Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

America needs to open new frontiers

Man atop a mountain

"The American spirit has long been shaped by our collective willingness to explore, to dare, to push boundaries and, perhaps most importantly, to sacrifice in pursuit of that better, bolder, different future," writes Frazier

Vernon Wiley/Getty Images

Frazier is an assistant professor at the Crump College of Law at St. Thomas University. Starting this summer, he will serve as a Tarbell fellow.

"American democracy was born of no theorist's dream; it was not carried in the Susan Constant to Virginia, nor in the Mayflower to Plymouth. It came out of the American forest, and it gained new strength each time it touched a new frontier.” That’s the core idea behind the “Frontier Thesis” set forth by historian Frederick Jackson Turner way back in 1893. It’s an idea worth returning to 131 years later — a time when most would agree that our democracy could use a little extra strength.


Turner’s thesis turned on the idea that a frontier available to anyone and everyone with enough gumption had a number of benefits to our political culture. For one thing, he thought it fostered egalitarianism, fueled opposition to elitism and promoted a spirit of self-sufficiency and desire for self-governance. It’s true that the frontier Turner envisioned in 1893 was not as open nor inclusive as he may have imagined. One person’s frontier often turned out to be another person’s home. Still the “Frontier Thesis” is worth exploring given its intuitive appeal and the stagnancy that has come to define our economy, politics and communities.

First, the economic frontier has long been closed to Americans searching for financial floaties. It’s hard to set out for the frontier if you’re not able to put food on the table. Consider that between 1979 and 2019, productivity jumped by nearly 60 percent while compensation ticked up just 14 percent. In other words, a frontier of economic possibilities was opened by new technology and new processes — yet most Americans were left sitting by the window looking at the horizon.

Second, the political frontier has been claimed by a handful of officials who seem unwilling to step aside for the next generation of trailblazers. The average House member serves about five terms, or 10 years. How’s that for a frontier? Want to make a difference? Wait a decade then give it a go! Things are even worse on the Senate side, where the average member is in their seat for more than a decade. Worse yet, scholars have announced that we have a “frozen Constitution” given that it is seemingly impervious to amendment.

Third, the physical frontier has been blocked off for a variety of reasons. As of 2015, the average American lived just 18 miles from their mom. “Go West, young man” has become “Go to the next exit, son.” That’s not a frontier. That’s just sad. No offense, moms.

The American spirit has long been shaped by our collective willingness to explore, to dare, to push boundaries and, perhaps most importantly, to sacrifice in pursuit of that better, bolder, different future. Given that we’ve become economically trapped, politically powerless and physically stagnant it’s no surprise that spirit has been extinguished. Depressing? You bet. Irreversible? Heck no.

There’s no reason why we cannot dream up a new frontier. I’m not talking about space — Elon can have it. I’m talking about exploring within our own massive country. The average American has been to just 17 states -- that’s a small fraction of a gloriously diverse country. One way to upend that sorry stat is to create a national service program that deploys Americans — young and old alike — to wherever there’s a community in need. Boom — frontier created, horizon expanded, stagnation ended. Of course, it’s not that simple. Creating a national service program is no small feat … but that’s exactly the point!

A universal, mandatory and meaningful national service program would give us all an opportunity to visit new places, develop new skills and, most importantly, imagine a better individual and collective future. This program would include service in the armed forces as well as civilian forms of service and it would be ongoing, perhaps requiring some annual stint of service. Turner would be proud. Our democracy is made stronger when we all have a shared opportunity to better ourselves and our community.

How best to open our economic, political and physical frontiers is not an easy question, but it’s one that merits deliberation and debate. For now, let’s just agree that we’ve got to get moving — it’s the American way.

Read More

How the Unprecedented Redistricting War Is Harming Election Officials, Politicians, and Voters

The Indiana State House is the site of the latest political fight over new congressional maps for the 2026 election.

Lee Klafczynski for Chalkbeat

How the Unprecedented Redistricting War Is Harming Election Officials, Politicians, and Voters

The redrawing of states’ congressional districts typically happens only once per decade, following the release of new U.S. Census data. But we’re now up to six states that have enacted new congressional maps for the 2026 midterms; that’s more than in any election cycle not immediately following a census since 1983-84. Even more are expected to join the fray before voters head to the polls next year. Ultimately, more than a third of districts nationwide could be redrawn, threatening to confuse and disenfranchise voters.

