Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Meet the reformer: Amber McReynolds, crusading for voting in our pajamas

Amber McReynolds

Amber McReynolds and her children, Klara and Kenton, were on this year's Rose Bowl parade float celebrating the centennial of women's suffrage.

Amber McReynolds

After 13 years in Denver's Office of the Clerk and Recorder — more than half the time as elections director, earning a reputation for bringing innovation and simplicity to the conduct of the city's contests — Amber McReynolds switched sides 18 months ago. She is now among the most prominent champions of conducting elections by mail as CEO of the nonpartisan National Vote at Home Institute. She is also co-author, with Stephanie Donner, of the recently published "When Women Vote" (Alden-Swain Press), which promotes ways to combat barriers to the ballot box based not only on gender but also race, disability and more. She has a master's from the London School of Economics and graduated from the University of Illinois, Champaign-Urbana. Her answers have been edited for length and clarity.

What's democracy's biggest challenge, in 10 words or less?

Honoring its promise to equally include all voices.


Describe your very first civic engagement.

Starting when I was about 5, my grandmothers Eleanor and Ada Lucille and my great-aunt Elsa were very engaged in our community as election judges. One grandmother always staged a neighborhood July 4 parade in Kewanee, the small Illinois town where I grew up 150 miles west of Chicago. She would dress as Uncle Sam and have all of the kids dress up as well to hand out flyers about voting. I started going with my parents to vote and stood in the booth while they completed their ballots. In high school I got involved in student government and activities that all involved civics and service. I learned to serve in an authentic way and that politics in high school was interesting, sometimes funny, sometimes disappointing, sometimes sad, sometimes mean — not unlike the politics we see today.

What was your biggest professional triumph?

Designing, building, passing and implementing the most comprehensive, innovative and effective voting modernization reform in Colorado's history in 2013, which made voting by mail available to everyone in the state. I was able to work with the most extraordinary Coloradans to make it happen, catapulting the state to being a leader in election administration, turnout, access, engagement, voter registration, security, efficiency and transparency. It's also one reason why the National Vote at Home Institute exists today and we've been able to assemble a rockstar team.

And your most disappointing setback?

It's hard when you know something would ultimately work better but there is simply resistance to change. For example, I failed to persuade the legislative leadership of one state (I won't say which) they could improve the voting experience, smooth out election administration and save $60 million to $80 million by moving to a model more like Colorado. It devastates me to think what that money could do for our children or education or many other societal needs. So, my most disappointing setbacks come from watching the inability of many politicians to do what's right while constantly fighting about who's right.

How does your identity influence the way you go about your work?

I'm a single mom and in charge of a national nonprofit. Like so many other women, in my career I've faced pay inequity, been discounted because of my identity, been asked if my boss was on the way to a meeting (when I was the boss), etc. So those experiences and that perspective has shaped how I approach my work. I'm also a Coloradan. And, similar to the suffrage movement a century ago, Western states have been far more aggressive in adopting changes that benefit all voters and improve the voting experience for all.

Every voter should have equal and equitable access to the ballot. That's not the case now. Your eligibility depends on where you live and what your circumstances are. This idea that everyone should vote on a single day at a government-assigned location is outdated and introduces more risk into the process, given what it takes to process so many votes in such a short time. So, providing more convenient and secure options for voting over a longer period is the way forward, and the best available option is voting at home with the option of casting a ballot in person at a voting center.

What's the best advice you've ever been given?

Have courage and be kind.

Create a new flavor for Ben & Jerry's.

Coffee with chocolate, sea salt and caramel.

What's your favorite political movie or TV show?

"Madam Secretary," the CBS show with Téa Leoni as a former CIA analyst and political science professor turned secretary of state.

What's the last thing you do on your phone at night?

Check my calendar for the next day. To be sure I have everything ready that needs to be ready for work, ensure I have coverage for the kids if I need help for work, then decide when I can fit in my workout.

What is your deepest, darkest secret?

