Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

We Need Critical Transformational Leaders Now More Than Ever

Opinion

We Need Critical Transformational Leaders Now More Than Ever

U.S. Sen. Alex Padilla (D-CA) listens at a news conference following the weekly Senate Democratic policy luncheon at the U.S. Capitol on June 17, 2025, in Washington, DC.

(Photo by Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images)

The image of U.S. Senator Alex Padilla—handcuffed and dragged away while advocating for immigrant rights—is more than symbolic. It’s a chilling reminder that in America today, even the highest-ranking Latino officials are not immune from the forces of erasure. This moment, along with ICE raids in Los Angeles, an assault on DEI in education, and the Tennessee Attorney General’s lawsuit seeking to dismantle funding for Hispanic-Serving Institutions (HSIs), signals a coordinated assault on Latino dignity, equity, and belonging. These are not isolated events. They are part of a broader backlash against racial justice, driven by white supremacy and an entrenched fear of demographic and cultural change.

As a scholar of race, leadership, and equity in higher education, I know this moment calls for something deeper than mere outrage. It calls for action. We need what I call Critical Transformational Leaders—individuals who act with moral courage, who center justice over comfort, and who are unafraid to challenge systemic racism from positions both high and humble.


Latinos have long been relegated to the margins of American opportunity. Historically underfunded schools, structural barriers to college access, and overrepresentation in low-wage, high-risk jobs are not accidents—they are outcomes of a deeply racialized system. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, Latinos are overrepresented in sectors like agriculture, construction, food service, and maintenance. Meanwhile, Hispanic degree attainment continues to trail that of white students, due in large part to institutional neglect, inadequate supports, and economic precarity.

At a time when the U.S. economy urgently needs more college-educated workers, the fastest-growing demographic—Latinos—is systematically shut out of pathways to social mobility. By 2060, Latinos will comprise nearly 30% of the U.S. population. Yet the very institutions that serve them, like HSIs and community colleges, are starved for resources while elite universities absorb the lion’s share of federal and philanthropic investment.

This is no accident. As economist Charles Clotfelter wrote, “Colleges were and are unequal—in the money they take in, the money they are able to put aside, the money they spend, and the quality of their facilities, faculty, and students.” This inequality is a feature of a racialized higher education system—not a bug. And yet, it’s these open-access Hispanic-serving institutions, not the Ivy League, that serve a majority of low-income, first-generation, and Latino students. They are doing the heavy lifting of American democracy.

From my research, I’ve seen Critical Transformational Leaders working at these institutions every day. I’ve met college presidents who create child care supports for student-parents, educators who restructure pathways to living-wage jobs, and staff who fight to keep food pantries open and offer emergency aid. These leaders understand that policy isn’t just paperwork—it’s a life raft. They ask, again and again, “Are we being courageous enough on behalf of our students?”

Yet too often, they are left to do this work without the necessary funding or political support. This chronic underinvestment is not just poor policy—it is racism in practice. As Dr. Ibram X. Kendi reminds us, “A policy is racist if it produces or sustains racial inequity.” Underfunding HSIs while investing heavily in elite institutions sustains exactly that.

We cannot continue to speak about equity in the abstract while actively gutting the institutions that make it possible. This moment demands clear-eyed honesty about our nation’s educational caste system and bold, equity-minded policy solutions to dismantle it. We must radically rethink how we invest in higher education and who we deem worthy of opportunity.

This is not simply about economics—though the economic case for investing in Latino education is clear. It is about our shared humanity. It is about citizenship—not just in the legal sense, but in the moral one. In a just society every voice is lifted, and citizens are granted participation as a right—not a privilege.

When we allow discrimination to go unchecked—when we remain silent as DEI programs are dismantled, as HSI funding is challenged, as Latino leaders are handcuffed—we erode not only opportunity, but democracy itself.

The U.S. has always relied on Latino labor. But now, it must invest in Latino leadership. Our institutions must be reimagined with equity at their center. That means funding HSIs not as an afterthought, but as a national imperative. It means measuring college success not by prestige, but by impact—on students, families, and communities. It means valuing Latinos not only as workers, but as scholars, leaders, and full participants in civic life.

As Leslie Cornfeld of the National Education Equity Lab put it:

“Talent is equally distributed. Opportunity is not.”

