Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Selma can lead us across the bridge again today

Bridge over a river

The Edmond Pettus Bridge is a symbol of the civil right movement, and it can be a symbol for rebuilding our divide.

Visions of America/Joe Sohm/Universal Images Group via Getty Images

Harwood is president and founder of The Harwood Institute. This is the latest entry in his series based on the "Enough. Time to Build.” campaign, which calls on community leaders and active citizens to step forward and build together.

Just recently, I was in Selma, Ala., giving a keynote address at the local NAACP’s annual banquet in honor of the 1965 Voting Rights Act. Selma and the Edmund Pettus Bridge are iconic in American history.

The Voting Rights Act, whose seeds were firmly planted in Selma, remains one of the most important pieces of legislation in our history. It’s a declaration that community is for all of us, not just some of us. That when we vote, we all get an equal say. That we are on a journey together.


Back in 1965, Selma led us across the bridge and showed us a better future. From that time forward, whatever happens in Selma will always be played out on a national stage, with people everywhere watching. Now, nearly 60 years later, I believe Selma can lead us across the bridge and show us the way forward again.

In fact, I am counting on Selma.

Still, the reality is most people throughout our country see Selma in just one of two ways. The bridge and that iconic moment from the past, with many Americans now making yearly pilgrimages there. Or its modern disrepair, with empty storefronts, dilapidated homes and pothole-filled roads.

Yet if you really look at Selma — if you are willing to see all of it — you will see the people of Selma and that Selma’s can-do spirit is alive and well. Residents there are proud to call the community home. And new examples of building are happening all over the community.

But here’s what I told people at the NAACP banque:. Physical buildings are important; people are more important. If Selma is going to lead us over the bridge again today, they need to build community first and foremost.

The good news is that if you really look at Selma, you will see that it is not stuck in the past. People there want to lift each other up and rebuild their community. Selma is poised to lead us forward. To focus on building community in a way that renews hope, I asked those at the NAACP banquet to wrestle with four questions that people throughout the community have continually asked me. They are just as critical for the country to wrestle with.

  1. How can we start moving forward? Our programs and strategies are important, but they are not sufficient. In my experience, the No. 1 predictor of whether or not a community moves forward is the health of its civic culture. From how we work together to whether leaders are in tune with what matters to people, to the presence of organizations that bring people together across divides and spark shared action. Moving forward requires giving our frayed civic culture renewed attention. Ignoring it only exacerbates the prevailing negative conditions in society.
  2. How can we activate more allies? We have to get real that in America today, most people have been driven out of the public square and are hunkered down; in communities like Selma, many are suffering from acute or chronic trauma. To bring them back requires patience, an open door, time and a declaration of what we are for instead of battle cries about what we’re against. Perhaps most of all, we must demonstrate proof that what we do together will make a difference in people’s daily lives. We must make the community a common enterprise. This is the path forward.
  3. How can we accelerate and deepen change? We too often write off anything that isn’t comprehensive, complex, new and shiny, even costly. But we’ve all seen large efforts start with fanfare only to fade away. Or we want to take on everything at once and be all things to all people. But that’s a recipe for being nothing to no one. Let’s rethink how we create change from “bigger is better” to “start small to go big.” And in doing so, we must commit to shifting from just “getting together” to actually “working together.”
  4. How can we create more belief? Creating change is a journey. Belief is the fuel for that journey. Thus, on our common journey, we must lift up positive stories of change in our communities. That’s how we get people to reimagine themselves as builders, doers and contributors. In short, we must make the invisible visible to inspire ourselves and others to believe again.

It was clear from my time in Selma that people there have what it takes to answer these questions. In fact, Selma’s fighting spirit is something we’d do well to tap into as a nation.

The eyes of America are on Selma. We needed the community back in 1965 to show us the way forward. We need Selma again today at yet another critical moment in American history. I believe they can take us across that bridge once more and into a brighter future.


Read More

The Reward — Angela and James: An American Dynasty

Ring–Fitzgerald Homestead, Will County (1987). A house still true to its original form, carrying forward the Rings’ steadiness, aspiration, and good citizenship across five generations.

Photo courtesy by Patrick Fitzgerald.

