Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Congress Bill Spotlight: Smithsonian Italian American Museum

News

Congress Bill Spotlight: Smithsonian Italian American Museum

People entering the Smithsonian Institute National Museum of American History in the Behring Center in Washington DC.

Getty Images, Ceri Breeze

The Fulcrum introduces Congress Bill Spotlight, a weekly report by Jesse Rifkin, focusing on the noteworthy legislation of the thousands introduced in Congress. Rifkin has written about Congress for years, and now he's dissecting the most interesting bills you need to know about, but that often don't get the right news coverage.

The most famous Italian Americans include Frank Sinatra, Joe DiMaggio, Antonin Scalia, and Anthony Fauci.


The Bill

The National Museum of Italian American History Commission Act would establish a commission to analyze whether a new Smithsonian museum about Italian Americans should be built in Washington, D.C.

The bipartisan commission would comprise eight members, two each appointed by four people: the top Republican and Democratic leaders in both the Senate and House. Within a year and a half after their first meeting, the group would have to submit a report to Congress on issues including the museum’s potential location and cost.

The House bill was introduced on February 6 by Rep. Tom Suozzi (D-NY3). No Senate companion version appears to have been introduced yet.

Context

Italian Americans comprise an estimated 4.8% of the U.S. population, making them the fifth-largest ancestry behind only German, English, Irish, and American.

Founded in 1846 and named after benefactor James Smithson, the Smithsonian Institution is the largest collection of museums in the world. Today, it comprises 21 museums and sites, mostly in the greater Washington, D.C. area.

In 2024, the four most visited Smithsonians were the Natural History Museum (3.9 million), American History Museum (2.1 million), Air and Space Museum (1.9 million), and National Zoo (1.6 million).

Congress greenlit two more Smithsonian museums in 2020: the American Women’s History Museum and the American Latino Museum. Neither site has yet selected a final physical location, yet alone opened.

What Supporters Say

Supporters argue the time has come for an Italian American museum.

"My father, Joseph A. Suozzi, had an extraordinary journey,” Rep. Suozzi said in a press release. “Born in Ruvo del Monte, Italy, he immigrated to the United States as a child, served as a navigator in the U.S. Air Force during World War II, was elected as Glen Cove City Court Judge at the age of 28, went on to serve as Glen Cove Mayor, and was later appointed to the Appellate Division of the N.Y. State Supreme Court.”

"My father's life embodied the classic American Dream,” Rep. Suozzi continued. "I cannot think of a better way to honor my father's legacy—and the legacies, experiences, and stories of so many other hard-working Italians and Italian Americans—than by establishing a National Museum of Italian American History.”

What Opponents Say

The Fulcrum was unable to locate any explicit statements of opposition. But opponents may counter that the museum is a logistical impossibility, at least if it’s to be in the same area as the other most prominent Smithsonians. Upon the African American History and Culture Museum’s opening, NPR said that it “fills the last open spot along the National Mall.”

21st Century Smithsonian Votes

Both the American Women’s History Museum and the American Latino Museum were enacted in 2020 as components of larger “must-pass” legislation, so votes on those individual provisions weren’t taken.

In 2001, the African American History and Culture Museum commission was enacted by voice vote in the House and unanimous consent in the Senate. In 2003, a vote to greenlight the actual museum itself was again enacted by unanimous consent in the Senate and a 409-9 House vote.

The House dissenters, all Republicans, publicly argued their case on fiscal rather than racial grounds. For years prior, though, former Sen. Jesse Helms (R-NC) —a former segregationist —had blocked the museum for racial reasons.

Odds of Passage

Rep. Suozzi previously introduced his Italian American bill in 2024. It attracted nine bipartisan cosponsors, seven Democrats and two Republicans, but never received a committee vote.

The current bill has attracted 40 bipartisan cosponsors: 32 Democrats and eight Republicans. It awaits a potential vote in either the House Administration or Natural Resources Committee.

Even if this commission gets enacted, though, things could take a while. The African American History and Culture Museum established a commission in 2001, Congress approved the museum in 2003, but the building itself didn’t open until 2016.

Jesse Rifkin is a freelance journalist with the Fulcrum. Don’t miss his weekly report, Congress Bill Spotlight, every Friday on the Fulcrum. Rifkin’s writings about politics and Congress have been published in the Washington Post, Politico, Roll Call, Los Angeles Times, CNN Opinion, GovTrack, and USA Today.

