Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

In swing states, D's and R's agree on how to lower health care costs

Stethoscope, pile of hundred dollar bills and a calculator
IronHeart/Getty Images

As the price of health care continues to rise faster than wages, a new public consultation survey by the Program for Public Consultation finds bipartisan majorities of Americans in six swing states, as well as nationally, support major proposals for lowering health care costs.

This survey is part of the “Swing Six Issue Surveys” series being conducted in the run-up to the November election in Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin on major policy issues. Unlike traditional polls, respondents in a public consultation survey go through an online “policymaking simulation” in which they are provided briefings and arguments for and against each policy. Content is reviewed by experts on different sides to ensure accuracy and balance.


“Even with the airwaves of the swing states filled with divisive messages, when people there focused on possible solutions for lowering health care costs, we found tremendous bipartisan common ground,” said Steven Kull, director of the Program for Public Consultation.

This survey was fielded May 23-July 8 with 6,854 adults participating, including 3,649 in Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin (approximately 600 in each), and 3,205 nationally. PPC is a program within the University of Maryland’s School of Public Policy.

Capping drug prices

The federal government capping the price of all drugs to what is charged in other developed countries is favored by large majorities in every swing state (77 percent to 81 percent), including majorities of Democrats (84 percent to 87 percent) and Republicans (72 percent to 82 percent). Nationally, a large bipartisan majority (78 percent) is also in favor.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

In the advance briefing, respondents were informed that drugs in the United States generally cost twice as much as in other developed countries and that this proposal would result in fewer new drugs being developed, per aCongressional Budget Office study.

Making higher ACA subsidies permanent

Making permanent the pandemic-era law that temporarily increased Affordable Care Act subsidies for lower- and middle-income households is favored by nearly two-thirds in every swing state (62 percent to 68 percent), including majorities of Democrats (71 percent to 78 percent) and Republicans (55 percent to 62 percent). Nationally, a bipartisan majority of 67 percent is in favor.

Subsidies are scheduled to return to pre-pandemic levels in 2026.

Revoking patents for unaffordable drugs developed with federal aid

Allowing the executive branch to revoke patents for drugs developed with federal aid, which are unaffordable for most who need them,is favored in every swing state (74 percent to 77 percent), including Democrats (79 percent to 84 percent) and Republicans (70 percent to 75 percent), as well as nationally (73 percent).

publicconsultation.org

Prohibiting deals that delay the release of generic drugs

Prohibiting “pay-to-delay” — in which brand-name drug companies preserve their ability to charge high prices by paying generic drug companies to delay bringing their generic version to market — is favored by majorities in every swing state (72 percent to 77 percent), including Democrats (75 percent to 84 percent) and Republicans (68 percent to 72 percent), as well as nationally (71 percent).

publicconsultation.org

Requiring price transparency for health care costs

Price transparency — requiring that health and insurance providers make prices publicly available as a means of promoting competition and lowering costs — has been enacted by both the Trump and Biden administrations through executive orders.

Making price transparency requirements permanent through legislation is favored by more than three-quarters in every swing state (75 percent to 84 percent), including Democrats (82 percent to 88 percent) and Republicans (74 percent to 80 percent), as well as nationally (77 percent).

publicconsultation.org

Funding substance abuse treatment

Providing $13 billion in additional federal funding to help make treatment for substance use disorder low-cost or free to nearly everyone who needs and wants it is favored by majorities in every swing state (65 percent to 79 percent), including Democrats (77 percent to 86 percent) and Republicans (56 percent to 77 percent). Nationally, a bipartisan majority (80 percent) is in favor.

publicconsultation.org

Read More

Donald Trump and Joe Biden in the Oval Office

President-elect Donald Trump and President Joe Biden meet in the Oval Office on Nov. 13.

Jabin Botsford /The Washington Post via Getty Images

Selfish Biden has given us four years of Trump

It’s been a rough go of it for those of us still clinging to antiquated notions that with leadership and power should come things like honesty, integrity, morality, and expertise.

One look at any number of Donald Trump’s Cabinet picks and it’s clear those things no longer matter to a great number of people. (Hell, one look at Trump himself and that’s painfully, comically obvious.)

Keep ReadingShow less
Donald Trump
Brandon Bell/Getty Images

How to approach Donald Trump's second presidency

The resistance to Donald Trump has failed. He has now shaped American politics for nearly a decade, with four more years — at least — to go. A hard truth his opponents must accept: Trump is the most dominant American politician since Franklin Delano Roosevelt.

This dominance unsettles and destabilizes American democracy. Trump is a would-be authoritarian with a single overriding impulse — to help himself above all else.

Yet somehow he keeps winning.

Keep ReadingShow less
Donald Trump and his family on stage

President-elect Donald Trump claimed a mandate on Nov. 6.

Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

Elections don’t tell leaders what voters want. 2024 was no exception.

Interpreting the meaning of any election is no easy task. In a democracy, the results never speak for themselves. That is as true of the 2024 presidential election as it has been for any other.

This year, as is the case every four years, the battle to say what the results mean and what lessons the winning candidate should learn began as soon as the voters were counted. But, alas, elections don’t speak for themselves.

Keep ReadingShow less
Young people cheering

Supporters cheer during a campaign event with Vice President Kamala Harris at Temple University in Philadelphia on Aug. 6.

Demetrius Freeman/The Washington Post via Getty Images

The youth have spoken in favor of Harris, but it was close

For many young voters, the 2024 presidential election was the moment they had been waiting for. Months of protests and demonstrations and two political conventions had all led to this — the opportunity to exercise their democratic rights and have a say in their future.

While Donald Trump won the election, Kamala Harris won among young voters. But even though 18- to 29-year-olds provided the strongest support for Harris, President Joe Biden did better with that cohort four years ago.

Keep ReadingShow less