Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

In swing states, D's and R's agree on how to lower health care costs

Stethoscope, pile of hundred dollar bills and a calculator
IronHeart/Getty Images

As the price of health care continues to rise faster than wages, a new public consultation survey by the Program for Public Consultation finds bipartisan majorities of Americans in six swing states, as well as nationally, support major proposals for lowering health care costs.

This survey is part of the “Swing Six Issue Surveys” series being conducted in the run-up to the November election in Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin on major policy issues. Unlike traditional polls, respondents in a public consultation survey go through an online “policymaking simulation” in which they are provided briefings and arguments for and against each policy. Content is reviewed by experts on different sides to ensure accuracy and balance.


“Even with the airwaves of the swing states filled with divisive messages, when people there focused on possible solutions for lowering health care costs, we found tremendous bipartisan common ground,” said Steven Kull, director of the Program for Public Consultation.

This survey was fielded May 23-July 8 with 6,854 adults participating, including 3,649 in Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin (approximately 600 in each), and 3,205 nationally. PPC is a program within the University of Maryland’s School of Public Policy.

Capping drug prices

The federal government capping the price of all drugs to what is charged in other developed countries is favored by large majorities in every swing state (77 percent to 81 percent), including majorities of Democrats (84 percent to 87 percent) and Republicans (72 percent to 82 percent). Nationally, a large bipartisan majority (78 percent) is also in favor.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

In the advance briefing, respondents were informed that drugs in the United States generally cost twice as much as in other developed countries and that this proposal would result in fewer new drugs being developed, per aCongressional Budget Office study.

Making higher ACA subsidies permanent

Making permanent the pandemic-era law that temporarily increased Affordable Care Act subsidies for lower- and middle-income households is favored by nearly two-thirds in every swing state (62 percent to 68 percent), including majorities of Democrats (71 percent to 78 percent) and Republicans (55 percent to 62 percent). Nationally, a bipartisan majority of 67 percent is in favor.

Subsidies are scheduled to return to pre-pandemic levels in 2026.

Revoking patents for unaffordable drugs developed with federal aid

Allowing the executive branch to revoke patents for drugs developed with federal aid, which are unaffordable for most who need them,is favored in every swing state (74 percent to 77 percent), including Democrats (79 percent to 84 percent) and Republicans (70 percent to 75 percent), as well as nationally (73 percent).

publicconsultation.org

Prohibiting deals that delay the release of generic drugs

Prohibiting “pay-to-delay” — in which brand-name drug companies preserve their ability to charge high prices by paying generic drug companies to delay bringing their generic version to market — is favored by majorities in every swing state (72 percent to 77 percent), including Democrats (75 percent to 84 percent) and Republicans (68 percent to 72 percent), as well as nationally (71 percent).

publicconsultation.org

Requiring price transparency for health care costs

Price transparency — requiring that health and insurance providers make prices publicly available as a means of promoting competition and lowering costs — has been enacted by both the Trump and Biden administrations through executive orders.

Making price transparency requirements permanent through legislation is favored by more than three-quarters in every swing state (75 percent to 84 percent), including Democrats (82 percent to 88 percent) and Republicans (74 percent to 80 percent), as well as nationally (77 percent).

publicconsultation.org

Funding substance abuse treatment

Providing $13 billion in additional federal funding to help make treatment for substance use disorder low-cost or free to nearly everyone who needs and wants it is favored by majorities in every swing state (65 percent to 79 percent), including Democrats (77 percent to 86 percent) and Republicans (56 percent to 77 percent). Nationally, a bipartisan majority (80 percent) is in favor.

publicconsultation.org

Read More

Members of Congress standing next to a poster about Project 2025

Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer and Sen. Patty Murray look at their Project 2025 poster during a press conference on Sept. 12.

Bill Clark/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images

Project 2025 policies are on the Nov. 5 ballot

Corbin is professor emeritus of marketing at the University of Northern Iowa.

It’s becoming crystal clear, as we near the Nov. 5 presidential election, that voters need to seriously check out the radical government reformation policies contained within the Heritage Foundation’s Project 2025. Here’s why.

The right-wing think tank has written not one, not two, but nine “Mandate for Leadership” documents for Republican presidential candidates, with its first playbook published in 1981. The Heritage Foundation spent $22 million —serious money — in 2023 to create Project 2025 for Donald Trump to implement.

Keep ReadingShow less
screenshot of Steve Kornacki

You don't need to be Steve Kornacki to know which states (and counties) to watch on election night.

YouTube screenshot

How to win a bar bet on election night

Klug served in the House of Representatives from 1991 to 1999. He hosts the political podcast “Lost in the Middle: America’s Political Orphans.”

The odds are you don’t go to sleep at night and dream of precinct maps and tabulation deadlines like NBC’s breathless election guru Steve Kornacki. Watch him on election night and you will be dazzled and exhausted by his machine-gun-like sharing of statistics and crosstabs.

Keep ReadingShow less
Latino man standing at the counter in a bakery

"Trump wants to bring jobs back to America. For us, this means more work here and for our community,” says Joge Sactic, who owns a bakery just outside Washington, D.C.

Beatrice M. Spadacini

Small-business owner prioritizes immigration in this year’s election

Spadacini is an Italian American freelance journalist who writes about social justice and public health.

The Fulcrum presents We the People, a series elevating the voices and visibility of the persons most affected by the decisions of elected officials. In this installment, we explore the motivations of over 36 million eligible Latino voters as they prepare to make their voices heard in November.

Keep ReadingShow less
Donald Trump and Kamala Harris debating

Former President Donald Trump and Vice President Kamala Harris debate on Sept. 10.

Demetrius Freeman/The Washington Post via Getty Images

The state of our nation: Polling Americans’ priorities for election 2024

Originally published by The 19th.

This is the third annual poll from The 19th and SurveyMonkey, designed to shed light on what women, particularly women of color, and LGBTQ+ people think about the issues animating our politics. It comes as Americans face another critical election, one that could make Democrat Kamala Harris the first woman to hold the country’s highest office or give Republican Donald Trump a second term. Here’s what we learned about how Americans view the candidates, as well as opinions on abortion and on reproductive care more broadly, the ability to access gender-affirming care and more.

Keep ReadingShow less
Taylor Swift

Taylor Swift made another call for peopleto register to vote at the Video Music Awards on Thursday.

Christopher Polk/Billboard via Getty Images

What will Taylor Swift's endorsement of Kamala Harris mean?

Nevins is co-publisher of The Fulcrum and co-founder and board chairman of the Bridge Alliance Education Fund.

On Sep 11, we reported in The Fulcrum thatTaylor Swift had entered the political fray by endorsing Vice President Kamala Harris for president of the United States. I ended the article by stating that “the full extent of her impact remains to be seen.”

Now only a few days later, some data is already suggesting the impact could be significant. The day after Swift endorsed Harris there was a significant surge of visitors to Vote.gov, the U.S. government website that helps citizens understand how they can register to vote. According to a spokesperson for the Government Services Administration, Swift’s endorsement on Instagram led directly to 337,826 people visiting the site.

Keep ReadingShow less