Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

From Fragility to Resilience: Fixing America’s Economic and Political Fault Lines

Opinion

From Fragility to Resilience: Fixing America’s Economic and Political Fault Lines

fractured foundation and US flag

AI generated

This series began with a simple but urgent question: What’s gone wrong with America’s economic policies, and how can we begin to fix them? The story so far has revealed not only financial instability but also deeper structural weaknesses that leave families, small businesses, and entire communities far more vulnerable than they should be.

In the first two articles, “Running on Empty” and “Crash Course,” we examined how middle-class families, small businesses, and retirees are increasingly caught in a web of debt and financial uncertainty. We also examined how Wall Street’s speculative excesses, deregulation, and shadow banking have pushed the financial system to the brink. Finally, we warned that Donald Trump’s economic agenda doesn’t address these problems—it magnifies them. Together, these earlier articles painted a picture of a system skating on thin ice, where even small shocks could trigger widespread crisis.


Now comes the hard part: finding a path forward.

A Fragile Foundation and a System on Borrowed Time

In the late 1970s, a nurse’s income could support a household of five—my own family lived that reality. Today, even two incomes often fall short. Half of Americans live paycheck to paycheck, and one in four spends nearly all their earnings on essentials. Credit card delinquencies have climbed to a 13-year high, while the costs of food, housing, and childcare continue to rise faster than wages.

Crushing student debt postpones homeownership and family formation, medical bills overwhelm households, and retirees confront shrinking safety nets as Social Security and Medicare edge closer to insolvency. Many who trusted these programs would always be there, failed to save enough, and now face retirement with too few resources. These pressures hint at a deeper crisis shaping daily life, where families are running harder to stay in place and the promise of upward mobility grows weaker with each passing year.

Small businesses and farmers are also paralyzed, with many farm families facing their gravest crisis since the 1980s. Tariff threats and congressional stopgaps make planning impossible. Instead of hiring or innovating, many hold back. As economist Hyman Minsky warned, what appears to be stability is often fragility in disguise. The same holds true for small towns hollowed out by decades of disinvestment: resilience on the surface but deep vulnerability underneath.

These household pressures connect directly to Wall Street’s excess. Federal deficits hover around 7 percent of GDP, interest payments on the national debt have tripled since 2021, and major banks carry dangerously thin cushions. Shadow banking, hedge funds, private equity, and crypto platforms operate with little oversight, creating risks that can spill over into the real economy. The concentration of risk in just a few giant institutions leaves the broader system exposed, and the lessons of 2008 seem to have faded too quickly.

The slide from safe finance into speculation and finally Ponzi finance is clear. Meme stocks, shaky AI startups, and commercial real estate burdened with debt all reflect this pattern. Deregulation, political pressure on the Federal Reserve, and tolerance for corporate leverage accelerate the cycle. If unchecked, these vulnerabilities could escalate into a crisis more damaging than the last, leaving policymakers scrambling once again to bail out the powerful while ordinary families bear the brunt of the pain.

Taken together, the warning signs are unmistakable: households weighed down by debt, businesses and farms in survival mode, and financial institutions skating on the edge of collapse. The system is brittle, and the cracks are widening.

Fixing What’s Broken

If "Running on Empty" diagnosed the household squeeze and "Crash Course" exposed systemic fragility, this final part turns to solutions. The fixes are not quick or painless, but they are possible if we summon the political will. And if pursued together, they could mark a turning point toward a more balanced, resilient economy.

At the broadest level, three priorities stand out, each of which deserves deeper attention. First, the nation must make rebuilding middle-class security a top priority by addressing the core costs of housing, education, healthcare, and retirement so that families can achieve stability once more. This means targeted investments in affordable housing, serious reforms to student debt, measures to control medical costs, and a long-term commitment to protecting Social Security and Medicare, ensuring that seniors are not left facing poverty in old age. Policymakers must also think about the next generation, ensuring that early childhood education, childcare support, and training programs are funded as essential public goods.

Second, financial excess must be contained through stronger oversight of banks, hedge funds, and shadow finance, along with a renewed commitment to institutional independence at places like the Federal Reserve. Restoring robust regulation would not only reduce the risk of another financial collapse but also rebuild public trust that the rules of the economy work for everyone, not just for the wealthiest institutions and investors. Transparency requirements, stronger enforcement powers, and coordination with international regulators are all necessary if the U.S. is to avoid repeating past mistakes. Limiting corporate leverage and addressing the risks posed by speculative markets, such as crypto, would also help stabilize the system.

Third, democracy itself requires repair. Congress must reclaim its budgetary authority by ending its reliance on continuing resolutions, and state and local governments need renewed support so they can act as meaningful counterweights to federal power. Just as important, civic life must be strengthened through education and reforms that encourage compromise rather than zero-sum politics, helping citizens see that government can still deliver for ordinary people and not just for partisan advantage. Ranked-choice voting, independent redistricting, and broader civic education could gradually shift political incentives toward problem-solving rather than permanent brinkmanship. Campaign finance reform is also vital. The Supreme Court should revisit Citizens United and restore reasonable limits on political spending so that democracy reflects the voices of citizens rather than the power of money.

None of these measures will be easy. All require political courage, a willingness to challenge entrenched interests, and an honest conversation with the public about costs and trade-offs. However, without such reforms, the system will remain brittle, and democracy will remain vulnerable. These reforms will take time. Citizens must be patient but also persistent in demanding them.

