Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

America needs to open new frontiers

Man atop a mountain

"The American spirit has long been shaped by our collective willingness to explore, to dare, to push boundaries and, perhaps most importantly, to sacrifice in pursuit of that better, bolder, different future," writes Frazier

Vernon Wiley/Getty Images

Frazier is an assistant professor at the Crump College of Law at St. Thomas University. Starting this summer, he will serve as a Tarbell fellow.

"American democracy was born of no theorist's dream; it was not carried in the Susan Constant to Virginia, nor in the Mayflower to Plymouth. It came out of the American forest, and it gained new strength each time it touched a new frontier.” That’s the core idea behind the “Frontier Thesis” set forth by historian Frederick Jackson Turner way back in 1893. It’s an idea worth returning to 131 years later — a time when most would agree that our democracy could use a little extra strength.


Turner’s thesis turned on the idea that a frontier available to anyone and everyone with enough gumption had a number of benefits to our political culture. For one thing, he thought it fostered egalitarianism, fueled opposition to elitism and promoted a spirit of self-sufficiency and desire for self-governance. It’s true that the frontier Turner envisioned in 1893 was not as open nor inclusive as he may have imagined. One person’s frontier often turned out to be another person’s home. Still the “Frontier Thesis” is worth exploring given its intuitive appeal and the stagnancy that has come to define our economy, politics and communities.

First, the economic frontier has long been closed to Americans searching for financial floaties. It’s hard to set out for the frontier if you’re not able to put food on the table. Consider that between 1979 and 2019, productivity jumped by nearly 60 percent while compensation ticked up just 14 percent. In other words, a frontier of economic possibilities was opened by new technology and new processes — yet most Americans were left sitting by the window looking at the horizon.

Second, the political frontier has been claimed by a handful of officials who seem unwilling to step aside for the next generation of trailblazers. The average House member serves about five terms, or 10 years. How’s that for a frontier? Want to make a difference? Wait a decade then give it a go! Things are even worse on the Senate side, where the average member is in their seat for more than a decade. Worse yet, scholars have announced that we have a “frozen Constitution” given that it is seemingly impervious to amendment.

Third, the physical frontier has been blocked off for a variety of reasons. As of 2015, the average American lived just 18 miles from their mom. “Go West, young man” has become “Go to the next exit, son.” That’s not a frontier. That’s just sad. No offense, moms.

The American spirit has long been shaped by our collective willingness to explore, to dare, to push boundaries and, perhaps most importantly, to sacrifice in pursuit of that better, bolder, different future. Given that we’ve become economically trapped, politically powerless and physically stagnant it’s no surprise that spirit has been extinguished. Depressing? You bet. Irreversible? Heck no.

There’s no reason why we cannot dream up a new frontier. I’m not talking about space — Elon can have it. I’m talking about exploring within our own massive country. The average American has been to just 17 states -- that’s a small fraction of a gloriously diverse country. One way to upend that sorry stat is to create a national service program that deploys Americans — young and old alike — to wherever there’s a community in need. Boom — frontier created, horizon expanded, stagnation ended. Of course, it’s not that simple. Creating a national service program is no small feat … but that’s exactly the point!

A universal, mandatory and meaningful national service program would give us all an opportunity to visit new places, develop new skills and, most importantly, imagine a better individual and collective future. This program would include service in the armed forces as well as civilian forms of service and it would be ongoing, perhaps requiring some annual stint of service. Turner would be proud. Our democracy is made stronger when we all have a shared opportunity to better ourselves and our community.

How best to open our economic, political and physical frontiers is not an easy question, but it’s one that merits deliberation and debate. For now, let’s just agree that we’ve got to get moving — it’s the American way.


Read More

Person holding a sign in front of the U.S. capitol that reads, "We The People."

The nation has reached a divide in the road—a moment when Americans must decide whether to accept a slow weakening of the Republic or insist on the principles that have held it together for more than two centuries

Getty Images

A Republic Under Strain—And a Choice Ahead

Americans feel something shifting beneath their feet — quieter than crisis but unmistakably a strain. Many live with a steady sense of uncertainty, conflict, and the emotional weight of issues that seem impossible to escape. They feel unheard, unsafe, or unsure whether the Republic they trust is fading. Friends, relatives, and former colleagues say they’ve tried to look away just to cope, hoping the turmoil will pass. And they ask the same thing: if the framers made the people the primary control on government, how will they help set the Republic back on a steadier path?

Understanding the strain Americans are experiencing is essential, but so is recognizing the choice we still have. Madison’s warning offers the answer the framers left us: when trust erodes and power concentrates, the Constitution turns back to the people—not as a slogan, but as a structural reality.

Keep ReadingShow less
Latest Attack Threatening President Trump Reflects Rising Political Violence in US

President Donald Trump speaks at the White House on April 25, 2026, after the cancellation of the annual White House Correspondents Association Dinner.

Latest Attack Threatening President Trump Reflects Rising Political Violence in US

For the third time in three years, Donald Trump has come under threat by an attacker. Many facts remain unclear after a gunman stormed the Washington Hilton on April 25, 2026, during the White House Correspondents’ Association dinner.

As the investigation into the shooting continues, Alfonso Serrano, The Conversation’s politics and society editor, spoke with James Piazza, a political violence scholar at Penn State, about what is driving the rise of political violence in the U.S. and what can be done about it.

Keep ReadingShow less
Democracy Requires Losing. Americans Are Forgetting That.
an american flag hanging from a pole in front of a building
Photo by Calysia Ramos on Unsplash

Democracy Requires Losing. Americans Are Forgetting That.

Americans believe in democracy. What they don’t believe in is losing.

That distinction matters. Democracy depends on its participants’ willingness to accept loss. Without that, elections stop resolving conflict and start producing it.

Keep ReadingShow less
Capitol Building.

An in-depth examination of the erosion of checks and balances in the United States, exploring Project 2025, executive overreach, and the growing strain on constitutional democracy—and the critical role of citizens in preserving it.

Getty Images, Rudy Sulgan

The Mirror Has Cracked: How the Three Branches Failed America

James Madison warned that the government would always mirror human nature — its virtues and its flaws. “What is government itself,” he asked, “but the greatest of all reflections on human nature?” The United States was built on a radical promise: a participatory government “of the people, by the people, for the people.” Today, that mirror is cracking in real time. What once reflected a nation striving toward freedom and equality now reflects something far more chaotic — a government drifting from its constitutional purpose and reshaped by loyalty tests, political revenge, and a blueprint designed to consolidate power.

In 2026, that reflection is unmistakable: a government shaped not by three independent branches, but by a president’s loyalists and a coordinated plan to remake American democracy from the inside out. The framers built guardrails — separation of powers, checks and balances, and independent institutions — to prevent the rise of authoritarian rule. Yet the country now faces a blueprint, Project 2025, that overrides those protections by placing independent agencies under presidential control, replacing civil servants with loyalists, and weaponizing the Department of Justice. This is not drift. It is design. And it has left the nation with a government that no longer reflects the people but instead reflects the ambitions of those who seek power without accountability.

Keep ReadingShow less