Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Elbows Up, Arms Crossed

Opinion

Elbows Up, Arms Crossed
people gathering near green trees during daytime
Photo by Malu Laker on Unsplash

Last month, 23andMe announced it was filing for bankruptcy, and dozens of states are suing to stop the company from selling off personal data. Yet, unlike for-profit businesses, lawyers in nonprofit organizations cannot just stop representing clients when funding ends. We continue the representation until the matter is concluded. This is a quagmire; immigration cases such as a U Visa can take 30 years to process from start to finish.

We also have a duty of confidentiality of information. This means that we cannot disclose information about representation. I remember learning, as a young attorney, that much like a doctor or therapist, if I saw a client in public, I could not speak to them or disclose that I knew them, unless they initiated that contact. The fact that I was a lawyer and guarded their secrets means everything.


While 23andMe may attempt to sell personal data to recover its losses, nonprofit and legal aid attorneys do not have an income-generating method to recover their losses. We cannot disclose client information, nor can we sell it in a public marketplace. When an agency such as DOGE seeks confidential IRS records to uncover immigration status, this protection means more than ever. Forcing an attorney to disclose client information is not permissible in the attorney-client relationship.

As an attorney currently serving as Executive Director of the nonprofit Survivor Justice Center, I have learned that in addition to representing clients and holding that duty, I am also running a business. Grant funding is not a viable business model, especially in today's market. Nonprofits need to be economically sustainable so that we can represent our clients. The recent funding cuts are making our work more difficult.

My staff asks me what the plan is if we lose all our immigration funding. I say, we are not alone. Last month, close colleagues at several immigration organizations who represent minors in removal proceedings lost over 50% of their budgets, due to federal executive orders, and many staffers were laid off. But the clients remain. I asked those organizations about their plans. One option is more pro bono representation. However, firms require the expertise of nonprofit lawyers for case supervision. If you lay off all the Legal Aid lawyers, who will supervise the pro bono cases? Another strategy is hoping that clients will eventually obtain private counsel. The frank worry: Many will not be able to afford it and will lose their cases.

This problem is continuing and severe. The funding cuts for our organization started with the VOCA cuts. And then, our Office of Victims of Crime Human Trafficking Funding was cut. And then, our California Department of Social Services' Immigration Services Funding was cut. And then, our America Rescue Plan funding ended. 35% of our remaining funding is federal.

Workers on the front lines provide direct services, which is tough and fraught with vicarious trauma and potential burnout, especially now that ICE is raiding domestic violence shelters. But in leadership, the pressure increases ten- or 20-fold. The pressures -- auditing, billing, budgeting, HR, donors, board- come from all sides. And yet my empathy and focus should be with both staff and the clients we serve.

Nonprofit Executive Directors already do multiple jobs. I am committed to the cause and our mission. But my most focused commitment is to the movement, staff, and team. I will uphold this obligation by protecting client privacy and continuing to fulfill my commitment to the work.

I am not a magician; I cannot answer every question or fix every issue. Even before today, there was data on the difficulty of doing immigrants’ rights work. I choose to be optimistic. I know I am often called on for my vision, and I understand; I am looking for leadership to inspire me. And I have it, in a strong network of Executive Directors. I am connected on listservs to almost every legal aid ED locally, statewide, and on a national level- from the legal services sector to the domestic violence and sexual assault movement. All organizations are more willing than ever to share documents. We have agreed to open-source our information and avoid wasting time unnecessarily. We are being creative. We support each other in innovative ways - sharing space, collaborating on grants, and making introductions where needed - and the occasional tears are shed or happy hours are had.

It is time for nonprofit leaders to come together through networking, developing collaborative and organic relationships, and establishing structures to sustain the work. I love the expression- Elbows up, we are ready to lock arms and push back.

I ask everyone to come together from a place of abundance and join in the idea that we can come from a place of abundance and work together, and figure out how to make the work sustainable and support our clients

In the meantime, I ask my team to take care of themselves. We practice self-care through wellness time. We changed vacation for exempt staff to self-managed time off. We encourage work from home. We support flexibility. COVID has brought this ability to our sector, and we continue it because it works for the team and our amazing clients.

Elbows Up!

Carmen McDonald is an attorney who serves as Executive Director of the Survivor Justice Center; she is a Public Voices Fellow of the OpEd Project and Blue Shield California.


