Jane Erickson and Bobby Milstein are Directors at The Rippel Foundation.
On her busiest days as the Director of Outreach at the New Castle Prevention Coalition, Dora Williams walks about 12 miles along the Route 9 corridor just south of Wilmington, Delaware, knocking on every door to share the organization’s resources for substance use recovery. But conversations often turn from substance use to larger discussions about life’s challenges – the need for stable housing, financial security, a healthy environment, and educational opportunity.
These are some of what are called vital conditions for health and well-being —the foundational factors people and communities need to thrive, such as basic needs for health and safety, humane housing, meaningful work and wealth, lifelong learning, a thriving natural world, and reliable transportation. Central to all of these is the vital condition of belonging and civic muscle. Belonging means feeling part of a community, embraced for who you are and valued for what you bring, and it builds civic muscle—the power of people in a diverse, multiracial society to work across differences as stewards of their lives together.
Each of the vital conditions contributes to individual and collective health and well-being. Ms. Dora, as she is known, came to realize that the key to reducing substance use and addiction in the community would be to strengthen vital conditions. Throughout the nation, community stewards like Ms. Dora are working to establish the vital conditions that everyone needs to participate, prosper, and reach their full potential. Stewards can be people, organizations, or networks who work with others to create the conditions that everyone needs to thrive together, beginning with those who are struggling and suffering. Given the entrenched inequities in health and well-being across the country, particularly among people of color, America needs more stewards to rise and do their part to create an equitable, thriving future.
Shared stewardship goes beyond traditional leadership. Whereas leaders often focus mainly on their own individual or organizational interests, stewards are driven by an expansive understanding of what we can accomplish by bridging differences and embracing our mutual interests—taking shared action to create a world in which everyone can thrive together, with no exceptions.
Stewards define success as more than individual victories; they strive to transform unjust systems that are not yet built for everyone to thrive. That is why shared stewardship, animated by belonging and civic muscle, is an antidote to the disconnection, fragmentation, and systemic exclusion that too often divides Americans and causes so much struggling and suffering. By strengthening stewardship, those working to build healthy, equitable communities are able to shift levers--like organizational strategies, policies, resource flows, and power dynamics--that ultimately expand vital conditions. Over time, Ms. Dora has moved beyond focusing solely on substance use to addressing vital conditions like safety (increasing the number of streetlights on dark roads) and learning (working with the school system to provide alternatives to school suspensions). And, she is not alone.
Stewardship is taking hold among countless other individuals, organizations, and networks across Delaware and beyond. In southern Wilmington, the South Bridge Community Development Corporation (SBCDC), whose mission is to create and support the local ownership of land, labor, and capital in the community, provides a striking illustration of how stewardship operates at an organizational level. An SBCDC project was originally focused on improving the exteriors of economically deprived and environmentally contaminated homes, but the organization realized that it could have a greater community impact by collaborating with fellow stewards, like government agencies and community-based organizations. Together, they are expanding their efforts to include improvements to home interiors, energy efficiency, environmental remediation, and more. The results will be safer, more stable housing for individual homeowners; increased property values throughout the community; and neighborhood beautification that benefits everyone. Ms. Dora, the SBCDC, and numerous other stewards in Delaware also benefit by working in partnership with Healthy Communities Delaware (HCD), a multi-sector, statewide network of communities and investors focused on expanding the vital conditions to improve health and well-being. HCD energizes a growing movement of stewards who believe we all have a role to play in creating an equitable future in which no one is left behind.
Between 2020 and July 2023, HCD has invested more than $3.5 million in community and individual stewards. Those partners have then gone on to secure more than $15 million in additional funding, thanks to HCD’s capacity-building investments. Virtually all HCD-funded partners have prioritized belonging and civic muscle as a vital condition worthy of their time and attention—demonstrating just how critical it is to the success of meaningful change in Delaware. Beyond Delaware, stewards across the country are building strong networks organized around shared values for equitable well-being. Many of those networks seem poised to expand even more, yet stewardship is still not the normative way of doing business. Efforts to drive transformative change remain disconnected and limited, as noted in ReThink Health’s 2021 Pulse Check on Shared Stewardship, the first-ever nationwide survey that explores the extent to which stewardship values, priorities, and practices are taking hold. To unlock America’s full potential for equitable health and well-being, changemakers across the country must do their part to ensure that shared stewardship becomes a rising norm.
Fortunately, a core set of stewardship practices has become increasingly well defined, in part through the work of The Rippel Foundation’s ReThink Health initiative. Together with thousands of collaborators, ReThink Health has identified essential stewardship practices that can generate lasting change in virtually any setting. These practices involve shifts in mindsets and behaviors--thinking and acting in ways that foster interdependence by connecting across differences, creating transformative opportunities, and learning and adapting.
