Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Restoring trust in government: The vital role of public servants

Washington, DC, skyline
John Baggaley/Getty Images

This past year has proven politically historic and unprecedented. In this year alone, we witnessed:

  • The current president, who received the most votes in American history when elected four years ago, drop out of the presidential race at the last minute due to party pressure amid unceasing rumors of cognitive decline.
  • The vice president, who was selected as the party-preferred candidate in his stead, fail to win a single battleground state despite an impressive array of celebrity endorsements, healthy financial backing and overwhelmingly positive media coverage.
  • The former president, who survived two assassination attempts — one leading to an iconic moment that some would swear was staged while others argued Godly intervention — decisively win the election, securing both popular and Electoral College vote victories to serve a second term, nonconsecutively (something that hasn’t happened since Grover Cleveland in the 1890s).

Many of us find ourselves craving more precedented times, desiring a return to some semblance of normalcy, hoping for some sense of unity, and envisioning a nation where we have some sense of trust and confidence in our government and those who serve in it.


Restoring Trust

Public trust in government has been declining for decades and shows few signs of improving. A 2024 State of Public Trust in Government survey suggests only 45 percent say most federal civil servants can be trusted to serve both political parties, two-thirds of the country believe there are many civil servants who work to undermine policies they disagree with, and just under a quarter say civil servants are nonpartisan.

This certainly portrays public servants unfavorably and reinforces why, according to the same survey, a mere 23 percent of Americans trust the federal government. This distrust, coupled with reports of poor performance and efforts to resist administration policies, was, arguably, the impetus for such controversial polices as Schedule F.

The 2024 presidential election didn’t help matters. The demeaning, divisive and derisive campaigns further undermined trust in government, public servants and fellow Americans.

While many Americans believe the government is wasteful, civil servants who are competent, non-partisan, and professional are key to improved outcomes for the public, which leads to greater transparency, accountability and trust.

Public servants must know their roles and responsibilities; ensure top performance and responsiveness; and fulfill their public oath to serve the American people and serve them well. This includes seeing past the campaign rhetoric and preparing to advise on — and help implement — policies (whether the candidate they supported was victorious or not).

At the same time, demoralizing and over-the-top disparagement of government is not helpful. Yes, government can be streamlined and reformed (and it should be done, respectfully and responsibly), but wholesale, indiscriminate dismantling would be ill advised and would fail to appreciate the complexity of such an undertaking as well as the the everyday public good that civil servants provide.

Administering and Implementing Policy

Every voter wants to know how the election outcome will affect them directly, including the topics they expressed concern about, including:

  • Inflation, which saw sharp increases during the current administration.
  • Immigration, which has expanded beyond the southwest border and includes a reported 11 million unauthorized immigrants.
  • Global conflict, which is changing in nature, increasingly includes more regions of the world and diverges from the more intense worries about what’s happening at our own front door.

But campaigning is different from governing. How lawmakers, advisors and public administrators execute policy on these, and a myriad of other issues such as healthcare will ultimately determine our future.

Guiding the way will be our next president, an unabashedly unconventional leader who has a major job ahead, particularly as we look to him to manage — and unite — the nation. Policy is important. How the policies are implemented, and the people who make it happen, matter just as much. And, career civil servants will play a key role, whether that role is contracted or expanded. It now comes down to the principles of public administration; economy, effectiveness, efficiency and equitable implementation

Supporting Civil Service, the President and All Americans

The landscape in which public servants do their work continues to shift. Fiscal constraints, ethical application of artificial intelligence, climate disasters and foreign affairs — all grand challenges in public administration — add to the difficulty of delivering good government.

Our future is as bright as our public servants are dedicated and accomplished. This is especially true if we support our civil servants, take an intergovernmental perspective, embrace bipartisan solutions, focus on data driven and evidence based policy and decision making, and deliver trusted analysis and research to our government leaders at all levels, including the next president.

While change in political direction is all but certain, the role our public servants play — and the value they impart — remains vital. And, they must lean into their responsibilities as they have for past administrations. There must be public servants who stand ready to support our next president with the much-needed, invaluable expertise only they can provide to ensure his and our country’s success.

Public service is honorable and should represent competence, nonpartisanship and excellence. Our public servants must faithfully give their best service and advice to our nation— playing their vital role in restoring public trust, impartially implementing the policies and laws that will change the lives of millions of Americans and countless others, and fulfilling their sacred obligation to the Constitution and the American people.

Blockwood, a former senior career executive in federal government, is an adjunct professor at Syracuse University’s Maxwell School of Citizenship of Public Affairs and incoming president and CEO of the National Academy of Public Administration.

Read More

Guarding What? The Moral Cost of Militarizing Our Cities

Protestors in Chicago, August 2025

Credit: Angeles Ponpa

Guarding What? The Moral Cost of Militarizing Our Cities

A federal judge recently blocked plans to deploy the National Guard to Chicago. But the battle over militarizing American streets is far from over. On Monday, a federal appeals court lifted a temporary restraining order and ruled that the National Guard can be deployed to Portland, Oregon, amid ongoing protests at the Macadam ICE Facility.

Every time political leaders propose sending troops into cities or float invoking the Insurrection Act, they test a fragile boundary that keeps democracy in check.

Keep ReadingShow less
Joe Manchin on Taxpayer-Funded Primaries: 'They're Locking Us Out!'

Joe Manchin

Alex Wong/Getty Images

Joe Manchin on Taxpayer-Funded Primaries: 'They're Locking Us Out!'

While appearing on CNN host Michael Smerconish’s show, former Democratic U.S. Senator Joe Manchin, now a registered independent, told Smerconish that “we have to have open primaries” in order to get candidates who prioritize representation to run and have a chance to win.

“We have to change the primary,” he added. “They are locking us out.”

Keep ReadingShow less
Ingrassia Exit Highlights Rare GOP Pushback to Trump’s Personnel Picks

President Donald Trump speaks at a White House press briefing on Jan. 30, 2025.

Credit: Jonah Elkowitz/Medill News Service

Ingrassia Exit Highlights Rare GOP Pushback to Trump’s Personnel Picks

WASHINGTON — Paul Ingrassia withdrew his nomination to lead the Office of Special Counsel on Tuesday night after facing Republican pushback over past controversial statements.

While Ingrassia joins a growing list of President Donald Trump’s nominees who have withdrawn from consideration, many who have aired controversial beliefs or lack requisite qualifications have still been appointed or are still in the nomination process.

Keep ReadingShow less
A Revolution in Congressional Decision-Making
low light photography of armchairs in front of desk

A Revolution in Congressional Decision-Making

The dysfunction of today’s federal government is not simply the product of political division or individual leaders; it is rooted in the internal rules of Congress itself. The Founders, in one of their few major oversights, granted Congress the authority to make its own procedural rules (Article I, Section 5) without establishing any framework for how it should operate. Over time, this blank check has produced a legislative process built to serve partisan power, not public representation.

The result is a Congress that often rewards obstruction and gridlock over compromise and action. The Founders imagined representatives closely tied to their constituents—one member for every 30,000 to 50,000 citizens. Today, that ratio has ballooned to one for every 765,000 in the House, and in the Senate, each member can represent tens of millions (e.g., California). As the population has grown, representation has become distant and impersonal, while procedural rules have tightened the grip of party leadership. Major issues can no longer reach the floor unless the majority party permits it. The link between citizens and decisions has nearly vanished.

Keep ReadingShow less