Minkin is a research associate at Issue One. Assefa is a research intern at Issue One.
More than 10,000 officials across the country run U.S. elections. This interview is part of a series highlighting the election heroes who are the faces of democracy.
Nedra Cooper, who is not affiliated with any political party, has a longstanding commitment to public service.
A resident of Las Vegas since 1971, Cooper began working as a poll worker in 1985. For the past two decades, she has also trained poll workers for the elections department in Clark County, Nev. With over 2.4 million residents, Clark is the most populous country in the state and the 11th most populous in the nation. Clark County is also home to about 70 percent of all registered voters in Nevada.
In her leisure time, Cooper can be found sewing, horseback riding — an activity she has enjoyed since 1996 — and enjoying criminal fiction and poetry, with a particular fondness for the works of Edgar Allan Poe.
In addition to her work in elections, Cooper has been a community activist since her youth. She is a member of numerous civil organizations, including the Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Committee, which she helped found in 1981 with a focus on education. In fact, Cooper was pivotal in securing a building for after-school tutoring managed by its members. In 2020, just before the start of the coronavirus pandemic, she organized a reenactment, in Nevada, of the Selma, Ala. march for voting rights.
Cooper’s dedication to community service has been recognized with a nomination for the President's Volunteer Service Award, which was acknowledged with a letter from President Bill Clinton, and she received congressional recognition for her volunteer work on the disaster action team with the Red Cross.
Since 2022, she has been part of Issue One’s Faces of Democracy campaign advocating for protections for election workers and for regular, predictable and sufficient federal funding of elections.
This interview has been edited for length and clarity.
Issue One: How did you end up working in elections?
Nedra Cooper: I've always been interested in how elections are run. You hear a lot of different philosophies about what goes on in an election department. When I got out of high school, I signed up to be a voter registrar in 1971. I was amazed by how that went down. Later, I worked for the county, and they would have county workers go work the election. I had the opportunity to be a part of the election process for as many years as I was willing to do it. When I retired, the election department reached out to me and asked me if I'd be interested in becoming a part of their team, and I jumped at that opportunity.
IO: What would you say to someone who is considering becoming a poll worker this year. Do you have an elevator pitch as to why somebody should work as a poll worker?
NC: You’re either part of the problem or part of the solution. I just think it's really important to get involved. I think each of us owe it to give something back to the community, and one of the ways that we can give back is by working the polls and understanding that every vote counts.
IO: What part of the election administration story in your area do you think isn’t told enough or isn’t widely understood enough?
NC: The safety of the election is really, really important. People don't understand that it's everyday people — their neighbors, their mothers, their fathers, their uncles, their sisters, their brothers — working the polls. It's not some select group that was found somewhere on a deserted island. It is your neighbor who might be working the polls, who may be the one getting threatened. In recent years, we’ve lost a lot of really good workers because of threats. It’s heartbreaking.
IO: You've worked for the Clark County Elections Department for more than 16 years. What types of changes have you seen in how elections are run during this time?
NC: One major change is the involvement of more technology in running elections. I love the fact that we are trying to upgrade systems to make sure that we've got the best systems that we can afford so that we can maintain the integrity of elections.
We've come a long way from how we used to do elections. The first time that I ever worked an election was in the 1970s, and now, with technology, we are able to process voters more professionally and expeditiously, so folks are not standing in line for hours.
IO: Many people are surprised to learn that the federal government doesn’t routinely fund the costs of running elections. Why do you think the federal government should routinely fund election administration costs?
NC: The biggest reason is because they delegate a lot of election components to the states. If you had federal dollars, I think that would help in terms of running elections with standardized processes. It can be difficult when voters move and recognize that elections are run differently between states. Most of us think that wherever we go, the voting process is going to be the same, kind of like how the Department of Motor Vehicles is basically the same no matter where you go.
IO: Twice over the past two years, you’ve come to Washington, D.C., to meet with lawmakers and policymakers as a part of a bipartisan advocacy push organized by Issue One. What were your key takeaways from those conversations and meetings?
NC: One of my biggest takeaways was about funding, making sure that all election departments have the funds that they need to run effective elections. It's interesting to find out that in a lot of states, elections are among the lowest funding priorities.
IO: In recent years, election-related misconceptions, conspiracy theories and lies have proliferated. How has this impacted your work?
NC: We have a lot of people who come to vote with misinformation, and that's how they carry themselves when they come to the vote centers, as if the election department is the one that has perpetrated a crime, or disenfranchisement, and not realizing that is actually other sources that are providing them with inaccurate information.
IO: Given all these challenges, what inspires you to stay in this line of work?
NC: I just believe in democracy. I believe in voting. I believe in the right to vote, and I believe that it's my job, my duty, to help make sure that those who want to vote and are eligible to vote will get an opportunity to vote. That's what keeps me going.
IO: Outside of being passionate about elections, what are your hobbies, or what is a fun fact that most people might not know about you?
NC: I ride horses and I sew. I'm a grandmother and I have grandkids and great grandkids that I get to spend time with, I really enjoy that. And my favorite time of year is Christmas. I just love Christmas.
IO: What is your favorite book or movie?
NC: Oh, that's hard! I have such an eclectic book collection! I love criminal fiction, autobiographies and poetry. One of my favorite poets is Edgar Allan Poe.
IO: Which historical figure would you have most liked to have had an opportunity to meet and why?
