Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Lawsuits challenge vote-by-mail rules in super restrictive Texas, Tenn.

Mail-in ballot
NoDerog/Getty Images

Lawsuits hoping to force states to ease voting-by-mail rules continue to flood courthouses around the country — the flow accelerated by a sense of urgency among Democrats and civil rights groups that the coronavirus will suppress turnout.

The most recent claims are in Texas and Tennessee, two of only six states that in the face of the pandemic are still sticking with strict excuse requirements for obtaining an absentee ballot.

Republican governments in both states, which have had some of the smallest shares of ballots cast by mail in the country, are fighting the idea that fear of Covid-19 infection should be excuse enough to vote from home this year — starting with the several runoffs postponed in Texas until July 14 and the congressional and legislative primaries still set for Aug 6 in Tennessee.


The suit filed in federal court Monday by the Texas chapter of the NAACP, the Texas Alliance of Retired Americans, Voto Latino and other groups maintain that four provisions of state election law are unconstitutional:

  • the requirement that voters pay the postage to return absentee ballots
  • the rule that such ballots are only counted if they arrive at local tabulating offices by the day after Election Day
  • the widespread discretion state officials have to toss ballots by questioning the validity of the signatures on the envelopes
  • the restrictions on who may help voters by collecting and delivering their ballots.

Marc Elias, the attorney who has filed cases on these issues in 13 states, is representing the plaintiffs but his usual clients, the Democratic Party and its campaign committees, are not involved.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

At the end of last month Elias filed a second federal lawsuit in Texas. That one, on behalf of several younger voters including Democratic activists, seeks to strike down as unconstitutional age discrimination the state law allowing only voters older than 65 to have no-other-excuse-required access to an absentee ballot.

GOP Attorney General Ken Paxton, meanwhile, is appealing a state court ruling last month that the pandemic is enough of a reason to request a mail-in ballot.

That is the same ruling that a voting rights group and voters in Memphis are seeking from a state judge in Tennessee, asking him to decree that all voters worried about the coronavirus may cite that as their reason for seeking a mail ballot. Their suit, filed Friday, argues that the law's excuse rules violate the right-to-vote guarantee in the state constitution.

The complaint is against several state officials including Gov. Bill Lee and Secretary of State Tre Hargett. Both Republicans say they will oppose efforts in the General Assembly, which reconvenes next month, to legislate an expansion of the excuse roster to include fear the pandemic — on the grounds the state cannot afford all the extra mail ballots they would then need to produce and process.

Read More

Trump and Biden at the debate

Our political dysfunction was on display during the debate in the simple fact of the binary choice on stage: Trump vs Biden.

Jabin Botsford/The Washington Post via Getty Images

The debate, the political duopoly and the future of American democracy

Johnson is the executive director of the Election Reformers Network, a national nonpartisan organization advancing common-sense reforms to protect elections from polarization.

The talk is all about President Joe Biden’s recent debate performance, whether he’ll be replaced at the top of the ticket and what it all means for the very concerning likelihood of another Trump presidency. These are critical questions.

But Donald Trump is also a symptom of broader dysfunction in our political system. That dysfunction has two key sources: a toxic polarization that elevates cultural warfare over policymaking, and a set of rules that protects the major parties from competition and allows them too much control over elections. These rules entrench the major-party duopoly and preclude the emergence of any alternative political leadership, giving polarization in this country its increasingly existential character.

Keep ReadingShow less
Robert F. Kennedy Jr.

Voters should be able to take the measure of Robert F. Kennedy Jr., since he is poised to win millions of votes in November.

Andrew Lichtenstein/Getty Images

Kennedy should have been in the debate – and states need ranked voting

Richie is co-founder and senior advisor of FairVote.

CNN’s presidential debate coincided with a fresh batch of swing-state snapshots that make one thing perfectly clear: Robert F. Kennedy Jr. may be a longshot to be our 47th president and faces his own controversies, yet the 10 percent he’s often achieving in Arizona, Michigan, Nevada and other battlegrounds could easily tilt the presidency.

Why did CNN keep him out with impossible-to-meet requirements? The performances, mistruths and misstatements by Joe Biden and Donald Trump would have shocked Abraham Lincoln and Stephen Douglas, who managed to debate seven times without any discussion of golf handicaps — a subject better fit for a “Grumpy Old Men” outtake than one of the year’s two scheduled debates.

Keep ReadingShow less
I Voted stickers

Veterans for All Voters advocates for election reforms that enable more people to participate in primaries.

BackyardProduction/Getty Images

Veterans are working to make democracy more representative

Proctor, a Navy veteran, is a volunteer with Veterans for All Voters.

Imagine this: A general election with no negative campaigning and four or five viable candidates (regardless of party affiliation) competing based on their own personal ideas and actions — not simply their level of obstruction or how well they demonize their opponents. In this reformed election process, the candidate with the best ideas and the broadest appeal will win. The result: The exhausted majority will finally be well-represented again.

Keep ReadingShow less
Person voting at a dropbox in Washington, D.C.

A bill moving through Congress would only allow U.S. citizens to vote in D.C. municipal eletions.

Chen Mengtong/China News Service via Getty Images

The battle over noncitizen voting in America's capital

Rogers is the “data wrangler” at BillTrack50. He previously worked on policy in several government departments.

Should you be allowed to vote if you aren’t an American citizen? Or according to the adage ‘No taxation without representation’, if you pay taxes should you get to choose the representatives who help spend those tax dollars? Those questions are at the heart of the debate over a bill to restrict voting to U.S. citizens.

Keep ReadingShow less
people walking through a polling place

Election workers monitor a little-used polling place in Sandy Springs, Ga., during the state's 2022 primary.

Nathan Posner/Anadolu Agency via Getty Images

What November election? Half of the U.S. House is already decided.

Troiano is the executive director ofUnite America, a philanthropic venture fund that invests in nonpartisan election reform to foster a more representative and functional government. He’s also the author of “The Primary Solution.”

Last month, Americans were treated to an embarrassing spectacle: Reps. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) and Jasmine Crockett (D-Texas) tradingpersonal insults related to “fake eyelashes” and a “bleach blonde bad built butch body” during a late-night committee hearing. Some likened it to Bravo’s “Real Housewives” reality TV series, and wondered how it was possible that elected officials could act that way and still be elected to Congress by the voters.

The truth is, the vast majority of us don’t actually elect our House members — not even close. Less than 10 percent of voters in Crockett’s district participated in her 2024 Democratic primary, which all but guaranteed her re-election in the safe blue district. Greene ran unopposed in her GOP primary — meaning she was re-elected without needing to win a single vote. The nearly 600,000 voters in her overwhelmingly red district were denied any meaningful choice. Both contests were decided well before most voters participate in the general election.

Keep ReadingShow less