Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Elbows Up, Arms Crossed

Opinion

Elbows Up, Arms Crossed
people gathering near green trees during daytime
Photo by Malu Laker on Unsplash

Last month, 23andMe announced it was filing for bankruptcy, and dozens of states are suing to stop the company from selling off personal data. Yet, unlike for-profit businesses, lawyers in nonprofit organizations cannot just stop representing clients when funding ends. We continue the representation until the matter is concluded. This is a quagmire; immigration cases such as a U Visa can take 30 years to process from start to finish.

We also have a duty of confidentiality of information. This means that we cannot disclose information about representation. I remember learning, as a young attorney, that much like a doctor or therapist, if I saw a client in public, I could not speak to them or disclose that I knew them, unless they initiated that contact. The fact that I was a lawyer and guarded their secrets means everything.


While 23andMe may attempt to sell personal data to recover its losses, nonprofit and legal aid attorneys do not have an income-generating method to recover their losses. We cannot disclose client information, nor can we sell it in a public marketplace. When an agency such as DOGE seeks confidential IRS records to uncover immigration status, this protection means more than ever. Forcing an attorney to disclose client information is not permissible in the attorney-client relationship.

As an attorney currently serving as Executive Director of the nonprofit Survivor Justice Center, I have learned that in addition to representing clients and holding that duty, I am also running a business. Grant funding is not a viable business model, especially in today's market. Nonprofits need to be economically sustainable so that we can represent our clients. The recent funding cuts are making our work more difficult.

My staff asks me what the plan is if we lose all our immigration funding. I say, we are not alone. Last month, close colleagues at several immigration organizations who represent minors in removal proceedings lost over 50% of their budgets, due to federal executive orders, and many staffers were laid off. But the clients remain. I asked those organizations about their plans. One option is more pro bono representation. However, firms require the expertise of nonprofit lawyers for case supervision. If you lay off all the Legal Aid lawyers, who will supervise the pro bono cases? Another strategy is hoping that clients will eventually obtain private counsel. The frank worry: Many will not be able to afford it and will lose their cases.

This problem is continuing and severe. The funding cuts for our organization started with the VOCA cuts. And then, our Office of Victims of Crime Human Trafficking Funding was cut. And then, our California Department of Social Services' Immigration Services Funding was cut. And then, our America Rescue Plan funding ended. 35% of our remaining funding is federal.

Workers on the front lines provide direct services, which is tough and fraught with vicarious trauma and potential burnout, especially now that ICE is raiding domestic violence shelters. But in leadership, the pressure increases ten- or 20-fold. The pressures -- auditing, billing, budgeting, HR, donors, board- come from all sides. And yet my empathy and focus should be with both staff and the clients we serve.

Nonprofit Executive Directors already do multiple jobs. I am committed to the cause and our mission. But my most focused commitment is to the movement, staff, and team. I will uphold this obligation by protecting client privacy and continuing to fulfill my commitment to the work.

I am not a magician; I cannot answer every question or fix every issue. Even before today, there was data on the difficulty of doing immigrants’ rights work. I choose to be optimistic. I know I am often called on for my vision, and I understand; I am looking for leadership to inspire me. And I have it, in a strong network of Executive Directors. I am connected on listservs to almost every legal aid ED locally, statewide, and on a national level- from the legal services sector to the domestic violence and sexual assault movement. All organizations are more willing than ever to share documents. We have agreed to open-source our information and avoid wasting time unnecessarily. We are being creative. We support each other in innovative ways - sharing space, collaborating on grants, and making introductions where needed - and the occasional tears are shed or happy hours are had.

It is time for nonprofit leaders to come together through networking, developing collaborative and organic relationships, and establishing structures to sustain the work. I love the expression- Elbows up, we are ready to lock arms and push back.

I ask everyone to come together from a place of abundance and join in the idea that we can come from a place of abundance and work together, and figure out how to make the work sustainable and support our clients

In the meantime, I ask my team to take care of themselves. We practice self-care through wellness time. We changed vacation for exempt staff to self-managed time off. We encourage work from home. We support flexibility. COVID has brought this ability to our sector, and we continue it because it works for the team and our amazing clients.

