Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

From Tariffs to Cyber Threats: The Global Fallout of Trump’s Foreign Policy

New research reveals economic strain, diplomatic isolation and rising cyber threats linked to Trump’s policies

Opinion

From Tariffs to Cyber Threats: The Global Fallout of Trump’s Foreign Policy

U.S. President Donald Trump attends a press conference with UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer (not pictured) at Chequers at the conclusion of a state visit on September 18, 2025 in Aylesbury, England.

(Photo by Leon Neal/Getty Images)

In my last op-ed (Best and worst U.S. presidential cabinets), 15 different research-based sources revealed that Donald Trump’s 2017-2021 and current cabinets are among the worst in U.S. history. The last paragraph of the op-ed stated: “Let’s face reality. A cabinet that ranks historically low with respect to competence, ethical standards, experience, and other research-based competency criteria makes the U.S. vulnerable to a multitude of operational inefficiencies, policy blunders, ethical mishaps, scandals, conflicts of interest, conspiracies, and foreign intervention.”

Several domestic and international conflicts require examination, not from the perspective of a cabinet member, but rather in relation to Trump’s policies and executive actions.


Domestic vulnerabilities

President Trump’s deportation and detention plans, plus the use of heavily armed military personnel for immigration control, have already put a strain on local, state, and national police resources. The paramilitary-style police-state tactics Americans are witnessing and the marginalization of vulnerable groups will certainly lead to further civil unrest and more lawsuits.

Trump’s immigration enforcement will undoubtedly affect 1.6 million construction workers and 1.2 million agricultural laborers, who provide the shelter services and food-related products that Americans depend upon (CBS News). The availability and cost of housing projects and food are in jeopardy.

Many of Mr. Trump’s 202 executive orders have rolled back protections related to gender, race, free speech, free assembly, and voting, further increasing legal and civil unrest. As of September 10, 342 active legal cases challenge Trump’s 2.0 endeavors; taxpayers will likely be responsible for covering the legal fees to defend his actions (Lawfare).

Spending freezes and the random firing of federal workers from FEMA, EPA, and HUD most assuredly risk compromising crisis response efficacy from natural disasters to environmental catastrophes and pandemics.

President Trump’s tariff policy has been assessed on imports from 194 countries (BBC News). Four different analyses note that the tariff-related price increase for America’s 67.5 million working families will be in the $2,400-$5,200 range every year until January 2029 (Yale Budget Lab, Center for American Progress, Petersen Institute, and Joint Economic Committee Republicans).

Other domestic vulnerabilities include social division, lobbyist-political party collusion, healthcare cutbacks, and veterans’ services, but op-ed space limits further explanation.

International vulnerabilities

With Trump’s tariff policy targeting 194 countries, reciprocal tariffs by other countries against the U.S. are quite possible, which could lead to spiraling economic costs, disrupting global supply chains, and damaging diplomatic relations.

If trade retaliation occurs, many of America’s 3.4 million agricultural producers, who depend on international trade, will face the threat of bankruptcy. Furthermore, many of America’s 34 million small business owners will be at risk of closing shop.

Walter Russell Mead, a columnist for the conservative-oriented Wall Street Journal, reported that since Mr. Trump has taken office, there has been a growing alignment by China, Russia, India, Iran, Pakistan, Egypt, Turkey, Armenia, Azerbaijan, and North Korea against American interests and our 51 formal allies (Sept. 2).

Trump eliminated USAID foreign aid and multilateral cooperation with approximately 100 developing countries. China and Russia are taking advantage of the situation to expand their political and economic influence and take America’s diplomatic place.

President Trump’s failure to work with China has created a situation where China’s cyber actors are positioned to attack America’s water, electricity, and telecommunications infrastructure. China’s military posture around Taiwan and the South China Sea is a purposeful challenge to America’s stance as the leader of the free world. China understands that trade and semiconductor supply chains are vital to the U.S. economy, and it has the upper hand.

Mr. Trump’s failure to control Russia’s attack on Ukraine has enabled Russian-supported hackers, cyber attackers, and information warfare groups to target U.S. government and corporate data. Four Republicans (i.e., Sen. Joni Ernst, Iowa; Sen. Chuck Grassley, Iowa; Sen. Thom Tillis, NC; and Rep. Don Bacon, Neb.) are skeptical of Trump’s international diplomacy as referenced in a Sept. 10 article titled “GOP increasingly says Putin has played Trump” (CNN Politics).

