Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Restoring trust in government: The vital role of public servants

Washington, DC, skyline
John Baggaley/Getty Images

This past year has proven politically historic and unprecedented. In this year alone, we witnessed:

  • The current president, who received the most votes in American history when elected four years ago, drop out of the presidential race at the last minute due to party pressure amid unceasing rumors of cognitive decline.
  • The vice president, who was selected as the party-preferred candidate in his stead, fail to win a single battleground state despite an impressive array of celebrity endorsements, healthy financial backing and overwhelmingly positive media coverage.
  • The former president, who survived two assassination attempts — one leading to an iconic moment that some would swear was staged while others argued Godly intervention — decisively win the election, securing both popular and Electoral College vote victories to serve a second term, nonconsecutively (something that hasn’t happened since Grover Cleveland in the 1890s).

Many of us find ourselves craving more precedented times, desiring a return to some semblance of normalcy, hoping for some sense of unity, and envisioning a nation where we have some sense of trust and confidence in our government and those who serve in it.


Restoring Trust

Public trust in government has been declining for decades and shows few signs of improving. A 2024 State of Public Trust in Government survey suggests only 45 percent say most federal civil servants can be trusted to serve both political parties, two-thirds of the country believe there are many civil servants who work to undermine policies they disagree with, and just under a quarter say civil servants are nonpartisan.

This certainly portrays public servants unfavorably and reinforces why, according to the same survey, a mere 23 percent of Americans trust the federal government. This distrust, coupled with reports of poor performance and efforts to resist administration policies, was, arguably, the impetus for such controversial polices as Schedule F.

The 2024 presidential election didn’t help matters. The demeaning, divisive and derisive campaigns further undermined trust in government, public servants and fellow Americans.

While many Americans believe the government is wasteful, civil servants who are competent, non-partisan, and professional are key to improved outcomes for the public, which leads to greater transparency, accountability and trust.

Public servants must know their roles and responsibilities; ensure top performance and responsiveness; and fulfill their public oath to serve the American people and serve them well. This includes seeing past the campaign rhetoric and preparing to advise on — and help implement — policies (whether the candidate they supported was victorious or not).

At the same time, demoralizing and over-the-top disparagement of government is not helpful. Yes, government can be streamlined and reformed (and it should be done, respectfully and responsibly), but wholesale, indiscriminate dismantling would be ill advised and would fail to appreciate the complexity of such an undertaking as well as the the everyday public good that civil servants provide.

Administering and Implementing Policy

Every voter wants to know how the election outcome will affect them directly, including the topics they expressed concern about, including:

  • Inflation, which saw sharp increases during the current administration.
  • Immigration, which has expanded beyond the southwest border and includes a reported 11 million unauthorized immigrants.
  • Global conflict, which is changing in nature, increasingly includes more regions of the world and diverges from the more intense worries about what’s happening at our own front door.

But campaigning is different from governing. How lawmakers, advisors and public administrators execute policy on these, and a myriad of other issues such as healthcare will ultimately determine our future.

Guiding the way will be our next president, an unabashedly unconventional leader who has a major job ahead, particularly as we look to him to manage — and unite — the nation. Policy is important. How the policies are implemented, and the people who make it happen, matter just as much. And, career civil servants will play a key role, whether that role is contracted or expanded. It now comes down to the principles of public administration; economy, effectiveness, efficiency and equitable implementation

Supporting Civil Service, the President and All Americans

The landscape in which public servants do their work continues to shift. Fiscal constraints, ethical application of artificial intelligence, climate disasters and foreign affairs — all grand challenges in public administration — add to the difficulty of delivering good government.

Our future is as bright as our public servants are dedicated and accomplished. This is especially true if we support our civil servants, take an intergovernmental perspective, embrace bipartisan solutions, focus on data driven and evidence based policy and decision making, and deliver trusted analysis and research to our government leaders at all levels, including the next president.

While change in political direction is all but certain, the role our public servants play — and the value they impart — remains vital. And, they must lean into their responsibilities as they have for past administrations. There must be public servants who stand ready to support our next president with the much-needed, invaluable expertise only they can provide to ensure his and our country’s success.

