Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Reasons to Care about the Sailors Aboard the USS Lincoln

Opinion

A military ship out in the sea.

USS Abraham Lincoln (CVN 72) conducts U.S. blockade operations related to the Strait of Hormuz on April 16, 2026 in the Arabian Sea.

Handout Photo by the U.S. Navy via Getty Images

The crew of the USS Abraham Lincoln has been at sea for over 265 days, and over 200 days without a port call. The aircraft carrier left San Diego on November 21, 202 for a routine Pacific deployment, only to be redirected to the Middle East instead for a war Congress never declared and voted not to authorize. Carriers are supposed to pull in every 30 to 45 days for resupply, maintenance, and something resembling a break; the Lincoln has gone nearly five times that long without one–a modern record for a warship.

Consider what that actually means for a human being. You’re living at work, on a ship, with your coworkers, away from your family and friends, and now the ship is starting to fall apart: the water fountains are broken, the water is contaminated, sometimes water needs to be rationed so showers and laundry are secured, the showers are moldy, the toilets are clogged, and the food is rationed, rotten, and can be, as Congressman Mike Levin described, as meager as a half a cup of rice and two tortillas. These are horrible working conditions. Whether or not you believe sailors signed up for this when they joined the military, you must admit, it’s a brutal job.


I’ve deployed to the South China Sea and the Persian Gulf as a Navy helicopter pilot. I know what months at sea do to a person, even when the ship has hot chow and working plumbing. It is unclear what their mission is and how they hope to achieve it, and now negotiations have stalled, and finding a diplomatic solution seems like a fantasy under this administration. Conditions have gotten so bad that the members of the crew are increasingly suicidal.

Some of them have managed to report back to their families. About 200 family members showed up to a town hall in San Diego this month to give acting Navy Secretary Hung Cao a message: that the Pentagon has broken their trust. Back in April, Secretary Hegseth called similar reporting “fake news.” Now, Navy Times and Stars and Stripes have both reported multiple attempted man overboard incidents aboard the Lincoln. One wife told reporters her husband texted her that he “hopes he doesn't wake up tomorrow.” The Navy's official response is that it hasn't “identified an increase in reported suicidal ideation or suicide attempts,” and that sailors have “continuous access to clean water, functional AC and healthy meal options.” The magnitude of the difference between official information from the Pentagon and firsthand reports from the crew should be troubling. The Department is either being intentionally deceptive or is just that out-of-touch.

Some critics may hear these reports and argue that troops had it way worse in Vietnam. Or in Iraq. But those were wars. If this administration continues to ballerina around calling this conflict a war in order to circumvent the Constitution, then they don’t get to use “war” to justify why our service members are being forced to ration food. Even if this were called a war, the forever wars in Iraq and Afghanistan already taught this country, at enormous cost, what repeated extended deployments do to a force. Veterans came home broken at a rate this country still hasn't fully grasped. How many missions can we accomplish if we keep forgetting to take care of our personnel along the way?

Meanwhile, for all his chest-beating, Secretary Hegseth sure likes to take his eye off the ball of war. He wants to make sure sailors have enough testosterone, but can’t ensure they have enough food. Since the Lincoln left San Diego, Hegseth has found time to pick fights with the Ivy League over military fellowships, threaten to sever the Pentagon's relationship with the Boy Scouts over wokeness, and, in an unprecedented move, personally blocked the promotions of more than a dozen senior officers (a disproportionate number of them Black or women). That's where his energy has gone, while sailors half a world away are jumping off his ships to escape.

Hegseth says he makes these decisions in the name of lethality. He believes the warrior ethos will save the military. But you don't get lethality out of a crew running on a rationed dinner for months on end. And the warrior ethos shouldn’t have to include bravely facing water contamination on your own ship. Even warfighters need basic care. The Department of Defense needs a leader who is up to the job of providing that care. Perhaps Secretary Hegseth could start by prioritizing the needs of the active-duty service members deployed to the Middle East over his beef with the Boy Scouts.

There are strategic reasons for us to take care of these sailors: their operational capacity depends on it, and not doing so could have negative consequences on retention and recruitment, which adds up to readiness, which is essential to national security. But there’s another reason: compassion. Leadership should mean looking out for your people. As my old Command Master Chief used to say, “it’s about heads in beds, too.” It’s time Secretary Hegseth realized that’s part of his job, fixed the plumbing, and got these sailors home to their families. And if he isn’t up to the task, then it’s high time he stepped aside.

