Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

More (grassroots) leaders please

People seated at a conference table

RESULTS members lobby on Capitol Hill.

RESULTS

Daley-Harris is the author of “ Reclaiming Our Democracy: Every Citizen’s Guide to Transformational Advocacy ” and the founder of RESULTS and Civic Courage. This is part of a series focused on better understanding transformational advocacy: citizens awakening to their power.

In a Washington Post column in early July titled, “ It’s time to ask: Can America still produce great leaders? ” Garrett M. Graff asks, “So, what does good leadership look like in practice? How do we find good leaders, and how are they trained and shaped?. … And, desperately, how can we please make more of them?” While Graff’s focus is on leaders in politics, government and business, my focus is on citizen leaders and the organizations that train and shape them. But we ask similar questions.

Recently I spoke with activists who got their start in transformational advocacy in Chicago and Nashville. Since so many of us find it hard to get started, I wanted to know how they began.


Fred LeMay was a commercial insurance underwriter and saw how changes in the climate were affecting the insurance and reinsurance markets. “I was reading climate articles,” he said, “and getting concerned for my kids and grandkids and the future of the planet. I thought maybe I should try to be more active.” LeMay co-leads the Middle Tennessee chapter of Citizens’ Climate Lobby.

Cindy Levin was a mechanical engineer and corporate type. “When I quit my job to provide full-time care for my kids, I lost my social network and my purpose,” she told me. “I did have this purpose to be a mom, but it was also isolating. Activism was a way to be relevant in the wider world.” Levin is now an author, speaker and activist who coaches others on how to develop relationships with their elected representatives. She received much of her training from RESULTS, the grassroots anti-poverty lobby I founded in 1980.

These volunteer activists and thousands of others benefited from the brilliance of another activist, Dorsey Lawson, who died recently at age 95. A giant in the early days of RESULTS, Lawson and the team of volunteers she built around her in Pasadena, Calif., in the 1980s were our research and development department.

They developed the laser talk — a short statement about a problem, examples of solutions and a call to take specific action — that advocates use in meetings with members of Congress, the media and others they want to mobilize.

Lawson and her fourth grade English as a Second Language class devised the process for teaching the laser talk — delivering the talk, then asking leading questions and having the group shout out the answers to see what they remember, and then asking the questions again and having them just think the answers to themselves. Learning and using laser talks is a key strategy in the work of effective grassroots advocacy organizations such as RESULTS and Citizens’ Climate Lobby.

RESULTS’ pioneering work around building a relationship with a member of Congress who opposes a global poverty bill you are advocating for and bringing them on board as a supporter also came from Lawson and her team of volunteers, starting more than 40 years ago with their Rep. Carlos Moorhead (R-Calif.).

The commitment to encouraging breakthroughs, to encouraging volunteer activists to move out of their comfort zone, was given voice by Lawson too.

While I was on one of my 21-city trips to start RESULTS groups in 1984, Lawson — writing in her role as assistant executive director — described one volunteer’s splitting headache and another’s feeling of nausea while completing op-eds they’d been invited to write.

“If you’re scared to do this kind of stuff, know that we are too,” Lawson wrote. “I felt flushed and feverish driving off to a reception for forty people with Rep. Matthew Martinez (D-CA). If you don’t have any discomfort, look at what would be a stretch for you. RESULTS is people breaking through the thought, ‘I don’t make a difference,’ to emerge as community leaders. Those who have pressed themselves to new heights of participation know the joy of this. What’s next for you?”

As always, she signed the letter, “Love, Dorsey.”

Lawson knew that joy followed the discomfort. She knew that it mattered to make big asks of volunteers — it mattered to the issue they cared about, and it mattered to the volunteers themselves.

When Lawson’s group developed the laser talk in 1984, UNICEF reported that 40,000 children around the world were dying every day from malnutrition and preventable disease, things like measles coupled with malnutrition. RESULTS volunteers have lobbied on these issues every year for the last four decades. Over that period, the latest figures show a 66 percent decline in global child deaths, a greater than 90 percent decline in deaths from dehydration and an 80 percent decline in child deaths from vaccine-preventable diseases.

Graff asked, “How do we find good leaders … how are they trained and … how can we please make more of them?” The innovations that Lawson and her team developed are one answer to Graff’s question. The difference she made with her life lives on in tens of millions of children’s lives saved and thousands of activists’ lives changed and will contribute to building more leaders well into the future.

Read More

After the Ceasefire, the Violence Continues – and Cries for New Words

An Israeli army vehicle moves on the Israeli side, near the border with the Gaza Strip on November 18, 2025 in Southern Israel, Israel.

