Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

We Need Critical Transformational Leaders Now More Than Ever

Opinion

We Need Critical Transformational Leaders Now More Than Ever

U.S. Sen. Alex Padilla (D-CA) listens at a news conference following the weekly Senate Democratic policy luncheon at the U.S. Capitol on June 17, 2025, in Washington, DC.

(Photo by Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images)

The image of U.S. Senator Alex Padilla—handcuffed and dragged away while advocating for immigrant rights—is more than symbolic. It’s a chilling reminder that in America today, even the highest-ranking Latino officials are not immune from the forces of erasure. This moment, along with ICE raids in Los Angeles, an assault on DEI in education, and the Tennessee Attorney General’s lawsuit seeking to dismantle funding for Hispanic-Serving Institutions (HSIs), signals a coordinated assault on Latino dignity, equity, and belonging. These are not isolated events. They are part of a broader backlash against racial justice, driven by white supremacy and an entrenched fear of demographic and cultural change.

As a scholar of race, leadership, and equity in higher education, I know this moment calls for something deeper than mere outrage. It calls for action. We need what I call Critical Transformational Leaders—individuals who act with moral courage, who center justice over comfort, and who are unafraid to challenge systemic racism from positions both high and humble.


Latinos have long been relegated to the margins of American opportunity. Historically underfunded schools, structural barriers to college access, and overrepresentation in low-wage, high-risk jobs are not accidents—they are outcomes of a deeply racialized system. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, Latinos are overrepresented in sectors like agriculture, construction, food service, and maintenance. Meanwhile, Hispanic degree attainment continues to trail that of white students, due in large part to institutional neglect, inadequate supports, and economic precarity.

At a time when the U.S. economy urgently needs more college-educated workers, the fastest-growing demographic—Latinos—is systematically shut out of pathways to social mobility. By 2060, Latinos will comprise nearly 30% of the U.S. population. Yet the very institutions that serve them, like HSIs and community colleges, are starved for resources while elite universities absorb the lion’s share of federal and philanthropic investment.

This is no accident. As economist Charles Clotfelter wrote, “Colleges were and are unequal—in the money they take in, the money they are able to put aside, the money they spend, and the quality of their facilities, faculty, and students.” This inequality is a feature of a racialized higher education system—not a bug. And yet, it’s these open-access Hispanic-serving institutions, not the Ivy League, that serve a majority of low-income, first-generation, and Latino students. They are doing the heavy lifting of American democracy.

From my research, I’ve seen Critical Transformational Leaders working at these institutions every day. I’ve met college presidents who create child care supports for student-parents, educators who restructure pathways to living-wage jobs, and staff who fight to keep food pantries open and offer emergency aid. These leaders understand that policy isn’t just paperwork—it’s a life raft. They ask, again and again, “Are we being courageous enough on behalf of our students?”

Yet too often, they are left to do this work without the necessary funding or political support. This chronic underinvestment is not just poor policy—it is racism in practice. As Dr. Ibram X. Kendi reminds us, “A policy is racist if it produces or sustains racial inequity.” Underfunding HSIs while investing heavily in elite institutions sustains exactly that.

We cannot continue to speak about equity in the abstract while actively gutting the institutions that make it possible. This moment demands clear-eyed honesty about our nation’s educational caste system and bold, equity-minded policy solutions to dismantle it. We must radically rethink how we invest in higher education and who we deem worthy of opportunity.

This is not simply about economics—though the economic case for investing in Latino education is clear. It is about our shared humanity. It is about citizenship—not just in the legal sense, but in the moral one. In a just society every voice is lifted, and citizens are granted participation as a right—not a privilege.

When we allow discrimination to go unchecked—when we remain silent as DEI programs are dismantled, as HSI funding is challenged, as Latino leaders are handcuffed—we erode not only opportunity, but democracy itself.

The U.S. has always relied on Latino labor. But now, it must invest in Latino leadership. Our institutions must be reimagined with equity at their center. That means funding HSIs not as an afterthought, but as a national imperative. It means measuring college success not by prestige, but by impact—on students, families, and communities. It means valuing Latinos not only as workers, but as scholars, leaders, and full participants in civic life.

