Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Meet the Faces of Democracy: Nedra Cooper

Poll worker turned trainer of other poll workers explains what keeps her motivated to support voting rights and democracy

Nedra Cooper
Issuee One

Minkin is a research associate at Issue One. Assefa is a research intern at Issue One.

More than 10,000 officials across the country run U.S. elections. This interview is part of a series highlighting the election heroes who are the faces of democracy.

Nedra Cooper, who is not affiliated with any political party, has a longstanding commitment to public service.

A resident of Las Vegas since 1971, Cooper began working as a poll worker in 1985. For the past two decades, she has also trained poll workers for the elections department in Clark County, Nev. With over 2.4 million residents, Clark is the most populous country in the state and the 11th most populous in the nation. Clark County is also home to about 70 percent of all registered voters in Nevada.

In her leisure time, Cooper can be found sewing, horseback riding — an activity she has enjoyed since 1996 — and enjoying criminal fiction and poetry, with a particular fondness for the works of Edgar Allan Poe.

In addition to her work in elections, Cooper has been a community activist since her youth. She is a member of numerous civil organizations, including the Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Committee, which she helped found in 1981 with a focus on education. In fact, Cooper was pivotal in securing a building for after-school tutoring managed by its members. In 2020, just before the start of the coronavirus pandemic, she organized a reenactment, in Nevada, of the Selma, Ala. march for voting rights.


Cooper’s dedication to community service has been recognized with a nomination for the President's Volunteer Service Award, which was acknowledged with a letter from President Bill Clinton, and she received congressional recognition for her volunteer work on the disaster action team with the Red Cross.

Since 2022, she has been part of Issue One’s Faces of Democracy campaign advocating for protections for election workers and for regular, predictable and sufficient federal funding of elections.

This interview has been edited for length and clarity.

Issue One: How did you end up working in elections?

Nedra Cooper: I've always been interested in how elections are run. You hear a lot of different philosophies about what goes on in an election department. When I got out of high school, I signed up to be a voter registrar in 1971. I was amazed by how that went down. Later, I worked for the county, and they would have county workers go work the election. I had the opportunity to be a part of the election process for as many years as I was willing to do it. When I retired, the election department reached out to me and asked me if I'd be interested in becoming a part of their team, and I jumped at that opportunity.

IO: What would you say to someone who is considering becoming a poll worker this year. Do you have an elevator pitch as to why somebody should work as a poll worker?

NC: You’re either part of the problem or part of the solution. I just think it's really important to get involved. I think each of us owe it to give something back to the community, and one of the ways that we can give back is by working the polls and understanding that every vote counts.

IO: What part of the election administration story in your area do you think isn’t told enough or isn’t widely understood enough?

NC: The safety of the election is really, really important. People don't understand that it's everyday people — their neighbors, their mothers, their fathers, their uncles, their sisters, their brothers — working the polls. It's not some select group that was found somewhere on a deserted island. It is your neighbor who might be working the polls, who may be the one getting threatened. In recent years, we’ve lost a lot of really good workers because of threats. It’s heartbreaking.

IO: You've worked for the Clark County Elections Department for more than 16 years. What types of changes have you seen in how elections are run during this time?

NC: One major change is the involvement of more technology in running elections. I love the fact that we are trying to upgrade systems to make sure that we've got the best systems that we can afford so that we can maintain the integrity of elections.

We've come a long way from how we used to do elections. The first time that I ever worked an election was in the 1970s, and now, with technology, we are able to process voters more professionally and expeditiously, so folks are not standing in line for hours.

IO: Many people are surprised to learn that the federal government doesn’t routinely fund the costs of running elections. Why do you think the federal government should routinely fund election administration costs?

NC: The biggest reason is because they delegate a lot of election components to the states. If you had federal dollars, I think that would help in terms of running elections with standardized processes. It can be difficult when voters move and recognize that elections are run differently between states. Most of us think that wherever we go, the voting process is going to be the same, kind of like how the Department of Motor Vehicles is basically the same no matter where you go.

IO: Twice over the past two years, you’ve come to Washington, D.C., to meet with lawmakers and policymakers as a part of a bipartisan advocacy push organized by Issue One. What were your key takeaways from those conversations and meetings?

NC: One of my biggest takeaways was about funding, making sure that all election departments have the funds that they need to run effective elections. It's interesting to find out that in a lot of states, elections are among the lowest funding priorities.

IO: In recent years, election-related misconceptions, conspiracy theories and lies have proliferated. How has this impacted your work?

NC: We have a lot of people who come to vote with misinformation, and that's how they carry themselves when they come to the vote centers, as if the election department is the one that has perpetrated a crime, or disenfranchisement, and not realizing that is actually other sources that are providing them with inaccurate information.

IO: Given all these challenges, what inspires you to stay in this line of work?

NC: I just believe in democracy. I believe in voting. I believe in the right to vote, and I believe that it's my job, my duty, to help make sure that those who want to vote and are eligible to vote will get an opportunity to vote. That's what keeps me going.

IO: Outside of being passionate about elections, what are your hobbies, or what is a fun fact that most people might not know about you?

NC: I ride horses and I sew. I'm a grandmother and I have grandkids and great grandkids that I get to spend time with, I really enjoy that. And my favorite time of year is Christmas. I just love Christmas.

IO: What is your favorite book or movie?

NC: Oh, that's hard! I have such an eclectic book collection! I love criminal fiction, autobiographies and poetry. One of my favorite poets is Edgar Allan Poe.

