Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Report cites a dozen narrow issues where partisan gridlock could be broken

bridging the partisan divide
ZargonDesign/Getty Images

After an especially contentious election and with the coronavirus pandemic raging, American politics may feel as polarized as ever. A new study makes the case that there's still plenty of hope for bridging the partisan chasm on a dozen top-tier domestic issues.

Making government more transparent and trimming big money's sway over elections are the two good-government reforms on the list.

The 48-page report, released Thursday by three left-leaning advocacy groups focused on environmental policy, aggregates an array of research and polling by others before unveiling "a transpartisan agenda to rebuild trust and tackle America's biggest challenges."


By confining their debates to these areas, the groups say, the incoming Biden administration and the new Congress — which will either remain divided or be controlled by only the narrowest of Democratic majorities — can steer the country over the political divide and toward a healing process after years of political warfare.

"This moment of heightened polarization also contains the seeds of renewal," says the report, by U.S. PIRG, Environment America and Frontier Group. "The good news is that there are a surprising number of public policies on which Republicans, Democrats and independents share common ground."

They see such consensus behind the notion that boosting transparency and accountability are imperative to restoring trust in government, and that for starters deals are within reach to bolster the ethics of federal officials and improve citizen access to information about government spending decisions.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

Voters of both parties are comparably "sick and tired of expensive elections bankrolled by wealthy special interests," the report says, asserting it's possible to crack the partisan stalemate over campaign finance with proposals such as tax credits or matching grants for small political contributions.

Two areas are right in the wheelhouse of the groups who produced the report. The growing influence of younger voters is at least "opening the door to forge bipartisan agreement on specific policies around the edges of the climate debate." And tax credits for wind and solar power remain broadly popular, so there should be bipartisan support for their renewal — if only to spur the economy as the pandemic abates.

Other areas for compromise it sees include the establishment of a national lending institution for infrastructure projects, an expansion of national service programs, bolstering public access to broadband internet and revitalizing career and technical education.

Maybe most optimistically of all, the groups see hope for measures "to keep guns out of the hands of potentially dangerous people."

While there is not necessarily broad bipartisan support for more ambitious proposals on all these areas, the report says "it is precisely by working together to implement change in narrow areas of agreement that our government can begin to get its transpartisan 'muscles' working again."

Previous bipartisan cooperation has led to important policy decisions, including civil rights legislation in the 1960s, environmental laws in the 1970s, tax code simplification in the 1980s, the Americans with Disabilities Act in the 1990s and the campaign finance reform of the 2000s, the report notes.

"Research shows that increasing one's contact with members of another group is a consistently effective way to reduce prejudice and misunderstanding," the report says. "By partnering on a shared agenda, Americans of good faith may come to recognize that politics does not have to be a theater of total war, but can be a venture for actually getting things done that are in the public interest."

And the issues outlined in this report are just the tip of the iceberg. There are many other areas, where elected officials can collaborate to identify potential solutions.

"By daring to venture across the political divide and find compromise on areas of public concern, leaders can get important work done for the American people, and that work itself will forge a pathway out of the nation's dangerous, counterproductive and toxic polarization," said Faye Park, president of U.S. PIRG.

Read More

Podcast: How do police feel about gun control?

Podcast: How do police feel about gun control?

Jesus "Eddie" Campa, former Chief Deputy of the El Paso County Sheriff's Department and former Chief of Police for Marshall Texas, discusses the recent school shooting in Uvalde and how loose restrictions on gun ownership complicate the lives of law enforcement on this episode of YDHTY.

Listen now

Podcast: Why conspiracy theories thrive in both democracies and autocracies

Podcast: Why conspiracy theories thrive in both democracies and autocracies

There's something natural and organic about perceiving that the people in power are out to advance their own interests. It's in part because it’s often true. Governments actually do keep secrets from the public. Politicians engage in scandals. There often is corruption at high levels. So, we don't want citizens in a democracy to be too trusting of their politicians. It's healthy to be skeptical of the state and its real abuses and tendencies towards secrecy. The danger is when this distrust gets redirected, not toward the state, but targets innocent people who are not actually responsible for people's problems.

On this episode of "Democracy Paradox" Scott Radnitz explains why conspiracy theories thrive in both democracies and autocracies.

Your Take:  The Price of Freedom

Your Take: The Price of Freedom

Our question about the price of freedom received a light response. We asked:

What price have you, your friends or your family paid for the freedom we enjoy? And what price would you willingly pay?

It was a question born out of the horror of images from Ukraine. We hope that the news about the Jan. 6 commission and Ketanji Brown Jackson’s Supreme Court nomination was so riveting that this question was overlooked. We considered another possibility that the images were so traumatic, that our readers didn’t want to consider the question for themselves. We saw the price Ukrainians paid.

One response came from a veteran who noted that being willing to pay the ultimate price for one’s country and surviving was a gift that was repaid over and over throughout his life. “I know exactly what it is like to accept that you are a dead man,” he said. What most closely mirrored my own experience was a respondent who noted her lack of payment in blood, sweat or tears, yet chose to volunteer in helping others exercise their freedom.

Personally, my price includes service to our nation, too. The price I paid was the loss of my former life, which included a husband, a home and a seemingly secure job to enter the political fray with a message of partisan healing and hope for the future. This work isn’t risking my life, but it’s the price I’ve paid.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

Given the earnest question we asked, and the meager responses, I am also left wondering if we think at all about the price of freedom? Or have we all become so entitled to our freedom that we fail to defend freedom for others? Or was the question poorly timed?

I read another respondent’s words as an indicator of his pacifism. And another veteran who simply stated his years of service. And that was it. Four responses to a question that lives in my heart every day. We look forward to hearing Your Take on other topics. Feel free to share questions to which you’d like to respond.

Keep ReadingShow less
No, autocracies don't make economies great

libre de droit/Getty Images

No, autocracies don't make economies great

Tom G. Palmer has been involved in the advance of democratic free-market policies and reforms around the globe for more than three decades. He is executive vice president for international programs at Atlas Network and a senior fellow at the Cato Institute.

One argument frequently advanced for abandoning the messy business of democratic deliberation is that all those checks and balances, hearings and debates, judicial review and individual rights get in the way of development. What’s needed is action, not more empty debate or selfish individualism!

In the words of European autocrat Viktor Orbán, “No policy-specific debates are needed now, the alternatives in front of us are obvious…[W]e need to understand that for rebuilding the economy it is not theories that are needed but rather thirty robust lads who start working to implement what we all know needs to be done.” See! Just thirty robust lads and one far-sighted overseer and you’re on the way to a great economy!

Keep ReadingShow less