Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Scenario planning for election outcomes: Finding agency in uncertainty

It is better to rehearse the future than be blindsided by the present

Amxious woman waiting to vote

The right tools can transform anxiety about the unknown into constructive action.

SDI Productions/Getty Images

Solomon is faculty in the Stanford University's design school and a creator of civic futures programs likeVote by Design,The Futures Happening, andThe Team.

As we move closer to the election, it's tempting to oscillate between obsessive news consumption and complete disengagement. Both responses are understandable — they're deeply rooted in our evolutionary biology.

Our brains are wired for a "fight or flight" response to uncertainty, a mechanism that served our ancestors well when facing immediate physical threats. But in today's complex and polarized political landscape, this instinctive defensive posture can leave us perpetually anxious and reactive, rather than thoughtfully prepared.


As someone who has spent over two decades helping leaders and students learn to navigate complexity and envision multiple futures, I've seen firsthand how the right tools can transform anxiety about the unknown into constructive action. Through my work with organizations ranging from Fortune 500 companies to emerging democracy reform nonprofits I've found that scenario planning offers something uniquely valuable: a way to engage with uncertainty that neither minimizes its significance nor leaves us paralyzed by it.

Scenario planning used to be a process reserved for military planners and elite organizations. Over the last decade, and magnified by the pandemic, it has evolved into a more accessible approach for organizations, communities and individuals seeking to build resilience in uncertain times. The power isn't in predicting the future — an impossible task, even for "expert" pollsters. Instead, scenario planning invites us to explore multiple possible futures to assess our preparedness and inform robust decisions that can strengthen us regardless of what unfolds. This process helps rewire our instinctive defensive response to uncertainty, creating neural pathways that lead to more strategic and proactive thinking.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

Many organizations are putting these principles into practice in compelling ways. The Bridgespan Group, a global consultancy, developed an open Election Year Resource for Nonprofit Leaders to help social-sector organizations think systematically about potential risks and opportunities. Its framework explores four potential electoral outcomes: "A Democratic Trifecta," "A Republican Trifecta" and two variations of "A Divided Government." Using a robust strategic diagnostic, leaders, boards and funders can assess their organizational strength across strategy, operations and funding –= identifying actions that make sense regardless of the election outcome.

The WithIn Collaborative takes a different but complementary approach, focusing on building internal capacity and resilience. Its Election Prep Guide begins with a crucial foundation: understanding our present-day resources and strengths. It asks powerful questions like "Who are the loved ones, ancestors, colleagues and allies who are with me in times of celebration, and in times of change and uncertainty?" and "When I am up against something unexpected, what are the practices that help steady me?" This centering on the present moment — and things that are in our control — strengthens our awareness of available options, even when the world feels filled with ambiguity.

The WithIn scenario framework is elegantly simple yet profound, exploring three potential outcomes: a Democratic victory, a Republican victory or an inconclusive election. While these vignettes may not capture every detail of what might unfold, they offer productive portals for engaging with highly probable outcomes, allowing us to rehearse our responses in advance.

The power of scenario planning is that it works at multiple scales, starting with your own stance towards the future. Ask yourself: Where will you be during and after the election? Who will you be with? What support systems do you want to have in place? What information sources will you trust? How will you manage your emotional well-being? These aren't just practical questions — they're anchors that can help ground us when uncertainty peaks. By thinking through these scenarios now, we create mental and emotional scaffolding that can support us through whatever unfolds.

Robust actions — those that make sense across multiple scenarios — might include strengthening community connections, diversifying information sources, building emergency savings or developing new skills. While these moves won't predict the future, they'll make us more resilient to whatever future arrives.

While we can't control everything that happens, we're not powerless. By systematically exploring different possibilities while identifying concrete actions we can take now, we maintain our ability to act meaningfully in the present moment. That's not just good planning — it's a vital form of civic engagement and collective and personal resilience building.

I encourage you to start having these conversations in your own communities and organizations. The future may be uncertain, but by preparing together, we can face it with greater confidence and capacity.

Election scenario template


Read More

Hand-drawn Pilgrim hat with the words "Happy Thanksgiving"
mushroomstore/Getty Images

This Thanksgiving, it's not only OK but necessary to talk politics

This Thanksgiving, do not follow the old maxim that we should never discuss politics at the dinner table.

Many people's emotions are running high right now. Elections often bring out a wide range of feelings, whether pride and optimism for those who are pleased with the results or disappointment and frustration from those who aren’t. After a long and grueling election season, we need to connect with and not avoid one another.

Keep ReadingShow less
Women voting

Voters cast their votes on Nov. 5 in in Nashua, New Hampshire.

Zhu Ziyu/VCG via Getty Images

Harris lost support from women overall — but not women over 65

Originally published by The 19th.

Vice President Kamala Harris’ potentially history-making bid to become the first woman in the White House did little to bring more women voters into the Democratic Party during the first presidential election after the loss of federal abortion rights, with seemingly one exception: women over 65.

These women were motivated by the same issues that were important to the overall electorate, like the economy, threats to democracy, immigration and abortion, something central to Harris’ failed bid for the presidency. They were, however, more likely to name priorities like caregiving, aging in place and preserving the government retirement savings program Social Security as decisive factors, according to an AARP analysis of an AP VoteCast survey of 120,000 registered voters.

Keep ReadingShow less
Donald Trump at a podium
Howard Schnapp/Newsday RM via Getty Images

Was Trump elected due to sexism, misogyny and racism?

As should be expected, the Democratic Party and its supporters are casting blame for the results of the 2024 presidential election. Many are looking inside the party and its ideology, policies, candidates and messaging, as they should. But some are trying to blame sexism (even misogyny) and racism for the failure of a woman of color to win the election.

As Americans, we should all disavow sexism, misogyny and racism, while acknowledging that these views still exist in some human hearts. But blaming the content of American hearts broadly is wrong, further divides us and is counterproductive to the goal of building a majority in the future.

Keep ReadingShow less
Kamala Harris embraces Beyonce

Beyoncé Knowles hugs Vice President Kamala Harris during a in October. Celebrity endorsements did little to help Harris reach young male voters.

Yi-Chin Lee/Houston Chronicle via Getty Images

How Democrats let a rising generation of supporters slip away

Far-right streamer Nick Fuentes, who usually welcomes publicity, received the type he probably didn’t want after Donald Trump’s election victory.

The 26-year old white supremacist and antisemite, who has been banned from multiple social media sites for violating hate speech policies, posted on X: “Your body, my choice. Forever.”

Keep ReadingShow less