Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Lawsuits challenge vote-by-mail rules in super restrictive Texas, Tenn.

Mail-in ballot
NoDerog/Getty Images

Lawsuits hoping to force states to ease voting-by-mail rules continue to flood courthouses around the country — the flow accelerated by a sense of urgency among Democrats and civil rights groups that the coronavirus will suppress turnout.

The most recent claims are in Texas and Tennessee, two of only six states that in the face of the pandemic are still sticking with strict excuse requirements for obtaining an absentee ballot.

Republican governments in both states, which have had some of the smallest shares of ballots cast by mail in the country, are fighting the idea that fear of Covid-19 infection should be excuse enough to vote from home this year — starting with the several runoffs postponed in Texas until July 14 and the congressional and legislative primaries still set for Aug 6 in Tennessee.


The suit filed in federal court Monday by the Texas chapter of the NAACP, the Texas Alliance of Retired Americans, Voto Latino and other groups maintain that four provisions of state election law are unconstitutional:

  • the requirement that voters pay the postage to return absentee ballots
  • the rule that such ballots are only counted if they arrive at local tabulating offices by the day after Election Day
  • the widespread discretion state officials have to toss ballots by questioning the validity of the signatures on the envelopes
  • the restrictions on who may help voters by collecting and delivering their ballots.

Marc Elias, the attorney who has filed cases on these issues in 13 states, is representing the plaintiffs but his usual clients, the Democratic Party and its campaign committees, are not involved.

At the end of last month Elias filed a second federal lawsuit in Texas. That one, on behalf of several younger voters including Democratic activists, seeks to strike down as unconstitutional age discrimination the state law allowing only voters older than 65 to have no-other-excuse-required access to an absentee ballot.

GOP Attorney General Ken Paxton, meanwhile, is appealing a state court ruling last month that the pandemic is enough of a reason to request a mail-in ballot.

That is the same ruling that a voting rights group and voters in Memphis are seeking from a state judge in Tennessee, asking him to decree that all voters worried about the coronavirus may cite that as their reason for seeking a mail ballot. Their suit, filed Friday, argues that the law's excuse rules violate the right-to-vote guarantee in the state constitution.

The complaint is against several state officials including Gov. Bill Lee and Secretary of State Tre Hargett. Both Republicans say they will oppose efforts in the General Assembly, which reconvenes next month, to legislate an expansion of the excuse roster to include fear the pandemic — on the grounds the state cannot afford all the extra mail ballots they would then need to produce and process.

Read More

Princeton Gerrymandering Project Gives California Prop 50 an ‘F’
Independent Voter News

Princeton Gerrymandering Project Gives California Prop 50 an ‘F’

The special election for California Prop 50 wraps up November 4 and recent polling shows the odds strongly favor its passage. The measure suspends the state’s independent congressional map for a legislative gerrymander that Princeton grades as one of the worst in the nation.

The Princeton Gerrymandering Project developed a “Redistricting Report Card” that takes metrics of partisan and racial performance data in all 50 states and converts it into a grade for partisan fairness, competitiveness, and geographic features.

Keep ReadingShow less
"Vote Here" sign

America’s political system is broken — but ranked choice voting and proportional representation could fix it.

Stephen Maturen/Getty Images

Election Reform Turns Down the Temperature of Our Politics

Politics isn’t working for most Americans. Our government can’t keep the lights on. The cost of living continues to rise. Our nation is reeling from recent acts of political violence.

79% of voters say the U.S. is in a political crisis, and 64% say our political system is too divided to solve the nation’s problems.

Keep ReadingShow less
U.S. President Barack Obama speaking on the phone in the Oval Office.

U.S. President Barack Obama talks President Barack Obama talks with President Hamid Karzai of Afghanistan during a phone call from the Oval Office on November 2, 2009 in Washington, DC.

Getty Images, The White House

‘Obama, You're 15 Years Too Late!’

The mid-decade redistricting fight continues, while the word “hypocrisy” has become increasingly common in the media.

The origin of mid-decade redistricting dates back to the early history of the United States. However, its resurgence and legal acceptance primarily stem from the Texas redistricting effort in 2003, a controversial move by the Republican Party to redraw the state's congressional districts, and the 2006 U.S. Supreme Court decision in League of United Latin American Citizens v. Perry. This decision, which confirmed that mid-decade redistricting is not prohibited by federal law, was a significant turning point in the acceptance of this practice.

Keep ReadingShow less
Hand of a person casting a ballot at a polling station during voting.

Gerrymandering silences communities and distorts elections. Proportional representation offers a proven path to fairer maps and real democracy.

Getty Images, bizoo_n

Gerrymandering Today, Gerrymandering Tomorrow, Gerrymandering Forever

In 1963, Alabama Governor George Wallace declared, "Segregation now, segregation tomorrow, segregation forever." (Watch the video of his speech.) As a politically aware high school senior, I was shocked by the venom and anger in his voice—the open, defiant embrace of systematic disenfranchisement, so different from the quieter racism I knew growing up outside Boston.

Today, watching politicians openly rig elections, I feel that same disbelief—especially seeing Republican leaders embrace that same systematic approach: gerrymandering now, gerrymandering tomorrow, gerrymandering forever.

Keep ReadingShow less