Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

From Tariffs to Cyber Threats: The Global Fallout of Trump’s Foreign Policy

New research reveals economic strain, diplomatic isolation and rising cyber threats linked to Trump’s policies

Opinion

From Tariffs to Cyber Threats: The Global Fallout of Trump’s Foreign Policy

U.S. President Donald Trump attends a press conference with UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer (not pictured) at Chequers at the conclusion of a state visit on September 18, 2025 in Aylesbury, England.

(Photo by Leon Neal/Getty Images)

In my last op-ed (Best and worst U.S. presidential cabinets), 15 different research-based sources revealed that Donald Trump’s 2017-2021 and current cabinets are among the worst in U.S. history. The last paragraph of the op-ed stated: “Let’s face reality. A cabinet that ranks historically low with respect to competence, ethical standards, experience, and other research-based competency criteria makes the U.S. vulnerable to a multitude of operational inefficiencies, policy blunders, ethical mishaps, scandals, conflicts of interest, conspiracies, and foreign intervention.”

Several domestic and international conflicts require examination, not from the perspective of a cabinet member, but rather in relation to Trump’s policies and executive actions.


Domestic vulnerabilities

President Trump’s deportation and detention plans, plus the use of heavily armed military personnel for immigration control, have already put a strain on local, state, and national police resources. The paramilitary-style police-state tactics Americans are witnessing and the marginalization of vulnerable groups will certainly lead to further civil unrest and more lawsuits.

Trump’s immigration enforcement will undoubtedly affect 1.6 million construction workers and 1.2 million agricultural laborers, who provide the shelter services and food-related products that Americans depend upon (CBS News). The availability and cost of housing projects and food are in jeopardy.

Many of Mr. Trump’s 202 executive orders have rolled back protections related to gender, race, free speech, free assembly, and voting, further increasing legal and civil unrest. As of September 10, 342 active legal cases challenge Trump’s 2.0 endeavors; taxpayers will likely be responsible for covering the legal fees to defend his actions (Lawfare).

Spending freezes and the random firing of federal workers from FEMA, EPA, and HUD most assuredly risk compromising crisis response efficacy from natural disasters to environmental catastrophes and pandemics.

President Trump’s tariff policy has been assessed on imports from 194 countries (BBC News). Four different analyses note that the tariff-related price increase for America’s 67.5 million working families will be in the $2,400-$5,200 range every year until January 2029 (Yale Budget Lab, Center for American Progress, Petersen Institute, and Joint Economic Committee Republicans).

Other domestic vulnerabilities include social division, lobbyist-political party collusion, healthcare cutbacks, and veterans’ services, but op-ed space limits further explanation.

International vulnerabilities

With Trump’s tariff policy targeting 194 countries, reciprocal tariffs by other countries against the U.S. are quite possible, which could lead to spiraling economic costs, disrupting global supply chains, and damaging diplomatic relations.

If trade retaliation occurs, many of America’s 3.4 million agricultural producers, who depend on international trade, will face the threat of bankruptcy. Furthermore, many of America’s 34 million small business owners will be at risk of closing shop.

Walter Russell Mead, a columnist for the conservative-oriented Wall Street Journal, reported that since Mr. Trump has taken office, there has been a growing alignment by China, Russia, India, Iran, Pakistan, Egypt, Turkey, Armenia, Azerbaijan, and North Korea against American interests and our 51 formal allies (Sept. 2).

Trump eliminated USAID foreign aid and multilateral cooperation with approximately 100 developing countries. China and Russia are taking advantage of the situation to expand their political and economic influence and take America’s diplomatic place.

President Trump’s failure to work with China has created a situation where China’s cyber actors are positioned to attack America’s water, electricity, and telecommunications infrastructure. China’s military posture around Taiwan and the South China Sea is a purposeful challenge to America’s stance as the leader of the free world. China understands that trade and semiconductor supply chains are vital to the U.S. economy, and it has the upper hand.

Mr. Trump’s failure to control Russia’s attack on Ukraine has enabled Russian-supported hackers, cyber attackers, and information warfare groups to target U.S. government and corporate data. Four Republicans (i.e., Sen. Joni Ernst, Iowa; Sen. Chuck Grassley, Iowa; Sen. Thom Tillis, NC; and Rep. Don Bacon, Neb.) are skeptical of Trump’s international diplomacy as referenced in a Sept. 10 article titled “GOP increasingly says Putin has played Trump” (CNN Politics).

Multiple independent sources note the leaders of China, Russia, and Israel are “playing with Trump” as he hasn’t displayed any diplomatic skills. It’s well-documented that Mr. Trump is a short-term, tactical, and transactional person, as opposed to the long-term, strategic, and relationship-oriented leader Americans have revered and experienced with other presidents.

