Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

RFK Advisory Panel Firings Betrays Senator Cassidy

Opinion

RFK Advisory Panel Firings Betrays Senator Cassidy

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. (R), U.S. President Donald Trump’s nominee for Secretary of Health and Human Services speaks with U.S. Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-LA) after testifying in his Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions confirmation hearing at the Dirksen Senate Office Building on January 30, 2025 in Washington, DC.

Getty Images, Kevin Dietsch

Our hyperpolarized politics as well as a malfunctioning Congress may end up making Americans much less healthy.

The Senate confirmation and recent actions taken by the Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS), Robert F. Kennedy Jr., highlight the utter dysfunction in our politics and within the legislative body strangled by partisanship.


Prior to being elected to the Senate, Sen. Bill Cassidy was a practicing physician, who not only believed in vaccinations, he promoted them to patients living in his home state of Louisiana. Cassidy now chairs the Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee (HELP) in the Senate.

Long-time vaccine skeptic Kennedy appeared in front of the HELP committee before moving on to the full Senate for confirmation. Kennedy needed Cassidy’s vote to win confirmation as HHS secretary.

Kennedy met with Cassidy several times before his confirmation vote and reassured Cassidy that he would “maintain the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices without changes.”

To be fair, Cassidy was attempting to do his advice and consent role as a U.S. senator in good faith, but it comes as no surprise, even probably to Cassidy, that Kennedy did not maintain his word.

On June 9, in a Wall Street Journal op-ed, Kennedy announced that he planned to fire all 17 members of the panel that advises the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) on vaccines.

The CDC advisory group, called the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), holds hearings on vaccine safety and efficacy, and makes recommendations about who should use the shots approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

Kennedy said the firings were a way to restore faith in vaccines and wrote: “The committee has been plagued with persistent conflicts of interest and has become little more than a rubber stamp for any vaccine.”

This claim as well as other accusations that Kennedy made against ACIP have been debunked by publications, including Barron's.

Just two hours after the publication of the op-ed, members of the ACIP panel received termination notices from the CDC, according to a copy of the email seen by POLITICO.

Following the ACIP terminations, Cassidy posted on X: “Of course, now the fear is that the ACIP will be filled up with people who know nothing about vaccines except suspicion. I’ve just spoken with Secretary Kennedy, and I’ll continue to talk with him to ensure this is not the case.”

Kennedy is playing Cassidy for a fool as The Washington Post reported on June 11 that Kennedy has chosen eight replacements, including Vicky Pebsworth, who is on the board of the National Vaccine Information Center, the nation’s oldest anti-vaccine group.

Another member, Robert W. Malone, a biochemist, previously sued The Washington Post, alleging defamation over the newspaper’s reporting on his advocacy against the coronavirus vaccine. The case was dismissed in 2023.

The ACID panel is scheduled to meet on June 25-27. Recommendation votes are scheduled for coronavirus, influenza, meningococcal, HPV, and RSV vaccines for adults, pregnant women, and infants. A quorum of at least eight ACIP members is required to hold a vote.

The following medical and professional organizations have condemned Kennedy for firing the previous committee members. These include the American Medical Association (AMA), the American Academy of Pediatrics, the American College of Physicians, the American Association of Immunologists, the Infectious Diseases Society of America, and the American Nurses Association.

During its annual meeting on June 10, the AMA called for Kennedy to immediately reverse his decision and called for a Senate investigation into his actions.

There is almost no one who thinks that will happen and there is no chance that the Senate will investigate Kennedy, especially given that Republicans are in the majority in both the House and Senate, despite Kennedy lying under oath during his Congressional confirmation hearings.

Cabinet members can be impeached, and, in our history, two cabinet members have been. They were the Secretary of War William W. Belknap in 1876 and Secretary of Homeland Security Alejandro Mayorkas in 2024. Neither was removed from office following the impeachment trials.

Cassidy tried to uphold his responsibilities at the front end of Kennedy’s confirmation, and it remains to be seen if Cassidy will do anything stronger than talking to Kennedy on the back end.

Because of hyper partisanship and polarization, Congress no longer conducts its good governance responsibilities, and in the case of Kennedy and HHS, it may harm the health and well-being of countless Americans.

