Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Scenario planning for election outcomes: Finding agency in uncertainty

It is better to rehearse the future than be blindsided by the present

Amxious woman waiting to vote

The right tools can transform anxiety about the unknown into constructive action.

SDI Productions/Getty Images

Solomon is faculty in the Stanford University's design school and a creator of civic futures programs likeVote by Design,The Futures Happening, andThe Team.

As we move closer to the election, it's tempting to oscillate between obsessive news consumption and complete disengagement. Both responses are understandable — they're deeply rooted in our evolutionary biology.

Our brains are wired for a "fight or flight" response to uncertainty, a mechanism that served our ancestors well when facing immediate physical threats. But in today's complex and polarized political landscape, this instinctive defensive posture can leave us perpetually anxious and reactive, rather than thoughtfully prepared.


As someone who has spent over two decades helping leaders and students learn to navigate complexity and envision multiple futures, I've seen firsthand how the right tools can transform anxiety about the unknown into constructive action. Through my work with organizations ranging from Fortune 500 companies to emerging democracy reform nonprofits I've found that scenario planning offers something uniquely valuable: a way to engage with uncertainty that neither minimizes its significance nor leaves us paralyzed by it.

Scenario planning used to be a process reserved for military planners and elite organizations. Over the last decade, and magnified by the pandemic, it has evolved into a more accessible approach for organizations, communities and individuals seeking to build resilience in uncertain times. The power isn't in predicting the future — an impossible task, even for "expert" pollsters. Instead, scenario planning invites us to explore multiple possible futures to assess our preparedness and inform robust decisions that can strengthen us regardless of what unfolds. This process helps rewire our instinctive defensive response to uncertainty, creating neural pathways that lead to more strategic and proactive thinking.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

Many organizations are putting these principles into practice in compelling ways. The Bridgespan Group, a global consultancy, developed an open Election Year Resource for Nonprofit Leaders to help social-sector organizations think systematically about potential risks and opportunities. Its framework explores four potential electoral outcomes: "A Democratic Trifecta," "A Republican Trifecta" and two variations of "A Divided Government." Using a robust strategic diagnostic, leaders, boards and funders can assess their organizational strength across strategy, operations and funding –= identifying actions that make sense regardless of the election outcome.

The WithIn Collaborative takes a different but complementary approach, focusing on building internal capacity and resilience. Its Election Prep Guide begins with a crucial foundation: understanding our present-day resources and strengths. It asks powerful questions like "Who are the loved ones, ancestors, colleagues and allies who are with me in times of celebration, and in times of change and uncertainty?" and "When I am up against something unexpected, what are the practices that help steady me?" This centering on the present moment — and things that are in our control — strengthens our awareness of available options, even when the world feels filled with ambiguity.

The WithIn scenario framework is elegantly simple yet profound, exploring three potential outcomes: a Democratic victory, a Republican victory or an inconclusive election. While these vignettes may not capture every detail of what might unfold, they offer productive portals for engaging with highly probable outcomes, allowing us to rehearse our responses in advance.

The power of scenario planning is that it works at multiple scales, starting with your own stance towards the future. Ask yourself: Where will you be during and after the election? Who will you be with? What support systems do you want to have in place? What information sources will you trust? How will you manage your emotional well-being? These aren't just practical questions — they're anchors that can help ground us when uncertainty peaks. By thinking through these scenarios now, we create mental and emotional scaffolding that can support us through whatever unfolds.

Robust actions — those that make sense across multiple scenarios — might include strengthening community connections, diversifying information sources, building emergency savings or developing new skills. While these moves won't predict the future, they'll make us more resilient to whatever future arrives.

While we can't control everything that happens, we're not powerless. By systematically exploring different possibilities while identifying concrete actions we can take now, we maintain our ability to act meaningfully in the present moment. That's not just good planning — it's a vital form of civic engagement and collective and personal resilience building.

I encourage you to start having these conversations in your own communities and organizations. The future may be uncertain, but by preparing together, we can face it with greater confidence and capacity.

Election scenario template


Read More

Donald Trump and his family on stage

President-elect Donald Trump claimed a mandate on Nov. 6.

Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

Elections don’t tell leaders what voters want. 2024 was no exception.

Interpreting the meaning of any election is no easy task. In a democracy, the results never speak for themselves. That is as true of the 2024 presidential election as it has been for any other.

This year, as is the case every four years, the battle to say what the results mean and what lessons the winning candidate should learn began as soon as the voters were counted. But, alas, elections don’t speak for themselves.

Keep ReadingShow less
Young people cheering

Supporters cheer during a campaign event with Vice President Kamala Harris at Temple University in Philadelphia on Aug. 6.

Demetrius Freeman/The Washington Post via Getty Images

The youth have spoken in favor of Harris, but it was close

For many young voters, the 2024 presidential election was the moment they had been waiting for. Months of protests and demonstrations and two political conventions had all led to this — the opportunity to exercise their democratic rights and have a say in their future.

While Donald Trump won the election, Kamala Harris won among young voters. But even though 18- to 29-year-olds provided the strongest support for Harris, President Joe Biden did better with that cohort four years ago.

Keep ReadingShow less
Hand-drawn Pilgrim hat with the words "Happy Thanksgiving"
mushroomstore/Getty Images

This Thanksgiving, it's not only OK but necessary to talk politics

This Thanksgiving, do not follow the old maxim that we should never discuss politics at the dinner table.

Many people's emotions are running high right now. Elections often bring out a wide range of feelings, whether pride and optimism for those who are pleased with the results or disappointment and frustration from those who aren’t. After a long and grueling election season, we need to connect with and not avoid one another.

Keep ReadingShow less
Men in "Dominicans for Trump" shirts

Attendees cheer as former President Donald Trump speaks on stage during a campaign rally in Allentown, Pa.,. in October.

Jabin Botsford/The Washington Post via Getty Images

The great Latino apology: It’s ‘the street,’ stupid

Donald Trump secured a surprising 43 percent of the Latino vote, enough to swing the election in his favor. Now, Democrats are forced to confront the fallout of their failure, which is rooted in decades of disinvestment and disregard for the diverse Latino communities. Articles, conferences and white papers have warned of these consequences for years.

Those familiar with Latino politics know that Latinos voting for Republicans is nothing new. Historically, Cuban Americans and some South American groups have formed a solid Republican voting bloc. What’s new is the recent shift among Mexican Americans, Central Americans and Puerto Ricans. Was it religion? Racism? Machismo? Misogyny? Negative experiences with government in the United States and home countries? A look at Mexico and its first female president (of Jewish descent) this year might challenge some of these assumptions. Whether this shift is permanent remains to be seen.

Keep ReadingShow less