Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Meet the Faces of Democracy: Nedra Cooper

Poll worker turned trainer of other poll workers explains what keeps her motivated to support voting rights and democracy

Minkin is a research associate at Issue One. Assefa is a research intern at Issue One.

More than 10,000 officials across the country run U.S. elections. This interview is part of a series highlighting the election heroes who are the faces of democracy.

Nedra Cooper, who is not affiliated with any political party, has a longstanding commitment to public service.

A resident of Las Vegas since 1971, Cooper began working as a poll worker in 1985. For the past two decades, she has also trained poll workers for the elections department in Clark County, Nev. With over 2.4 million residents, Clark is the most populous country in the state and the 11th most populous in the nation. Clark County is also home to about 70 percent of all registered voters in Nevada.

In her leisure time, Cooper can be found sewing, horseback riding — an activity she has enjoyed since 1996 — and enjoying criminal fiction and poetry, with a particular fondness for the works of Edgar Allan Poe.

In addition to her work in elections, Cooper has been a community activist since her youth. She is a member of numerous civil organizations, including the Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Committee, which she helped found in 1981 with a focus on education. In fact, Cooper was pivotal in securing a building for after-school tutoring managed by its members. In 2020, just before the start of the coronavirus pandemic, she organized a reenactment, in Nevada, of the Selma, Ala. march for voting rights.


Cooper’s dedication to community service has been recognized with a nomination for the President's Volunteer Service Award, which was acknowledged with a letter from President Bill Clinton, and she received congressional recognition for her volunteer work on the disaster action team with the Red Cross.

Since 2022, she has been part of Issue One’s Faces of Democracy campaign advocating for protections for election workers and for regular, predictable and sufficient federal funding of elections.

This interview has been edited for length and clarity.

Issue One: How did you end up working in elections?

Nedra Cooper: I've always been interested in how elections are run. You hear a lot of different philosophies about what goes on in an election department. When I got out of high school, I signed up to be a voter registrar in 1971. I was amazed by how that went down. Later, I worked for the county, and they would have county workers go work the election. I had the opportunity to be a part of the election process for as many years as I was willing to do it. When I retired, the election department reached out to me and asked me if I'd be interested in becoming a part of their team, and I jumped at that opportunity.

IO: What would you say to someone who is considering becoming a poll worker this year. Do you have an elevator pitch as to why somebody should work as a poll worker?

NC: You’re either part of the problem or part of the solution. I just think it's really important to get involved. I think each of us owe it to give something back to the community, and one of the ways that we can give back is by working the polls and understanding that every vote counts.

IO: What part of the election administration story in your area do you think isn’t told enough or isn’t widely understood enough?

NC: The safety of the election is really, really important. People don't understand that it's everyday people — their neighbors, their mothers, their fathers, their uncles, their sisters, their brothers — working the polls. It's not some select group that was found somewhere on a deserted island. It is your neighbor who might be working the polls, who may be the one getting threatened. In recent years, we’ve lost a lot of really good workers because of threats. It’s heartbreaking.

IO: You've worked for the Clark County Elections Department for more than 16 years. What types of changes have you seen in how elections are run during this time?

NC: One major change is the involvement of more technology in running elections. I love the fact that we are trying to upgrade systems to make sure that we've got the best systems that we can afford so that we can maintain the integrity of elections.

We've come a long way from how we used to do elections. The first time that I ever worked an election was in the 1970s, and now, with technology, we are able to process voters more professionally and expeditiously, so folks are not standing in line for hours.

IO: Many people are surprised to learn that the federal government doesn’t routinely fund the costs of running elections. Why do you think the federal government should routinely fund election administration costs?

NC: The biggest reason is because they delegate a lot of election components to the states. If you had federal dollars, I think that would help in terms of running elections with standardized processes. It can be difficult when voters move and recognize that elections are run differently between states. Most of us think that wherever we go, the voting process is going to be the same, kind of like how the Department of Motor Vehicles is basically the same no matter where you go.

IO: Twice over the past two years, you’ve come to Washington, D.C., to meet with lawmakers and policymakers as a part of a bipartisan advocacy push organized by Issue One. What were your key takeaways from those conversations and meetings?

NC: One of my biggest takeaways was about funding, making sure that all election departments have the funds that they need to run effective elections. It's interesting to find out that in a lot of states, elections are among the lowest funding priorities.

IO: In recent years, election-related misconceptions, conspiracy theories and lies have proliferated. How has this impacted your work?

NC: We have a lot of people who come to vote with misinformation, and that's how they carry themselves when they come to the vote centers, as if the election department is the one that has perpetrated a crime, or disenfranchisement, and not realizing that is actually other sources that are providing them with inaccurate information.

IO: Given all these challenges, what inspires you to stay in this line of work?

NC: I just believe in democracy. I believe in voting. I believe in the right to vote, and I believe that it's my job, my duty, to help make sure that those who want to vote and are eligible to vote will get an opportunity to vote. That's what keeps me going.

IO: Outside of being passionate about elections, what are your hobbies, or what is a fun fact that most people might not know about you?