We have met the enemy

Due to Trump’s policies, the USA’s national security, economic, supply chain, diplomatic relations, civil rights, disaster response, law enforcement, Sino-Russian hostility, humanitarian aid, foreign intervention, and peacebuilding – to name a few – are all more vulnerable to domestic and international conflicts.

If you feel America is in trouble with Trump’s actions, it’s incumbent to alert your three elected delegates in Washington, DC, as to how vulnerable -- domestically and internationally – we have become. Let Congress know they need to step up to Mr. Trump and his cabinet members by upholding their oath of office to “support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic.”

Steve Corbin is a Professor Emeritus of Marketing at, University of Northern Iowa


Read More

Silence, Signals, and the Unfinished Story of the Abandoned Disability Rule

Waiting for the Door to Open: Advocates and older workers are left in limbo as the administration’s decision to abandon a harsh disability rule exists only in private assurances, not public record.

AI-created animation

Silence, Signals, and the Unfinished Story of the Abandoned Disability Rule

We reported in the Fulcrum on November 30th that in early November, disability advocates walked out of the West Wing, believing they had secured a rare reversal from the Trump administration of an order that stripped disability benefits from more than 800,000 older manual laborers.

The public record has remained conspicuously quiet on the matter. No press release, no Federal Register notice, no formal statement from the White House or the Social Security Administration has confirmed what senior officials told Jason Turkish and his colleagues behind closed doors in November: that the administration would not move forward with a regulation that could have stripped disability benefits from more than 800,000 older manual laborers. According to a memo shared by an agency official and verified by multiple sources with knowledge of the discussions, an internal meeting in early November involved key SSA decision-makers outlining the administration's intent to halt the proposal. This memo, though not publicly released, is said to detail the political and social ramifications of proceeding with the regulation, highlighting its unpopularity among constituents who would be affected by the changes.

Keep ReadingShow less
How Trump turned a January 6 death into the politics of ‘protecting women’

A memorial for Ashli Babbitt sits near the US Capitol during a Day of Remembrance and Action on the one year anniversary of the January 6, 2021 insurrection.

(John Lamparski/NurPhoto/AP)

How Trump turned a January 6 death into the politics of ‘protecting women’

In the wake of the insurrection at the Capitol on January 6, 2021, President Donald Trump quickly took up the cause of a 35-year-old veteran named Ashli Babbitt.

“Who killed Ashli Babbitt?” he asked in a one-sentence statement on July 1, 2021.

Keep ReadingShow less
Gerrymandering Test the Boundaries of Fair Representation in 2026

Supreme Court, Allen v. Milligan Illegal Congressional Voting Map

Gerrymandering Test the Boundaries of Fair Representation in 2026

A wave of redistricting battles in early 2026 is reshaping the political map ahead of the midterm elections and intensifying long‑running fights over gerrymandering and democratic representation.

In California, a three‑judge federal panel on January 15 upheld the state’s new congressional districts created under Proposition 50, ruling 2–1 that the map—expected to strengthen Democratic advantages in several competitive seats—could be used in the 2026 elections. The following day, a separate federal court dismissed a Republican lawsuit arguing that the maps were unconstitutional, clearing the way for the state’s redistricting overhaul to stand. In Virginia, Democratic lawmakers have advanced a constitutional amendment that would allow mid‑decade redistricting, a move they describe as a response to aggressive Republican map‑drawing in other states; some legislators have openly discussed the possibility of a congressional map that could yield 10 Democratic‑leaning seats out of 11. In Missouri, the secretary of state has acknowledged in court that ballot language for a referendum on the state’s congressional map could mislead voters, a key development in ongoing litigation over the fairness of the state’s redistricting process. And in Utah, a state judge has ordered a new congressional map that includes one Democratic‑leaning district after years of litigation over the legislature’s earlier plan, prompting strong objections from Republican lawmakers who argue the court exceeded its authority.

Keep ReadingShow less
New Year’s Resolutions for Congress – and the Country

Speaker of the House Mike Johnson (R-LA) (L) and Rep. August Pfluger (R-TX) lead a group of fellow Republicans through Statuary Hall on the way to a news conference on the 28th day of the federal government shutdown at the U.S. Capitol on October 28, 2025 in Washington, DC.

Getty Images, Chip Somodevilla

New Year’s Resolutions for Congress – and the Country

Every January 1st, many Americans face their failings and resolve to do better by making New Year’s Resolutions. Wouldn’t it be delightful if Congress would do the same? According to Gallup, half of all Americans currently have very little confidence in Congress. And while confidence in our government institutions is shrinking across the board, Congress is near rock bottom. With that in mind, here is a list of resolutions Congress could make and keep, which would help to rebuild public trust in Congress and our government institutions. Let’s start with:

1 – Working for the American people. We elect our senators and representatives to work on our behalf – not on their behalf or on behalf of the wealthiest donors, but on our behalf. There are many issues on which a large majority of Americans agree but Congress can’t. Congress should resolve to address those issues.

Keep ReadingShow less