Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Democrats are from Mars, Republicans are from Venus

Democrats are from Mars, Republicans are from Venus

A simulation of two planets in space.

Getty Images, Jose A. Bernat Bacete

As I think about Tuesday’s address by President Donald Trump and the response of Senator Elissa Slotkin from Michigan—a former CIA analyst and a rising star in the Democratic Party—I am reminded of the book “Men Are from Mars, Women Are from Venus” by John Gray published in 1992.

A sequel should be written today: “Democrats Are from Mars, Republicans Are from Venus”…..or vice versa since the planet they each are from doesn’t matter.


The book became a cultural phenomenon in the 1990s, offering insights into relationships and communication between men and women. The differences in communication styles, emotional needs, and general views of life remind me so much of the differences between Democrats and Republicans.

Tuesday night's address by President Trump and the response of Democrats is a perfect example. As Republicans enthusiastically applauded every word the President said, Democrats were furious in their outrage. The differing perspectives of the state of affairs in the U.S. and the world might as well come from two people—or in this case, political parties—that are from two different planets.

While Trump and Republicans praised Elon Musk’s effort with DOGE to eliminate waste, fraud, and abuse within the government, democrats were outraged.

Rep. Gerry Connolly (Va.), the top Democrat on the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, decided to boycott Trump’s speech “in solidarity” with federal government employees who have been terminated as part of the Trump administration’s push to downsize the government and cut waste. Connolly also added that his protest is a way to offer backing for those both domestic and overseas who are set to be impacted by Trump’s agenda.

And, of course, Democrats maligned the impact tariffs will have on inflation and their impact on everyday working Americans, while President Trump said that “tariffs are not just about protecting American jobs, they're about protecting the soul of our country."

And, on the issue of war and peace, the two parties might as well come from two different planets. Mr. Trump said, during his address, that he is "working tirelessly to end the savage conflict in Ukraine." Senator Slotkin replied by saying, "President Trump loves to say peace through strength. That's actually a line he stole from Ronald Reagan. But let me tell you, after the spectacle that just took place in the Oval Office last week, Reagan must be rolling in his grave, "implying that Reagan would be more supportive of an adversary to Russia than Mr. Trump has been to Ukraine.

The examples of how there are two opposing perceptions of the state of our union go on and on.

Democrat members of Congress and Republican Members are seemingly from two different planets when one listens to their respective responses to the State of the Union address.

As I think about “Men Are from Mars, Women Are from Venus as a metaphor for two groups with fundamentally different perspectives that are trying to coexist, one can certainly see similarities in the dynamic between Democrats and Republicans. Both groups often operate with distinct "languages," priorities, and worldviews, which can make communication and collaboration feel like interplanetary diplomacy.

As just one example, just as the book suggests men and women have different emotional needs, Democrats and Republicans often prioritize different issues—like social programs versus tax cuts. Taking a lesson from the book, which emphasizes understanding and compromise, successful bipartisan problem solving will require bridging those divides with empathy and mutual respect.

It’s a perfect example of the difference between Democrats and Republicans can be seen in reflecting on the White House meeting last week between President Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy.

Democrats were largely critical of Trump's behavior during the meeting, describing it as disrespectful and counterproductive, and accused Trump and Vice President JD Vance of undermining U.S. support for Ukraine and playing into Russian interests.

On the other hand, Republicans generally expressed frustration with Zelenskyy, accusing him of being ungrateful and difficult to work with, some suggesting, as did Senator Lindsey Graham, that Zelenskyy needed to change his approach or step aside.

It's a perfect example that Democrats Are from Mars, Republicans Are from Venus.

If we are ever going to move forward as a nation and solve the serious problems facing our nation, perhaps we should take a lesson from “Men Are from Mars, Women Are from Venus”. The book categorizes ways people express and experience love into five "languages," providing insights into relationships and how to bridge communication gaps. Substitute the word “see the world” for “love” and it might serve as a useful lesson for us all.

Another book from the early 1990s, "You Just Don't Understand" by Deborah Tannen, focuses on similar gender-based differences that, once again, might serve us all in thinking about the difference between Democrats and Republicans, and help us address common misunderstandings. The book emphasizes the need to dive deeper into linguistic patterns and perceptions of what is coming between two different tribes occupying the same nation.

Perhaps, we can all have fun with this by re-watching the movie “When Harry Met Sally,” as it captures the differences and tensions between the sexes with a bit of humor. We certainly need to break down the barriers and humor might just do the trick.

Imagine a bipartisan roast where politicians poke fun at their own party’s quirks—like Democrats joking about their love for the rule of law and Republicans about their love for tax cuts. It could be a refreshing way to ease tensions and foster some goodwill.

Laughter might not solve everything, but it sure makes the journey a bit lighter. If laughter doesn’t work, how about a national therapy session?

If not, we’ll just head for different planets and all our problems will be solved.


David Nevins is co-publisher of The Fulcrum and co-founder and board chairman of the Bridge Alliance Education Fund.

Read More

Two speech bubbles overlapping.

Recent data shows that Americans view members of the opposing political party overly negatively, leading people to avoid political discourse with those who hold different views.

Getty Images, Richard Drury

How To Motivate Americans’ Conversations Across Politics

Introduction

A large body of research shows that Americans hold overly negative distortions of those across the political spectrum. These misperceptions—often referred to as "Perception Gaps"—make civil discourse harder, since few Americans are eager to engage with people they believe are ideologically extreme, interpersonally hostile, or even threatening or inferior. When potential disagreement feels deeply uncomfortable or dangerous, conversations are unlikely to begin.

Correcting these distortions can help reduce barriers to productive dialogue, making Americans more open to political conversations.

Keep ReadingShow less
Divided American flag

Rev. Dr. F. Willis Johnson writes on the serious impacts of "othering" marginalized populations and how, together, we must push back to create a more inclusive and humane society.

Jorge Villalba/Getty Images

New Rules of the Game: Weaponization of Othering

By now, you have probably seen the viral video. Taylor Townsend—Black, bold, unbothered—walks off the court after a bruising match against her white European opponent, Jelena Ostapenko. The post-match glances were sharper than a backhand slice. Next came the unsportsmanlike commentary—about her body, her "attitude," and a not-so-veiled speculation about whether she belonged at this level. To understand America in the Trump Redux era, one only needs to study this exchange.

Ostapenko vs. Townsend is a microcosm of something much bigger: the way anti-democratic, vengeful politics—modeled from the White House on down—have bled into every corner of public life, including sports. Turning “othering” into the new national pastime. Divisive politics has a profound impact on marginalized groups. Neither Ostapenko nor Donald Trump invented this playbook, yet Trump and his sycophants are working to master it. Fueled by a sense of grievance, revenge, and an insatiable appetite for division, he—like Ostapenko—has normalized once somewhat closeted attitudes.

Keep ReadingShow less
Hand blocking someone speaking

The Third Way has recently released a memo stating that the “stampede away from the Democratic Party” is partly a result of the language and rhetoric it uses.

Westend61/Getty Images

To Protect Democracy, Democrats Should Pay Attention to the Third Way’s List of ‘Offensive’ Words

More than fifty years ago, comedian George Carlin delivered a monologue entitled Seven Words You Can Never Say on Television.” It was a tribute to the legendary Lenny Bruce, whose “nine dirty words” performance led to his arrest and his banning from many places.

His seven words were “p—, f—, c—, c———, m———–, and t—.”

Keep ReadingShow less