While no one is surprised by Kennedy’s actions in the highest position of our top health agency, we should be no less alarmed by the consequences.


Lynn Schmidt is a columnist and Editorial Board member with the St. Louis Post-Dispatch. She holds a master's of science in political science as well as a bachelor's of science in nursing.

Read More

Ingrassia Exit Highlights Rare GOP Pushback to Trump’s Personnel Picks

President Donald Trump speaks at a White House press briefing on Jan. 30, 2025.

Credit: Jonah Elkowitz/Medill News Service

Ingrassia Exit Highlights Rare GOP Pushback to Trump’s Personnel Picks

WASHINGTON — Paul Ingrassia withdrew his nomination to lead the Office of Special Counsel on Tuesday night after facing Republican pushback over past controversial statements.

While Ingrassia joins a growing list of President Donald Trump’s nominees who have withdrawn from consideration, many who have aired controversial beliefs or lack requisite qualifications have still been appointed or are still in the nomination process.

Keep ReadingShow less
A Revolution in Congressional Decision-Making
low light photography of armchairs in front of desk

A Revolution in Congressional Decision-Making

The dysfunction of today’s federal government is not simply the product of political division or individual leaders; it is rooted in the internal rules of Congress itself. The Founders, in one of their few major oversights, granted Congress the authority to make its own procedural rules (Article I, Section 5) without establishing any framework for how it should operate. Over time, this blank check has produced a legislative process built to serve partisan power, not public representation.

The result is a Congress that often rewards obstruction and gridlock over compromise and action. The Founders imagined representatives closely tied to their constituents—one member for every 30,000 to 50,000 citizens. Today, that ratio has ballooned to one for every 765,000 in the House, and in the Senate, each member can represent tens of millions (e.g., California). As the population has grown, representation has become distant and impersonal, while procedural rules have tightened the grip of party leadership. Major issues can no longer reach the floor unless the majority party permits it. The link between citizens and decisions has nearly vanished.

Keep ReadingShow less
Lasting peace requires accepting Israel’s right to exist

US President Donald Trump hailed a "tremendous day for the Middle East" as he and regional leaders signed a declaration on Oct. 13, 2025, meant to cement a ceasefire in Gaza, hours after Israel and Hamas exchanged hostages and prisoners. (TNS)

Lasting peace requires accepting Israel’s right to exist

President Trump took a rhetorical victory lap in front of the Israeli parliament Monday. Ignoring his patented departures from the teleprompter, which violated all sorts of valuable norms, it was a speech Trump deserved to give. The ending of the war — even if it’s just a ceasefire — and the release of Israel’s last living hostages is, by itself, a monumental diplomatic accomplishment, and Trump deserves to take a bow.

Much of Trump’s prepared text was forward-looking, calling for a new “golden age” for the Middle East to mirror the one allegedly unfolding here in America. I’m generally skeptical about “golden ages,” here or abroad, and especially leery about any talk about “everlasting peace” in a region that has known “peace” for only a handful of years since the fall of the Ottoman Empire.

Keep ReadingShow less
A child looks into an empty fridge-freezer in a domestic kitchen.

The Trump administration’s suspension of the USDA’s Household Food Security Report halts decades of hunger data tracking.

Getty Images, Catherine Falls Commercial

Trump Gives Up the Fight Against Hunger

A Vanishing Measure of Hunger

Consider a hunger policy director at a state Department of Social Services studying food insecurity data across the state. For years, she has relied on the USDA’s annual Household Food Security Report to identify where hunger is rising, how many families are skipping meals, and how many children go to bed hungry. Those numbers help her target resources and advocate for stronger programs.

Now there is no new data. The survey has been “suspended for review,” officially to allow for a “methodological reassessment” and cost analysis. Critics say the timing and language suggest political motives. It is one of many federal data programs quietly dropped under a Trump executive order on so-called “nonessential statistics,” a phrase that almost parodies itself. Labeling hunger data “nonessential” is like turning off a fire alarm because it makes too much noise; it implies that acknowledging food insecurity is optional and reveals more about the administration’s priorities than reality.

Keep ReadingShow less