News. Debate. Community. Levers for a better democracy.
Check out our Election Dissection blog:
Our panel of experts will be analyzing voting controversies until the 2020 winners are clear.

Fix the Court

Fix the Court is a national, nonpartisan organization that advocates for non-ideological "fixes" that would make the federal courts, and primarily the U.S. Supreme Court, more open and more accountable to the American people.
News. Community. Debate. Levers for better democracy.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter.

Balance of Power
Drew Angerer/Getty Images

A packed court would neuter judicial independence and strengthen the president

Strand is president of the Congressional Institute, a nonprofit that seeks to help members of Congress better serve their constituents and their constituents better understand Congress.
Keep reading... Show less
The White House
President Trump Nominates Judge Amy Coney Barrett for Asso… | Flickr

How will Justice Barrett rule on voting rights?

Election Dissection contributor Edward B. Foley lays out one of the key questions about a Supreme Court back at full strength with a conservative supermajority: Which conservative tradition will Amy Coney Barrett follow?

If Barrett follows the judicial self-restraint philosophy of Felix Frankfurter, Barrett will be reluctant to act on questions relating to electoral politics, Foley writes in The Washington Post. In order for the high court to retain public confidence, it was necessary to maintain "complete detachment, in fact and in appearance, from political entanglements and by abstention from injecting itself into the clash of political forces in political settlements," Frankfurter said.

Keep reading... Show less
Kamil Krzaczynski/Getty Images

Wisconsin voters have been advised to vote in person if they do not get their ballots in the mail today.

Get to your mailboxes right now, Supreme Court tells procrastinators in Wisconsin

Wisconsinites with ballots sitting on their kitchen tables have received the same message now from two of Washington's most influential institutions, the Supreme Court and the Postal Service: Complete them and get them in the mail right away. As in, Tuesday.

USPS long ago set this day as the best-practices cutoff for mailing an absentee ballot with confidence it would arrive by Election Day. The warning took on special urgency Monday in one of the top presidential battlegrounds, when the high court voted 5-3 against Wisconsin accepting any mailed ballots arriving after the polls close a week from now.

The decision was the last in an election law dispute before Justice Amy Coney Barrett was confirmed and sworn in Monday night. She can now participate in the appeals of ballot receipt extensions in two other tossups, Pennsylvania and North Carolina.

Keep reading... Show less
File:Panorama of United States Supreme Court Building at Dusk.jpg ...

The coming Supreme Court showdown that may affect how you vote

There is a collision of two tectonic plates occurring in the world of election law, and it is causing an earthquake in federal jurisprudence on absentee voting.

One of these tectonic plates is the so-called Anderson-Burdick balancing test. This has been the Supreme Court's basic framework for evaluating the general constitutionality of election procedures. Anderson involved the independent presidential candidacy of John Anderson in 1980 and, specifically, his claim that Ohio had an unconstitutionally early deadline for getting on the ballot. Anderson's claim prevailed.

Burdick involved Hawaii's prohibition against write-in votes. (The claim of unconstitutionality lost.) The court in that case built on its Anderson decision. It said that a court must weigh "the character and magnitude of the asserted injury" to First and 14th Amendment rights against the state's interests and justifications for "the burden imposed by its rule."

Keep reading... Show less
© Issue One. All rights reserved.