what an authentic encounter might be. Can we see the organic causes of the physiological ailments as arising from a single organ system – the organ of relationship?

Without actual evidence of a relationship between the physiological ailments and the failure of personal encounter, this writer (myself in 2012) is lunging, like a fencer with his sword, to puncture a delusion. He wants to interrupt a conversation running in the background like an almost-silent electric motor, asking us to notice the hum, to question it. He wants to open to our inspection the matter of what it is to credit evidence. For believing—especially with the coming of artificial intelligence, which can manufacture apparently flawless pictures of the real, and with the seething of the mob crying havoc online and then out in the streets—even believing in evidence may not ground us in truth.

Keep ReadingShow less
When a Lifelong Friendship Ends in the MAGA Era

Pro-Trump merchandise, January 19, 2025

(Photo by Andrew Lichtenstein/Corbis via Getty Images)

When a Lifelong Friendship Ends in the MAGA Era

Losing a long-standing relationship because of political polarization—especially around Donald Trump—has become a common and painful experience in 2025.

Here is my story. We met in kindergarten in Paterson, New Jersey—two sons of Latin American immigrants navigating the same cracked sidewalks, the same crowded hallways, the same dreams our parents carried north. For decades, our friendship was an anchor, a reminder of where we came from and who we were becoming. We shared the same values, the same struggles, the same hopes for the future. I still remember him saying, “You know you’re my best friend,” as we rode bikes through our neighborhood on a lazy summer afternoon in the 1970s, as if I needed the reassurance. I didn’t. In that moment, I believed we’d be lifelong friends.

Keep ReadingShow less
Americans wrapped in a flag

Defining what it means to be an American leveraging the Declaration of Independence and the Pledge of Allegiance to focus on core principles: equality, liberty, and justice.

SeventyFour

What It Means to Be an American and Fly the Flag

There is deep disagreement among Americans today on what it means to be an American. The two sides are so polarized that each sees the other as a threat to our democracy's continued existence. There is even occasional talk about the possibility of civil war.

With the passions this disagreement has fostered, how do we have a reasoned discussion of what it means to be an American, which is essential to returning this country to a time when we felt we were all Americans, regardless of our differences on specific policies and programs? Where do we find the space to have that discussion?

Keep ReadingShow less