Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Meet the reformer: Amber McReynolds, crusading for voting in our pajamas

Amber McReynolds

Amber McReynolds and her children, Klara and Kenton, were on this year's Rose Bowl parade float celebrating the centennial of women's suffrage.

Amber McReynolds

After 13 years in Denver's Office of the Clerk and Recorder — more than half the time as elections director, earning a reputation for bringing innovation and simplicity to the conduct of the city's contests — Amber McReynolds switched sides 18 months ago. She is now among the most prominent champions of conducting elections by mail as CEO of the nonpartisan National Vote at Home Institute. She is also co-author, with Stephanie Donner, of the recently published "When Women Vote" (Alden-Swain Press), which promotes ways to combat barriers to the ballot box based not only on gender but also race, disability and more. She has a master's from the London School of Economics and graduated from the University of Illinois, Champaign-Urbana. Her answers have been edited for length and clarity.

What's democracy's biggest challenge, in 10 words or less?

Honoring its promise to equally include all voices.


Describe your very first civic engagement.

Starting when I was about 5, my grandmothers Eleanor and Ada Lucille and my great-aunt Elsa were very engaged in our community as election judges. One grandmother always staged a neighborhood July 4 parade in Kewanee, the small Illinois town where I grew up 150 miles west of Chicago. She would dress as Uncle Sam and have all of the kids dress up as well to hand out flyers about voting. I started going with my parents to vote and stood in the booth while they completed their ballots. In high school I got involved in student government and activities that all involved civics and service. I learned to serve in an authentic way and that politics in high school was interesting, sometimes funny, sometimes disappointing, sometimes sad, sometimes mean — not unlike the politics we see today.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

What was your biggest professional triumph?

Designing, building, passing and implementing the most comprehensive, innovative and effective voting modernization reform in Colorado's history in 2013, which made voting by mail available to everyone in the state. I was able to work with the most extraordinary Coloradans to make it happen, catapulting the state to being a leader in election administration, turnout, access, engagement, voter registration, security, efficiency and transparency. It's also one reason why the National Vote at Home Institute exists today and we've been able to assemble a rockstar team.

And your most disappointing setback?

It's hard when you know something would ultimately work better but there is simply resistance to change. For example, I failed to persuade the legislative leadership of one state (I won't say which) they could improve the voting experience, smooth out election administration and save $60 million to $80 million by moving to a model more like Colorado. It devastates me to think what that money could do for our children or education or many other societal needs. So, my most disappointing setbacks come from watching the inability of many politicians to do what's right while constantly fighting about who's right.

How does your identity influence the way you go about your work?

I'm a single mom and in charge of a national nonprofit. Like so many other women, in my career I've faced pay inequity, been discounted because of my identity, been asked if my boss was on the way to a meeting (when I was the boss), etc. So those experiences and that perspective has shaped how I approach my work. I'm also a Coloradan. And, similar to the suffrage movement a century ago, Western states have been far more aggressive in adopting changes that benefit all voters and improve the voting experience for all.

Every voter should have equal and equitable access to the ballot. That's not the case now. Your eligibility depends on where you live and what your circumstances are. This idea that everyone should vote on a single day at a government-assigned location is outdated and introduces more risk into the process, given what it takes to process so many votes in such a short time. So, providing more convenient and secure options for voting over a longer period is the way forward, and the best available option is voting at home with the option of casting a ballot in person at a voting center.

What's the best advice you've ever been given?

Have courage and be kind.

Create a new flavor for Ben & Jerry's.

Coffee with chocolate, sea salt and caramel.

What's your favorite political movie or TV show?

"Madam Secretary," the CBS show with Téa Leoni as a former CIA analyst and political science professor turned secretary of state.

What's the last thing you do on your phone at night?

Check my calendar for the next day. To be sure I have everything ready that needs to be ready for work, ensure I have coverage for the kids if I need help for work, then decide when I can fit in my workout.

What is your deepest, darkest secret?

I am fascinated by wigs, particularly pink and blue, so perhaps I have a secret desire to be a rock star. And I always wanted to be a pilot and go into the CIA. My thought was that if I knew how to fly, I could get myself out of any tough situation. I wanted to be the female version of James Bond.

Read More

"Voter Here" sign outside of a polling location.

"Voter Here" sign outside of a polling location.

Getty Images, Grace Cary

Stopping the Descent Toward Banana Republic Elections

President Trump’s election-related executive order begins by pointing out practices in Canada, Sweden, Brazil, and elsewhere that outperform the U.S. But it is Trump’s order itself that really demonstrates how far we’ve fallen behind. In none of the countries mentioned, or any other major democracy in the world, would the head of government change election rules by decree, as Trump has tried to do.

Trump is the leader of a political party that will fight for control of Congress in 2026, an election sure to be close, and important to his presidency. The leader of one side in such a competition has no business unilaterally changing its rules—that’s why executive decrees changing elections only happen in tinpot dictatorships, not democracies.

Keep ReadingShow less
"Vote" pin.
Getty Images, William Whitehurst

Most Americans’ Votes Don’t Matter in Deciding Elections

New research from the Unite America Institute confirms a stark reality: Most ballots cast in American elections don’t matter in deciding the outcome. In 2024, just 14% of eligible voters cast a meaningful vote that actually influenced the outcome of a U.S. House race. For state house races, on average across all 50 states, just 13% cast meaningful votes.

“Too many Americans have no real say in their democracy,” said Unite America Executive Director Nick Troiano. “Every voter deserves a ballot that not only counts, but that truly matters. We should demand better than ‘elections in name only.’”

Keep ReadingShow less
Why America’s Elections Will Never Be the Same After Trump
text
Photo by Dan Dennis on Unsplash

Why America’s Elections Will Never Be the Same After Trump

Donald Trump wasted no time when he returned to the White House. Within hours, he signed over 200 executive orders, rapidly dismantling years of policy and consolidating control with the stroke of a pen. But the frenzy of reversals was only the surface. Beneath it lies a deeper, more troubling transformation: presidential elections have become all-or-nothing battles, where the victor rewrites the rules of government and the loser’s agenda is annihilated.

And it’s not just the orders. Trump’s second term has unleashed sweeping deportations, the purging of federal agencies, and a direct assault on the professional civil service. With the revival of Schedule F, regulatory rollbacks, and the targeting of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion programs, the federal bureaucracy is being rigged to serve partisan ideology. Backing him is a GOP-led Congress, too cowardly—or too complicit—to assert its constitutional authority.

Keep ReadingShow less
One Lesson from the Elections: Looking At Universal Voting

A roll of "voted" stickers.

Pexels, Element5 Digital

One Lesson from the Elections: Looking At Universal Voting

The analysis and parsing of learned lessons from the 2024 elections will continue for a long time. What did the campaigns do right and wrong? What policies will emerge from the new arrangements of power? What do the parties need to do for the future?

An equally important question is what lessons are there for our democratic structures and processes. One positive lesson is that voting itself was almost universally smooth and effective; we should applaud the election officials who made that happen. But, many elements of the 2024 elections are deeply challenging, from the increasingly outsized role of billionaires in the process to the onslaught of misinformation and disinformation.

Keep ReadingShow less