Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Thousands of N.C. students waiting for colleges to make proper IDs for voting

Thousands of N.C. students waiting for colleges to make proper IDs for voting

Dozens of North Carolina colleges have their student IDs pending approval for use as voter identification during the 2020 election.

Sara D. Davis/Getty Images

Next year's presidential election will mark the first time North Carolina voters must show photo ID before casting their ballots. The state's colleges and universities are supposed to ease this obstacle for their students — but many may not act in time.

More than two dozen schools, with a combined enrollment of 54,000, have yet to ask permission for their student identification cards to count as an approved proof of residency. And the cutoff for applying to the state Board of Elections is Saturday.

Thirteen schools with 170,000 students, including some of the biggest in the state, have had their ID card designs rejected and have only three weeks to come up with an alternative.

That so many students would have their potential to vote put in limbo by this bureaucratic tardiness is an alarming turn in a state where the Republican power structure has long been at the center of allegations of voter suppression of a group that normally turns out heavily for Democrats.


The tardiness of the schools has alarmed officials, including Ellen Weintraub, the chairwoman of the Federal Election Commission, who sounded the "alert!" on Twitter and wrote to all the schools and their student leaders urging them to get to work on their applications.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

The early deadline was established because a photo ID will be required starting with the March 3 primaries, and early voting begins several weeks before that. The state says it needs more than three months to train poll workers on the new procedures, including deciding what ID counts and what does not. (An in-state driver's license is still the gold standard, but out-of-state students and many from urban areas don't have them.)

In addition to colleges and universities, charter schools and state and local governments can also apply to have their identification cards accepted for voting purposes. As of noon on Thursday, six dozen institutions had their applications approved.

Most of the IDs that were rebuffed display photographic portraits that were not up to the state's exacting standards for clarity, pose and authenticity.

The schools now under the gun to come up with new IDs by Nov. 15 include the flagship state school, the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, and the biggest historically black college in the country, North Carolina A&T State University.

The General Assembly tried to implement a photo ID requirement in 2013, but a federal appeals court struck it down in 2016 for discriminating against African-Americans. This time around the law was upheld because it accepted more forms of identification than before.

In 2018, a majority of North Carolina voters approved a constitutional amendment to require photo IDs to vote. The requirements now being implemented were subsequently set by the Republican-majority Legislature. A second law was enacted this year to delay the start of the requirement until next year, meaning voters in local elections next month do not need picture proof.

Read More

A better direction for democracy reform

Denver election judge Eric Cobb carefully looks over ballots as counting continued on Nov. 6. Voters in Colorado rejected a ranked choice voting and open primaries measure.

Helen H. Richardson/MediaNews Group/The Denver Post via Getty Images

A better direction for democracy reform

Drutman is a senior fellow at New America and author "Breaking the Two-Party Doom Loop: The Case for Multiparty Democracy in America."

This is the conclusion of a two-part, post-election series addressing the questions of what happened, why, what does it mean and what did we learn? Read part one.

I think there is a better direction for reform than the ranked choice voting and open primary proposals that were defeated on Election Day: combining fusion voting for single-winner elections with party-list proportional representation for multi-winner elections. This straightforward solution addresses the core problems voters care about: lack of choices, gerrymandering, lack of competition, etc., with a single transformative sweep.

Keep ReadingShow less
To-party doom loop
Breaking the Two-Party Doom Loop: The Case for Multiparty Democracy in America

Let’s make sense of the election results

Drutman is a senior fellow at New America and author of "Breaking the Two-Party Doom Loop: The Case for Multiparty Democracy in America."

Well, here are some of my takeaways from Election Day, and some other thoughts.

1. The two-party doom loop keeps getting doomier and loopier.

Keep ReadingShow less
Person voting in Denver

A proposal to institute ranked choice voting in Colorado was rejected by voters.

RJ Sangosti/MediaNews Group/The Denver Post via Getty Images

Despite setbacks, ranked choice voting will continue to grow

Mantell is director of communications for FairVote.

More than 3 million people across the nation voted for better elections through ranked choice voting on Election Day, as of current returns. Ranked choice voting is poised to win majority support in all five cities where it was on the ballot, most notably with an overwhelming win in Washington, D.C. – 73 percent to 27 percent.

Keep ReadingShow less
Electoral College map

It's possible Donald Trump and Kamala Harris could each get 269 electoral votes this year.

Electoral College rules are a problem. A worst-case tie may be ahead.

Johnson is the executive director of the Election Reformers Network, a national nonpartisan organization advancing common-sense reforms to protect elections from polarization. Keyssar is a Matthew W. Stirling Jr. professor of history and social policy at the Harvard Kennedy School. His work focuses on voting rights, electoral and political institutions, and the evolution of democracies.

It’s the worst-case presidential election scenario — a 269–269 tie in the Electoral College. In our hyper-competitive political era, such a scenario, though still unlikely, is becoming increasingly plausible, and we need to grapple with its implications.

Recent swing-state polling suggests a slight advantage for Kamala Harris in the Rust Belt, while Donald Trump leads in the Sun Belt. If the final results mirror these trends, Harris wins with 270 electoral votes. But should Trump take the single elector from Nebraska’s 2nd congressional district — won by Joe Biden in 2020 and Trump in 2016 — then both candidates would be deadlocked at 269.

Keep ReadingShow less