Multiple independent sources note the leaders of China, Russia, and Israel are “playing with Trump” as he hasn’t displayed any diplomatic skills. It’s well-documented that Mr. Trump is a short-term, tactical, and transactional person, as opposed to the long-term, strategic, and relationship-oriented leader Americans have revered and experienced with other presidents.

We have met the enemy

Due to Trump’s policies, the USA’s national security, economic, supply chain, diplomatic relations, civil rights, disaster response, law enforcement, Sino-Russian hostility, humanitarian aid, foreign intervention, and peacebuilding – to name a few – are all more vulnerable to domestic and international conflicts.

If you feel America is in trouble with Trump’s actions, it’s incumbent to alert your three elected delegates in Washington, DC, as to how vulnerable -- domestically and internationally – we have become. Let Congress know they need to step up to Mr. Trump and his cabinet members by upholding their oath of office to “support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic.”

Steve Corbin is a Professor Emeritus of Marketing at, University of Northern Iowa


Read More

 Medical Vial Vaccine on Shelf Table

Peptides like BPC-157, MOTS-c and Semax are surging in popularity despite limited human evidence. Here’s why FDA regulation, research and safety matter.

skaman306/Getty Images

Millions Using Unapproved Peptides as FDA Debates Regulation

Peptides, the short chains of amino acids that help regulate biological functions, have become the latest obsession in health, fitness, and longevity.

Online clinics and wellness influencers promote them as ways to heal injuries, reduce inflammation, improve metabolism, sharpen thinking, and slow aging.

Keep ReadingShow less
An illustration of the U.S. flag on the shape of the U.S. with blue and red figures of people across it.

Every state has its own constitution.

How State Constitutions Became the Battleground for American Rights and Liberties – on Both the Left and Right

Beyond picking governors, state legislators, local officials and representatives to serve in Congress, voters in almost every state this year will have the opportunity to amend the language of their state constitution. In one state, they could potentially rewrite the constitution altogether.

Though the U.S. Constitution is rarely amended, voters frequently amend their state constitutions. In every election cycle, voters are asked to ratify constitutional amendments.

Keep ReadingShow less
The Unscrupulousness of AIPAC

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu addresses the American Israel Public Affairs Committee's annual policy conference at the Washington Convention Center March 6, 2018 in Washington, DC.

(Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)

The Unscrupulousness of AIPAC

After AIPAC failed to defeat El-Sayed in the Michigan Democratic Senate primary—after spending $32 million—it said that it remains committed to defeating El-Sayed and his "radical, anti-Israel" agenda in the general election. Which means it is poised to sink tens of millions of dollars in supporting Republican Mike Rogers. It also said that Haley Stevens, his opponent, had presented "an authentic Democratic agenda." Meaning that El-Sayed did not? And they think that Mike Rogers, a MAGA Trump supporter, does compared with El-Sayed?

How can AIPAC say that El-Sayed does not present an authentic Democratic agenda when his socialist stance is much more in line with the principles stated in the Declaration of Independence than most centrist Democrats'? And making it sound like AIPAC cares about an authentic Democratic agenda is deceitful, when in the same breath they make clear that they will support Mike Rogers, a Trump lackey, in the general election.

Keep ReadingShow less
Scientists Warn of Deepening Federal Attacks on Research
silhouette of person using microscope

Scientists Warn of Deepening Federal Attacks on Research

Scientists and the federal government have been close partners since World War II. A landmark report by President Truman’s chief science advisor laid out a vision for government research that shaped eight decades of federally funded science. That vision is now at risk. In principle, the Trump administration has supported scientific research with its own vision for a new “golden age of science.” But in practice, the administration has upended the relationship between the government, researchers, and their institutions. The changes have alarmed working scientists and their allies, who have protested in record numbers.

In July, I moderated a webinar on “Rewriting the Rules: What’s happening to public science?” (read the transcript here). The webinar was co-sponsored by NAPA, CODE, and the Bridge Alliance, with Dr. Aaron Carroll of AcademyHealth, Dr. Chris Marcum of the Federation of American Scientists, Dr. Gretchen Goldman of the Union of Concerned Scientists, and Dr. Maryam Zaringhalam of the Center for Open Science. I also interviewed Cole Donovan of the Stand Up for Science Foundation by email.

Keep ReadingShow less