I am fascinated by wigs, particularly pink and blue, so perhaps I have a secret desire to be a rock star. And I always wanted to be a pilot and go into the CIA. My thought was that if I knew how to fly, I could get myself out of any tough situation. I wanted to be the female version of James Bond.


Read More

People standing at voting booths.

The proposed SAVE Act and MEGA Act would require proof of citizenship to register to vote, risking the disenfranchisement of millions of eligible Americans.

Getty Images, EvgeniyShkolenko

The SAVE Act is a Solution in Search of A Problem

The federal government seems to be barreling toward a federal election power grab. Trump's State of the Union address called for the Senate to push through the SAVE Act, which has already passed the House, in the name of so-called "election integrity." And the SAVE Act isn’t the only such bill. Like the SAVE Act, the Make Elections Great Again (MEGA) Act—introduced in the House—would require voters to provide a document outlined in the Act that allegedly proves their U.S. citizenship. We’ve been down this road before in Texas, and spoiler alert: it was unworkable.

Both the SAVE and MEGA Acts would disenfranchise millions of eligible U.S. citizens without making our federal elections more secure. They seek to roll out a faulty federal voter registration system, despite the existing separate registration and voting process for state and local elections. And these Acts target a minuscule “problem”—but would unleash mass voter purges and confusion.

Keep ReadingShow less
With the focus on the voting posters, the people in the background of the photo sign up to vote.

Should the U.S. nationalize elections? A constitutional analysis of federalism, the Elections Clause, and the risks of centralized control over voting systems.

Getty Images, SDI Productions

Why Nationalizing Elections Threatens America’s Federalist Design

The Federalism Question: Why Nationalizing Elections Deserves Skepticism

The renewed push to nationalize American elections, presented as a necessary reform to ensure uniformity and fairness, deserves the same skepticism our founders directed toward concentrated federal power. The proposal, though well-intentioned, misunderstands both the constitutional architecture of our republic and the practical wisdom in decentralized governance.

The Constitutional Framework Matters

The Constitution grants states explicit authority over the "Times, Places and Manner" of holding elections, with Congress retaining only the power to "make or alter such Regulations." This was not an oversight by the framers; it was intentional design. The Tenth Amendment reinforces this principle: powers not delegated to the federal government remain with the states and the people. Advocates for nationalization often cite the Elections Clause as justification, but constitutional permission is not constitutional wisdom.

Keep ReadingShow less
Postal Service Changes Mean Texas Voters Shouldn’t Wait To Mail Voter Registrations and Ballots

A voter registration drive in Corpus Christi, Texas, on Oct. 5, 2024. The deadline to register to vote for Texas' March 3 primary election is Feb. 2, 2026. Changes to USPS policies may affect whether a voter registration application is processed on time if it's not postmarked by the deadline.

Gabriel Cárdenas for Votebeat

Postal Service Changes Mean Texas Voters Shouldn’t Wait To Mail Voter Registrations and Ballots

Texans seeking to register to vote or cast a ballot by mail may not want to wait until the last minute, thanks to new guidance from the U.S. Postal Service.

The USPS last month advised that it may not postmark a piece of mail on the same day that it takes possession of it. Postmarks are applied once mail reaches a processing facility, it said, which may not be the same day it’s dropped in a mailbox, for example.

Keep ReadingShow less
Post office trucks parked in a lot.

Changes to USPS postmarking, ranked choice voting fights, costly runoffs, and gerrymandering reveal growing cracks in U.S. election systems.

Photo by Sam LaRussa on Unsplash.

2026 Will See an Increase in Rejected Mail-In Ballots - Here's Why

While the media has kept people’s focus on the Epstein files, Venezuela, or a potential invasion of Greenland, the United States Postal Service adopted a new rule that will have a broad impact on Americans – especially in an election year in which millions of people will vote by mail.

The rule went into effect on Christmas Eve and has largely flown under the radar, with the exception of some local coverage, a report from PBS News, and Independent Voter News. It states that items mailed through USPS will no longer be postmarked on the day it is received.

Keep ReadingShow less