Public service is honorable and should represent competence, nonpartisanship and excellence. Our public servants must faithfully give their best service and advice to our nation— playing their vital role in restoring public trust, impartially implementing the policies and laws that will change the lives of millions of Americans and countless others, and fulfilling their sacred obligation to the Constitution and the American people.

Blockwood, a former senior career executive in federal government, is an adjunct professor at Syracuse University’s Maxwell School of Citizenship of Public Affairs and incoming president and CEO of the National Academy of Public Administration.

Read More

From Nixon to Trump: A Blueprint for Restoring Congressional Authority
the capitol building in washington d c is seen from across the water

From Nixon to Trump: A Blueprint for Restoring Congressional Authority

The unprecedented power grab by President Trump, in many cases, usurping the clear and Constitutional authority of the U.S. Congress, appears to leave our legislative branch helpless against executive branch encroachment. In fact, the opposite is true. Congress has ample authority to reassert its role in our democracy, and there is a precedent.

During the particularly notable episode of executive branch corruption during the Nixon years, Congress responded with a robust series of reforms. Campaign finance laws were dramatically overhauled and strengthened. Nixon’s overreach on congressionally authorized spending was corrected with the passage of the Impoundment Act. And egregious excesses by the military and intelligence community were blunted by the War Powers Act and the bipartisan investigation by Senator Frank Church (D-Idaho).

Keep ReadingShow less
In and Out: The Limits of Term Limits

Person speaking in front of an American flag

Jason_V/Getty Images

In and Out: The Limits of Term Limits

Nearly 14 years ago, after nearly 12 years of public service, my boss, Rep. Todd Platts, surprised many by announcing he was not running for reelection. He never term-limited himself, per se. Yet he had long supported legislation for 12-year term limits. Stepping aside at that point made sense—a Cincinnatus move, with Todd going back to the Pennsylvania Bar as a hometown judge.

Term limits are always a timely issue. Term limits may have died down as an issue in the halls of Congress, but I still hear it from people in my home area.

Keep ReadingShow less
“It’s Probably as Bad as It Can Get”:
A Conversation with Lilliana Mason

Liliana Mason

“It’s Probably as Bad as It Can Get”: A Conversation with Lilliana Mason

In the aftermath of the killing of conservative activist Charlie Kirk, the threat of political violence has become a topic of urgent concern in the United States. While public support for political violence remains low—according to Sean Westwood of the Polarization Research Lab, fewer than 2 percent of Americans believe that political murder is acceptable—even isolated incidence of political violence can have a corrosive effect.

According to political scientist Lilliana Mason, political violence amounts to a rejection of democracy. “If a person has used violence to achieve a political goal, then they’ve given up on the democratic process,” says Mason, “Instead, they’re trying to use force to affect government.”

Keep ReadingShow less
Combatting the Trump Administration’s Militarized Logic

Members of the National Guard patrol near the U.S. Capitol on October 1, 2025 in Washington, DC.

(Photo by Al Drago/Getty Images)

Combatting the Trump Administration’s Militarized Logic

Approaching a year of the new Trump administration, Americans are getting used to domestic militarized logic. A popular sense of powerlessness permeates our communities. We bear witness to the attacks against innocent civilians by ICE, the assassination of Charlie Kirk, and we naturally wonder—is this the new American discourse? Violent action? The election of Zohran Mamdani as mayor of New York offers hope that there may be another way.

Zohran Mamdani, a Muslim democratic socialist, was elected as mayor of New York City on the fourth of November. Mamdani’s platform includes a reimagining of the police force in New York City. Mamdani proposes a Department of Community Safety. In a CBS interview, Mamdani said, “Our vision for a Department of Community Safety, the DCS, is that we would have teams of dedicated mental health outreach workers that we deploy…to respond to those incidents and get those New Yorkers out of the subway system and to the services that they actually need.” Doing so frees up NYPD officers to respond to actual threats and crime, without a responsibility to the mental health of civilians.

Keep ReadingShow less