Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

On the right, anti-Trumpers launch ads boosting absentee alternative

President Donald Trump with Fox News anchors

Conservatives launched their vote-by-mail ad campaign on Fox during President Trump's Sunday town hall.

Oliver Contreras-Pool/Getty Images

The push to expand mail-in voting because of the coronavirus pandemic has mostly come from Democrats, but now a group of prominent GOP dissidents is joining the call.

Republicans for the Rule of Law, a group of conservatives opposed to President Trump, has launched a $1 million campaign to promote voting by mail in this year's election. The first spot aired during Sunday night's Fox News town hall with the president.

Almost a dozen polls in the past month have found lopsided majorities in favor of expanding the option to vote absentee. But Trump and congressional GOP leaders have hardened in opposition, making the issue increasingly partisan and casting doubt on additional federal aid to make voting easier and safer during the public health crisis.


The 30-second spot will also run throughout the week on local stations and cable networks. It is the latest in a series of TV ads opposing Trump's policies the group has aired since its creation a year ago as an offshoot of Defending Democracy Together, a group of prominent "never Trump" conservatives assembled by political commentator Bill Kristol.

The ad features testimony from eight Republican voters who urge viewers to tell their elected officials to support expanding absentee voting. "We shouldn't have to put ourselves in danger to vote for you," a Pennsylvania woman identified only as Angela says at the end.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

The other voters say, in short snippets: "Voting is our patriotic duty as Americans. If coronavirus is still around in November, it won't be safe to vote at polling stations. Congress needs to step up and help the states prepare for expanding mail and absentee voting to ensure a fair, safe and secure election for everyone."


Republicans call for expanded voting options amidst the pandemicyoutu.be


Republicans for the Rule of Law is urging Congress to provide additional funding to the states to support the certain surge in absentee voting this fall, although the group doesn't specify how much money is sufficient.

The economic rescue package enacted in March included $400 million in grants that states may use however they choose for making their elections run more smoothly this year. Good-government groups and election officials say that's not nearly enough to cover all the anticipated expenses, and congressional Democrats' opening position for the next economic stimulus bill is that it should provide $4 billion more.

But GOP leaders say they're in no rush to produce another expensive stimulus bill and have resisted the Democrats' idea of focusing the next round of aid on the states. And, with the presidential election now less than six months away, time is running short to make arrangements for all the extra printing and counting-equipment purchases many states say will be essential to conducting a comprehensive and reliable vote.

"Five states already have vote-by-mail elections, and they've learned how to do it safely, securely, and fairly. Other states can learn from their example, but they need congressional support," said Sarah Longwell, the group's spokeswoman. "We've lost enough to the coronavirus. We can't lose our democracy, too."

Read More

A better direction for democracy reform

Denver election judge Eric Cobb carefully looks over ballots as counting continued on Nov. 6. Voters in Colorado rejected a ranked choice voting and open primaries measure.

Helen H. Richardson/MediaNews Group/The Denver Post via Getty Images

A better direction for democracy reform

Drutman is a senior fellow at New America and author "Breaking the Two-Party Doom Loop: The Case for Multiparty Democracy in America."

This is the conclusion of a two-part, post-election series addressing the questions of what happened, why, what does it mean and what did we learn? Read part one.

I think there is a better direction for reform than the ranked choice voting and open primary proposals that were defeated on Election Day: combining fusion voting for single-winner elections with party-list proportional representation for multi-winner elections. This straightforward solution addresses the core problems voters care about: lack of choices, gerrymandering, lack of competition, etc., with a single transformative sweep.

Keep ReadingShow less
To-party doom loop
Breaking the Two-Party Doom Loop: The Case for Multiparty Democracy in America

Let’s make sense of the election results

Drutman is a senior fellow at New America and author of "Breaking the Two-Party Doom Loop: The Case for Multiparty Democracy in America."

Well, here are some of my takeaways from Election Day, and some other thoughts.

1. The two-party doom loop keeps getting doomier and loopier.

Keep ReadingShow less
Person voting in Denver

A proposal to institute ranked choice voting in Colorado was rejected by voters.

RJ Sangosti/MediaNews Group/The Denver Post via Getty Images

Despite setbacks, ranked choice voting will continue to grow

Mantell is director of communications for FairVote.

More than 3 million people across the nation voted for better elections through ranked choice voting on Election Day, as of current returns. Ranked choice voting is poised to win majority support in all five cities where it was on the ballot, most notably with an overwhelming win in Washington, D.C. – 73 percent to 27 percent.

Keep ReadingShow less
Electoral College map

It's possible Donald Trump and Kamala Harris could each get 269 electoral votes this year.

Electoral College rules are a problem. A worst-case tie may be ahead.

Johnson is the executive director of the Election Reformers Network, a national nonpartisan organization advancing common-sense reforms to protect elections from polarization. Keyssar is a Matthew W. Stirling Jr. professor of history and social policy at the Harvard Kennedy School. His work focuses on voting rights, electoral and political institutions, and the evolution of democracies.

It’s the worst-case presidential election scenario — a 269–269 tie in the Electoral College. In our hyper-competitive political era, such a scenario, though still unlikely, is becoming increasingly plausible, and we need to grapple with its implications.

Recent swing-state polling suggests a slight advantage for Kamala Harris in the Rust Belt, while Donald Trump leads in the Sun Belt. If the final results mirror these trends, Harris wins with 270 electoral votes. But should Trump take the single elector from Nebraska’s 2nd congressional district — won by Joe Biden in 2020 and Trump in 2016 — then both candidates would be deadlocked at 269.

Keep ReadingShow less