As Leslie Cornfeld of the National Education Equity Lab put it:

“Talent is equally distributed. Opportunity is not.”

To change that, we need more than programs. We need a movement. We need Critical Transformational Leaders—in every classroom, boardroom, and policy chamber—who are willing to confront injustice with vision and resolve. If we want Latinos to thrive not in spite of this country, but because of it, we must ensure the systems around them do not continue to fail.

The future of our democracy depends on it.

Dr. Anthony Hernandez, a faculty member in the Department of Educational Policy Studies at the University of Wisconsin—Madison (UW-Madison), received a research award from the National Academy of Education/Spencer Foundation for his study on leadership in Hispanic-Serving Institutions.


Read More

A woman protesting holds a sign that readds, "Our Raise! Labor Safety Costs, surrounded by other people.

Uber drivers participate in a rally outside of the Uber Headquarters on January 05, 2023 in New York City. Uber drivers in NYC participated in a 24-hour strike outside of the company's NYC headquarters

Michael M. Santiago/Getty Images

21st-Century Gig Workers Need Portable Benefits

In recent years, the US labor force has been undergoing a fundamental transformation. In today’s "Uber economy," gig workers, freelancers, contractors, temps, permatemps, remote workers after COVID, and so-called “independent workers” have been championed by Silicon Valley and Wall Street as the “new way to work”—the wave of the future, especially with AI changing the nature of work itself.

Many US consumers have driven in an Uber taxi, but don’t realize that most drivers earn below minimum wage after accounting for vehicle expenses, gas, maintenance, and unpaid time waiting for passengers. Those drivers are so-called “independent contractors,” so the billion-dollar Uber is not responsible for providing healthcare, Social Security contributions, workers' compensation, or unemployment compensation, not to mention sick leave or vacation pay.

Keep ReadingShow less
 Little kids playing with colorful wooden building blocks on the table

Colorado, Maui County, and Washington State are connecting early childhood services and putting families at the center. Here’s what worked and why.

Lourdes Balduque/Getty Images

Community Partnerships Build Systems for Early Childhood Success

In Colorado’s San Luis Valley, a family looking for developmental support for their toddler may drive over an hour to reach a specialist, if one is even taking new patients. In too many communities across the country, like the San Luis Valley, the problem isn’t that services don’t exist. It’s that pediatricians, childcare providers, and mental health professionals are all working toward the same goal, but may not be working together.

When families have to navigate a maze of disconnected programs and providers, children start to miss opportunities for timely developmental support. Not because communities don’t care, but because the systems around them were never built to function as one.

Keep ReadingShow less
US Capitol building
The United States Capitol building with its white dome against a blue sky

Would Congressional Term Limits Make Congress Better—or Worse?

Starting in the 1990’s, the idea of putting term limits on members of Congress became a recurring idea to reform the institution and improve democracy. The idea was born out of the theory that replacing the current crop of legislators with a new batch would produce a better Congress. More than 30 years later we now have quantitative and qualitative data showing the impact of term limits.

Twenty-one state legislatures have enacted some kind of term limit on legislators since 1990. Since then, dozens of academic studies have examined the impact on such factors as: complexity of legislation, influence of lobbyists and staff on legislative outcomes, and interactions with constituent. Here are some key findings.

Keep ReadingShow less
Hand points to the word tax on a screen

Data calculations

Getty Images

Inconvenient Numbers Are a Sign the System Works

Earlier in October, the Bureau of Labor Statistics reported that consumer prices rose 3.7 percent over the past year, a little higher than the month before, with gasoline accounting for more than half of September's increase. Rising prices are the kind of news no incumbent politician wants weeks before an election. The report was published anyway, on schedule. That is the quiet discipline of a trustworthy statistical system. It tells us what is true even when the number is unwelcome to whoever holds power.

So, do Americans trust government data? We do. But that trust is incomplete, and it has room to grow.

Keep ReadingShow less