Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

How to reunite America around a roadmap for the future

blue and red paper cutout figures coming together
wildpixel/Getty Images

Erdman is founder and president of the Center for Collaborative Democracy, which is organizing the Grand Bargain Project.

Orekondy is an attorney and community organizer, and is Partnerships Director at the Grand Bargain Project.

American democracy is facing an onslaught of fear and anger — driven by elections that candidates can win just by demonizing opponents, and social media that earn billions by stoking our primal emotions. Those emotions are so raw that frequent calls for civility have failed to work.

Indeed, after the upcoming election, voters on the losing side are likely to lash out more fiercely than ever in our lifetimes. And in January, the two parties are nearly certain to clash incessantly over a path forward, further fueling Americans’ angst, perhaps to the breaking point.


What would it take to replace fear and anger with solid grounds for hope? To that end, the Grand Bargain Project has identified six goals that 90+ percent of Americans see as critical to their future:

  • Boosting economic mobility and growth.
  • Reforming education so students can reach their potential.
  • Making health care more effective and less costly.
  • Curbing the national debt.
  • Powering the economy with clean energy.
  • Making the tax code fairer and simpler.

Are these goals within reach? As things stand, nearly every law is enacted to satisfy some voters, interest groups and politicians — at one point in time. Current policies thereby contradict one another, severely limiting their effectiveness.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

So, if common-sense reforms in all six areas were combined, might that produce massive benefits to society?

To find out, we distilled ideas from top former federal officials, think tank leaders, diverse citizens and stakeholders in the six areas. The result: a combination of reforms that struck us as having the potential to improve nearly every American’s prospects.

While each person who has seen the result has found parts they disliked, nearly all have preferred the total package over the country’s current direction, including:

  • 97 percent of attendees at our Braver Angels workshop in June.
  • 91 percent of stakeholders in the above areas whom we have interviewed to date.
  • 92 percent of attendees at a Young Presidents Organization meeting in August.
  • 85-plus percent of high-profile deficit hawks, climate activists, liberals and libertarians interviewed.

Given these levels of approval, we see the potential to build a nationwide movement large enough for most political leaders to pay attention. To that end, the project is moving forward along four tracks:

1)Bridge Alliance, leaders of various Rotary Clubs and other grassroots organizations are working with us to incorporate the Grand Bargain into their ongoing programs.

2) Braver Angels will soon start hosting workshops to deliberate over the six issues. We too, in cooperation with Living Room Conversations, will begin holding community deliberations — both in person and online — over the content of the Grand Bargain, and incorporate the results into the next iteration.

3) On a parallel track, we have interviewed 23 major stakeholders in the six areas and are scheduling interviews with another 30. We will incorporate their feedback into the next iteration, which we expect to release in early December. We will then ask the stakeholders to publicly endorse the plan.

4) To mobilize the 100+ million “exhausted majority” of Americans who hunger for a better future, but disagree about how to get there — and therefore lack power to affect change, we will broadcast digital-social messages such as:

If just a fraction of us put aside our differences and unite into a movement supporting the Grand Bargain, we could at last exert influence proportional to our numbers.

To further empower the exhausted majority, we are seeking their input on the content of the Grand Bargain, inviting the public to endorse the evolving plan and asking them to enlist their personal networks.

Once we have built broad support from the public and stakeholders,our advisors who have strong connections to the president-elect and new congressional leaders will ask them to consider the following:
Almost half the country sees each of you as a threat to their future. And each party is certain to block the other’s agenda. If you want to win wide public support — and actually lead this country — your best alternative, we believe, is to adopt the Grand Bargain as your governing agenda. It would, after all, advance the goals that over 90 percent of Americans see as necessary for them to thrive.

Our project is clearly ambitious. But we know of no other credible way to unite Americans across the spectrum around a practical plan to boost economic mobility, curb the debt, accelerate the transition to clean energy, or attain the other key objectives.

We urge you to join us in helping shape this new governing agenda.

Read More

Americans wrapped in a flag
Citizens are united and legislators don’t represent us
SeventyFour

Defining the Democracy Reform Movement: Rev. F. Willis Johnson

The Fulcrum presents The Path Forward: Defining the Democracy Reform Movement. Scott Warren's weekly interviews engage diverse thought leaders to elevate the conversation about building a thriving and healthy democratic republic that fulfills its potential as a national social and political game-changer. This series is the start of focused collaborations and dialogue led by The Bridge Alliance and The Fulcrum teams to help the movement find a path forward.

The second interview of this series took place with Reverend F. Willis Johnson, an entrepreneur and an elder in the West Ohio Conference of the United Methodist Church in Columbus, Ohio. Reverend Johnson provided a religious and spiritual perspective on the needs of this moment, which is different from many organizations that often receive outsized attention.

Keep ReadingShow less
Democrats are from Mars, Republicans are from Venus

A simulation of two planets in space.

Getty Images, Jose A. Bernat Bacete

Democrats are from Mars, Republicans are from Venus

As I think about Tuesday’s address by President Donald Trump and the response of Senator Elissa Slotkin from Michigan—a former CIA analyst and a rising star in the Democratic Party—I am reminded of the book “Men Are from Mars, Women Are from Venus” by John Gray published in 1992.

A sequel should be written today: “Democrats Are from Mars, Republicans Are from Venus”…..or vice versa since the planet they each are from doesn’t matter.

Keep ReadingShow less
Defining the Democracy Reform Movement: Julia Roig

USA flag on pole during daytime

Photo by Zetong Li on Unsplash

Defining the Democracy Reform Movement: Julia Roig

The Fulcrum presents The Path Forward: Defining the Democracy Reform Movement. Scott Warren's weekly interviews engage diverse thought leaders to elevate the conversation about building a thriving and healthy democratic republic that fulfills its potential as a national social and political game-changer. This series is the start of focused collaborations and dialogue led by The Bridge Alliance and The Fulcrum teams to help the movement find a path forward.

I’m excited to start this series by highlighting an interview with Julia Roig, the Chief Network Weaver for the Horizons Project. Julia brings extensive experience working for democratic change around the world, and her work at the Horizons Project focuses on supporting and building the broader pro-democracy ecosystem.

Keep ReadingShow less
One party worked harder to build a bigger tent in 2024
Getty Images, tadamichi

One party worked harder to build a bigger tent in 2024

Democrats keep pointing fingers for reasons they lost last November. Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s new role leading the Department of Health and Human Services underscores an important factor deserving more attention: Democrats spent millions trying to bully Kennedy, Jill Stein, and other insurgents off the ballot rather than respect their supporters. They treated it as a strategic masterstroke, but their anti-democratic bet was a miscalculation.

In a change election resulting in the closest popular vote since 2000, hypocrisy was a fatal sin. Democrats would have benefited from embracing competition and building a bigger tent of their own, not fighting against voter choice. It was not enough to stand up for the rule of law and protection of voting rights. To build a majority in today’s America, one must embrace voter choice.

Keep ReadingShow less