I believe we can achieve lethality without sacrificing humanity. If we can’t, then let’s decide it’s not worth it.


Julie Roland was a Naval Officer for ten years, deploying to both the South China Sea and the Persian Gulf as a helicopter pilot before separating in June 2025 as a Lieutenant Commander. She has a law degree from the University of San Diego, a Master of Laws from Columbia University, and is a member of the Truman National Security Project.


Read More

Donald Trump with Brazil flag

Donald Trump with Brazil flag

AI generated with Getty Image

Trump Cannot Cry “Election Interference” in the US While Meddling in Brazil

Hugo Balta is currently traveling through Brazil, reporting on democracy, civic engagement, and the political dynamics shaping the South American country at a moment that offers urgent lessons for the United States.

SÃO PAULO—For years, the political mainstream in Washington has treated the sanctity of ballot boxes as an exceptional American virtue under siege from malicious foreign actors. Yet, look beyond the equator, and that high-minded rhetoric instantly dissolves into a dangerous hypocrisy. You cannot self-righteously decry the subversion of domestic voting systems while simultaneously pulling the geopolitical levers to distort someone else’s.

Keep ReadingShow less
Capitol building
white concrete building during daytime

Congress Broke the Constitutional Order — And Now They Want Voters to Forget

How can leaders who broke the constitutional order, ignored their oath, weakened rights, and harmed the people now ask Americans to forget — and reward them with reelection? The question is not abstract — it goes to the heart of what the Constitution demands from those who swear an oath to uphold it.

The constitutional order is the framework that protects the Republic: three branches, checks and balances, oversight, limits on executive power, and the oath every member of Congress swears — to support and defend the Constitution of the United States. Yet in recent years, Congress has allowed that order to erode. Oversight collapsed. Guardrails bent. Silence replaced accountability. Loyalty to a president replaced loyalty to the Constitution.

Keep ReadingShow less
John Kennedy display a sign

John Kennedy display a sign accusing former Special Counsel Jack Smith of meeting with Fulton County, Georgia, District Attorney Fani Willis during a hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee in the Hart Senate Office Building on Sept. 29, 2026, in Washington, D.C. The committee is holding the hearing to examine Smith’ s probe into Donald Trump.

(Getty Images)

Schmitt’s smoking gun backfires on him

Tuesday was supposed to be a big day for Missouri Sen. Eric Schmitt, a little-known first-term junior Senator whose main claim to fame thus far was the 25 lawsuits he filed against President Joe Biden’s administration in a span of 20 months while Missouri’s attorney general.

But congressional hearings have long been a place not to do actual legislating but to make a name for oneself, and Schmitt was going to take his opportunity on Tuesday, when he got to question former Special Counsel Jack Smith in the Senate Judiciary Committee.

Keep ReadingShow less
 U.S. President Donald Trump speaks from the Cross Hall of the White House on April 1, 2026 in Washington, DC.

U.S. President Donald Trump speaks from the Cross Hall of the White House on April 1, 2026 in Washington, DC.

Pool/Getty Images

How Presidential Primetime Addresses Shape Public Trust in Democratic Institutions

A question still being studied is the effects on public trust when the head of the Executive casts doubt on the institutions that run elections, enforce laws, and decide legal disputes. The President of the United States is arguably the most powerful man in the world. He is the commander in chief of a nation #1 in nominal gross domestic product as well as #1 in military power, budget, and spending as of 2026. The actions he takes spew ripple effects across the world and follow many generations. A way you can measure the executive's power can also be measured in how much influence his speeches have on the markets, opinions of the masses, news outlets, lawmakers, social media reactions, etc. His framing of an issue can shape the next day’s political conversation.

These conversations become extremely dangerous/consequential when discussing a principle as embedded in our country as Democracy. In his July primetime speech, Trump continued to pedal the claims about election security and argued for stricter voting rules. He continued to portray the country as facing a moment of corruption and uncertainty, followed by presenting himself as the one prepared to restore order. The address continued with repeated claims about his loss in the 2020 election that have not been supported by the evidence compiled over years of investigation by many parties. Professional reviews, audits, and courts have yet to find significant evidence of foul play substantial enough to influence the outcome of that election.

Keep ReadingShow less