Elbows Up!

Carmen McDonald is an attorney who serves as Executive Director of the Survivor Justice Center; she is a Public Voices Fellow of the OpEd Project and Blue Shield California.


Read More

Tensions were High as Representatives Debated Allegations Against the Southern Poverty Law Center

Members of the House Judiciary Committee during the hearing on the Southern Poverty Law Center.

Credit: Olivia Ardito

Tensions were High as Representatives Debated Allegations Against the Southern Poverty Law Center

WASHINGTON, D.C. – The House Judiciary Committee held a hearing last Wednesday examining claims that the Southern Poverty Law Center had funded the very hate groups the center aims to dismantle. Tensions were high as Republicans and Democrats fired back at each other. Noticeably absent was a representative from the center, a non-profit that since 1971 has fought for racial justice and against white supremacy.

The hearing came after the Texas Attorney General Ken Pax­ton announced last Monday that he was investigating the center. The U.S. Justice Department indicted the Southern Poverty Law Center in April for allegedly funneling money to people associated with violent extremist groups. The group has flatly rejected the accusations. While Republicans backed these claims, Democrats viewed the allegations as part of the Trump-backed efforts to hinder “DEI” and other racial justice initiatives.

Keep ReadingShow less
Trump Is Protecting Insurrectionists But Not Your Kids

An analysis of gun violence, political extremism, Islamophobia, and community resilience in America after the San Diego Islamic Center shooting.

GemaIbarra / Getty Images

Trump Is Protecting Insurrectionists But Not Your Kids

Last Monday, two teenage gunmen opened fire outside the Islamic Center of San Diego, murdering three Muslim men. Unfortunately, this is the type of horror Americans have been conditioned to expect. After years of political stagnation on gun safety and ongoing hateful acts of violence, our president has signaled once again to children, to the Muslim community, and to everyone else: he does not care if you get shot.

Gun violence has been on the rise in the United States for too long. Perhaps the most harrowing consequence is that gun violence is now the leading cause of death among children. Whether from school shootings, homicides, suicides, or accidents, the gun-death rate for children is nearly five in every 100,000. In fact, the number of domestic deaths due to gun violence is about as many as U.S. military deaths in every war since World War I combined. More children have been lost to gun violence since 2020 than troops lost since 9/11. Yet even with such a striking death toll—and one affecting children no less—happening on our own soil, Vice President J.D. Vance calls it a “fact of life.

Keep ReadingShow less
The dome of the United States Capitol Building in Washington, D.C., stands tall against a blue sky with the American flag waving proudly

Congress faces growing pressure to pass redistricting reform as lawmakers debate banning gerrymandering, independent commissions, and mid-decade map changes amid renewed national controversy over fair elections.

Getty Images, aire images

Congress's Missed Opportunities on Redistricting Reform

On April 29, Issue One posted an image on Facebook and Instagram: CONGRESS CAN FIX THIS WITH THREE SIMPLE STEPS:

  1. Establish Clear National Criteria for Fair Maps
  2. Require Independent Redistricting Commissions in Every State
  3. Ban Mid-Decade Redistricting.

Issue One added below: “… but it needs 60 Senate votes to do it.”

Keep ReadingShow less
Open Letter to Justice Roberts: Partisan Gerrymandering Is Unconstitutional
beige concrete building under blue sky during daytime

Open Letter to Justice Roberts: Partisan Gerrymandering Is Unconstitutional

The Supreme Court, in holding that partisan gerrymandering is permissible—unless it "goes too far"—stated that the argument made against this practice based on the Court's "one person, one vote" doctrine didn't work because the cases that developed that doctrine were about ensuring that each vote had an equal weight. The Court reasoned that after redistricting, each vote still has equal weight.

I would respectfully disagree. After admittedly partisan redistricting, each vote does not have an equal weight. The purpose of partisan gerrymandering is typically to create a "safe" seat—to group citizens so that the dominant political party has a clear majority of the voters. It's the transformation of a contested seat or even a seat safe for the other party into a safe seat for the party doing the redistricting.

Keep ReadingShow less