Read More

Illustration of someone holding a strainer, and the words "fakes," "facts," "news," etc. going through it.

Trump-era misinformation has pushed American politics to a breaking point. A Truth in Politics law may be needed to save democracy.

Getty Images, SvetaZi

The Need for a Truth in Politics Law: De-Frauding American Politics

“Have you no sense of decency, sir, at long last?” With those words in 1954, Army lawyer Joseph Welch took Senator Joe McCarthy to task and helped end McCarthy’s destructive un-American witch hunt. The time has come to say the same to Donald Trump and his MAGA allies and stop their vile perversion of our right to free speech.

American politics has always been rife with misleading statements and, at times, outright falsehoods. Mendacity just seems to be an ever-present aspect of politics. But with the ascendency of Trump, and especially this past year, things have taken an especially nasty turn, becoming so aggressive and incendiary as to pose a real threat to the health and well-being of our nation’s democracy.

Keep ReadingShow less
Silence, Signals, and the Unfinished Story of the Abandoned Disability Rule

Waiting for the Door to Open: Advocates and older workers are left in limbo as the administration’s decision to abandon a harsh disability rule exists only in private assurances, not public record.

AI-created animation

Silence, Signals, and the Unfinished Story of the Abandoned Disability Rule

We reported in the Fulcrum on November 30th that in early November, disability advocates walked out of the West Wing, believing they had secured a rare reversal from the Trump administration of an order that stripped disability benefits from more than 800,000 older manual laborers.

The public record has remained conspicuously quiet on the matter. No press release, no Federal Register notice, no formal statement from the White House or the Social Security Administration has confirmed what senior officials told Jason Turkish and his colleagues behind closed doors in November: that the administration would not move forward with a regulation that could have stripped disability benefits from more than 800,000 older manual laborers. According to a memo shared by an agency official and verified by multiple sources with knowledge of the discussions, an internal meeting in early November involved key SSA decision-makers outlining the administration's intent to halt the proposal. This memo, though not publicly released, is said to detail the political and social ramifications of proceeding with the regulation, highlighting its unpopularity among constituents who would be affected by the changes.

Keep ReadingShow less
How Trump turned a January 6 death into the politics of ‘protecting women’

A memorial for Ashli Babbitt sits near the US Capitol during a Day of Remembrance and Action on the one year anniversary of the January 6, 2021 insurrection.

(John Lamparski/NurPhoto/AP)

How Trump turned a January 6 death into the politics of ‘protecting women’

In the wake of the insurrection at the Capitol on January 6, 2021, President Donald Trump quickly took up the cause of a 35-year-old veteran named Ashli Babbitt.

“Who killed Ashli Babbitt?” he asked in a one-sentence statement on July 1, 2021.

Keep ReadingShow less
Gerrymandering Test the Boundaries of Fair Representation in 2026

Supreme Court, Allen v. Milligan Illegal Congressional Voting Map

Gerrymandering Test the Boundaries of Fair Representation in 2026

A wave of redistricting battles in early 2026 is reshaping the political map ahead of the midterm elections and intensifying long‑running fights over gerrymandering and democratic representation.

In California, a three‑judge federal panel on January 15 upheld the state’s new congressional districts created under Proposition 50, ruling 2–1 that the map—expected to strengthen Democratic advantages in several competitive seats—could be used in the 2026 elections. The following day, a separate federal court dismissed a Republican lawsuit arguing that the maps were unconstitutional, clearing the way for the state’s redistricting overhaul to stand. In Virginia, Democratic lawmakers have advanced a constitutional amendment that would allow mid‑decade redistricting, a move they describe as a response to aggressive Republican map‑drawing in other states; some legislators have openly discussed the possibility of a congressional map that could yield 10 Democratic‑leaning seats out of 11. In Missouri, the secretary of state has acknowledged in court that ballot language for a referendum on the state’s congressional map could mislead voters, a key development in ongoing litigation over the fairness of the state’s redistricting process. And in Utah, a state judge has ordered a new congressional map that includes one Democratic‑leaning district after years of litigation over the legislature’s earlier plan, prompting strong objections from Republican lawmakers who argue the court exceeded its authority.

Keep ReadingShow less