NC: I ride horses and I sew. I'm a grandmother and I have grandkids and great grandkids that I get to spend time with, I really enjoy that. And my favorite time of year is Christmas. I just love Christmas.

IO: What is your favorite book or movie?

NC: Oh, that's hard! I have such an eclectic book collection! I love criminal fiction, autobiographies and poetry. One of my favorite poets is Edgar Allan Poe.

IO: Which historical figure would you have most liked to have had an opportunity to meet and why?

NC: Harriet Tubman, because it took courage that I can't even begin to understand to be a part of the Underground Railroad and bring as many people to freedom as she did.

IO: It’s our understanding that in 2020, just before the coronavirus pandemic, you organized and coordinated a reenactment of the Selma march for voting rights in Nevada. What motivated you to do this?

NC: It was all about voting. I think sometimes people forget the shoulders that we stand on, especially minority groups. We just barely got the chance to vote, starting in 1965 with the Voting Rights Act, and even then, there were still states that made it difficult for Black voters to vote. There are generations who feel like there is no racism or discrimination because they feel like they've never experienced it. And so I think it is important to remember our ancestors. I am not able to work at the election department because of open arms; I am here because of the shoulders that I stood on. The NAACP in Las Vegas had to blaze a trail for all of the other civic leaders in our Black community to make it so that the rest of us could do these things.

Read More

Is Bombing Iran Deja Vu All Over Again?

The B-2 "Spirit" Stealth Bomber flys over the 136th Rose Parade Presented By Honda on Jan. 1, 2025, in Pasadena, California. (Jerod Harris/Getty Images/TNS)

Jerod Harris/Getty Images/TNS)

Is Bombing Iran Deja Vu All Over Again?

After a short and successful war with Iraq, President George H.W. Bush claimed in 1991 that “the ghosts of Vietnam have been laid to rest beneath the sands of the Arabian desert.” Bush was referring to what was commonly called the “Vietnam syndrome.” The idea was that the Vietnam War had so scarred the American psyche that we forever lost confidence in American power.

The elder President Bush was partially right. The first Iraq war was certainly popular. And his successor, President Clinton, used American power — in the former Yugoslavia and elsewhere — with the general approval of the media and the public.

Keep ReadingShow less
Conspiratorial Thinking Isn’t Growing–Its Consequences Are
a close up of a typewriter with the word conspiracy on it

Conspiratorial Thinking Isn’t Growing–Its Consequences Are

The Comet Ping Pong Pizzagate shooting, the plot to kidnap Governor Gretchen Whitmer, and a man’s livestreamed beheading of his father last year were all fueled by conspiracy theories. But while the headlines suggest that conspiratorial thinking is on the rise, this is not the case. Research points to no increase in conspiratorial thinking. Still, to a more dangerous reality: the conspiracies taking hold and being amplified by political ideologues are increasingly correlated with violence against particular groups. Fortunately, promising new research points to actions we can take to reduce conspiratorial thinking in communities across the US.

Some journalists claim that this is “a golden age of conspiracy theories,” and the public agrees. As of 2022, 59% of Americans think that people are more likely to believe in conspiracy theories today than 25 years ago, and 73% of Americans think conspiracy theories are “out of control.” Most blame this perceived increase on the role of social media and the internet.

Keep ReadingShow less
Illness, Presidents, and Confidantes

U.S. President Joe Biden speaks at the Economic Club of Washington, DC September 19, 2024 in Washington, DC.

Getty Images, Win McNamee

Illness, Presidents, and Confidantes

Ever since the reality of President Biden’s mental and physical decline has been made public, ink is being spent, bemoaning that the nation was at risk because the President was not fit to make crucial decisions twenty-four hours a day.

Isn’t it foolish that, in a constitutional republic with clear separation and interdependence of powers, we should rely on one human being to make a decision at three in the morning that could have grievous consequences for the whole nation and the world? Are we under the illusion that we must and can elect an all-wise, always-on, energizer-bunny, superhero?

Keep ReadingShow less
Donald Trump

Trump's reliance on inflammatory, and often dehumanizing, language is not an unfortunate quirk—it’s a deliberate tactic.

Jabin Botsford/The Washington Post via Getty Images

From ‘Obliteration’ to ‘Enemies Within’: Trump’s Language Echoes Authoritarianism

When President Trump declared that the U.S. strikes “obliterated” Iran’s nuclear program, it wasn’t just a policy claim—it was an exercise in narrative control. Predictably, his assertion was met with both support and skepticism. Yet more than a comment on military efficacy, the statement falls into a broader pattern that underscores how Trump uses language not just to communicate but to dominate.

Alongside top officials like CIA Director John Ratcliffe and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, Trump claimed the strikes set Iran’s nuclear ambitions back by years. However, conflicting intelligence assessments tell a more nuanced story. A leaked Defense Intelligence Agency report concluded that while infrastructure was damaged and entrances sealed, core components such as centrifuges remained largely intact. Iran had already relocated much of its enriched uranium. The International Atomic Energy Agency echoed that damage was reparable.

Keep ReadingShow less