Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Trump is a past, present and future threat to national security

Vladimir Putin and Donald Trump shaking hands

President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin shake hands at the 2019 G20 summit in Oasaka, Japan.

Mikhail Svetlov/Getty Images

Corbin is professor emeritus of marketing at the University of Northern Iowa.

Psychological scientists who study human behavior concur that past actions are the best predictor of future actions. If past actions caused no problem, then all is well. If, however, a person demonstrated poor behavior in the past, well, buckle up. The odds are very great the person will continue to perform poorly if given the chance.

Donald Trump’s past behavior regarding just one area of protecting American citizens — specifically national defense — tells us that if he becomes the 47th president, we’re in a heap of trouble. Examining Trump’s past national security endeavors needs to be seriously examined by Americans before voting on Nov. 5.


A vast majority of Americans recall how Trump cozied up to Russia as our rival assisted in his 2016 election with disinformation, misinformation and propaganda about Hillary Clinton. It’s no surprise that Trump repeated that same behavior when he and his friend Vladimir Putin — who he referred to as a “genius” — had Russia interfere on Trump’s behalf in the 2020 election. As reported by the conservative-oriented Wall Street Journal, election interference by Russia is already being repeated for the 2024 election.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

Of major concern to journalists who write for the Wall Street Journal, which is owned by Rupert Murdoch’s News Corporation (Murdoch also owns Fox News), is Trump’s relationship with the CRINK nations — China, Russia, Iran and North Korea — and its effect on our national security.

Trump’s embrace of CRINK’s dictators as he plans for another term as president is disturbing as noted by the Journal article.

CRINK, along with a few of their allies, have formed an axis of evil that is in direct opposition to Western power, freedom and democracy. CRINK’s authoritarian-fascism rule is one Trump has embraced by the explicit praise he’s lathered on each of CRINK’s dictators.

Students of history know China has been trying to take control of Taiwan since 1954, Russia started attacking Ukraine in 2014, Iran began its anti-Israel stance in 1979 and the North Korea-South Korea conflict has been in existence since 1950. But Trump is not a student of history or international relationships; he’s a transactional individual who adores power-brokers.

On May 8, 2018, President Trump withdrew America from a 2015 nuclear deal with Iran. How’d that work out? On April 13, Iran launched more than 300 missiles on Israel. This act alone has caused U.S. intelligence services and international officials to conclude Iran poses a significant threat to America and its allies. For the record, Russia has a very large arsenal of around 6,000 nuclear warheads, China has over 400 and North Korea has 50.

Joseph Collins, a retired Army colonel who served as a deputy assistant secretary of defense for stability operations and is lifetime member of the Council on Foreign Relations, is critical of Trump’s record. He notes in addition to Trump ending the Iranian nuclear development agreement, little was gained by Trump withdrawing America from the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty with Russia, the Paris Climate Accord, the Trans-Pacific Partnership and the United Nations Human Rights Council and Health Organization.

Collins contends these series of Trump’s withdrawals has allowed “China and other powers to fill into the leadership vacuum. U.S. security partners are troubled by these developments and see them as evidence of a new, selfish neo-isolationism on the part of the nation that used to take pride in its leadership of the new world.”

Furthermore, Collins has seen first-hand that Trump has a dysfunctional decision-making style. It’s well documented the former president did not have long intelligence briefings, didn’t read detailed briefing materials, misplaced confidential documents, designated some secret national documents as personal, shared classified information with unauthorized foreigners, and made major decisions without consultation with allies and advisors.

In summary, Collins states “it is impossible to give the Trump national security policy good marks.”

Let’s face the reality of homeland security. America cannot stand alone. We desperately need to maintain a solid relationship with our 200-plus allies, increase Department of Defense appropriations and vigorously oppose CRINK’s advances or we will cease to exist as a democracy.

Should Trump return to the White House on Jan. 20, 2025, the safety and security of 342 million Americans is in jeopardy.

