Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Judge not buying Texas arguments against online voter registration

mouse clicking check
alexsl/Getty Images

It only took a few days for the revived drive to expand the voter rolls in Texas to get back on track.

A civil rights group has been pushing litigation for four years alleging the second most populous state's voter registration rules violate federal law. And just three days after the first hearing in the latest iteration of the lawsuit, a federal judge in San Antonio signaled he may soon force the state to adopt new online registration practices.

District Judge Orlando Garcia said Texas had presented "no viable defense" for not allowing people to simultaneously update their voter registration information when they apply for or renew a driver's license online.


After making that determination, the judge ordered the state to update the three plaintiffs' voter information so they may register by Monday's deadline for voting in the congressional and presidential primaries on Super Tuesday. He did not make a decision on the underlying suit that would apply to voters statewide.

But his skepticism about the state's position was welcome news for voting rights advocates hoping to boost turnout this year — if not in time for the March 3 voting then at least by November, when Democrats say that a surge in new voters could lead them to carry the state (which has 38 electoral votes) for the first time since 1976.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

This year 38 states and the District of Columbia allow online registration. Texas is by far the biggest state that does not. Michigan, North Carolina and New Jersey are the others with more than 5 million people but no online registration.

The Texas Civil Rights Project has sued on behalf of people unable to update their registration when changing their addresses on their driver's licenses through the Department of Public Safety's online portal. The suit contends a 1993 law, requiring states to register people who ask or alter their voting information when updating their licenses, should apply to people doing so online, not just in-person at a motor vehicle bureau.

Texas now requires people using the DPS site to print, sign and mail in a separate form to update voter information — extra steps the "motor voter law" was intended to eliminate.

"Congress lifted these burdens to make voter registration easier, not more confusing and difficult," Garcia wrote.

This is the second time such an effort has been before Garcia. But after he sided with the group in its first suit in 2018, an appeals court overturned him on the grounds that the plaintiffs had subsequently registered and so their claim was moot.

Read More

One Lesson from the Elections: Looking At Universal Voting

A roll of "voted" stickers.

Pexels, Element5 Digital

One Lesson from the Elections: Looking At Universal Voting

The analysis and parsing of learned lessons from the 2024 elections will continue for a long time. What did the campaigns do right and wrong? What policies will emerge from the new arrangements of power? What do the parties need to do for the future?

An equally important question is what lessons are there for our democratic structures and processes. One positive lesson is that voting itself was almost universally smooth and effective; we should applaud the election officials who made that happen. But, many elements of the 2024 elections are deeply challenging, from the increasingly outsized role of billionaires in the process to the onslaught of misinformation and disinformation.

Keep ReadingShow less
MERGER: The Organization that Brought Ranked Choice Voting and Ended SuperPACs in Maine Joins California’s Nonpartisan Primary Pioneers

A check mark and hands.

Photo by Allison Saeng on Unsplash. Unsplash+ License obtained by the author.

MERGER: The Organization that Brought Ranked Choice Voting and Ended SuperPACs in Maine Joins California’s Nonpartisan Primary Pioneers

Originally published by Independent Voter News.

Today, I am proud to share an exciting milestone in my journey as an advocate for democracy and electoral reform.

Keep ReadingShow less
Half-Baked Alaska

A photo of multiple checked boxes.

Getty Images / Thanakorn Lappattaranan

Half-Baked Alaska

This past year’s elections saw a number of state ballot initiatives of great national interest, which proposed the adoption of two “unusual” election systems for state and federal offices. Pairing open nonpartisan primaries with a general election using ranked choice voting, these reforms were rejected by the citizens of Colorado, Idaho, and Nevada. The citizens of Alaska, however, who were the first to adopt this dual system in 2020, narrowly confirmed their choice after an attempt to repeal it in November.

Ranked choice voting, used in Alaska’s general elections, allows voters to rank their candidate choices on their ballot and then has multiple rounds of voting until one candidate emerges with a majority of the final vote and is declared the winner. This more representative result is guaranteed because in each round the weakest candidate is dropped, and the votes of that candidate’s supporters automatically transfer to their next highest choice. Alaska thereby became the second state after Maine to use ranked choice voting for its state and federal elections, and both have had great success in their use.

Keep ReadingShow less
Top-Two Primaries Under the Microscope

The United States Supreme Court.

Getty Images / Rudy Sulgan

Top-Two Primaries Under the Microscope

Fourteen years ago, after the Supreme Court ruled unconstitutional the popular blanket primary system, Californians voted to replace the deeply unpopular closed primary that replaced it with a top-two system. Since then, Democratic Party insiders, Republican Party insiders, minor political parties, and many national reform and good government groups, have tried (and failed) to deep-six the system because the public overwhelmingly supports it (over 60% every year it’s polled).

Now, three minor political parties, who opposed the reform from the start and have unsuccessfully sued previously, are once again trying to overturn it. The Peace and Freedom Party, the Green Party, and the Libertarian Party have teamed up to file a complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. Their brief repeats the same argument that the courts have previously rejected—that the top-two system discriminates against parties and deprives voters of choice by not guaranteeing every party a place on the November ballot.

Keep ReadingShow less