Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Elbows Up, Arms Crossed

Opinion

Elbows Up, Arms Crossed
people gathering near green trees during daytime
Photo by Malu Laker on Unsplash

Last month, 23andMe announced it was filing for bankruptcy, and dozens of states are suing to stop the company from selling off personal data. Yet, unlike for-profit businesses, lawyers in nonprofit organizations cannot just stop representing clients when funding ends. We continue the representation until the matter is concluded. This is a quagmire; immigration cases such as a U Visa can take 30 years to process from start to finish.

We also have a duty of confidentiality of information. This means that we cannot disclose information about representation. I remember learning, as a young attorney, that much like a doctor or therapist, if I saw a client in public, I could not speak to them or disclose that I knew them, unless they initiated that contact. The fact that I was a lawyer and guarded their secrets means everything.


While 23andMe may attempt to sell personal data to recover its losses, nonprofit and legal aid attorneys do not have an income-generating method to recover their losses. We cannot disclose client information, nor can we sell it in a public marketplace. When an agency such as DOGE seeks confidential IRS records to uncover immigration status, this protection means more than ever. Forcing an attorney to disclose client information is not permissible in the attorney-client relationship.

As an attorney currently serving as Executive Director of the nonprofit Survivor Justice Center, I have learned that in addition to representing clients and holding that duty, I am also running a business. Grant funding is not a viable business model, especially in today's market. Nonprofits need to be economically sustainable so that we can represent our clients. The recent funding cuts are making our work more difficult.

My staff asks me what the plan is if we lose all our immigration funding. I say, we are not alone. Last month, close colleagues at several immigration organizations who represent minors in removal proceedings lost over 50% of their budgets, due to federal executive orders, and many staffers were laid off. But the clients remain. I asked those organizations about their plans. One option is more pro bono representation. However, firms require the expertise of nonprofit lawyers for case supervision. If you lay off all the Legal Aid lawyers, who will supervise the pro bono cases? Another strategy is hoping that clients will eventually obtain private counsel. The frank worry: Many will not be able to afford it and will lose their cases.

This problem is continuing and severe. The funding cuts for our organization started with the VOCA cuts. And then, our Office of Victims of Crime Human Trafficking Funding was cut. And then, our California Department of Social Services' Immigration Services Funding was cut. And then, our America Rescue Plan funding ended. 35% of our remaining funding is federal.

Workers on the front lines provide direct services, which is tough and fraught with vicarious trauma and potential burnout, especially now that ICE is raiding domestic violence shelters. But in leadership, the pressure increases ten- or 20-fold. The pressures -- auditing, billing, budgeting, HR, donors, board- come from all sides. And yet my empathy and focus should be with both staff and the clients we serve.

Nonprofit Executive Directors already do multiple jobs. I am committed to the cause and our mission. But my most focused commitment is to the movement, staff, and team. I will uphold this obligation by protecting client privacy and continuing to fulfill my commitment to the work.

I am not a magician; I cannot answer every question or fix every issue. Even before today, there was data on the difficulty of doing immigrants’ rights work. I choose to be optimistic. I know I am often called on for my vision, and I understand; I am looking for leadership to inspire me. And I have it, in a strong network of Executive Directors. I am connected on listservs to almost every legal aid ED locally, statewide, and on a national level- from the legal services sector to the domestic violence and sexual assault movement. All organizations are more willing than ever to share documents. We have agreed to open-source our information and avoid wasting time unnecessarily. We are being creative. We support each other in innovative ways - sharing space, collaborating on grants, and making introductions where needed - and the occasional tears are shed or happy hours are had.

It is time for nonprofit leaders to come together through networking, developing collaborative and organic relationships, and establishing structures to sustain the work. I love the expression- Elbows up, we are ready to lock arms and push back.

I ask everyone to come together from a place of abundance and join in the idea that we can come from a place of abundance and work together, and figure out how to make the work sustainable and support our clients

In the meantime, I ask my team to take care of themselves. We practice self-care through wellness time. We changed vacation for exempt staff to self-managed time off. We encourage work from home. We support flexibility. COVID has brought this ability to our sector, and we continue it because it works for the team and our amazing clients.