Now that you are fully aware of Trump’s national defense blunders and know past actions are the best predictor of future actions, is he our best choice to be leader of the free world? If Trump is elected, you can kiss democracy good-bye and “CRINK-U.S.” will be the newest acronym for authoritarian-fascism dictatorship-oriented countries.

Read More

Donald Trump at a podium

Former President Donald Trump's campaign exploits racist dog whistles, demonizing immigrants and endorsing white nationalist rhetoric, writes Johnson.

Adam J. Dewey/Anadolu via Getty Images)

Contending with whiteness in 2024

Johnson is a United Methodist pastor, the author of "Holding Up Your Corner: Talking About Race in Your Community" and program director for the Bridge Alliance, which houses The Fulcrum.

The 2024 presidential campaign is shaping to be a racial reckoning for America.

With Vice President Kamala Harris positioned to shatter the glass ceiling as the first woman and person of color in the Oval Office and Donald Trump's candidacy fanning the flames of racial hatred, the election is laying bare the nation's ongoing struggle with whiteness and racial justice. As a pastor and advocate for racial reconciliation, I believe this moment will test our democracy's commitment to liberty and justice for all.

Keep ReadingShow less
Kamala Harris and Donald Trump

Kamala Harris and Donald Trump

Jacek Boczarski/Anadolu, Andrew Leyden/NurPhoto via Getty Images

Where Harris, Trump stand on issues is less important than you think

Anderson edited "Leveraging: A Political, Economic and Societal Framework," has taught at five universities and ran for the Democratic nomination for a Maryland congressional seat in 2016.

Candidates for president of the United States typically run for office as though they were running for prime minister in a parliamentary democracy where their own party would have a clear majority in parliament. In such systems, which make up the vast majority of democracies in the world, the prime minister has enormous power to set policy.

In the United States, you would think that presidents are prime ministers because they always talk about what "I" will do as president based on where "I" stand on a great range of issues. While the president admittedly has much more power to set foreign policy, all major domestic policies must be passed by Congress. Indeed, Congress makes laws, while the president and the Cabinet execute them.

Keep ReadingShow less
The Latino voting bloc: Young, growing and complex
Photo by Element5 Digital

The Latino voting bloc: Young, growing and complex

Sugrue is vice president of research at the Latino Policy Forum.

The Fulcrum presents We the People, a series elevating the voices and visibility of the persons most affected by the decisions of elected officials. In this first installment, we explore the motivations of over 36 million eligible Latino voters as they prepare to make their voices heard in November.

Keep ReadingShow less
Kamala Harris

Pollsters found that negative attitudes toward women make people much less likely to support Kamala Harris for president in 2024.

Jacek Boczarski/Anadolu via Getty Images

U.S. voters say they’re ready for a woman president − but sexist attitudes still go along with opposition to Harris

Eichen is a PhD researcher of political science at the University of Massachusetts Amherst; Rhodes is an associate professor of political science at UMass Amherst. Nteta is a provost professor of political science and director of the UMass Amherst Poll.

Since President Joe Biden exited the presidential race on July 21, 2024, and endorsed Vice President Kamala Harris as the Democratic presidential nominee, Harris’ campaign has generated widespread enthusiasm and attention. She quickly became the official Democratic presidential nominee and erased Donald Trump’s lead over Biden in national and swing-state polling.

Keep ReadingShow less
Kamala Harris and Tim Walz walk onto a stage

Vice President Kamala Harris and Gov. Tim Walz need to do real outreach to Gen Z if they want to win that segment of the vote, writes Tang.

Yalonda M. James/San Francisco Chronicle via Getty Images)

Don't meme it: Harris/Walz must address Gen Z's real concerns to win

Tang is a rising senior at Deerfield Academy.

It started with coconuts, brats and idiosyncratic dances. It has expanded into pictures with piglets and Minnesota jokes now that Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz has joined the presidential race as Kamala Harris' running mate. Such viral posts represent the Democratic ticket’s reversal of fortune — the Harris campaign says it has raised more than $500 million since President Joe Biden exited the race.

Keep ReadingShow less