Conclusion: From Fragility to Resilience

This series began with families stretched to the breaking point, followed Wall Street’s dangerous gambles, and ends with a call to repair the foundations. Fragility is not destiny; the cracks are visible and can be repaired if leaders choose long-term stability over short-term spectacle.

Rebuilding middle-class security, restoring guardrails on finance, and renewing democratic institutions—from congressional responsibility and institutional independence to stronger civic life—are not partisan luxuries but democratic necessities.

The stakes extend beyond economics. They reach into the legitimacy of government, the cohesion of communities, and the public’s trust that tomorrow can be better than today. Yet too often leaders and the media fixate on short-term political theater instead of the deeper reforms required to secure the nation’s future.

If every election continues to feel like a cliffhanger for the republic, the system itself may not be able to withstand the strain. Strengthening institutions and pursuing reform is not optional; it is the only way forward. Moving from fragility to resilience will require patience, persistence, and vision—and it remains within reach if leaders and citizens alike demand it.

Robert Cropf is a Political Science Professor at Saint Louis University.


Read More

Silence, Signals, and the Unfinished Story of the Abandoned Disability Rule

Waiting for the Door to Open: Advocates and older workers are left in limbo as the administration’s decision to abandon a harsh disability rule exists only in private assurances, not public record.

AI-created animation

Silence, Signals, and the Unfinished Story of the Abandoned Disability Rule

We reported in the Fulcrum on November 30th that in early November, disability advocates walked out of the West Wing, believing they had secured a rare reversal from the Trump administration of an order that stripped disability benefits from more than 800,000 older manual laborers.

The public record has remained conspicuously quiet on the matter. No press release, no Federal Register notice, no formal statement from the White House or the Social Security Administration has confirmed what senior officials told Jason Turkish and his colleagues behind closed doors in November: that the administration would not move forward with a regulation that could have stripped disability benefits from more than 800,000 older manual laborers. According to a memo shared by an agency official and verified by multiple sources with knowledge of the discussions, an internal meeting in early November involved key SSA decision-makers outlining the administration's intent to halt the proposal. This memo, though not publicly released, is said to detail the political and social ramifications of proceeding with the regulation, highlighting its unpopularity among constituents who would be affected by the changes.

Keep ReadingShow less
How Trump turned a January 6 death into the politics of ‘protecting women’

A memorial for Ashli Babbitt sits near the US Capitol during a Day of Remembrance and Action on the one year anniversary of the January 6, 2021 insurrection.

(John Lamparski/NurPhoto/AP)

How Trump turned a January 6 death into the politics of ‘protecting women’

In the wake of the insurrection at the Capitol on January 6, 2021, President Donald Trump quickly took up the cause of a 35-year-old veteran named Ashli Babbitt.

“Who killed Ashli Babbitt?” he asked in a one-sentence statement on July 1, 2021.

Keep ReadingShow less
Gerrymandering Test the Boundaries of Fair Representation in 2026

Supreme Court, Allen v. Milligan Illegal Congressional Voting Map

Gerrymandering Test the Boundaries of Fair Representation in 2026

A wave of redistricting battles in early 2026 is reshaping the political map ahead of the midterm elections and intensifying long‑running fights over gerrymandering and democratic representation.

In California, a three‑judge federal panel on January 15 upheld the state’s new congressional districts created under Proposition 50, ruling 2–1 that the map—expected to strengthen Democratic advantages in several competitive seats—could be used in the 2026 elections. The following day, a separate federal court dismissed a Republican lawsuit arguing that the maps were unconstitutional, clearing the way for the state’s redistricting overhaul to stand. In Virginia, Democratic lawmakers have advanced a constitutional amendment that would allow mid‑decade redistricting, a move they describe as a response to aggressive Republican map‑drawing in other states; some legislators have openly discussed the possibility of a congressional map that could yield 10 Democratic‑leaning seats out of 11. In Missouri, the secretary of state has acknowledged in court that ballot language for a referendum on the state’s congressional map could mislead voters, a key development in ongoing litigation over the fairness of the state’s redistricting process. And in Utah, a state judge has ordered a new congressional map that includes one Democratic‑leaning district after years of litigation over the legislature’s earlier plan, prompting strong objections from Republican lawmakers who argue the court exceeded its authority.

Keep ReadingShow less
New Year’s Resolutions for Congress – and the Country

Speaker of the House Mike Johnson (R-LA) (L) and Rep. August Pfluger (R-TX) lead a group of fellow Republicans through Statuary Hall on the way to a news conference on the 28th day of the federal government shutdown at the U.S. Capitol on October 28, 2025 in Washington, DC.

Getty Images, Chip Somodevilla

New Year’s Resolutions for Congress – and the Country

Every January 1st, many Americans face their failings and resolve to do better by making New Year’s Resolutions. Wouldn’t it be delightful if Congress would do the same? According to Gallup, half of all Americans currently have very little confidence in Congress. And while confidence in our government institutions is shrinking across the board, Congress is near rock bottom. With that in mind, here is a list of resolutions Congress could make and keep, which would help to rebuild public trust in Congress and our government institutions. Let’s start with:

1 – Working for the American people. We elect our senators and representatives to work on our behalf – not on their behalf or on behalf of the wealthiest donors, but on our behalf. There are many issues on which a large majority of Americans agree but Congress can’t. Congress should resolve to address those issues.

Keep ReadingShow less