Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

What Democracy Promised Us — and What We Got Instead

Opinion

What Democracy Promised Us — and What We Got Instead
a flag on a pole
Photo by Don Starkey on Unsplash

The Fulcrum is committed to nurturing the next generation of journalists. To learn about the many NextGen initiatives we are leading, click HERE.

We asked Lluvia Chavez, a Mexican-American bilingual journalist dedicated to amplifying the stories of underrepresented communities and a cohort member with the Fulcrum Fellowship, to share her thoughts on what democracy means to her and her perspective on its current health.


Here’s her insight on the topic.

Democracy promises a lot. It promises power to the people, protection, and accountability for the powerful. It promises fairness, transparency, and dignity. But lately, I’ve been asking myself: Who actually gets to experience democracy that way?

Because what we’re living through is a version of “democracy” that I feel like something else entirely.

In 2024, Donald Trump became the first former U.S. president to be convicted on 34 felony counts in a criminal trial. Yet despite that historic verdict, he faced no jail time, no fines, no probation. In 2025, he returned to office, proof that the rule of law does not apply equally. Meanwhile, thousands of ordinary Americans — disproportionately people of color — sit behind bars for far less. According to the U.S. Sentencing Commission’s 2023 report, over 5,200 individuals were sentenced for nonviolent property or financial offenses (like fraud, theft, and embezzlement) in federal court alone — without any violent element. That stark contrast highlights how democracy can fail when justice is not applied evenly.

Democracy also claims to protect freedom of speech, protest, and the press. But across the country, that freedom is under threat. At Columbia University, graduate student and green card holder Mahmoud Khalil was detained by ICE in March 2025 after participating in pro-Palestine protests. Though a federal judge ordered his release, citing First Amendment violations, the damage was done. Fear rippled through immigrant communities, especially students and scholars who once believed their legal status protected them.

The Trump administration’s Executive Order 14188 escalated that fear. It authorized federal agencies to monitor international students involved in protests, treating dissent not as a constitutional right but as a potential threat. That same administration moved to punish Harvard University by freezing over $2.2 billion in federal funding and threatening its ability to enroll international students, a clear retaliation against academic institutions that refused to silence student voices.

These are not isolated incidents. They are symptoms of a democracy drifting from its principles. And those very principles — fairness, equality, the idea that power rests with the people — are what this country prides itself on, and projects onto the rest of the world. It’s why immigrants from every corner of the globe come here chasing the American dream. As a Latina, I’m frightened by how my community is being treated in times when democracy seems to be fading. When hard-working people live under constant threat, it’s hard to believe those promises were ever meant for us.

I still believe democracy is attainable, but not in the version that has been corrupted by unchecked power and selective enforcement. I believe in a democracy where the law applies to everyone, not just the powerless. As a reporter, I also feel immense responsibility as Journalism plays a huge role in democracy — it demands truth, amplifies voices, and insists on transparency.

To me, democracy means a shared responsibility to protect not only our rights, but also those of others. This is evident in the thousands of protests taking place across the country, many under banners that read “No Kings,” a reminder that no one is above the law. It means creating systems that uphold dignity, inclusion, and truth.

Democracy is ever-changing, and change is only beneficial if it brings real progress. Today, it can feel as though the efforts of those who fought for human rights are being eroded. But that’s also why it matters so much to stay engaged, to exercise our First Amendment rights — to keep pushing so that each shift brings us closer to the fairness and dignity democracy promised in the first place.

Please help the Fulcrum in its mission of nurturing the next generation of journalists by donating HERE!


Read More

Trump’s Anti-Latino Racism is a Major Liability for Democracy

Close-up of sign reading 'Immigrants Make America Great' at a Baltimore rally.