SUGGESTIONS:

Congress Bill Spotlight: Panama Canal Repurchase Act

Congress Bill Spotlight: Make Greenland Great Again Act

Congress Bill Spotlight: BIG OIL from the Cabinet Act

Congress Bill Spotlight: renaming Gulf of Mexico as “Gulf of America”

Congress Bill Spotlight: constitutional amendment letting Trump be elected to a third term

Congress Bill Spotlight: adding Donald Trump’s face to Mount Rushmore

Congress Bill Spotlight: BAD DOGE Act

Congress Bill Spotlight: Repealing Trump’s National Energy Emergency


Read More

US Capitol building
The United States Capitol building with its white dome against a blue sky

Would Congressional Term Limits Make Congress Better—or Worse?

Starting in the 1990’s, the idea of putting term limits on members of Congress became a recurring idea to reform the institution and improve democracy. The idea was born out of the theory that replacing the current crop of legislators with a new batch would produce a better Congress. More than 30 years later we now have quantitative and qualitative data showing the impact of term limits.

Twenty-one state legislatures have enacted some kind of term limit on legislators since 1990. Since then, dozens of academic studies have examined the impact on such factors as: complexity of legislation, influence of lobbyists and staff on legislative outcomes, and interactions with constituent. Here are some key findings.

Keep ReadingShow less
Hand points to the word tax on a screen

Data calculations

Getty Images

Inconvenient Numbers Are a Sign the System Works

Earlier in October, the Bureau of Labor Statistics reported that consumer prices rose 3.7 percent over the past year, a little higher than the month before, with gasoline accounting for more than half of September's increase. Rising prices are the kind of news no incumbent politician wants weeks before an election. The report was published anyway, on schedule. That is the quiet discipline of a trustworthy statistical system. It tells us what is true even when the number is unwelcome to whoever holds power.

So, do Americans trust government data? We do. But that trust is incomplete, and it has room to grow.

Keep ReadingShow less
The Pennsylvania state capitol building.

The Pennsylvania state capitol building.

jimfeng/Getty Images

Pennsylvania’s Bipartisan Exchange Is Rebuilding Trust in Governance

The University of Pittsburgh Institute of Politics has nearly 40 years of experience working with legislators from different political parties, and it is building on this history by drawing on lessons from the successful American Congressional Exchange model, begun in 2018 at the Bipartisan Policy Center, and from state exchanges now underway in Minnesota and Michigan. The University of Pittsburgh Institute of Politics, in collaboration with the Bridge Alliance, has launched the Pennsylvania Legislative Exchange.

This state-based, systematic approach is designed to foster better relationships and build trust across the political aisle with the following guiding principles:

Keep ReadingShow less
An empty grocery cart in a market.

NYC Mayor Zohran Mamdani proposes five city-run grocery stores. See the arguments for and against, from food deserts to bodega concerns and the $70M cost.

Getty Images, Kwangmoozaa

Government-Owned Grocery Stores: Accessible Nutrition or Government Overreach?

Issue Introduction

Over the past few years, affordability has become the most central issue affecting Americans and the quality of life in the United States. The prices of groceries and basic necessities have risen 25-30% since the COVID-19 pandemic and are projected to rise another 3.2% in 2026. At the same time, the exodus of grocery chains from rural and low-income areas has scattered food deserts throughout individual states. Recent mass closures include Grocery Outlet’s shuttering of 36 stores and continued shut-downs of many Albertsons locations. These factors have led politicians to make affordability a major campaign issue.

During his progressive campaign for mayor of New York City, Zohran Mamdani raised the idea of opening grocery stores owned and operated by the city government to provide New Yorkers with affordable groceries. In his April 2026 public address that marked his first 100 days in office, Mayor Mamdani announced plans for the first of five city-run grocery stores. Mamdani’s proposed initiative will use $70 million in capital funding to build five city-owned municipal stores–one in each borough–and place them under control of the New York City Economic Development Corporation (NYCEDC). NYCEDC will then select third-party operating staff in accordance with city standards for affordability and proper labor practices. Public opinion following the announcement continues to be divided between uproar and support.

Keep ReadingShow less