Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

The Fahey Q&A with Kate Titus, finding creative ways to get a reform on Oregon's ballot

Opinion

Kate Titus of Common Cause Oregon
Kate Titus

After organizing the Voters Not Politicians 2018 ballot initiative that put citizens in charge of drawing Michigan's legislative maps, Fahey became founding executive director of The People, which is forming statewide networks to promote government accountability. She interviews a colleague in the world of democracy reform each month for our Opinion section.


Kate Titus is executive director of Common Cause Oregon, whose goal is to make the political process fair, transparent and more democratic. She is currently helping to lead People Not Politicians Oregon, a coalition circulating petitions to get an initiative on the November ballot that would create an independent commission to draw boundaries for the Legislature and congressional districts.

Our recent conversation has been edited for clarity and brevity.

Fahey: You're approaching a big deadline. What needs to happen for the redistricting initiative to have a chance to be successful?

Titus: We need 149,360 signatures to get our proposal on the ballot, so as Oregonians we need to step up. Registered voters need to find a petition and print, sign and mail it to us by June 26 — the end of next week. They can also email us to request a petition be mailed to their address. It can make all the difference if folks who support this get two or three others to sign with them. We've got a great opportunity to make the democratic process more democratic. The process for drawing district lines has been rigged because legislators have an inherent conflict of interest. We know there's a better way.

Fahey: Tell us a little about your background.

Titus: I've been organizing ever since I can remember, but I started working with Common Cause about eight years ago. I grew up in the 1960s and '70s and witnessed civil rights movements that made me understand that it's on us to create change. The leadership of people who leaned in and made great progress inspired me to advocate for voting rights today. It was, and continues to be, a huge challenge. We've come a long way but have much work ahead. There are still ways in which organized forces try to suppress some faction of the vote.

Fahey: Tell me more about what People Not Politicians Oregon is advocating for.

Titus: Our coalition is good governance organizations and others from all across the political spectrum. We seek to change redistricting and put it into the hands of an independent commission with clear guidelines and transparency. It would include four Democrats, four Republican and four registered voters unaffiliated with either major party.

Fahey: Share a bit about Oregon's history with gerrymandering.

Titus: Most people don't know we've had a problematic history with redistricting. It only happens every 10 years, so a lot of people aren't old enough to know what happened in the 1950s, let alone the 1910s. The Legislature, for about five decades, didn't adjust districts at all, as they're supposed to, so votes had unequal weight. The courts forced the state to start redistricting again in the latter half of the 1900s — but it was contentious, and each time it was challenged and ended up going to the secretary of state or the courts. Even with the best intentions, whichever party is in control views things through a lens of maintaining power, not of representing the interests of the people.

Fahey: What would be the positive impacts of this initiative?

Titus: Once we do pass this, we'll have a more transparent process where districts are more reflective and responsive. Most Oregonians vote for one party or another, but those are not the only interests we care about. We may also share interests based on racial, geographic or other factors. People of color, women and young people are all significantly underrepresented in state office. There's no perfect way to draw lines, but an independent and community-driven process is better than one driven by political parties and legislators, who have conflicts of interest.

Fahey: How has Covid-19 impacted your ability to get the proposal on the ballot?

Titus: It's harder to get signatures, because we can't go door to door. There are no busy gatherings with lots of people, and we can't sign up people with clipboards face-to-face. We've mailed out the signature petitions to over a million voters. And we're using email, social media and remote person-to-person methods of contact to get the word out.

Fahey: How have community members in Oregon become involved?

Titus: A team of Common Cause volunteers is working remotely: calling, emailing and texting to spread the word. Other organizations are organizing volunteers spreading the word through social media and their personal networks. And volunteers in Salem can go into an office and process thousands of petitions coming in daily — while socially distanced.

Fahey: What can people do to help?

Titus: It's an enormous task that will take Oregonians stepping up to succeed. We have a letter to the editor tool on our website. Spreading awareness through social networks and taking the time to sign the petition are great ways to help.