The truly unusual thing, though, is that four of those states passed new maps totally voluntarily. Texas, Missouri, and North Carolina all redrew their districts after President Donald Trump urged them to create more safe seats for Republicans to help the GOP maintain control of the House of Representatives next year, and California did so in order to push back against Trump and create more safe seats for Democrats. (The other two states redrew for more anodyne reasons: Utah’s old map was thrown out in court, and Ohio’s was always set to expire after the 2024 election.) To put that in perspective, only two states voluntarily redistricted in total in the 52 years from 1973 to 2024, according to the Pew Research Center.

Keep ReadingShow less
Crowd waving flags
Crowd waving flags
(Mark Wilson/Getty Images)

For the People, By the People

Democracy was once America’s proudest legacy — the last best hope on earth, a torch that lit the path for nations worldwide. Today, dysfunction grips all three branches of government: Congress abandons its duty to the people, the President exploits power for retribution, and the Supreme Court fails to enforce accountability. This betrayal of trust places our republic at risk. Americans must reclaim democracy from dysfunction and abuse of power.

The United States is both a participatory democracy — by the people, for the people — and a constitutional republic. Power lies with the people, and elected officials are entrusted to serve them. The President enforces the laws, Congress checks executive power, and the Supreme Court interprets the Constitution. These checks and balances are designed to prevent abuse of power, yet Congress and the Court have abandoned their duty (U.S. Constitution).

Keep ReadingShow less
Framing "Freedom"

hands holding a sign that reads "FREEDOM"

Photo Credit: gpointstudio

Framing "Freedom"

The idea of “freedom” is important to Americans. It’s a value that resonates with a lot of people, and consistently ranks among the most important. It’s a uniquely powerful motivator, with broad appeal across the political spectrum. No wonder, then, that we as communicators often appeal to the value of freedom when making a case for change.

But too often, I see people understand values as magic words that can be dropped into our communications and work exactly the way we want them to. Don’t get me wrong: “freedom” is a powerful word. But simply mentioning freedom doesn’t automatically lead everyone to support the policies we want or behave the way we’d like.

Keep ReadingShow less
Hands resting on another.

Amid headlines about Epstein, survivors’ voices remain overlooked. This piece explores how restorative justice offers CSA survivors healing and choice.

Getty Images, PeopleImages

What Do Epstein’s Victims Need?

Jeffrey Epstein is all over the news, along with anyone who may have known about, enabled, or participated in his systematic child sexual abuse. Yet there is significantly less information and coverage on the perspectives, stories and named needs of these survivors themselves. This is almost always the case for any type of coverage on incidences of sexual violence – we first ask “how should we punish the offender?”, before ever asking “what does the survivor want?” For way too long, survivors of sexual violence, particularly of childhood sexual abuse (CSA), have been cast to the wayside, treated like witnesses to crimes committed against the state, rather than the victims of individuals that have caused them enormous harm. This de-emphasis on direct survivors of CSA is often presented as a form of “protection” or “respect for their privacy” and while keeping survivors safe is of the utmost importance, so is the centering and meeting of their needs, even when doing so means going against the grain of what the general public or criminal legal system think are conventional or acceptable responses to violence. Restorative justice (RJ) is one of those “unconventional” responses to CSA and yet there is a growing number of survivors who are naming it as a form of meeting their needs for justice and accountability. But what is restorative justice and why would a CSA survivor ever want it?

“You’re the most powerful person I’ve ever known and you did not deserve what I did to you.” These words were spoken toward the end of a “victim offender dialogue”, a restorative justice process in which an adult survivor of childhood sexual abuse had elected to meet face-to-face for a facilitated conversation with the person that had harmed her. This phrase was said by the man who had violently sexually abused her in her youth, as he sat directly across from her, now an adult woman. As these two people looked at each other at that moment, the shift in power became tangible, as did a dissolvement of shame in both parties. Despite having gone through a formal court process, this survivor needed more…more space to ask questions, to name the impacts this violence had and continues to have in her life, to speak her truth directly to the person that had harmed her more than anyone else, and to reclaim her power. We often talk about the effects of restorative justice in the abstract, generally ineffable and far too personal to be classifiable; but in that instant, it was a felt sense, it was a moment of undeniable healing for all those involved and a form of justice and accountability that this survivor had sought for a long time, yet had not received until that instance.

Keep ReadingShow less