Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

In swing states, D's and R's agree on how to lower health care costs

Stethoscope, pile of hundred dollar bills and a calculator
IronHeart/Getty Images

As the price of health care continues to rise faster than wages, a new public consultation survey by the Program for Public Consultation finds bipartisan majorities of Americans in six swing states, as well as nationally, support major proposals for lowering health care costs.

This survey is part of the “Swing Six Issue Surveys” series being conducted in the run-up to the November election in Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin on major policy issues. Unlike traditional polls, respondents in a public consultation survey go through an online “policymaking simulation” in which they are provided briefings and arguments for and against each policy. Content is reviewed by experts on different sides to ensure accuracy and balance.


“Even with the airwaves of the swing states filled with divisive messages, when people there focused on possible solutions for lowering health care costs, we found tremendous bipartisan common ground,” said Steven Kull, director of the Program for Public Consultation.

This survey was fielded May 23-July 8 with 6,854 adults participating, including 3,649 in Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin (approximately 600 in each), and 3,205 nationally. PPC is a program within the University of Maryland’s School of Public Policy.

Capping drug prices

The federal government capping the price of all drugs to what is charged in other developed countries is favored by large majorities in every swing state (77 percent to 81 percent), including majorities of Democrats (84 percent to 87 percent) and Republicans (72 percent to 82 percent). Nationally, a large bipartisan majority (78 percent) is also in favor.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

In the advance briefing, respondents were informed that drugs in the United States generally cost twice as much as in other developed countries and that this proposal would result in fewer new drugs being developed, per aCongressional Budget Office study.

Making higher ACA subsidies permanent

Making permanent the pandemic-era law that temporarily increased Affordable Care Act subsidies for lower- and middle-income households is favored by nearly two-thirds in every swing state (62 percent to 68 percent), including majorities of Democrats (71 percent to 78 percent) and Republicans (55 percent to 62 percent). Nationally, a bipartisan majority of 67 percent is in favor.

Subsidies are scheduled to return to pre-pandemic levels in 2026.

Revoking patents for unaffordable drugs developed with federal aid

Allowing the executive branch to revoke patents for drugs developed with federal aid, which are unaffordable for most who need them,is favored in every swing state (74 percent to 77 percent), including Democrats (79 percent to 84 percent) and Republicans (70 percent to 75 percent), as well as nationally (73 percent).

publicconsultation.org

Prohibiting deals that delay the release of generic drugs

Prohibiting “pay-to-delay” — in which brand-name drug companies preserve their ability to charge high prices by paying generic drug companies to delay bringing their generic version to market — is favored by majorities in every swing state (72 percent to 77 percent), including Democrats (75 percent to 84 percent) and Republicans (68 percent to 72 percent), as well as nationally (71 percent).

publicconsultation.org

Requiring price transparency for health care costs

Price transparency — requiring that health and insurance providers make prices publicly available as a means of promoting competition and lowering costs — has been enacted by both the Trump and Biden administrations through executive orders.

Making price transparency requirements permanent through legislation is favored by more than three-quarters in every swing state (75 percent to 84 percent), including Democrats (82 percent to 88 percent) and Republicans (74 percent to 80 percent), as well as nationally (77 percent).

publicconsultation.org

Funding substance abuse treatment

Providing $13 billion in additional federal funding to help make treatment for substance use disorder low-cost or free to nearly everyone who needs and wants it is favored by majorities in every swing state (65 percent to 79 percent), including Democrats (77 percent to 86 percent) and Republicans (56 percent to 77 percent). Nationally, a bipartisan majority (80 percent) is in favor.

publicconsultation.org

Read More

Hand-drawn Pilgrim hat with the words "Happy Thanksgiving"
mushroomstore/Getty Images

This Thanksgiving, it's not only OK but necessary to talk politics

This Thanksgiving, do not follow the old maxim that we should never discuss politics at the dinner table.

Many people's emotions are running high right now. Elections often bring out a wide range of feelings, whether pride and optimism for those who are pleased with the results or disappointment and frustration from those who aren’t. After a long and grueling election season, we need to connect with and not avoid one another.

Keep ReadingShow less
Women voting

Voters cast their votes on Nov. 5 in in Nashua, New Hampshire.

Zhu Ziyu/VCG via Getty Images

Harris lost support from women overall — but not women over 65

Originally published by The 19th.

Vice President Kamala Harris’ potentially history-making bid to become the first woman in the White House did little to bring more women voters into the Democratic Party during the first presidential election after the loss of federal abortion rights, with seemingly one exception: women over 65.

These women were motivated by the same issues that were important to the overall electorate, like the economy, threats to democracy, immigration and abortion, something central to Harris’ failed bid for the presidency. They were, however, more likely to name priorities like caregiving, aging in place and preserving the government retirement savings program Social Security as decisive factors, according to an AARP analysis of an AP VoteCast survey of 120,000 registered voters.

Keep ReadingShow less
Donald Trump at a podium
Howard Schnapp/Newsday RM via Getty Images

Was Trump elected due to sexism, misogyny and racism?

As should be expected, the Democratic Party and its supporters are casting blame for the results of the 2024 presidential election. Many are looking inside the party and its ideology, policies, candidates and messaging, as they should. But some are trying to blame sexism (even misogyny) and racism for the failure of a woman of color to win the election.

As Americans, we should all disavow sexism, misogyny and racism, while acknowledging that these views still exist in some human hearts. But blaming the content of American hearts broadly is wrong, further divides us and is counterproductive to the goal of building a majority in the future.

Keep ReadingShow less
Kamala Harris embraces Beyonce

Beyoncé Knowles hugs Vice President Kamala Harris during a in October. Celebrity endorsements did little to help Harris reach young male voters.

Yi-Chin Lee/Houston Chronicle via Getty Images

How Democrats let a rising generation of supporters slip away

Far-right streamer Nick Fuentes, who usually welcomes publicity, received the type he probably didn’t want after Donald Trump’s election victory.

The 26-year old white supremacist and antisemite, who has been banned from multiple social media sites for violating hate speech policies, posted on X: “Your body, my choice. Forever.”

Keep ReadingShow less