Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

On the right, anti-Trumpers launch ads boosting absentee alternative

President Donald Trump with Fox News anchors

Conservatives launched their vote-by-mail ad campaign on Fox during President Trump's Sunday town hall.

Oliver Contreras-Pool/Getty Images

The push to expand mail-in voting because of the coronavirus pandemic has mostly come from Democrats, but now a group of prominent GOP dissidents is joining the call.

Republicans for the Rule of Law, a group of conservatives opposed to President Trump, has launched a $1 million campaign to promote voting by mail in this year's election. The first spot aired during Sunday night's Fox News town hall with the president.

Almost a dozen polls in the past month have found lopsided majorities in favor of expanding the option to vote absentee. But Trump and congressional GOP leaders have hardened in opposition, making the issue increasingly partisan and casting doubt on additional federal aid to make voting easier and safer during the public health crisis.


The 30-second spot will also run throughout the week on local stations and cable networks. It is the latest in a series of TV ads opposing Trump's policies the group has aired since its creation a year ago as an offshoot of Defending Democracy Together, a group of prominent "never Trump" conservatives assembled by political commentator Bill Kristol.

The ad features testimony from eight Republican voters who urge viewers to tell their elected officials to support expanding absentee voting. "We shouldn't have to put ourselves in danger to vote for you," a Pennsylvania woman identified only as Angela says at the end.

The other voters say, in short snippets: "Voting is our patriotic duty as Americans. If coronavirus is still around in November, it won't be safe to vote at polling stations. Congress needs to step up and help the states prepare for expanding mail and absentee voting to ensure a fair, safe and secure election for everyone."


Republicans call for expanded voting options amidst the pandemicyoutu.be


Republicans for the Rule of Law is urging Congress to provide additional funding to the states to support the certain surge in absentee voting this fall, although the group doesn't specify how much money is sufficient.

The economic rescue package enacted in March included $400 million in grants that states may use however they choose for making their elections run more smoothly this year. Good-government groups and election officials say that's not nearly enough to cover all the anticipated expenses, and congressional Democrats' opening position for the next economic stimulus bill is that it should provide $4 billion more.

But GOP leaders say they're in no rush to produce another expensive stimulus bill and have resisted the Democrats' idea of focusing the next round of aid on the states. And, with the presidential election now less than six months away, time is running short to make arrangements for all the extra printing and counting-equipment purchases many states say will be essential to conducting a comprehensive and reliable vote.

"Five states already have vote-by-mail elections, and they've learned how to do it safely, securely, and fairly. Other states can learn from their example, but they need congressional support," said Sarah Longwell, the group's spokeswoman. "We've lost enough to the coronavirus. We can't lose our democracy, too."


Read More

People standing at voting booths.

The proposed SAVE Act and MEGA Act would require proof of citizenship to register to vote, risking the disenfranchisement of millions of eligible Americans.

Getty Images, EvgeniyShkolenko

The SAVE Act is a Solution in Search of A Problem

The federal government seems to be barreling toward a federal election power grab. Trump's State of the Union address called for the Senate to push through the SAVE Act, which has already passed the House, in the name of so-called "election integrity." And the SAVE Act isn’t the only such bill. Like the SAVE Act, the Make Elections Great Again (MEGA) Act—introduced in the House—would require voters to provide a document outlined in the Act that allegedly proves their U.S. citizenship. We’ve been down this road before in Texas, and spoiler alert: it was unworkable.

Both the SAVE and MEGA Acts would disenfranchise millions of eligible U.S. citizens without making our federal elections more secure. They seek to roll out a faulty federal voter registration system, despite the existing separate registration and voting process for state and local elections. And these Acts target a minuscule “problem”—but would unleash mass voter purges and confusion.

Keep ReadingShow less
With the focus on the voting posters, the people in the background of the photo sign up to vote.

Should the U.S. nationalize elections? A constitutional analysis of federalism, the Elections Clause, and the risks of centralized control over voting systems.

Getty Images, SDI Productions

Why Nationalizing Elections Threatens America’s Federalist Design

The Federalism Question: Why Nationalizing Elections Deserves Skepticism

The renewed push to nationalize American elections, presented as a necessary reform to ensure uniformity and fairness, deserves the same skepticism our founders directed toward concentrated federal power. The proposal, though well-intentioned, misunderstands both the constitutional architecture of our republic and the practical wisdom in decentralized governance.

The Constitutional Framework Matters

The Constitution grants states explicit authority over the "Times, Places and Manner" of holding elections, with Congress retaining only the power to "make or alter such Regulations." This was not an oversight by the framers; it was intentional design. The Tenth Amendment reinforces this principle: powers not delegated to the federal government remain with the states and the people. Advocates for nationalization often cite the Elections Clause as justification, but constitutional permission is not constitutional wisdom.

Keep ReadingShow less
Postal Service Changes Mean Texas Voters Shouldn’t Wait To Mail Voter Registrations and Ballots

A voter registration drive in Corpus Christi, Texas, on Oct. 5, 2024. The deadline to register to vote for Texas' March 3 primary election is Feb. 2, 2026. Changes to USPS policies may affect whether a voter registration application is processed on time if it's not postmarked by the deadline.

Gabriel Cárdenas for Votebeat

Postal Service Changes Mean Texas Voters Shouldn’t Wait To Mail Voter Registrations and Ballots

Texans seeking to register to vote or cast a ballot by mail may not want to wait until the last minute, thanks to new guidance from the U.S. Postal Service.

The USPS last month advised that it may not postmark a piece of mail on the same day that it takes possession of it. Postmarks are applied once mail reaches a processing facility, it said, which may not be the same day it’s dropped in a mailbox, for example.

Keep ReadingShow less
Post office trucks parked in a lot.

Changes to USPS postmarking, ranked choice voting fights, costly runoffs, and gerrymandering reveal growing cracks in U.S. election systems.

Photo by Sam LaRussa on Unsplash.

2026 Will See an Increase in Rejected Mail-In Ballots - Here's Why

While the media has kept people’s focus on the Epstein files, Venezuela, or a potential invasion of Greenland, the United States Postal Service adopted a new rule that will have a broad impact on Americans – especially in an election year in which millions of people will vote by mail.

The rule went into effect on Christmas Eve and has largely flown under the radar, with the exception of some local coverage, a report from PBS News, and Independent Voter News. It states that items mailed through USPS will no longer be postmarked on the day it is received.

Keep ReadingShow less