Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

America needs to open new frontiers

Man atop a mountain

"The American spirit has long been shaped by our collective willingness to explore, to dare, to push boundaries and, perhaps most importantly, to sacrifice in pursuit of that better, bolder, different future," writes Frazier

Vernon Wiley/Getty Images

Frazier is an assistant professor at the Crump College of Law at St. Thomas University. Starting this summer, he will serve as a Tarbell fellow.

"American democracy was born of no theorist's dream; it was not carried in the Susan Constant to Virginia, nor in the Mayflower to Plymouth. It came out of the American forest, and it gained new strength each time it touched a new frontier.” That’s the core idea behind the “Frontier Thesis” set forth by historian Frederick Jackson Turner way back in 1893. It’s an idea worth returning to 131 years later — a time when most would agree that our democracy could use a little extra strength.


Turner’s thesis turned on the idea that a frontier available to anyone and everyone with enough gumption had a number of benefits to our political culture. For one thing, he thought it fostered egalitarianism, fueled opposition to elitism and promoted a spirit of self-sufficiency and desire for self-governance. It’s true that the frontier Turner envisioned in 1893 was not as open nor inclusive as he may have imagined. One person’s frontier often turned out to be another person’s home. Still the “Frontier Thesis” is worth exploring given its intuitive appeal and the stagnancy that has come to define our economy, politics and communities.

First, the economic frontier has long been closed to Americans searching for financial floaties. It’s hard to set out for the frontier if you’re not able to put food on the table. Consider that between 1979 and 2019, productivity jumped by nearly 60 percent while compensation ticked up just 14 percent. In other words, a frontier of economic possibilities was opened by new technology and new processes — yet most Americans were left sitting by the window looking at the horizon.

Second, the political frontier has been claimed by a handful of officials who seem unwilling to step aside for the next generation of trailblazers. The average House member serves about five terms, or 10 years. How’s that for a frontier? Want to make a difference? Wait a decade then give it a go! Things are even worse on the Senate side, where the average member is in their seat for more than a decade. Worse yet, scholars have announced that we have a “frozen Constitution” given that it is seemingly impervious to amendment.

Third, the physical frontier has been blocked off for a variety of reasons. As of 2015, the average American lived just 18 miles from their mom. “Go West, young man” has become “Go to the next exit, son.” That’s not a frontier. That’s just sad. No offense, moms.

The American spirit has long been shaped by our collective willingness to explore, to dare, to push boundaries and, perhaps most importantly, to sacrifice in pursuit of that better, bolder, different future. Given that we’ve become economically trapped, politically powerless and physically stagnant it’s no surprise that spirit has been extinguished. Depressing? You bet. Irreversible? Heck no.

There’s no reason why we cannot dream up a new frontier. I’m not talking about space — Elon can have it. I’m talking about exploring within our own massive country. The average American has been to just 17 states -- that’s a small fraction of a gloriously diverse country. One way to upend that sorry stat is to create a national service program that deploys Americans — young and old alike — to wherever there’s a community in need. Boom — frontier created, horizon expanded, stagnation ended. Of course, it’s not that simple. Creating a national service program is no small feat … but that’s exactly the point!

A universal, mandatory and meaningful national service program would give us all an opportunity to visit new places, develop new skills and, most importantly, imagine a better individual and collective future. This program would include service in the armed forces as well as civilian forms of service and it would be ongoing, perhaps requiring some annual stint of service. Turner would be proud. Our democracy is made stronger when we all have a shared opportunity to better ourselves and our community.

How best to open our economic, political and physical frontiers is not an easy question, but it’s one that merits deliberation and debate. For now, let’s just agree that we’ve got to get moving — it’s the American way.


Read More

What the World Cup Teaches Us About Democracy

Charles De Ketelaere #17 of Belgium scores his team’s first goal past Unai Simon #23 of Spain during the FIFA World Cup 2026 Quarter Final match between Spain and Belgium at Los Angeles Stadium on July 10, 2026, in Inglewood, California.

(Photo by David Ramos/Getty Images)

What the World Cup Teaches Us About Democracy

As live sporting events go, nothing comes close to the World Cup. I was in the stands when South Africa, my birth country, hosted the event in 2010 after decades of exclusion from global athletics. In June of this year, I had a full-circle moment when South Africa played in the knockout rounds for the first time, and I stood with my two American sons, arms around them, singing South Africa's anthem — the only national anthem that weaves multiple languages into a single, unifying song. Later in the week, I was in the stands again, cheering Spain's win over Austria, a country to which my only connections are a brief holiday…and the fact that my mother's family fled from there during the Inquisition.

The magic of the World Cup is that everyone in the stands wears the flags and shirts of countries that are “theirs” in some way. For some, it’s where they were born; for others, where they live or where their ancestors hailed from. For some, it is simply a country they have adopted for the afternoon. It is impossible to know how deep a person’s connection runs simply by looking at them. And next to a person waving one team’s colors is a stranger, family member, or close friend supporting the opposing team—or wearing the jersey of a team that isn’t playing that day at all.

Keep ReadingShow less
​Former President Joe Biden, former President Barack Obama, former President George W. Bush, and former President Bill Clinton pose together.

Former President Joe Biden, former President Barack Obama, former President George W. Bush, and former President Bill Clinton pose ahead of the dedication ceremony for the opening of the Barack Obama Presidential Center, in John Lewis Plaza, on June 18, 2026, in Chicago, Illinois.

Pablo Martinez Monsivais - Pool / Getty Images

America Shouldn't Need a Political Savior to Hold It Together

America is waiting for a political savior, but the problem is structural.

This dynamic was illustrated during two recent broadcast appearances by journalist Katy Tur. Discussing modern secessionist movements on June 15, 2026, Tur found optimism in a poll showing 54 percent of Americans still believe we share core values, and she later expressed hope that future leaders could reunite the country.

Keep ReadingShow less
Constitution of the United State with the U.S. flag in the background.

The Framers designed a republic with the intention to manage factionalism through deliberate compromise and institutional guardrails, whereas 21st-century polarization often treats compromise as a moral failing.

Douglas Sacha, Getty Images

Our Framers on 21st Century Primaries and Polarization

The Framers would view 21st-century closed primaries and political polarization as the exact manifestation of "factionalism" they spent the 1787 Constitutional Convention trying to prevent. They would argue these systems force candidates to appeal to ideological extremes rather than the broad, moderate consensus required for stable governance.

The Danger of Factionalism: In Federalist No. 10, James Madison defined a "faction" as a group of citizens united by a passion or interest adverse to the rights of others. He argued that while factions are inevitable, their effects must be controlled. The Framers would recognize 21st-century hyper-polarization as the dominance of unyielding factions that prioritize absolute ideological purity over democratic compromise.

Keep ReadingShow less