Elbows Up!

Carmen McDonald is an attorney who serves as Executive Director of the Survivor Justice Center; she is a Public Voices Fellow of the OpEd Project and Blue Shield California.

Read More

Congress Bill Spotlight: Remove the Stain Act

A deep look at the fight over rescinding Medals of Honor from U.S. soldiers at Wounded Knee, the political clash surrounding the Remove the Stain Act, and what’s at stake for historical justice.

Getty Images, Stocktrek Images

Congress Bill Spotlight: Remove the Stain Act

Should the U.S. soldiers at 1890’s Wounded Knee keep the Medal of Honor?

Context: history

Keep ReadingShow less
The Recipe for a Humanitarian Crisis: 600,000 Venezuelans Set to Be Returned to the “Mouth of the Shark”

Migrant families from Honduras, Guatemala, Venezuela and Haiti live in a migrant camp set up by a charity organization in a former hospital, in the border town of Matamoros, Mexico.

(Photo by Andrew Lichtenstein/Corbis via Getty Images)

The Recipe for a Humanitarian Crisis: 600,000 Venezuelans Set to Be Returned to the “Mouth of the Shark”

On October 3, 2025, the U.S. Supreme Court cleared the way for Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem to end Temporary Protected Status for roughly 600,000 Venezuelans living in the United States, effective November 7, 2025. Although the exact mechanisms and details are unclear at this time, the message from DHS is: “Venezuelans, leave.”

Proponents of the Administration’s position (there is no official Opinion from SCOTUS, as the ruling was part of its shadow docket) argue that (1) the Secretary of DHS has discretion to determine designate whether a country is safe enough for individuals to return from the US, (2) “Temporary Protected Status” was always meant to be temporary, and (3) the situation in Venezuela has improved enough that Venezuelans in the U.S. may now safely return to Venezuela. As a lawyer who volunteers with immigrants, I admit that the two legal bases—Secretary’s broad discretion and the temporary nature of TPS—carry some weight, and I will not address them here.

Keep ReadingShow less
For the Sake of Our Humanity: Humane Theology and America’s Crisis of Civility

Praying outdoors

ImagineGolf/Getty Images

For the Sake of Our Humanity: Humane Theology and America’s Crisis of Civility

The American experiment has been sustained not by flawless execution of its founding ideals but by the moral imagination of people who refused to surrender hope. From abolitionists to suffragists to the foot soldiers of the civil-rights movement, generations have insisted that the Republic live up to its creed. Yet today that hope feels imperiled. Coarsened public discourse, the normalization of cruelty in policy, and the corrosion of democratic trust signal more than political dysfunction—they expose a crisis of meaning.

Naming that crisis is not enough. What we need, I argue, is a recovered ethic of humaneness—a civic imagination rooted in empathy, dignity, and shared responsibility. Eric Liu, through Citizens University and his "Civic Saturday" fellows and gatherings, proposes that democracy requires a "civic religion," a shared set of stories and rituals that remind us who we are and what we owe one another. I find deep resonance between that vision and what I call humane theology. That is, a belief and moral framework that insists public life cannot flourish when empathy is starved.

Keep ReadingShow less
The Myth of Colorblind Fairness

U.S. Supreme Court

Photo by mana5280 on Unsplash

The Myth of Colorblind Fairness

Two years after the Supreme Court banned race-conscious college admissions in Students for Fair Admissions, universities are scrambling to maintain diversity through “race-neutral” alternatives they believe will be inherently fair. New economic research reveals that colorblind policies may systematically create inequality in ways more pervasive than even the notorious “old boy” network.

The “old boy” network, as its name suggests, is nothing new—evoking smoky cigar lounges or golf courses where business ties are formed, careers are launched, and those not invited are left behind. Opportunity reproduces itself, passed down like an inheritance if you belong to the “right” group. The old boy network is not the only example of how a social network can discriminate. In fact, my research shows it may not even be the best one. And how social networks discriminate completely changes the debate about diversity.

Keep ReadingShow less