Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Meet the Faces of Democracy: Nedra Cooper

Poll worker turned trainer of other poll workers explains what keeps her motivated to support voting rights and democracy

Minkin is a research associate at Issue One. Assefa is a research intern at Issue One.

More than 10,000 officials across the country run U.S. elections. This interview is part of a series highlighting the election heroes who are the faces of democracy.

Nedra Cooper, who is not affiliated with any political party, has a longstanding commitment to public service.

A resident of Las Vegas since 1971, Cooper began working as a poll worker in 1985. For the past two decades, she has also trained poll workers for the elections department in Clark County, Nev. With over 2.4 million residents, Clark is the most populous country in the state and the 11th most populous in the nation. Clark County is also home to about 70 percent of all registered voters in Nevada.

In her leisure time, Cooper can be found sewing, horseback riding — an activity she has enjoyed since 1996 — and enjoying criminal fiction and poetry, with a particular fondness for the works of Edgar Allan Poe.

In addition to her work in elections, Cooper has been a community activist since her youth. She is a member of numerous civil organizations, including the Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Committee, which she helped found in 1981 with a focus on education. In fact, Cooper was pivotal in securing a building for after-school tutoring managed by its members. In 2020, just before the start of the coronavirus pandemic, she organized a reenactment, in Nevada, of the Selma, Ala. march for voting rights.


Cooper’s dedication to community service has been recognized with a nomination for the President's Volunteer Service Award, which was acknowledged with a letter from President Bill Clinton, and she received congressional recognition for her volunteer work on the disaster action team with the Red Cross.

Since 2022, she has been part of Issue One’s Faces of Democracy campaign advocating for protections for election workers and for regular, predictable and sufficient federal funding of elections.

This interview has been edited for length and clarity.

Issue One: How did you end up working in elections?

Nedra Cooper: I've always been interested in how elections are run. You hear a lot of different philosophies about what goes on in an election department. When I got out of high school, I signed up to be a voter registrar in 1971. I was amazed by how that went down. Later, I worked for the county, and they would have county workers go work the election. I had the opportunity to be a part of the election process for as many years as I was willing to do it. When I retired, the election department reached out to me and asked me if I'd be interested in becoming a part of their team, and I jumped at that opportunity.

IO: What would you say to someone who is considering becoming a poll worker this year. Do you have an elevator pitch as to why somebody should work as a poll worker?

NC: You’re either part of the problem or part of the solution. I just think it's really important to get involved. I think each of us owe it to give something back to the community, and one of the ways that we can give back is by working the polls and understanding that every vote counts.

IO: What part of the election administration story in your area do you think isn’t told enough or isn’t widely understood enough?

NC: The safety of the election is really, really important. People don't understand that it's everyday people — their neighbors, their mothers, their fathers, their uncles, their sisters, their brothers — working the polls. It's not some select group that was found somewhere on a deserted island. It is your neighbor who might be working the polls, who may be the one getting threatened. In recent years, we’ve lost a lot of really good workers because of threats. It’s heartbreaking.

IO: You've worked for the Clark County Elections Department for more than 16 years. What types of changes have you seen in how elections are run during this time?

NC: One major change is the involvement of more technology in running elections. I love the fact that we are trying to upgrade systems to make sure that we've got the best systems that we can afford so that we can maintain the integrity of elections.

We've come a long way from how we used to do elections. The first time that I ever worked an election was in the 1970s, and now, with technology, we are able to process voters more professionally and expeditiously, so folks are not standing in line for hours.

IO: Many people are surprised to learn that the federal government doesn’t routinely fund the costs of running elections. Why do you think the federal government should routinely fund election administration costs?

NC: The biggest reason is because they delegate a lot of election components to the states. If you had federal dollars, I think that would help in terms of running elections with standardized processes. It can be difficult when voters move and recognize that elections are run differently between states. Most of us think that wherever we go, the voting process is going to be the same, kind of like how the Department of Motor Vehicles is basically the same no matter where you go.

IO: Twice over the past two years, you’ve come to Washington, D.C., to meet with lawmakers and policymakers as a part of a bipartisan advocacy push organized by Issue One. What were your key takeaways from those conversations and meetings?

NC: One of my biggest takeaways was about funding, making sure that all election departments have the funds that they need to run effective elections. It's interesting to find out that in a lot of states, elections are among the lowest funding priorities.

IO: In recent years, election-related misconceptions, conspiracy theories and lies have proliferated. How has this impacted your work?

NC: We have a lot of people who come to vote with misinformation, and that's how they carry themselves when they come to the vote centers, as if the election department is the one that has perpetrated a crime, or disenfranchisement, and not realizing that is actually other sources that are providing them with inaccurate information.

IO: Given all these challenges, what inspires you to stay in this line of work?

NC: I just believe in democracy. I believe in voting. I believe in the right to vote, and I believe that it's my job, my duty, to help make sure that those who want to vote and are eligible to vote will get an opportunity to vote. That's what keeps me going.

