Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Mail voting must be open to all Tennesseans during Covid, judge rules

Tennesssee voting

Voting two years ago in Brentwood, Tenn. Everyone in the state should be able to cast a mail ballot this year because of the pandemic, a judge has ruled.

William Deshazer/Getty Images

Every voter in Tennessee should be permitted to use an absentee ballot during the coronavirus pandemic, a state judge has ruled.

At least during the current public health emergency, Judge Ellen Hobbs Lyle of Nashville decided Thursday, the current limits on voting by mail impose "an unreasonable burden on the fundamental right to vote guaranteed by the Tennessee Constitution."

If the ruling survives an expected appeal, it would be a significant victory for the movement to assure solid turnout in the presidential election despite the Covid-19 outbreak.


Tennessee is one of 16 states that still require an "excuse" in order for people to vote absentee. All but a handful of them have eased those restrictions to encourage more remote voting this year on mail-in voting because of the coronavirus.

Republican Secretary of State Tre Hargett has resisted joining them — saying the available reasons are sufficient and that opening mail voting to all Tenessseans would be impractically expensive to institute in time and would result in ballot fraud. Lyle rejected all those arguments and pointed to the "can-do approach" set by the other states.

Lyle noted that she was not mandating that all 4.1 million registered voters in the state automatically receive an absentee ballot as has been ordered in other states. Voters will still be required to make the request themselves.

Tennessee has more than a dozen categories that qualify someone for an absentee ballot, from being sick to being 60 or older. Still, only 2 percent of votes were cast by mail two years ago.

On Aug. 6 the state holds primary elections for congressional and state legislative seats and general elections for county offices.

The court's injunction is indefinite, meaning that it could also be in force for the Nov. 3 general election unless an appeals court intervenes. The state is reliably red, so President Trump can count on its 11 electoral votes. Turnout in the 2016 election was 62 percent, but may be less this year because of a lack of any competitive statewide races.

The judge ordered the state to publish on public websites, and tell county officials, that "voters who do not wish to vote in-person due to the Covid-19 virus situation are eligible to request an absentee ballot by mail."

"It is yet another court decision replacing legislation passed by the people's elected officials with its own judgment, largely ignoring the practicalities of implementing such a decision, and doing so in the midst of a pandemic and budget crisis," GOP Attorney General Herbert Slatery said in a statement promising to appeal.

Backed by GOP Gov. Bill Lee, the Republican-led General Assembly has blocked several measures from Democrats that would offer absentee ballots to all voters, including one just this week.


Read More

Voters lining up to vote.

Voters line up at the Oak Lawn Branch Library voting center on Primary Election Day in Dallas on March 3, 2026. Republicans' decision to hold a split primary from the Democrats and to eliminate countywide voting forced Dallas County voters to cast ballots at assigned neighborhood precincts, leading to confusion. Republicans have now decided to use countywide polling locations for the May 26 runoff election.

Shelby Tauber for The Texas Tribune

Dallas County GOP Will Agree To Use Countywide Voting Sites for May 26 Runoff Election

Dallas County Republicans will agree to allow voters to cast ballots at countywide voting sites for the May 26 runoff election after a switch to precinct-based voting sites caused chaos, the county party chair said Tuesday.

Dallas County Republican Chairman Allen West supported the use of precinct-based sites earlier this month, but said using precincts again for the runoff would expose the county party to “increased risk and voter confusion” because the county is planning to use countywide sites for upcoming municipal elections and early voting.

Keep ReadingShow less
A person signing a piece of paper with other people around them.

Javon Jackson, center, was able to register to vote following passage of a 2019 Nevada law that restored voting rights to formerly incarcerated individuals.

The Nation Is Missing Millions of Voters Due to Lack of Rights for Former Felons

If you gathered every American with a prison record into one contiguous territory and admitted it to the union, you would create the 12th-largest state. It would be home to at least 7 million to 8 million people and hold a dozen votes in the Electoral College.

In a close presidential race, this hypothetical state of the formerly incarcerated could decide who wins the White House.

Keep ReadingShow less
With the focus on the voting posters, the people in the background of the photo sign up to vote.

An analysis of Trump’s SAVE Act strategy, the voter ID debate, and how Pew data is being misused—exploring election integrity, voter suppression, and the political fight shaping U.S. democracy.

Getty Images, SDI Productions

Stop Fighting Voter ID. Start Defining It.

President Trump doesn't need the SAVE America Act to pass. He only needs the debate to continue. Every minute spent arguing about voter suppression repeats the underlying premise — that noncitizen voting is a real and widespread problem — until it feels like an established fact. The question is whether Democrats will contest Republicans’ definition before the frame hardens.

Trump's claim that 88% of Americans support the bill traces to a Pew Research Center survey — a survey that found 83% support a “government-issued photo ID to vote,” not extreme vetting for proof of citizenship. That support included 95% of Republicans and 71% of Democrats, indicating genuine, broad, bipartisan support for a basic civic principle. That's worth taking seriously.

Keep ReadingShow less
People standing at voting booths.

The proposed SAVE Act and MEGA Act would require proof of citizenship to register to vote, risking the disenfranchisement of millions of eligible Americans.

Getty Images, EvgeniyShkolenko

The SAVE Act is a Solution in Search of A Problem

The federal government seems to be barreling toward a federal election power grab. Trump's State of the Union address called for the Senate to push through the SAVE Act, which has already passed the House, in the name of so-called "election integrity." And the SAVE Act isn’t the only such bill. Like the SAVE Act, the Make Elections Great Again (MEGA) Act—introduced in the House—would require voters to provide a document outlined in the Act that allegedly proves their U.S. citizenship. We’ve been down this road before in Texas, and spoiler alert: it was unworkable.

Both the SAVE and MEGA Acts would disenfranchise millions of eligible U.S. citizens without making our federal elections more secure. They seek to roll out a faulty federal voter registration system, despite the existing separate registration and voting process for state and local elections. And these Acts target a minuscule “problem”—but would unleash mass voter purges and confusion.

Keep ReadingShow less