Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Congress Bill Spotlight: Smithsonian Italian American Museum

Congress Bill Spotlight: Smithsonian Italian American Museum

People entering the Smithsonian Institute National Museum of American History in the Behring Center in Washington DC.

Getty Images, Ceri Breeze

The Fulcrum introduces Congress Bill Spotlight, a weekly report by Jesse Rifkin, focusing on the noteworthy legislation of the thousands introduced in Congress. Rifkin has written about Congress for years, and now he's dissecting the most interesting bills you need to know about, but that often don't get the right news coverage.

The most famous Italian Americans include Frank Sinatra, Joe DiMaggio, Antonin Scalia, and Anthony Fauci.


The Bill

The National Museum of Italian American History Commission Act would establish a commission to analyze whether a new Smithsonian museum about Italian Americans should be built in Washington, D.C.

The bipartisan commission would comprise eight members, two each appointed by four people: the top Republican and Democratic leaders in both the Senate and House. Within a year and a half after their first meeting, the group would have to submit a report to Congress on issues including the museum’s potential location and cost.

The House bill was introduced on February 6 by Rep. Tom Suozzi (D-NY3). No Senate companion version appears to have been introduced yet.

Context

Italian Americans comprise an estimated 4.8% of the U.S. population, making them the fifth-largest ancestry behind only German, English, Irish, and American.

Founded in 1846 and named after benefactor James Smithson, the Smithsonian Institution is the largest collection of museums in the world. Today, it comprises 21 museums and sites, mostly in the greater Washington, D.C. area.

In 2024, the four most visited Smithsonians were the Natural History Museum (3.9 million), American History Museum (2.1 million), Air and Space Museum (1.9 million), and National Zoo (1.6 million).

Congress greenlit two more Smithsonian museums in 2020: the American Women’s History Museum and the American Latino Museum. Neither site has yet selected a final physical location, yet alone opened.

What Supporters Say

Supporters argue the time has come for an Italian American museum.

"My father, Joseph A. Suozzi, had an extraordinary journey,” Rep. Suozzi said in a press release. “Born in Ruvo del Monte, Italy, he immigrated to the United States as a child, served as a navigator in the U.S. Air Force during World War II, was elected as Glen Cove City Court Judge at the age of 28, went on to serve as Glen Cove Mayor, and was later appointed to the Appellate Division of the N.Y. State Supreme Court.”

"My father's life embodied the classic American Dream,” Rep. Suozzi continued. "I cannot think of a better way to honor my father's legacy—and the legacies, experiences, and stories of so many other hard-working Italians and Italian Americans—than by establishing a National Museum of Italian American History.”

What Opponents Say

The Fulcrum was unable to locate any explicit statements of opposition. But opponents may counter that the museum is a logistical impossibility, at least if it’s to be in the same area as the other most prominent Smithsonians. Upon the African American History and Culture Museum’s opening, NPR said that it “fills the last open spot along the National Mall.”

21st Century Smithsonian Votes

Both the American Women’s History Museum and the American Latino Museum were enacted in 2020 as components of larger “must-pass” legislation, so votes on those individual provisions weren’t taken.

In 2001, the African American History and Culture Museum commission was enacted by voice vote in the House and unanimous consent in the Senate. In 2003, a vote to greenlight the actual museum itself was again enacted by unanimous consent in the Senate and a 409-9 House vote.

The House dissenters, all Republicans, publicly argued their case on fiscal rather than racial grounds. For years prior, though, former Sen. Jesse Helms (R-NC) —a former segregationist —had blocked the museum for racial reasons.

Odds of Passage

Rep. Suozzi previously introduced his Italian American bill in 2024. It attracted nine bipartisan cosponsors, seven Democrats and two Republicans, but never received a committee vote.

The current bill has attracted 40 bipartisan cosponsors: 32 Democrats and eight Republicans. It awaits a potential vote in either the House Administration or Natural Resources Committee.

Even if this commission gets enacted, though, things could take a while. The African American History and Culture Museum established a commission in 2001, Congress approved the museum in 2003, but the building itself didn’t open until 2016.

Jesse Rifkin is a freelance journalist with the Fulcrum. Don’t miss his weekly report, Congress Bill Spotlight, every Friday on the Fulcrum. Rifkin’s writings about politics and Congress have been published in the Washington Post, Politico, Roll Call, Los Angeles Times, CNN Opinion, GovTrack, and USA Today.