The path to a thriving future, especially for those who have been left behind and undervalued, lies in adopting the practices of shared stewardship. The work taking place in Delaware is a powerful example of what it looks like when stewards at every level are equipped to drive positive change by thinking and acting beyond narrowly defined short-term outcomes. By embracing collaboration, expanding aspirations beyond singular programs, and committing to building belonging and civic muscle as the means for achieving greater equity, stewards can work together to produce sustainable, transformative change in their communities.



















A golden tray sits on the Resolute Desk as President Donald Trump speaks during an announcement on American nuclear innovation in the Oval Office at the White House on July 24, 2026, in Washington, D.C. Trump is signing multiple executive orders targeting the nuclear energy sector and easing rules for new reactors and nuclear fuel supply chains.
Trump’s hubris rivals the fallen heroes of ancient Greek mythology
In January, the New York Times asked President Donald Trump if there were any limits on his global powers.
“Yeah,” the president responded, “there is one thing. My own morality. My own mind. It’s the only thing that can stop me.”
That was eight months ago, but fortunately Christopher Nolan’s blockbuster adaptation of “The Odyssey” has made ancient Greek literature newly relevant. Before that window closes, I’d like to talk about hubris.
Today, the term mostly means excessive pride or arrogance. That’s part of what the Greeks meant by it too, but the meaning was a bit richer and more specific. Hubris was an insolent or outrageous act that offended the gods, often because the transgressor was claiming abilities or authorities that solely belonged to supreme beings.
Nolan renamed and slightly modified the concept of xenia for the film, calling it “Zeus’ law.” In the director’s telling, mortals should follow the rules laid out by the gods, specifically the requirement to treat strangers with respect lest they be gods in disguise.
In a sense, hubris is the opposite, or at least the rejection, of xenia. The hubris of the suitors, and at times Odysseus himself, invites punishment by the gods and their mortal instruments.
Which brings me back to Donald Trump. His claim that there are no constraints on his personal power to dictate events on the global stage was one of the greatest expressions of hubris ever uttered by a political leader.
Trump’s claim was obviously false when he made it.
He vowed that he could end the Russia-Ukraine war in 24 hours. He’s proved powerless to make that happen. If he had divine powers to work his will, why would he have balked at implementing his tariffs so often that Wall Street adopted the “TACO trade” term for his deals? “TACO” stands for “Trump always chickens out.”
And why would Trump have made so many embarrassing concessions to China — from rescinding tariffs on Chinese goods to allowing them to buy crucial and incredibly valuable computer chips?
But Trump saw his success at capturing Venezuelan strongman Nicolas Maduro as proof of his ability to launch missiles to the same effect as Zeus’ lightning bolts. Trump believed he was the most powerful man who ever lived.
This is no exaggeration. In March, when the Iran invasion seemed successful, Trump gave a document penned by“Presidential Historian David King” to New York Times reporters Maggie Haberman and Jonathan Swan purporting to prove that Trump was “the most powerful person to have EVER walked this planet.” King was, in fact, a businessman and occasional caddy for legendary golfer Gary Player.
King compared Trump favorably to many of history’s most powerful, and often heinous, figures: Alexander the Great, Attila the Hun, William the Conqueror, Napoleon Bonaparte, Joseph Stalin, Genghis Khan, Mao Tse Tung, Adolf Hitler and Vladimir Lenin. Many of these men thought they were the most powerful person in the world, too. And many were defeated precisely because they believed it.
At least Napoleon and Hitler had a string of truly impressive victories before they learned the folly of hubris. The limits on Trump’s power have been exposed by far less august forces than the combined might of the allies in World War II or the fearsome Russian winter.
Iran is a comparatively middling power. But the regime’s ability to absorb punishment while imposing its will on the Strait of Hormuz has proved to be a greater constraint on Trump’s power than his morality or mind. We should note that, at least rhetorically, his morality has not proved much of a constraint. He has repeatedly promised to destroy Iranian “civilization” if the regime refuses to capitulate.
But they haven’t — and won’t anytime soon — because the regime’s tolerance for pain far outstrips Trump’s. The combined fear of skyrocketing oil prices, outrage of Gulf state potentates, diminishing weapon supplies and domestic unpopularity is doing the work that international law, congressional oversight and the collective opinion of foreign policy experts can’t or won’t do.
If I considered Trump more heroic than reason and facts could allow, I would say his Sisyphean predicament has the whiff of Greek tragedy to it. Trump is vexed by the fact that the Iranians won’t honor deals or ratify his countless premature claims of victory — giving new meaning to his vow that his presidency would make people tired of winning. It’s almost like they’re out-Trumping Trump.
Things might have gone better if he’d heeded that great Greek tragedian Sophocles: “For Zeus utterly abhors the boasts of a proud tongue.”
____
Jonah Goldberg is editor-in-chief of The Dispatch and the host of The Remnant podcast. His Twitter handle is @JonahDispatch.