NC: Harriet Tubman, because it took courage that I can't even begin to understand to be a part of the Underground Railroad and bring as many people to freedom as she did.
IO: It’s our understanding that in 2020, just before the coronavirus pandemic, you organized and coordinated a reenactment of the Selma march for voting rights in Nevada. What motivated you to do this?
NC: It was all about voting. I think sometimes people forget the shoulders that we stand on, especially minority groups. We just barely got the chance to vote, starting in 1965 with the Voting Rights Act, and even then, there were still states that made it difficult for Black voters to vote. There are generations who feel like there is no racism or discrimination because they feel like they've never experienced it. And so I think it is important to remember our ancestors. I am not able to work at the election department because of open arms; I am here because of the shoulders that I stood on. The NAACP in Las Vegas had to blaze a trail for all of the other civic leaders in our Black community to make it so that the rest of us could do these things.



















A golden tray sits on the Resolute Desk as President Donald Trump speaks during an announcement on American nuclear innovation in the Oval Office at the White House on July 24, 2026, in Washington, D.C. Trump is signing multiple executive orders targeting the nuclear energy sector and easing rules for new reactors and nuclear fuel supply chains.
Trump’s hubris rivals the fallen heroes of ancient Greek mythology
In January, the New York Times asked President Donald Trump if there were any limits on his global powers.
“Yeah,” the president responded, “there is one thing. My own morality. My own mind. It’s the only thing that can stop me.”
That was eight months ago, but fortunately Christopher Nolan’s blockbuster adaptation of “The Odyssey” has made ancient Greek literature newly relevant. Before that window closes, I’d like to talk about hubris.
Today, the term mostly means excessive pride or arrogance. That’s part of what the Greeks meant by it too, but the meaning was a bit richer and more specific. Hubris was an insolent or outrageous act that offended the gods, often because the transgressor was claiming abilities or authorities that solely belonged to supreme beings.
Nolan renamed and slightly modified the concept of xenia for the film, calling it “Zeus’ law.” In the director’s telling, mortals should follow the rules laid out by the gods, specifically the requirement to treat strangers with respect lest they be gods in disguise.
In a sense, hubris is the opposite, or at least the rejection, of xenia. The hubris of the suitors, and at times Odysseus himself, invites punishment by the gods and their mortal instruments.
Which brings me back to Donald Trump. His claim that there are no constraints on his personal power to dictate events on the global stage was one of the greatest expressions of hubris ever uttered by a political leader.
Trump’s claim was obviously false when he made it.
He vowed that he could end the Russia-Ukraine war in 24 hours. He’s proved powerless to make that happen. If he had divine powers to work his will, why would he have balked at implementing his tariffs so often that Wall Street adopted the “TACO trade” term for his deals? “TACO” stands for “Trump always chickens out.”
And why would Trump have made so many embarrassing concessions to China — from rescinding tariffs on Chinese goods to allowing them to buy crucial and incredibly valuable computer chips?
But Trump saw his success at capturing Venezuelan strongman Nicolas Maduro as proof of his ability to launch missiles to the same effect as Zeus’ lightning bolts. Trump believed he was the most powerful man who ever lived.
This is no exaggeration. In March, when the Iran invasion seemed successful, Trump gave a document penned by“Presidential Historian David King” to New York Times reporters Maggie Haberman and Jonathan Swan purporting to prove that Trump was “the most powerful person to have EVER walked this planet.” King was, in fact, a businessman and occasional caddy for legendary golfer Gary Player.
King compared Trump favorably to many of history’s most powerful, and often heinous, figures: Alexander the Great, Attila the Hun, William the Conqueror, Napoleon Bonaparte, Joseph Stalin, Genghis Khan, Mao Tse Tung, Adolf Hitler and Vladimir Lenin. Many of these men thought they were the most powerful person in the world, too. And many were defeated precisely because they believed it.
At least Napoleon and Hitler had a string of truly impressive victories before they learned the folly of hubris. The limits on Trump’s power have been exposed by far less august forces than the combined might of the allies in World War II or the fearsome Russian winter.
Iran is a comparatively middling power. But the regime’s ability to absorb punishment while imposing its will on the Strait of Hormuz has proved to be a greater constraint on Trump’s power than his morality or mind. We should note that, at least rhetorically, his morality has not proved much of a constraint. He has repeatedly promised to destroy Iranian “civilization” if the regime refuses to capitulate.
But they haven’t — and won’t anytime soon — because the regime’s tolerance for pain far outstrips Trump’s. The combined fear of skyrocketing oil prices, outrage of Gulf state potentates, diminishing weapon supplies and domestic unpopularity is doing the work that international law, congressional oversight and the collective opinion of foreign policy experts can’t or won’t do.
If I considered Trump more heroic than reason and facts could allow, I would say his Sisyphean predicament has the whiff of Greek tragedy to it. Trump is vexed by the fact that the Iranians won’t honor deals or ratify his countless premature claims of victory — giving new meaning to his vow that his presidency would make people tired of winning. It’s almost like they’re out-Trumping Trump.
Things might have gone better if he’d heeded that great Greek tragedian Sophocles: “For Zeus utterly abhors the boasts of a proud tongue.”
____
Jonah Goldberg is editor-in-chief of The Dispatch and the host of The Remnant podcast. His Twitter handle is @JonahDispatch.