Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

From Tariffs to Cyber Threats: The Global Fallout of Trump’s Foreign Policy

New research reveals economic strain, diplomatic isolation and rising cyber threats linked to Trump’s policies

Opinion

From Tariffs to Cyber Threats: The Global Fallout of Trump’s Foreign Policy

U.S. President Donald Trump attends a press conference with UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer (not pictured) at Chequers at the conclusion of a state visit on September 18, 2025 in Aylesbury, England.

(Photo by Leon Neal/Getty Images)

In my last op-ed (Best and worst U.S. presidential cabinets), 15 different research-based sources revealed that Donald Trump’s 2017-2021 and current cabinets are among the worst in U.S. history. The last paragraph of the op-ed stated: “Let’s face reality. A cabinet that ranks historically low with respect to competence, ethical standards, experience, and other research-based competency criteria makes the U.S. vulnerable to a multitude of operational inefficiencies, policy blunders, ethical mishaps, scandals, conflicts of interest, conspiracies, and foreign intervention.”

Several domestic and international conflicts require examination, not from the perspective of a cabinet member, but rather in relation to Trump’s policies and executive actions.


Domestic vulnerabilities

President Trump’s deportation and detention plans, plus the use of heavily armed military personnel for immigration control, have already put a strain on local, state, and national police resources. The paramilitary-style police-state tactics Americans are witnessing and the marginalization of vulnerable groups will certainly lead to further civil unrest and more lawsuits.

Trump’s immigration enforcement will undoubtedly affect 1.6 million construction workers and 1.2 million agricultural laborers, who provide the shelter services and food-related products that Americans depend upon (CBS News). The availability and cost of housing projects and food are in jeopardy.

Many of Mr. Trump’s 202 executive orders have rolled back protections related to gender, race, free speech, free assembly, and voting, further increasing legal and civil unrest. As of September 10, 342 active legal cases challenge Trump’s 2.0 endeavors; taxpayers will likely be responsible for covering the legal fees to defend his actions (Lawfare).

Spending freezes and the random firing of federal workers from FEMA, EPA, and HUD most assuredly risk compromising crisis response efficacy from natural disasters to environmental catastrophes and pandemics.

President Trump’s tariff policy has been assessed on imports from 194 countries (BBC News). Four different analyses note that the tariff-related price increase for America’s 67.5 million working families will be in the $2,400-$5,200 range every year until January 2029 (Yale Budget Lab, Center for American Progress, Petersen Institute, and Joint Economic Committee Republicans).

Other domestic vulnerabilities include social division, lobbyist-political party collusion, healthcare cutbacks, and veterans’ services, but op-ed space limits further explanation.

International vulnerabilities

With Trump’s tariff policy targeting 194 countries, reciprocal tariffs by other countries against the U.S. are quite possible, which could lead to spiraling economic costs, disrupting global supply chains, and damaging diplomatic relations.

If trade retaliation occurs, many of America’s 3.4 million agricultural producers, who depend on international trade, will face the threat of bankruptcy. Furthermore, many of America’s 34 million small business owners will be at risk of closing shop.

Walter Russell Mead, a columnist for the conservative-oriented Wall Street Journal, reported that since Mr. Trump has taken office, there has been a growing alignment by China, Russia, India, Iran, Pakistan, Egypt, Turkey, Armenia, Azerbaijan, and North Korea against American interests and our 51 formal allies (Sept. 2).

Trump eliminated USAID foreign aid and multilateral cooperation with approximately 100 developing countries. China and Russia are taking advantage of the situation to expand their political and economic influence and take America’s diplomatic place.

President Trump’s failure to work with China has created a situation where China’s cyber actors are positioned to attack America’s water, electricity, and telecommunications infrastructure. China’s military posture around Taiwan and the South China Sea is a purposeful challenge to America’s stance as the leader of the free world. China understands that trade and semiconductor supply chains are vital to the U.S. economy, and it has the upper hand.

Mr. Trump’s failure to control Russia’s attack on Ukraine has enabled Russian-supported hackers, cyber attackers, and information warfare groups to target U.S. government and corporate data. Four Republicans (i.e., Sen. Joni Ernst, Iowa; Sen. Chuck Grassley, Iowa; Sen. Thom Tillis, NC; and Rep. Don Bacon, Neb.) are skeptical of Trump’s international diplomacy as referenced in a Sept. 10 article titled “GOP increasingly says Putin has played Trump” (CNN Politics).