The Reward — Angela and James: An American Dynasty

They got an early start; the morning light came on fast. The Ring siblings were headed to the Joliet depot with young Angela in tow — the same depot where Lincoln’s funeral train had passed in silence thirty years earlier. Now they were bound for the White City, forty miles northeast. The Columbian Exposition was a turning point for both Angela and America. Buffalo Bill’s Wild West Show, pitched just outside the fairgrounds, rivaled the Exhibition itself.

One photograph captured it all. Taken in a fairground photo booth, the Ring siblings stood in their summer clothes, huddled around eleven-year-old Angela. Their faces were bright and open — a single moment preserved in time. Determined to outshine the 1889 Paris Exhibition and its Eiffel Tower, Chicago answered with George Ferris’s great wheel. At night, the city glowed, outlined in electric white light.

Keep ReadingShow less
The Knicks and the Practice of Us

Jalen Brunson #11 of the New York Knicks celebrates with the Larry O'Brien Championship Trophy during the New York Knicks Championship ticker tape parade and victory rally celebrating winning the 2026 NBA Finals on June 18, 2026 in New York City.

(Photo by Angelina Katsanis/Getty Images)

The Knicks and the Practice of Us

I didn’t grow up anywhere near Madison Square Garden. My childhood unfolded in the Midwest, far from New York’s tangled boroughs and yellow cabs. My father brought the city with him, tucked in the vowels of his accent and the teams he rooted for. He was a Jersey boy at first. Then, a reluctant Midwesterner. Geography, though, never truly loosened its grip. In our house, sports allegiance wasn’t a choice. It was inherited—an expectation passed like a family recipe. Or a story retold until it blurs into fact.

For my father, and then for me, the Knicks were never just a team. They were a test of endurance. Before I could distinguish a pick-and-roll from a triangle offense, I understood Knicks loyalty: you waited. You hoped in public, persisted when heartbreak was routine. Knicks fandom was boot camp for disappointment. The main skill was getting up after being knocked down.

Keep ReadingShow less
Reclaiming Patriotism: Between Nationalism and Pessimism

People gather over a giant Declaration of Independence

Photo by Mario Tama/Getty Images.

Reclaiming Patriotism: Between Nationalism and Pessimism

As America approaches the 250th anniversary of its independence, I am more in the mood to protest than to celebrate. Does that make me unpatriotic? The answer depends on how we understand “patriotism.” For a nation that is founded in revolution, let’s affirm a deeper and more profound love of country, a civic patriotism celebrative of our larger ideals including pluralism, dissent, and a commitment to social change.

Two Types of Patriotism

Keep ReadingShow less
A New Path to Depolarization: Media That Brings Us Together
Political polarization
Polarization and the politics of love

A New Path to Depolarization: Media That Brings Us Together

As we face ever-growing partisan polarization in American society, the need for large-scale action becomes increasingly urgent. As James Coan and I have written about in the Fulcrum during my time at More Like US, there are approaches grounded in a significant body of social psychological research that can help address this rapidly growing problem, namely different variations of social contact theory, especially vicarious contact. Until recently, much of the research and thus much of the basis for our articles has been focused on applying social contact theory to other problems facing society: prejudice against members of the LGBTQ community, individuals with autism, and immigrant schoolchildren, among other examples.

It was therefore exciting when last fall I saw the publication of an article in Political Science Research and Methods titled "Content That's as Good as Contact?: Vicarious Intergroup Contact and the Promise of Depolarization at Scale." The study, conducted in 2022 in conjunction with YouGov, finally attempted to measure the effectiveness of indirect contact as a path to depolarization, primarily through the vicarious experience of productive political conversation. Encompassing over 2,000 participants gathered from a nationally representative sample recruited by YouGov’s online panel, the study looked to test affective polarization, measured attitudinally, and interest and investment in depolarization, measured behaviorally. To this end, the study tested multiple media interventions, namely a 50-minute Braver Angels documentary featuring a “Red-Blue” depolarization workshop; a 50-minute placebo nature documentary about wildebeest migration; a 5-minute version of the Braver Angels documentary; a second 5-minute version that emphasized partisan misperception correction; and a pure control group, with no treatment.

Keep ReadingShow less