To celebrate the holiday season with our readers, The Fulcrum would like to share John Lennon’s classic song, Happy Xmas (War is Over). As we reflect on 2022 and look ahead to the promise of a new year, we hope you find the joy and magic of the season with your family, friends and colleagues.
Site Navigation
Search
Latest Stories
Join a growing community committed to civic renewal.
Subscribe to The Fulcrum and be part of the conversation.
Top Stories
Latest news
Read More
A Rare Bipartisan Housing Bill Just Became Law – but Americans Will Still Struggle With Affordability
Jul 16, 2026
A sweeping housing measure, which became law on July 11, 2026, is being widely celebrated as a crucial step in addressing the nation’s housing crisis. The ROAD to Housing Act is one of the few substantive bills passed by Congress in recent years, and the first major housing bill enacted since the 1990s.
Despite clearing Congress with overwhelming margins in the Senate and the House, the measure encountered one final hiccup when President Donald Trump abruptly canceled its signing ceremony on June 24, and then again refused to sign it on July 10. However, since Trump did not veto the bill, it automatically became law at 12:01 a.m. on July 11.
Despite the bipartisan support, however, even supporters say it doesn’t do enough to ease America’s housing affordability crunch.
Many of the 60 provisions in the wide-ranging bill are regulatory in nature, such as streamlining environmental impact reviews and reducing the frequency of inspections for homes with tenants receiving federal rental assistance. Others seek to make it easier for homebuyers to acquire financing.
These elements and more could help move the needle on the nation’s housing morass.
But as housing policy scholars, we believe the improvements will be only marginal. That’s because the reforms do not address the main source of the nation’s housing problem: that millions of renters and homeowners lack the income necessary to cover their housing costs.
Promising changes
The bill does include several important reforms.
The provision that has received the most attention limits the ability of private equity firms and other institutional investors to acquire and operate single-family homes as rental properties.
Although institutional investors account for about 2% of all single-family rentals nationally, they have a bigger presence in certain housing markets, mostly in the South. These firms will typically purchase homes in cash, disadvantaging individual homebuyers who need to take out a mortgage. They’ve also been known to more aggressively raise rents and initiate eviction proceedings than other landlords.
The legislation also includes several measures aimed at reducing home prices and increasing housing supply.
One reduces the cost of manufactured housing – often known as mobile homes – by eliminating the requirement to include a steel chassis that can be attached to wheels. This is expected to reduce building costs by around US$5,000 to $10,000, or about 4% to 8% of the average cost of a new unit.
Other cost-saving elements include streamlining environmental reviews for proposed housing developments and encouraging new designs for midsize apartment buildings that would allow for just one stairway. Fire safety regulations have long required multifamily buildings to contain two or more staircases so that residents can exit their homes safely if one staircase is impassable because of smoke or other reasons.
However, improvements in fire safety have largely eliminated the need for the second staircase in midsize buildings. By eliminating the two-stairway requirement, developers can reduce their construction costs and have more flexibility in their architectural designs.
Another component requires the Department of Housing and Urban Development to issue guidelines and “best-practice frameworks” for zoning and land-use policies, presumably to nudge cities and towns to allow developers to build smaller homes on smaller lots.
To further facilitate housing construction, the bill requires local governments that receive federal funding for community development to publish a “searchable online database of undeveloped land parcels,” which is intented to make it easier to identify potential low-cost development sites.
The bill also encourages the Federal Housing Administration and other lenders to issue “small dollar mortgages” of less than $100,000. Currently, when low-priced homes are available, it can be difficult for interested homebuyers to obtain financing because it is more profitable for lenders to underwrite larger mortgages.
Finally, the law reauthorizes for three years the Community Development Block Grant Disaster Recovery program. This program helps cities, counties and states recover from disasters declared by U.S. presidents, focusing on low- and moderate-income households.
While most of the legislation focuses on homeowner housing, a couple of provisions address important challenges for subsidized rental housing. One seeks to encourage landlord participation in the Housing Choice Voucher Program by making it easier for landlords to satisfy the federal government’s housing inspection requirements.
Another provision helps protect low-income rural renters from losing their homes when the federally funded mortgages on their buildings expire. Currently, these rent subsidies, which are provided by the Department of Agriculture, can only be used in the buildings it finances. Many of these mortgages are due to expire over the next few years, putting residents with rental assistance at risk of eviction. The legislation will enable these households to remain in place or move to other buildings without federally funded mortgages.
Americans are still being crushed by costs
Yet as sweeping as the bill is, its impact is likely to be modest.
Nearly all of the legislation involves regulatory changes. The bill does not increase subsidies available to low-income renters and homeowners, or to potential homebuyers.
The majority of all renters are cost burdened, meaning they currently spend more than 30% of their income on housing. Over a quarter of all homeowners are cost burdened, too. The legislation almost certainly will not diminish this affordability crisis.
Sens. Tim Scott, R-S.C., and Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., were key architects of the bipartisan ROAD to Housing Act. Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call via Getty Images
Several measures aim to reduce the cost of new housing. But with few exceptions, they are contingent on the support and participation of states, cities and suburbs.
For example, nothing in the bill requires localities to change their zoning and building codes to allow more apartment buildings or smaller single-family homes to be built at higher densities. Homeowners are usually strongly opposed to development if they fear it will change the character of their community or lower the value of their property. Existing homeowners do not want – and almost certainly will not allow – a wholesale erosion of their home equity. They will continue to fight to preserve the valuations of their homes.
Nor does the House’s passage of the bill mean that Congress has become more supportive of low-income housing. On the same day that the House passed the bill, the House Appropriations Committee released its fiscal year 2027 budget proposal for Transportation, Housing and Urban Development. It included cuts to public housing, Community Development Block Grants, the Home Investment Partnership Program and the Housing Choice Voucher Program.
