Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Staff wants more people of color named to the FEC

Federal Election Commission

Employees at the dormant FEC say one of the three vacancies, at least, should be filled with only the second non-white commissioner ever.

Sarah Silbiger/Getty Images

In its 45-year history, the Federal Election Commission has had 31 commissioners — all but one of them white.

"Such homogenous senior leadership is not reflective of the diverse nation the FEC serves, and it is detrimental to the morale and effectiveness of the agency," more than five dozen agency staff members said in a letter Monday urging President Trump and Senate leaders to fix the problem.

They asked Trump to nominate and the Senate to confirm at least one person of color for the three vacancies on the commission, which has been essentially shut down for the past eight weeks for lack of a four-member quorum. That seems highly unlikely before the election, not only because partisan politics are intensified during the campaign but also because senators will be in town for only a few weeks before November.


Nonetheless, the unusual public complaint from the nonpartisan civil servants inside the ranks suggests just how beleaguered the government's principal campaign finance watchdog is these days — and how the nation's reckoning with systemic racism this year has taken root in most every corner of society.

This is the second time in a year the FEC has been unable to function for lack of a quorum. After Matthew Petersen resigned almost a year ago, the agency was in limbo for more than nine months until conservative Texas campaign finance lawyer Trey Trainor was confirmed in May. But fellow conservative Caroline Hunter resigned just a month later, leaving the FEC toothless once again.

The president immediately proposed as her replacement Allen Dickerson of the Institute for Free Speech, a campaign finance deregulation advocacy group, but the Senate has not touched the nomination. If he joined the panel, only one of the other two vacancies could be filled by a Republican. The law mandates a bipartisan split to make sure neither party can impose its campaign finance views on the other.

But political affiliation is not the only important factor to consider when choosing new commissioners, the 66 staff members — about one-fifth of the FEC workforce — wrote in the letter. Proper enforcement of campaign finance laws is informed not only by commissioners' legal training, they said, but also the members' different life experiences and perspectives.

"By excluding members of a wide swath of our country's population, the commission loses out on the perspectives of people from diverse communities," the letter states. "We make this call not to tip the balance toward any party or potential nominee but instead to rectify a historical blindness to the benefits commissioners of diverse backgrounds and experiences can bring."

While not named in the letter, Shana Broussard, a senior attorney at the FEC since 2015, would be a fine starting point to diversify the commission as its first Black member. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer and Amy Klobuchar of Minnesota, the top Democrat on the committee that oversees the agency, have called for her nomination.

The only non-white member in FEC history was Ann Ravel, whose mother is Brazilian. She was a commissioner from 2013 to 2017 and is now running as a Democrat for the state Senate in California.

The letter was an outgrowth of a workshop on diversity, equity and inclusion the agency staff held this summer.


Read More

Man wearing Trump hat watches Trump on TV

Trump’s 10-to-1 rule aims to cut red tape, but fewer regulations can mean weaker food safety, Head Start services, and checks on presidential power.

Wu Xiaoling/Xinhua via Getty Images

Trump’s 10-to-1 Rule Gives the Presidency Too Much Power

We only think about the plumbing in our homes when something goes wrong. The same is true for government bureaucracy. Rules, procedures, and bureaucrats operate largely out of sight, making sure food is safe, Social Security checks arrive, workplaces are safe, and children with disabilities receive the services promised to them by law. Yes, there is plenty of red tape in government, just as an old house can accumulate pipes that no longer serve much purpose. But ripping out pipes simply because there are too many of them is not much of a plumbing strategy. Yet the Trump administration has made the number of federal regulations it eliminates a measure of success. That raises a more important question: When does cutting bureaucracy stop making government more efficient and start making it less capable?

1. The Case for Cutting Red Tape

Keep ReadingShow less
US Capitol building
white dome building near body of water during daytime
Photo by José Matute on Unsplash

We The People

On November 19, 1863, President Abraham Lincoln concluded the Gettysburg Address with a vision of democracy that has endured for more than a century:

“That this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom, and that government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth.”

Keep ReadingShow less
The U.S. Capitol in autumn.

New surveys of nearly 20,000 battleground voters find bipartisan majorities say Congress ignores the public, and that more public influence would help.

Philip Yabut/Getty Images

Americans Say the People Can Lead Congress to Common Ground; It Appears They Are Right

New surveys in battleground states and districts across the country, as well as nationwide, find that Americans—both Republicans and Democrats—believe Congress does what most Americans would do less than half the time.

They also found that majorities agree that if Congress were to be more influenced by the people, it would be more likely to find common ground. In fact, surveys show that majorities of Republicans and Democrats agree on what to do about many issues that Congress is stuck on.

Keep ReadingShow less