Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Restore 200,000 Georgians to the rolls before Senate election, lawsuit demands

Georgia voter rally

Georgia Tech's women's basketball team encouraged voters on Nov. 3.

Tom Williams/Getty Images

Nearly 200,000 valid voters should be returned to the rolls in time for Georgia's twin elections that will decide partisan control of the Senate in five weeks, a new lawsuit argues.

The suit, filed Wednesday by three voting rights groups in federal court in Atlanta, alleges the Georgia secretary of state's office improperly removed 198,351 voters from the state's registration database last year — an error rate of 63 percent.

The Black Voters Matter Fund, the Transformative Justice Coalition and the Rainbow Push Coalition maintain that voters who hadn't moved were taken off the rolls because the state did not use the correct list to verify addresses. The suit also challenges the state's "use it or lose it" law, which requires people to vote in at least one federal election every four years or interact with a state election office in order to remain registered.


The lawsuit is based on a report released by the ACLU of Georgia in September. As with most potentially disenfranchising actions, it concluded, young, poor, urban and minority voters were the most affected by the apparent purge.

It is unclear how many, if any, re-registered in time for the November election. The voting rights groups have asked that all the voters be restored by Jan. 5. That is when the state will vote in one of the most impassioned and expensive runoff elections in modern congressional history. Both of the state's Senate seats will be contested, because on Election Day nobody received the 50 percent majority required by state law.

Republican incumbent David Perdue is seeking a second term against Democratic activist and documentary filmmaker Jon Ossoff. And GOP Senate appointee Kelly Loeffler is seeking election in her own right against Democratic Rev. Raphael Warnock. If Democrats win both races, they will effectively control the Senate, with 50 seats and the new vice president, Kamala Harris, available to break a tie.

At a news conference Wednesday, Gabriel Sterling, the voting system implementation manager in the secretary of state's office, dismissed allegations of bad behavior by his office. "I'm going to go with no," he said when asked if nearly 200,000 voters had been unfairly purged, but he added: "Frankly, I've not seen or heard of this lawsuit yet."


Read More

CT election security group honors 10 years of fighting for democracy

A 2021 poll shows 73% of Connecticut voters supported the amendment giving all voters the option to vote by absentee ballot without needing an excuse.

(Adobe Stock)

CT election security group honors 10 years of fighting for democracy

A Connecticut voting-rights group is celebrating its 10th anniversary.

Bridgeport Generation Now has worked to broaden voting access and ensure fairer elections for city residents. Some of its most important work came at a time when many Bridgeport residents felt their votes didn't matter, pointing to absentee ballot fraud as the cause.

Keep ReadingShow less
Court’s Slaughter Decision Hands Presidents Sweeping New Authority

U.S. President Donald Trump in the Oval Office at the White House on July 24, 2026 in Washington, DC.

Photo by Eric Lee/Getty Images)

Court’s Slaughter Decision Hands Presidents Sweeping New Authority

This series from Lawyers Defending American Democracy connects the words of the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution to current events that threaten democracy and the justice system. Each piece highlights the unique responsibility lawyers carry—through their oath, professional obligations, and roles in their communities—to help the public understand what’s at risk and to speak out when democratic principles are under threat. LDAD’s call to action is straightforward: as the Founders once did, we must recognize threats to constitutional values, demand accountability, and act to defend them.

In its recent decision in Trump v. Slaughter, a divided Supreme Court approved an expansive use of presidential power that upsets the Constitutional balance between Congress and the President. The Court approved the President’s summary dismissal of agency leaders (in this case, commissioners of the Federal Trade Commission), notwithstanding a statute signed by a former President and the Court's own precedent specifically forbidding such dismissals. This decision will further politicize and weaponize much of our federal government.

Keep ReadingShow less