Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

All will get Connecticut vote-by-mail applications, but most don't qualify

Connecticut Secretary of State Denise Merrill

Secretary of State Denise Merrill plans to send out absentee ballot applications to all 2.2 million registered voters in Connecticut.

Joe Raedle/Getty Images

Connecticut will send a ballot-by-mail application to every registered voter, but for now only a relative handful in the state are legally allowed to complete the form.

Democratic Secretary of State Denise Merrill promised the mailing Monday as part of a multifaceted plan to make voting safer and easier during the coronavirus pandemic. But the state has strict limits on who may vote absentee, and the law does not suggest that fear of exposure to a potentially fatal virus is an acceptable reason for not going to the polls in person.

Connecticut is the only blue state among just sixthat have not yet modified or abandoned such excuse requirements during the Covid-19 outbreak. Unless that happens, there's little reason to expect much more than 6 percent of the electorate — the share of the vote cast by mail statewide two years ago — will have a legal claim to vote from home this year.


"My illness" is one of the six allowable reasons listed on the form for getting an absentee ballot — along with being disabled, a poll worker, on active military duty, out of town or having to restrict travel for religious reasons.

Merrill told reporters that, while she has the authority to declare that fear of the coronavirus is covered by the illness option, she would like Democratic Gov. Ned Lamont or the Democratic-majority General Assembly to take the lead in declaring such an excuse is allowable — and for how long.

"I am completely sympathetic to the issues that people have," she said. "I think it's unconscionable that we would make people decide their health versus their vote."

Lamont said he could potentially expand absentee voting for the Aug. 11 presidential, legislative and congressional primaries through an executive order. But his emergency executive powers expire in September, so changes for the general election would be up to the Legislature. It has adjourned because of the pandemic but is expected to reconvene this summer for a special session.

Sixteen states normally require an excuse to vote absentee, but 10 have either temporarily suspended or expanded their qualification criteria to include the widespread public health concerns.

The federal government allocated $5 million to Connecticut from among $400 million in congressionally approved grants for making this year's election safer, and Merrill says the state will use the bulk of the money for mailing out the absentee ballot applications to the state's 2.2 million voters along with postage-paid return envelopes.

She says she also has the money to recruit and train general election poll workers and launch a public awareness campaign. Townships in the state are in charge of administering elections and bear much of the costs.

Read More

Princeton Gerrymandering Project Gives California Prop 50 an ‘F’
Independent Voter News

Princeton Gerrymandering Project Gives California Prop 50 an ‘F’

The special election for California Prop 50 wraps up November 4 and recent polling shows the odds strongly favor its passage. The measure suspends the state’s independent congressional map for a legislative gerrymander that Princeton grades as one of the worst in the nation.

The Princeton Gerrymandering Project developed a “Redistricting Report Card” that takes metrics of partisan and racial performance data in all 50 states and converts it into a grade for partisan fairness, competitiveness, and geographic features.

Keep ReadingShow less
"Vote Here" sign

America’s political system is broken — but ranked choice voting and proportional representation could fix it.

Stephen Maturen/Getty Images

Election Reform Turns Down the Temperature of Our Politics

Politics isn’t working for most Americans. Our government can’t keep the lights on. The cost of living continues to rise. Our nation is reeling from recent acts of political violence.

79% of voters say the U.S. is in a political crisis, and 64% say our political system is too divided to solve the nation’s problems.

Keep ReadingShow less
U.S. President Barack Obama speaking on the phone in the Oval Office.

U.S. President Barack Obama talks President Barack Obama talks with President Hamid Karzai of Afghanistan during a phone call from the Oval Office on November 2, 2009 in Washington, DC.

Getty Images, The White House

‘Obama, You're 15 Years Too Late!’

The mid-decade redistricting fight continues, while the word “hypocrisy” has become increasingly common in the media.

The origin of mid-decade redistricting dates back to the early history of the United States. However, its resurgence and legal acceptance primarily stem from the Texas redistricting effort in 2003, a controversial move by the Republican Party to redraw the state's congressional districts, and the 2006 U.S. Supreme Court decision in League of United Latin American Citizens v. Perry. This decision, which confirmed that mid-decade redistricting is not prohibited by federal law, was a significant turning point in the acceptance of this practice.

Keep ReadingShow less
Hand of a person casting a ballot at a polling station during voting.

Gerrymandering silences communities and distorts elections. Proportional representation offers a proven path to fairer maps and real democracy.

Getty Images, bizoo_n

Gerrymandering Today, Gerrymandering Tomorrow, Gerrymandering Forever

In 1963, Alabama Governor George Wallace declared, "Segregation now, segregation tomorrow, segregation forever." (Watch the video of his speech.) As a politically aware high school senior, I was shocked by the venom and anger in his voice—the open, defiant embrace of systematic disenfranchisement, so different from the quieter racism I knew growing up outside Boston.

Today, watching politicians openly rig elections, I feel that same disbelief—especially seeing Republican leaders embrace that same systematic approach: gerrymandering now, gerrymandering tomorrow, gerrymandering forever.

Keep ReadingShow less