IO: Outside of being passionate about elections, what are your hobbies, or what is a fun fact that most people might not know about you?

NC: I ride horses and I sew. I'm a grandmother and I have grandkids and great grandkids that I get to spend time with, I really enjoy that. And my favorite time of year is Christmas. I just love Christmas.

IO: What is your favorite book or movie?

NC: Oh, that's hard! I have such an eclectic book collection! I love criminal fiction, autobiographies and poetry. One of my favorite poets is Edgar Allan Poe.

IO: Which historical figure would you have most liked to have had an opportunity to meet and why?

NC: Harriet Tubman, because it took courage that I can't even begin to understand to be a part of the Underground Railroad and bring as many people to freedom as she did.

IO: It’s our understanding that in 2020, just before the coronavirus pandemic, you organized and coordinated a reenactment of the Selma march for voting rights in Nevada. What motivated you to do this?

NC: It was all about voting. I think sometimes people forget the shoulders that we stand on, especially minority groups. We just barely got the chance to vote, starting in 1965 with the Voting Rights Act, and even then, there were still states that made it difficult for Black voters to vote. There are generations who feel like there is no racism or discrimination because they feel like they've never experienced it. And so I think it is important to remember our ancestors. I am not able to work at the election department because of open arms; I am here because of the shoulders that I stood on. The NAACP in Las Vegas had to blaze a trail for all of the other civic leaders in our Black community to make it so that the rest of us could do these things.

Read More

Ukraine, Russia, and the Dangerous Metaphor of Holding the Cards
a hand holding a deck of cards in front of a christmas tree
Photo by Luca Volpe on Unsplash

Ukraine, Russia, and the Dangerous Metaphor of Holding the Cards

Donald Trump has repeatedly used the phrase “holding the cards” during his tenure as President to signal that he, or sometimes an opponent, has the upper hand. The metaphor projects bravado, leverage, and the inevitability of success or failure, depending on who claims control.

Unfortunately, Trump’s repeated invocation of “holding the cards” embodies a worldview where leverage, bluff, and dominance matter more than duty, morality, or responsibility. In contrast, leadership grounded in duty emphasizes ethical obligations to allies, citizens, and democratic principles—elements strikingly absent from this metaphor.

Keep ReadingShow less
Beyond Apologies: Corporate Contempt and the Call for Real Accountability
campbells chicken noodle soup can

Beyond Apologies: Corporate Contempt and the Call for Real Accountability

Most customers carry a particular image of Campbell's Soup: the red-and-white label stacked on a pantry shelf, a touch of nostalgia, and the promise of a dependable bargain. It's food for snow days, tight budgets, and the middle of the week. For generations, the brand has positioned itself as a companion to working families, offering "good food" for everyday people. The company cultivated that trust so thoroughly that it became almost cliché.

Campbell's episode, now the subject of national headlines and an ongoing high-profile legal complaint, is troubling not only for its blunt language but for what it reveals about the hidden injuries that erode the social contract linking institutions to citizens, workers to workplaces, and brands to buyers. If the response ends with the usual PR maneuvers—rapid firings and the well-rehearsed "this does not reflect our values" statement. Then both the lesson and the opportunity for genuine reform by a company or individual are lost. To grasp what this controversy means for the broader corporate landscape, we first have to examine how leadership reveals its actual beliefs.

Keep ReadingShow less
Donald Trump

When ego replaces accountability in the presidency, democracy weakens. An analysis of how unchecked leadership erodes trust, institutions, and the rule of law.

Brandon Bell/Getty Images

When Leaders Put Ego Above Accountability—Democracy At Risk

What has become of America’s presidency? Once a symbol of dignity and public service, the office now appears chaotic, ego‑driven, and consumed by spectacle over substance. When personal ambition replaces accountability, the consequences extend far beyond politics — they erode trust, weaken institutions, and threaten democracy itself.

When leaders place ego above accountability, democracy falters. Weak leaders seek to appear powerful. Strong leaders accept responsibility.

Keep ReadingShow less
Leaders Fear Accountability — Why?
Protesters hold signs outside a government building.
Photo by Leo_Visions on Unsplash

Leaders Fear Accountability — Why?

America is being damaged not by strong leaders abusing power, but by weak leaders avoiding responsibility. Their refusal to be accountable has become a threat to democracy itself. We are now governed by individuals who hold power but lack the character, courage, and integrity required to use it responsibly. And while everyday Americans are expected to follow rules, honor commitments, and face consequences, we have a Congress and a President who are shielded by privilege and immunity. We have leaders in Congress who lie, point fingers, and break ethics rules because they can get away with it. There is no accountability. Too many of our leaders operate as if ethics were optional.

Internal fighting among members of Congress has only deepened the dysfunction. Instead of holding one another accountable, lawmakers spend their energy attacking colleagues, blocking legislation, and protecting party leaders. Infighting reveals a failure to check themselves, leaving citizens with a government paralyzed by disputes rather than focused on solutions. When leaders cannot even enforce accountability within their own ranks, the entire system falters.

Keep ReadingShow less