Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

More (grassroots) leaders please

People seated at a conference table

RESULTS members lobby on Capitol Hill.

RESULTS

Daley-Harris is the author of “ Reclaiming Our Democracy: Every Citizen’s Guide to Transformational Advocacy ” and the founder of RESULTS and Civic Courage. This is part of a series focused on better understanding transformational advocacy: citizens awakening to their power.

In a Washington Post column in early July titled, “ It’s time to ask: Can America still produce great leaders? ” Garrett M. Graff asks, “So, what does good leadership look like in practice? How do we find good leaders, and how are they trained and shaped?. … And, desperately, how can we please make more of them?” While Graff’s focus is on leaders in politics, government and business, my focus is on citizen leaders and the organizations that train and shape them. But we ask similar questions.

Recently I spoke with activists who got their start in transformational advocacy in Chicago and Nashville. Since so many of us find it hard to get started, I wanted to know how they began.


Fred LeMay was a commercial insurance underwriter and saw how changes in the climate were affecting the insurance and reinsurance markets. “I was reading climate articles,” he said, “and getting concerned for my kids and grandkids and the future of the planet. I thought maybe I should try to be more active.” LeMay co-leads the Middle Tennessee chapter of Citizens’ Climate Lobby.

Cindy Levin was a mechanical engineer and corporate type. “When I quit my job to provide full-time care for my kids, I lost my social network and my purpose,” she told me. “I did have this purpose to be a mom, but it was also isolating. Activism was a way to be relevant in the wider world.” Levin is now an author, speaker and activist who coaches others on how to develop relationships with their elected representatives. She received much of her training from RESULTS, the grassroots anti-poverty lobby I founded in 1980.

These volunteer activists and thousands of others benefited from the brilliance of another activist, Dorsey Lawson, who died recently at age 95. A giant in the early days of RESULTS, Lawson and the team of volunteers she built around her in Pasadena, Calif., in the 1980s were our research and development department.

They developed the laser talk — a short statement about a problem, examples of solutions and a call to take specific action — that advocates use in meetings with members of Congress, the media and others they want to mobilize.

Lawson and her fourth grade English as a Second Language class devised the process for teaching the laser talk — delivering the talk, then asking leading questions and having the group shout out the answers to see what they remember, and then asking the questions again and having them just think the answers to themselves. Learning and using laser talks is a key strategy in the work of effective grassroots advocacy organizations such as RESULTS and Citizens’ Climate Lobby.

RESULTS’ pioneering work around building a relationship with a member of Congress who opposes a global poverty bill you are advocating for and bringing them on board as a supporter also came from Lawson and her team of volunteers, starting more than 40 years ago with their Rep. Carlos Moorhead (R-Calif.).

The commitment to encouraging breakthroughs, to encouraging volunteer activists to move out of their comfort zone, was given voice by Lawson too.

While I was on one of my 21-city trips to start RESULTS groups in 1984, Lawson — writing in her role as assistant executive director — described one volunteer’s splitting headache and another’s feeling of nausea while completing op-eds they’d been invited to write.

“If you’re scared to do this kind of stuff, know that we are too,” Lawson wrote. “I felt flushed and feverish driving off to a reception for forty people with Rep. Matthew Martinez (D-CA). If you don’t have any discomfort, look at what would be a stretch for you. RESULTS is people breaking through the thought, ‘I don’t make a difference,’ to emerge as community leaders. Those who have pressed themselves to new heights of participation know the joy of this. What’s next for you?”

As always, she signed the letter, “Love, Dorsey.”

Lawson knew that joy followed the discomfort. She knew that it mattered to make big asks of volunteers — it mattered to the issue they cared about, and it mattered to the volunteers themselves.

When Lawson’s group developed the laser talk in 1984, UNICEF reported that 40,000 children around the world were dying every day from malnutrition and preventable disease, things like measles coupled with malnutrition. RESULTS volunteers have lobbied on these issues every year for the last four decades. Over that period, the latest figures show a 66 percent decline in global child deaths, a greater than 90 percent decline in deaths from dehydration and an 80 percent decline in child deaths from vaccine-preventable diseases.

Graff asked, “How do we find good leaders … how are they trained and … how can we please make more of them?” The innovations that Lawson and her team developed are one answer to Graff’s question. The difference she made with her life lives on in tens of millions of children’s lives saved and thousands of activists’ lives changed and will contribute to building more leaders well into the future.

Read More

Can MAGA go any lower defending Donald Trump?

U.S. president Donald Trump delivers remarks at the U.S.-Saudi Investment Forum at the John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts in Washington, D..C on Nov. 19, 2025.

(Brendan Smialowski/AFP via Getty Images/TCA)

Can MAGA go any lower defending Donald Trump?

I remember it well. It was Oct. 7, 2016, a Friday. That afternoon The Washington Post dropped a bombshell, the perfect October surprise, just a month before the presidential election.

Earlier in the week, Hillary Clinton had been hammering Donald Trump on the news that he may not have paid taxes for 18 years.

Keep ReadingShow less
Hardliners vs. Loyalists: Republicans Divide Over Mamdani Moment

U.S. President Donald Trump shakes hands with New York City Mayor-elect Zohran Mamdani (L) during a meeting in the Oval Office of the White House on November 21, 2025 in Washington, DC.

Photo by Andrew Harnik/Getty Images

Hardliners vs. Loyalists: Republicans Divide Over Mamdani Moment

Yesterday’s meeting between Donald Trump and New York City's Mayor-elect, Zohran Mamdani, was marked by an unexpected cordiality. Trump praised Mamdani’s “passion for his community” and called him “a very energetic young man with strong ideas,” while Mamdani, in turn, described Trump as “gracious” and “surprisingly open to dialogue.” The exchange was strikingly civil, even warm — a sharp departure from the months of hostility that had defined their relationship in the public eye.

That warmth stood in stark contrast to the bitter words exchanged before and after Mamdani’s election. Trump had dismissed him as a “radical socialist who wants to destroy America,” while Mamdani blasted Trump as “a corrupt demagogue who thrives on division.” Republican Senator Rick Scott piled on, branding Mamdani a “literal communist” and predicting Trump would “school” him at the White House. Representative Elise Stefanik went further, labeling him a “jihadist” during her gubernatorial campaign and, even after Trump’s praise, insisting that “if he walks like a jihadist… he’s a jihadist.” For Republicans who had invested heavily in demonizing Mamdani, Trump’s embrace left allies fuming and fractured, caught between loyalty to their leader and the hardline attacks they had once championed.

Keep ReadingShow less
Trump's Clemency for Giuliani et al is Another Effort to Whitewash History and Damage Democracy

Former NYC Mayor Rudy Giuliani, September 11, 2025 in New York City.

(Photo by Michael M. Santiago/Getty Images)

Trump's Clemency for Giuliani et al is Another Effort to Whitewash History and Damage Democracy

In the earliest days of the Republic, Alexander Hamilton defended giving the president the exclusive authority to grant pardons and reprieves against the charge that doing so would concentrate too much power in one person’s hands. Reading the news of President Trump’s latest use of that authority to reward his motley crew of election deniers and misfit lawyers, I was taken back to what Hamilton wrote in 1788.

He argued that “The principal argument for reposing the power of pardoning in this case to the Chief Magistrate is this: in seasons of insurrection or rebellion, there are often critical moments, when a well- timed offer of pardon to the insurgents or rebels may restore the tranquility of the commonwealth; and which, if suffered to pass unimproved, it may never be possible afterwards to recall.”

Keep ReadingShow less