Trump’s Anti-Latino Racism is a Major Liability for Democracy

Donald Trump’s second administration has fully clarified Latinos’ racial position in America: our ethnic group’s labor, culture, and aspirations are too much for his supporters to stomach. The Latino presence in America triggers too many uneasy questions (are they White?), too many doubts (are they really American?), and too much resentment (why are they doing better than me?).

Trump’s targeted deportations of undocumented Latinos, unwarranted arrests of Latino citizens, and heightened ICE presence in Latino neighborhoods address these worries by lumping Latinos with Black people. Simply put, we have become yet another visible population that America socially stigmatizes, economically exploits, and politically terrorizes because aggrieved White adults want to preserve their rank as our nation’s premier racial group. The cumulative impacts are serious: just yesterday, an international panel of investigators on human rights and racism, backed by the U.N., found that such actions have resulted in “grave human rights violations.”

Keep ReadingShow less
People waving US flags

People waving US flags

LeoPatrizi/Getty Images

Democracy Fellowship Spotlight: Joel Gurin on Trustworthy Data

Earlier this year, the Bridge Alliance and the National Academy of Public Administration launched the Fellows for Democracy and Public Service Initiative to strengthen the country's civic foundations. This fellowship unites the Academy’s distinguished experts with the Bridge Alliance’s cross‑sector ecosystem to elevate distributed leadership throughout the democracy reform landscape. Instead of relying on traditional, top‑down models, the program builds leadership ecosystems: spaces where people share expertise, prioritize collaboration, and use public‑facing storytelling to renew trust in democratic institutions. Each fellow grounds their work in one of six core sectors essential to a thriving democratic republic.

Recently, I interviewed Joel Gurin, who founded and now leads the Center for Open Data Enterprise (CODE) and wrote Open Data Now. Before launching CODE in 2015, he chaired the White House Task Force on Smart Disclosure, which studied how open government data can improve consumer markets. He also led as Chief of the Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau at the Federal Communications Commission and spent over a decade at Consumer Reports.

Keep ReadingShow less
A balance.

A retired New York judge criticizes President Trump’s actions on tariffs, judicial defiance, alleged corruption, and executive overreach, warning of threats to constitutional order and the rule of law in the United States.

Getty Images

A Pay‑to‑Play Presidency Testing the Limits of Our Institutions

Another day, another outrage, and another attack on the Constitution that this President has twice taken a vow to uphold. Instead of accepting the Supreme Court decision striking down his imposition of tariffs, the President is now imposing them by executive order and excoriating the Justices who ruled against him. His disrespect for the Constitution and the judiciary is boundless.

To this retired New York State judge, all hell seems to have broken loose in our federal government. Congress lies dormant when it is not enabling the chief executive’s misuse and personal acquisition of federal funds, and, notwithstanding its recent tariffs ruling, a majority of the Supreme Court generally rubber-stamps the administration’s actions through opaque “shadow docket” rulings. In doing so, SCOTUS abdicates its role as an independent check.

Keep ReadingShow less
Bravado Isn’t a Strategy: Why the Iran War Has No Endgame

People clear rubble in a house in the Beryanak District after it was damaged by missile attacks two days before, on March 15, 2026 in Tehran, Iran. The United States and Israel continued their joint attack on Iran that began on February 28. Iran retaliated by firing waves of missiles and drones at Israel, and targeting U.S. allies in the region.

Getty Images, Majid Saeedi

Bravado Isn’t a Strategy: Why the Iran War Has No Endgame

Most of what we have heard from the administration as it pertains to the Iran War is swagger and bro-talk. A few days into the war, the White House released a social media video that combined footage of the bombardment with clips from video games. Not long after, it released a second video, titled “Justice the American Way,” that mixed images of the U.S. military with scenes from movies like Gladiator and Top Gun Maverick.

Speaking to reporters at the Pentagon, War Secretary Pete Hegseth boasted of “death and destruction from the sky all day long.” “They are toast, and they know it,” he said. “This was never meant to be a fair fight... we are punching them while they’re down.”

Keep ReadingShow less