IO: Which historical figure would you have most liked to have had an opportunity to meet and why?

NC: Harriet Tubman, because it took courage that I can't even begin to understand to be a part of the Underground Railroad and bring as many people to freedom as she did.

IO: It’s our understanding that in 2020, just before the coronavirus pandemic, you organized and coordinated a reenactment of the Selma march for voting rights in Nevada. What motivated you to do this?

NC: It was all about voting. I think sometimes people forget the shoulders that we stand on, especially minority groups. We just barely got the chance to vote, starting in 1965 with the Voting Rights Act, and even then, there were still states that made it difficult for Black voters to vote. There are generations who feel like there is no racism or discrimination because they feel like they've never experienced it. And so I think it is important to remember our ancestors. I am not able to work at the election department because of open arms; I am here because of the shoulders that I stood on. The NAACP in Las Vegas had to blaze a trail for all of the other civic leaders in our Black community to make it so that the rest of us could do these things.


Read More

U.S. Attorney General Todd Blanche

U.S. Attorney General Todd Blanche at the Robert F. Kennedy Department of Justice building on September 30, 2026 in Washington, DC.

(Photo by Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images)

Trump’s Weaponization of the DOJ Threatens Democratic Governance

The dust from the November 2026 midterm elections has barely settled, yet a familiar, toxic chorus of political warfare is already drowning out the clear message from American voters.

With Democrats securing majorities in both the House and Senate, voters signaled a desire for checks, balances, and a focused effort on the pressing economic issues squeezing everyday families. Instead, President Donald Trump has chosen to meet the incoming legislative branch not with an open hand, but with a weaponized Department of Justice.

Keep ReadingShow less
Democratic Presidential candidate U.S. Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) holds his first presidential campaign rally at Brooklyn College on March 02, 2019 in Brooklyn, New York.

A lobbyist who worked for both Bernie Sanders and Fortune 500 clients explains what democratic socialist wins mean for business, and how to prepare.

VIEW press/Getty Images

I Campaigned for Bernie Sanders Then Lobbied for Amazon

In 2016, my political outreach company, Firehouse Phones, worked on the presidential campaign of a democratic socialist. It was one of many campaigns my firm touched, but that one stays on my resume for a reason: it taught me more about how persuasion actually works than any client engagement before or since.

Today I run Ohio River South, a government affairs firm focused on the nation's fastest-growing region — the American South. Over the past decade we've advocated for nearly two dozen Fortune 500 companies — Amazon in my earlier lobbying years, and later growing a client roster that included Alphabet, Microsoft, General Motors, United Healthcare, and Capital One.

Keep ReadingShow less
The White House
The white house with green lawn and trees
Photo by Josh on Unsplash

The Politics of Gratitude: Why Washington Punishes the Loyalty It Cannot Price

On a Sunday night in August, Senator Jon Ossoff told a campaign rally in Atlanta that President Trump would rather build his ballroom and “travel with Natalie” than do his job. He never used her last name. He did not need to. Natalie Harp, the White House aide known to colleagues as Trump’s “human printer” for trailing him with a portable printer and transcribing his social-media dictation, had become a punchline before most Americans knew who she was.

The backlash arrived within hours. White House officials accused Ossoff of insinuating an affair; Republican Rep. Brandon Gill noted that Harp survived bone cancer only because the Right to Try Act, which Trump signed in 2018, let her seek an experimental treatment outside the normal approval process, and dismissed any other reading of the moment as unfair. Weeks earlier, Harp had been at the center of a far more consequential story: in July, she was one of a handful of aides, alongside the defense secretary and two senior staffers, chosen to accompany Trump on a covert switch of aircraft as he left a security summit in Turkey after officials detected a credible Iranian threat, while most of the traveling delegation stayed behind on a decoy plane. That is the real proximity Ossoff's line was needling. Then came a detail that complicated the story further: Trump had personally given Harp and several other aides cash gifts of $45,000 apiece, which a former federal ethics official called troublesome, since money on that scale can leave a recipient feeling indebted to whoever signs the check.

Keep ReadingShow less
A map labeling Lake Ontario as "Lake America" is displayed behind U.S. President Donald Trump.

A map labeling Lake Ontario as "Lake America" is displayed as U.S. President Donald Trump signs an executive order during an event in the Oval Office of the White House on August 27, 2026 in Washington, DC.

Andrew Harnik/Getty Images

Cartography of Convenience: Why Rushed Renaming Erodes Public Trust

In tough economic times, governments often reach for the easiest kind of progress: a new name on an old sign. Wage stagnation, inflation, crumbling roads, and rising rents are hard problems that take years and real money to fix. Renaming a street, a lake, or a strait is not. It costs a fraction as much and lets officials point to something they “did.” A new name never fixes a pothole or lowers a grocery bill. This year offered an unusually rich catalogue of the habit, reaching from a city council in Texas to a wartime waterway in the Persian Gulf.

A Concept Borrowed From the Cremation Ground

Indian philosophy has an old idea called shmashana vairagya, describing the sudden clarity a person feels standing at a cremation ground, when ordinary ambitions look small. The feeling fades once the mourner goes home. Public policy has its own version of this cycle. In the raw hours after a tragedy, a scandal, or a surge of national feeling, officials decide, sometimes within a single social media post, what belongs on a map or a sign forever. The emotion passes in hours. The bill, when there is one, stays for years.

Keep ReadingShow less