Fahey: What has been your most gratifying moment in this campaign?

Titus: Seeing people step up in the middle of a major health crisis. We have volunteers checking in daily on Zoom to compare notes. They feel how hard it is to gather signatures one by one — but when you look at the tens of thousands of signatures combined, it makes a difference.

Fahey: If you were speaking with a high school student or new immigrant, how would you describe what being an American means to you?

Titus: We're all part of many communities — families, neighborhoods, geographic areas. But we're also part of an experiment in democracy. We have yet to realize the full promise of American democracy. We have yet to see Americans obtain full and equal rights. But as an American, I get to be part of that experiment, and you do too.


Read More

Voters lining up to vote.

Voters line up at the Oak Lawn Branch Library voting center on Primary Election Day in Dallas on March 3, 2026. Republicans' decision to hold a split primary from the Democrats and to eliminate countywide voting forced Dallas County voters to cast ballots at assigned neighborhood precincts, leading to confusion. Republicans have now decided to use countywide polling locations for the May 26 runoff election.

Shelby Tauber for The Texas Tribune

Dallas County GOP Will Agree To Use Countywide Voting Sites for May 26 Runoff Election

Dallas County Republicans will agree to allow voters to cast ballots at countywide voting sites for the May 26 runoff election after a switch to precinct-based voting sites caused chaos, the county party chair said Tuesday.

Dallas County Republican Chairman Allen West supported the use of precinct-based sites earlier this month, but said using precincts again for the runoff would expose the county party to “increased risk and voter confusion” because the county is planning to use countywide sites for upcoming municipal elections and early voting.

Keep ReadingShow less
People at voting booths.

A clear breakdown of voter ID laws under the Constitution, federal statutes, and court rulings—plus analysis of new Trump administration proposals to impose nationwide voter identification requirements.

Getty Images, LPETTET

Just the Facts: Voter ID, States’ Powers, and Federal Limits

The Fulcrum approaches news stories with an open mind and skepticism, presenting our readers with a broad spectrum of viewpoints through diligent research and critical thinking. As best we can, remove personal bias from our reporting and seek a variety of perspectives in both our news gathering and selection of opinion pieces. However, before our readers can analyze varying viewpoints, they must have the facts.


Few issues generate more heat and are less understood than voter ID.

Keep ReadingShow less
A person signing a piece of paper with other people around them.

Javon Jackson, center, was able to register to vote following passage of a 2019 Nevada law that restored voting rights to formerly incarcerated individuals.

The Nation Is Missing Millions of Voters Due to Lack of Rights for Former Felons

If you gathered every American with a prison record into one contiguous territory and admitted it to the union, you would create the 12th-largest state. It would be home to at least 7 million to 8 million people and hold a dozen votes in the Electoral College.

In a close presidential race, this hypothetical state of the formerly incarcerated could decide who wins the White House.

Keep ReadingShow less
With the focus on the voting posters, the people in the background of the photo sign up to vote.

An analysis of Trump’s SAVE Act strategy, the voter ID debate, and how Pew data is being misused—exploring election integrity, voter suppression, and the political fight shaping U.S. democracy.

Getty Images, SDI Productions

Stop Fighting Voter ID. Start Defining It.

President Trump doesn't need the SAVE America Act to pass. He only needs the debate to continue. Every minute spent arguing about voter suppression repeats the underlying premise — that noncitizen voting is a real and widespread problem — until it feels like an established fact. The question is whether Democrats will contest Republicans’ definition before the frame hardens.

Trump's claim that 88% of Americans support the bill traces to a Pew Research Center survey — a survey that found 83% support a “government-issued photo ID to vote,” not extreme vetting for proof of citizenship. That support included 95% of Republicans and 71% of Democrats, indicating genuine, broad, bipartisan support for a basic civic principle. That's worth taking seriously.

Keep ReadingShow less