Multiple independent sources note the leaders of China, Russia, and Israel are “playing with Trump” as he hasn’t displayed any diplomatic skills. It’s well-documented that Mr. Trump is a short-term, tactical, and transactional person, as opposed to the long-term, strategic, and relationship-oriented leader Americans have revered and experienced with other presidents.

We have met the enemy

Due to Trump’s policies, the USA’s national security, economic, supply chain, diplomatic relations, civil rights, disaster response, law enforcement, Sino-Russian hostility, humanitarian aid, foreign intervention, and peacebuilding – to name a few – are all more vulnerable to domestic and international conflicts.

If you feel America is in trouble with Trump’s actions, it’s incumbent to alert your three elected delegates in Washington, DC, as to how vulnerable -- domestically and internationally – we have become. Let Congress know they need to step up to Mr. Trump and his cabinet members by upholding their oath of office to “support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic.”

Steve Corbin is a Professor Emeritus of Marketing at, University of Northern Iowa


Read More

​U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth

U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth testifies during a Senate Committee on Appropriations hearing on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C., on July 21, 2026. Hegseth is crafting a strong and masculine identity for his audience as he reportedly contemplates a presidential run.

(Alex Wroblewski/AFP/Getty Images/TNS)

Politicians Can’t Just ’Give the People What They Want’

For reasons that will baffle my many detractors, I am often asked for advice about being an opinion journalist. One of my standard responses is: You have to be willing to disappoint your biggest fans.

What I mean is that if you start to see your job as telling fans what they want to hear, you risk becoming an entertainer rather than a thinker, and eventually you become a caricature. I’ve seen it happen numerous times. Patrick Buchanan was a brilliant columnist and a serious person. But over the course of his career, he listened too much to the people who said, “Go Pat, go!” and too little to friends who said, “I think that’s taking it too far.”

Keep ReadingShow less
White marble exterior of the United States Capitol, often called the Capitol Building, is the home of the United States Congress and the seat of the legislative branch of the U.S. federal government

Congress approval is at a record-low 10%. Moderation and consensus-building, not partisan theatrics, are how Washington gets problems solved.

Richard Sharrocks / Getty Images

Reclaiming the Politics of the Possible

Washington is stuck in a cycle of performative conflict. The incentives seem to reward outrage, not outcomes that last; purity tests, not problem‑solving. So it’s no surprise that after three shutdowns in less than a year, public approval of Congress collapsed to just 10 percent this spring. (Gallup, April 2026.) But the country we live in — where many middle-income families report persistent financial strain and businesses are navigating unprecedented technological upheaval — cannot be governed by theatrics. Breaking this cycle requires moderation, consensus‑building, and a cooperative approach to governance.

This is not a call for centrism as an ideology. Instead, this is a call for transformative leaders to embrace moderation as their governing strategy, recognizing that in a pluralistic country of nearly 350 million people durable solutions require broad and stable alliances. Ultimately, this is a call for the 240 million of us who are eligible to vote in November to elect consensus-builders instead of bomb-throwers, and healers instead of arsonists.

Keep ReadingShow less
California’s New Law Aims To Close a Housing Gap for Domestic Violence Survivors
Emily Scherer for The 19th; Getty Images

California’s New Law Aims To Close a Housing Gap for Domestic Violence Survivors

Domestic violence survivors often struggle to find housing, and California’s “Unseen and Unheard Housing Act” will help make more housing available to meet their specific needs.

California Gov. Gavin Newsom signed the bill Sunday requiring cities and counties to factor in domestic violence survivors when planning for future housing.

Keep ReadingShow less
Classsroom
empty classroom with desks and chalkboard
Photo by Ivan Aleksic on Unsplash

Who Gets a Seat?: Florida’s New Bans on Undocumented Students in Public Higher Education

Each year, roughly 8,000 undocumented students graduate from Florida high schools. In 2026, Florida became the newest state to pass a regulation prohibiting this population from enrolling in state public colleges and selective universities. In June 2026, Florida State Board of Education passed Rule 6A-10.0240, which requires all 28 Florida College System institutions to certify admitted students as citizens of the United States or have lawful presence. In September 2026, a separate state board extended a similar ban to Florida’s most selective public universities.

Throughout the United States, there are three states that have historically upheld similar barring policies: Alabama and South Carolina ban undocumented students from all public colleges and universities, while Georgia bars them only from its most selective public universities. Florida’s restrictions are administrative rules and regulations, not state laws passed by the Legislature. Similar bills died in committee during Florida’s 2026 legislative session.

Keep ReadingShow less