Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Burning Down the House

Opinion

Burning Down the House

A protestor holding a sign that states "We The People" standing in front of the U.S. Capitol.

Getty Images, Antenna

Five years ago, our house burned down.

We built our house, had lived there twenty-five years, and brought up our eight children there. Birthdays, holidays, reunions, parties, so many memories. Our family loved it; it was home.


My husband and I were in a neighboring town when we got the call from the fire department that night. The firefighters were already on the scene and needed to know if anyone was home and where they might be in the house.

Three of our sons were home.

Breaking land-speed records and passing fire trucks and police cars on the way to the fire, we finally flew over the hill onto our street and into a sea of flashing red and blue lights. Smoke was billowing everywhere, flames shooting into the air, devouring our house and lighting up the faces of the many police, firefighters and neighbors scattered across the lawn. We did not see our sons.

For the entire interminable car ride, not once did I think about any “thing” in my house, not my computer (with all my work), not even treasured photos. All I thought about were my children.

Our youngest son, William, a fourth grader, was safe and with our next-door neighbor. One of our middle sons, Michael, had tried repeatedly to rescue our oldest son, Jonathan, who is handicapped. On Michael’s last attempt, the firefighters had to drag him back down the collapsing stairs.

Four of the firefighters had just broken through Jonathan’s bedroom window. Using infrared, they found him. They carried him outside down the ladder, just moments before his room was totally consumed in flames.

Jonathan and Michael were loaded into an ambulance. I waved the ambulance down, and off we sped. The medics said both boys would need immediate treatment for carbon monoxide poisoning and smoke inhalation. But they would live.

As we went over the hill, I turned to look back, knowing I would never see our house, or anything in it, again. But it didn’t matter, not at all. I was filled with gratitude and joy at the medics’ words. My children would live.

In our current political climate, many feel we are figuratively “burning down the house”: i.e. our White House and House of Representatives, as well as the Supreme Court and Senate. All off-kilter, all burning.

So many incendiary decisions, political fights, policies, and even names changed, seemingly as capriciously as flames burn. (House fires can burn at 2,500 degrees Fahrenheit and double in size every 30 seconds.)

Too hot, too fast: not fair, not right, we think these policies and structures are destroying the scaffolding of our lives. Or we may be encouraged by what we view as a necessary bonfire, and call it progress.

The pendulum will swing; what is done will be undone. What is good will be called bad, and bad, good. Again and again, we go round. We have been there before; change is the nature of life.

There will be a time ...for all the works and days of hands…

And time yet for a hundred indecisions.

And “for decisions and revisions which a minute will reverse.” ~ T. S. Eliot

Our greatest concern must always be the potential “burning” of our Constitution. This we cannot allow. The precious worth of our democracy rests within this document of freedoms and rights. Embrace it and enforce it: it is the heart and soul of our country.

Although we may not agree on what the “good fight” is, courage is demanded, as in the firefighters who saved our sons’ lives. In a family, in a nation, we can never stop fighting for that most essential concept, for “we, the people.” And not only for the people living now but for those in the past who honed our ideals and sacrificed for them and those who will carry our dreams into the future.

Those words, “will live,” are the only words we want to hear in any monumental crisis. They confer clear focus and hope, whether in the ravages of a fire or in the madness of an age.

If we remember what is important, we will thrive. We will live on.

Notes: Our fire was an electrical fire, starting in an outlet, likely hot for at least a year before “erupting,” but was hidden behind a sofa. And our boys are fine: Jonathan, healthy; Michael just graduated from college; and William is now a teenager… Help!

Amy Lockard is an Iowa resident who regularly contributes to regional newspapers and periodicals. She is working on the second of a four-book fictional series based on Jane Austen’s “Pride and Prejudice."


Read More

A person's hand holding a stamp above a vote deposit box.

A woman casts her vote on the day of the presidential election on May 18, 2025 in Bucharest, Romania. Today's was a second-round vote after a first round on May 4th.

Getty Images, Andrei Pungovsch

When Rivals Converge: Electoral Influence Beyond the Cold War

A recent report issued by Republican staff members on the U.S. House Judiciary Committee, which focused on alleged European censorship practices, cited Romania as a case study of aggressive EU overreach, referencing investigations into the far-right candidate’s campaign financing and the annulment decision. In doing so, elements within the U.S. political system appeared to align rhetorically with Moscow’s framing of the episode as an example of EU elite suppression rather than Russian interference.

This does not constitute evidence of coordination between Russia and the United States. There is no public proof of joint strategy or operational cooperation. But it does suggest something more subtle: narrative convergence in support of the same political force abroad and in opposition to pro-European institutional actors.

Keep ReadingShow less
A display entitled 'The Dirty Business of Slavery' at the President's House on August 9, 2025 in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Tourists inspect a display entitled 'The Dirty Business of Slavery' at the President's House on August 9, 2025 in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Getty Images, Matthew Hatcher

Trump's Perversion of U.S. History

One more example of Trump's broadcasting fake news and lies is his confrontation with American history.

In his Executive Order, "Restore Truth and Sanity to American History," Trump stated that there has been "a concerted and widespread effort to rewrite our Nation’s history, replacing objective facts with a distorted narrative driven by ideology rather than truth." He has, among other things, instructed the National Park Service and a variety of museums and other sites to remove all information that "inappropriately disparage Americans, past or living." This includes information about slavery, the treatment of Native Americans, and a host of other subjects.

Keep ReadingShow less
Solidarity Without Borders: Civil Society Must Coordinate Internationally to Protect Democracy and Rights

People standing, holding letters that spell out "courage."

Photo provided

Solidarity Without Borders: Civil Society Must Coordinate Internationally to Protect Democracy and Rights

Across every continent, marginalized communities face systematic, escalating threats wherever democracy comes under attack. In the United States, Black Americans confront voter suppression and attacks on our history. Across the Americas, immigrants and racialized communities face racial profiling and assault by immigration enforcement. In Brazil and across South America, Indigenous peoples endure environmental destruction and rising violence. In Europe, Roma communities, immigrants, and refugees experience discrimination and hostile policies. Across Africa, the Middle East, and Asia, members of marginalized ethnic and religious communities face state violence, forced labor, and the denial of basic human rights. In every region of the world, members of the LGBTQ+ community face discrimination and threats.

These are not random or isolated acts of oppression. When considered together, they reveal something more sinister: authoritarianism is becoming increasingly more connected and coordinated around the world. This coordination specifically targets the most vulnerable because authoritarians understand that it is easier to manipulate a divided and fearful society. Attacking those who are most marginalized weakens the entire democratic fabric.

Keep ReadingShow less
A Party That Seeks to Nationalize and Control Elections Has Entered Fascist Territory

Donald Trump’s call to “nationalize” elections raises constitutional alarms. A deep dive into federalism, authoritarian warning signs, and 2026 implications.

Getty Images, Boris Zhitkov

A Party That Seeks to Nationalize and Control Elections Has Entered Fascist Territory

I’m well aware that using the word fascist in the headline of an article about Donald Trump invites a predictably negative response from some folks. But before we argue about words (and which labels are accurate and which aren’t), let’s look at the most recent escalation that led me to use it.

In Trump’s latest entry in his ongoing distraction-and-intimidation saga, he publicly suggested that elections should be “nationalized,” yanking control away from the states and concentrating it at the federal level. The remarks came after yet another interview in which Trump again claimed, without evidence, that certain states are “crooked” and incapable of running fair elections, a familiar complaint from the guy who only trusts ballots after they’ve gone his way.

Keep ReadingShow less