SUGGESTIONS:

Congress Bill Spotlight: Panama Canal Repurchase Act

Congress Bill Spotlight: Make Greenland Great Again Act

Congress Bill Spotlight: BIG OIL from the Cabinet Act

Congress Bill Spotlight: renaming Gulf of Mexico as “Gulf of America”

Congress Bill Spotlight: constitutional amendment letting Trump be elected to a third term

Congress Bill Spotlight: adding Donald Trump’s face to Mount Rushmore

Congress Bill Spotlight: BAD DOGE Act

Congress Bill Spotlight: Repealing Trump’s National Energy Emergency

Read More

Veterans’ Care at Risk Under Trump As Hundreds of Doctors and Nurses Reject Working at VA Hospitals
Photo illustration by Lisa Larson-Walker/ProPublica

Veterans’ Care at Risk Under Trump As Hundreds of Doctors and Nurses Reject Working at VA Hospitals

Veterans hospitals are struggling to replace hundreds of doctors and nurses who have left the health care system this year as the Trump administration pursues its pledge to simultaneously slash Department of Veterans Affairs staff and improve care.

Many job applicants are turning down offers, worried that the positions are not stable and uneasy with the overall direction of the agency, according to internal documents examined by ProPublica. The records show nearly 4 in 10 of the roughly 2,000 doctors offered jobs from January through March of this year turned them down. That is quadruple the rate of doctors rejecting offers during the same time period last year.

Keep ReadingShow less
Protecting the U.S. Press: The PRESS Act and What It Could Mean for Journalists

The Protect Reporters from Excessive State Suppression (PRESS) Act aims to fill the national shield law gap by providing two protections for journalists.

Getty Images, Manu Vega

Protecting the U.S. Press: The PRESS Act and What It Could Mean for Journalists

The First Amendment protects journalists during the news-gathering and publication processes. For example, under the First Amendment, reporters cannot be forced to report on an issue. However, the press is not entitled to different legal protections compared to a general member of the public under the First Amendment.

In the United States, there are protections for journalists beyond the First Amendment, including shield laws that protect journalists from pressure to reveal sources or information during news-gathering. 48 states and the District of Columbia have shield laws, but protections vary widely. There is currently no federal shield law. As of 2019, at least 22 journalists have been jailed in the U.S. for refusing to comply with requests to reveal sources of information. Seven other journalists have been jailed and fined for the same reason.

Keep ReadingShow less
Democrats Score Strategic Wins Amid Redistricting Battles

Democrat Donkey is winning arm wrestling match against Republican elephant

AI generated image

Democrats Score Strategic Wins Amid Redistricting Battles

Democrats are quietly building momentum in the 2025 election cycle, notching two key legislative flips in special elections and gaining ground in early polling ahead of the 2026 midterms. While the victories are modest in number, they signal a potential shift in voter sentiment — and a brewing backlash against Republican-led redistricting efforts.

Out of 40 special elections held across the United States so far in 2025, only two seats have changed party control — both flipping from Republican to Democrat.

Keep ReadingShow less
Policing or Occupation? Trump’s Militarizing America’s Cities Sets a Dangerous Precedent

A DC Metropolitan Police Department car is parked near a rally against the Trump Administration's federal takeover of the District of Columbia, outside of the AFL-CIO on August 11, 2025 in Washington, DC.

(Photo by Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images)

Policing or Occupation? Trump’s Militarizing America’s Cities Sets a Dangerous Precedent

President Trump announced the activation of hundreds of National Guard troops in Washington, D.C., along with the deployment of federal agents—including more than 100 from the FBI. This comes despite Justice Department data showing that violent crime in D.C. fell 35% from 2023 to 2024, reaching its lowest point in over three decades. These aren’t abstract numbers—they paint a picture of a city safer than it has been in a generation, with fewer homicides, assaults, and robberies than at any point since the early 1990s.

The contradiction could not be more glaring: the same president who, on January 6, 2021, stalled for hours as a violent uprising engulfed the Capitol is now rushing to “liberate” a city that—based on federal data—hasn’t been this safe in more than thirty years. Then, when democracy itself was under siege, urgency gave way to dithering; today, with no comparable emergency—only vague claims of lawlessness—he mobilizes troops for a mission that looks less like public safety and more like political theater. The disparity between those two moments is more than irony; it is a blueprint for how power can be selectively applied, depending on whose power is threatened.

Keep ReadingShow less