To change that, we need more than programs. We need a movement. We need Critical Transformational Leaders—in every classroom, boardroom, and policy chamber—who are willing to confront injustice with vision and resolve. If we want Latinos to thrive not in spite of this country, but because of it, we must ensure the systems around them do not continue to fail.

The future of our democracy depends on it.

Dr. Anthony Hernandez, a faculty member in the Department of Educational Policy Studies at the University of Wisconsin—Madison (UW-Madison), received a research award from the National Academy of Education/Spencer Foundation for his study on leadership in Hispanic-Serving Institutions.


Read More

A TSA employee standing in the airport, with two travelers in the foreground.

A Transportation Security Administration (TSA) worker screens passengers and airport employees at O'Hare International Airport on January 07, 2019 in Chicago, Illinois. TSA employees are currently working under the threat of not receiving their next paychecks, scheduled for January 11, because of the partial government shutdown now in its third week.

Getty Images, Scott Olson

Nope. Nevermind. Some DHS agencies still shut down.

House Republicans reject clean bill to open shut-down DHS agencies (March 28 update)

House Republicans (and three Democrats) rejected the Senate's clean bill to end the shutdown late Friday night. Instead, the House passed a different bill that fully funds every agency in the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) but for only 60 days with the knowledge that this short-term continuing resolution will not pass in the Senate.

Both chambers are out until April 13 so the shutdown is expected to last until then at least. Hope that no major weather disasters occur before then because FEMA is one of the DHS agencies out of commission (though some of its employees may be working without pay). It's possible that air travel security lines won't get worse since the President signed an Executive Order authorizing DHS to pay TSA workers. New DHS Secretary Mullin says paychecks will start to go out as early as Monday. How long can this approach continue? Unknown. Leaving aside the questionable legality of repurposing funds in this way, DHS may not be willing to keep paying TSA from these other funds long-term.

Keep ReadingShow less
Protestors holding signs, including one that says "let the people vote."
Attendees hold signs advocating for voting rights and against the SAVE America Act at a rally to outside the U.S. Capitol on March 18, 2026 in Washington, DC.
Getty Images, Heather Diehl

The Senate Was Meant to Slow Us Down—Not Stop Us Cold

The Senate is once again locked in a familiar pattern: a bill with clear support on one side, firm opposition on the other—and no obvious path forward.

This time it’s the SAVE Act, framed by its supporters as a safeguard for election integrity and by its opponents as a barrier to voting access. The arguments are well-rehearsed. The positions are firm. And yet, beneath the policy debate sits a more revealing truth: in today’s Senate, the outcome of legislation is often shaped long before a final vote is ever cast.

Keep ReadingShow less
Clarity Is Power: The Three Pillars That Keep the People in Charge
man in white robe holding a book statue
Photo by Caleb Fisher on Unsplash

Clarity Is Power: The Three Pillars That Keep the People in Charge

American democracy does not weaken all at once. It falters when citizens lose clarity about how power is being used in their name. Abraham Lincoln warned that “public sentiment is everything… without it, nothing can succeed.” When people understand what their leaders are doing, they can hold them accountable.

But when confusion takes hold, power shifts quietly, and the public’s ability to act begins to erode. Clarity enables citizens to participate fully in democratic life and shape a government that responds to them. Confusion is not harmless; it erodes the safeguards, public awareness, and civic action that make self‑government possible. Clarity strengthens all three pillars at once — it protects our constitutional safeguards, sharpens public awareness, and fuels civic action.

Keep ReadingShow less
CONNECT for Health Act of 2025
person wearing lavatory gown with green stethoscope on neck using phone while standing

CONNECT for Health Act of 2025

How does a bill with no enemies fail to move? That question should trouble anyone who cares about Medicare, about rural health care, and about whether Congress can still do straightforward things.

In plain terms, the CONNECT Act would permanently end the outdated rule that limits Medicare telehealth to patients in rural areas who travel to an approved facility. It would make the patient's home a covered site of care. It would protect audio-only services, critical for seniors without broadband or smartphones, especially for behavioral health. It would ensure that Federally Qualified Health Centers can be reimbursed for telehealth, and it would lock in the pandemic-era flexibilities that Congress has been extending on a temporary basis since 2020. In short, it would turn five years of emergency workarounds into permanent, accountable policy.

Keep ReadingShow less