(Photo by Amir Levy/Getty Images)

After the Ceasefire, the Violence Continues – and Cries for New Words

Since October 10, 2025, the day when the US-brokered ceasefire between Israel and Hamas was announced, Israel has killed at least 401 civilians, including at least 148 children. This has led Palestinian scholar Saree Makdisi to decry a “continuing genocide, albeit one that has shifted gears and has—for now—moved into the slow lane. Rather than hundreds at a time, it is killing by twos and threes” or by twenties and thirties as on November 19 and November 23 – “an obscenity that has coalesced into a new normal.” The Guardian columnist Nesrine Malik describes the post-ceasefire period as nothing more than a “reducefire,” quoting the warning issued by Amnesty International’s secretary general Agnès Callamard that the ”world must not be fooled” into believing that Israel’s genocide is over.

A visual analysis of satellite images conducted by the BBC has established that since the declared ceasefire, “the destruction of buildings in Gaza by the Israeli military has been continuing on a huge scale,” entire neighborhoods “levelled” through “demolitions,” including large swaths of farmland and orchards. The Guardian reported already in March of 2024, that satellite imagery proved the “destruction of about 38-48% of tree cover and farmland” and 23% of Gaza’s greenhouses “completely destroyed.” Writing about the “colossal violence” Israel has wrought on Gaza, Palestinian legal scholar Rabea Eghbariah lists “several variations” on the term “genocide” which researchers found the need to introduce, such as “urbicide” (the systematic destruction of cities), “domicide” (systematic destruction of housing), “sociocide,” “politicide,” and “memoricide.” Others have added the concepts “ecocide,” “scholasticide” (the systematic destruction of Gaza’s schools, universities, libraries), and “medicide” (the deliberate attacks on all aspects of Gaza’s healthcare with the intent to “wipe out” all medical care). It is only the combination of all these “-cides,” all amounting to massive war crimes, that adequately manages to describe the Palestinian condition. Constantine Zurayk introduced the term “Nakba” (“catastrophe” in Arabic) in 1948 to name the unparalleled “magnitude and ramifications of the Zionist conquest of Palestine” and its historical “rupture.” When Eghbariah argues for “Nakba” as a “new legal concept,” he underlines, however, that to understand its magnitude, one needs to go back to the 1917 Balfour Declaration, in which the British colonial power promised “a national home for the Jewish people” in Palestine, even though just 6 % of its population were Jewish. From Nakba as the “constitutive violence of 1948,” we need today to conceptualize “Nakba as a structure,” an “overarching frame.”

Keep ReadingShow less
Ukraine, Russia, and the Dangerous Metaphor of Holding the Cards
a hand holding a deck of cards in front of a christmas tree
Photo by Luca Volpe on Unsplash

Ukraine, Russia, and the Dangerous Metaphor of Holding the Cards

Donald Trump has repeatedly used the phrase “holding the cards” during his tenure as President to signal that he, or sometimes an opponent, has the upper hand. The metaphor projects bravado, leverage, and the inevitability of success or failure, depending on who claims control.

Unfortunately, Trump’s repeated invocation of “holding the cards” embodies a worldview where leverage, bluff, and dominance matter more than duty, morality, or responsibility. In contrast, leadership grounded in duty emphasizes ethical obligations to allies, citizens, and democratic principles—elements strikingly absent from this metaphor.

Keep ReadingShow less
Beyond Apologies: Corporate Contempt and the Call for Real Accountability
campbells chicken noodle soup can

Beyond Apologies: Corporate Contempt and the Call for Real Accountability

Most customers carry a particular image of Campbell's Soup: the red-and-white label stacked on a pantry shelf, a touch of nostalgia, and the promise of a dependable bargain. It's food for snow days, tight budgets, and the middle of the week. For generations, the brand has positioned itself as a companion to working families, offering "good food" for everyday people. The company cultivated that trust so thoroughly that it became almost cliché.

Campbell's episode, now the subject of national headlines and an ongoing high-profile legal complaint, is troubling not only for its blunt language but for what it reveals about the hidden injuries that erode the social contract linking institutions to citizens, workers to workplaces, and brands to buyers. If the response ends with the usual PR maneuvers—rapid firings and the well-rehearsed "this does not reflect our values" statement. Then both the lesson and the opportunity for genuine reform by a company or individual are lost. To grasp what this controversy means for the broader corporate landscape, we first have to examine how leadership reveals its actual beliefs.

Keep ReadingShow less
Donald Trump

When ego replaces accountability in the presidency, democracy weakens. An analysis of how unchecked leadership erodes trust, institutions, and the rule of law.

Brandon Bell/Getty Images

When Leaders Put Ego Above Accountability—Democracy At Risk

What has become of America’s presidency? Once a symbol of dignity and public service, the office now appears chaotic, ego‑driven, and consumed by spectacle over substance. When personal ambition replaces accountability, the consequences extend far beyond politics — they erode trust, weaken institutions, and threaten democracy itself.

When leaders place ego above accountability, democracy falters. Weak leaders seek to appear powerful. Strong leaders accept responsibility.

Keep ReadingShow less