Now that it is law, the 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act will hopefully accelerate reform efforts. But on its own, it’s less a speedway that will supercharge housing supply and provide immediate relief for the most cost-burdened Americans, and more a modest on-ramp that reflects the limits of what’s politically feasible in a divided and polarized Congress.
A Rare Bipartisan Housing Bill Just Became Law – but Americans Will Still Struggle With Affordability was originally published by The Conversation and is republished with permission.
Keep ReadingShow less
Recommended

187 participants in the City of Tallahassee's nationally recognized youth program Tallahassee Engaged in Meaningful Productivity for Opportunity graduated on Thursday, June 22, 2023.
Alicia Devine/Tallahassee Democrat
TEMPO Reconnects Former High Schoolers with Education and Career Opportunities
Jul 15, 2026
TALLAHASSEE, FLA — As high school graduation rates are projected to decline, Florida’s capital has found a unique way to give former students a path to higher education.
The Tallahassee Engaged in Meaningful Productivity for Opportunities (TEMPO) program, founded in 2017, is aimed at providing individuals aged 16-24 who may not have graduated from high school with the means to earn a GED and a connection to work opportunities around the Tallahassee area with the aid of partnered organizations and agencies.
Kimball Thomas, former principal of Rickards High School, realized that instead of pushing these students towards traditional educational pathways, there needed to be a way to re-engage them within their community.
After leaving his work as a principal, he realized how he could connect these students with new opportunities.
“When I became involved with the city, I realized there's a population of kids out there on our streets who are high school dropouts who are subject to crime, drugs, and living in poverty. We need some type of initiative to re-engage these kids,” said Thomas.
Graduation rates are a priority for a school district. The more students who graduate successfully from a high school program, the more likely they are to succeed outside of the K-12 system in place.
The Leon County School District, which houses Tallahassee schools, has a graduation rate of 87.9%, only about 4% below the Florida average. However, what happens to the other 12% who don’t graduate from Tallahassee high schools annually?
Seeing students disappear from the community without graduating from high school is what prompted Thomas to create a program for students who may not have graduated from traditional high schools.
Thomas shared that the program began with a graduating class of 12 GED recipients in June of 2018 and has since created opportunities for students to earn technical degrees and work with local fire and police departments.
Through collaborations with employers in Tallahassee’s local community, the program has provided students and alumni with work opportunities.
“We got kids in underground utilities and public infrastructure; we've had kids in electric and gas. Almost every department has had a TEMPO kid that they've given an opportunity to,” said Thomas.
TEMPO doesn’t just wait for students to join its cohorts. Thomas shares that the majority of students who join each year come from on-the-ground recruiting, even sharing that sometimes it comes down to finding them “in their backyards.”
After recruiting students, the program works to connect each participant to a team of city employees that guides them throughout the next steps of the program.
“We have our case managers who help these kids through action planning and having a goal. Case managers are really putting in the day-to-day work to make this happen with the program,” said Thomas.
Thomas believes that the goal of the program isn’t just to connect students with these opportunities years after dropping out, but to scout them out before they make the next step.
“We have worked with the school district more on these kids who are on the cusp of dropping out of school, and they don't go one to two or three years before we find them to have that kind of partnership and expand that narrative, so that kids who are really struggling and look like they're not going to graduate on time can make an even smoother transition into the City of Tallahassee’s TEMPO program,” said Thomas.
This year, the program reached its largest milestone, with over 160 graduates, including over 40 who earned technical certificates from Lively Technical College, Tallahassee State College, and Florida Health Science Consulting.
But the program goes far beyond just giving these students degrees, according to Thomas. 4,200 students have since engaged with the program, and the city reports that none of its participants have been convicted of a crime since their participation. For Thomas, the program is defined through support from the local community.
“We've had unanimous city commission reports and support since it started. So you know, with that phenomenon going on, and that kind of engagement happening for people to keep them away from crime and to give them hope and opportunity, how could the community not support it?” said Thomas.
Through the program’s success, a STOP-GAP poverty initiative was launched in 2020 to allow the relatives of students or alumni from the program who also did not graduate with their high school diplomas.
This expansion has given untraditional students outside of the 16-24 age bracket the opportunity to receive their GED. Thomas shares that watching the STOP-GAP initiative start and seeing families receive their diplomas together has been an incomparable experience as a former principal.
“In last year's group was one of my former students. I was their principal in a high school year 30 years ago, [they] came back into this program, and I ended up finally giving that kid his high school diploma,” said Thomas. “Can you imagine that this kid dropped out when I was his principal 30 years ago?”
According to U.S. Census data, about 93.7% of adults aged 25 and above are high school graduates, only around three percent above the state average of 89.9%
As the program continues to expand, Thomas hopes it won't stop at creating the STOP-GAP initiative. His next goal is to open a community re-engagement center for students and alumni, and with the program’s growth thus far, this goal doesn’t seem too distant.
“I would say right now the next step is to look at a re-engagement center one day to look at having a place that these kids can call their own, and a place where they can meet and talk, and people can come by and rally behind them, and have events,” said Thomas.
Gabriela Quintero is an incoming freshman at Barnard College of Columbia University, pursuing her B.A. in Political Science and English. Interested in politics, migration, policy, and culture, she hopes to pursue a career in political and cultural journalism.
Keep ReadingShow less
Wheat Ridge Residents Tackle Sustainability and Equity
Jul 15, 2026
Civic muscle is easy to find in Wheat Ridge, Colorado, where residents often step up to address issues such as sustainability, equity, and neighborhood quality. A 2021 All-America City, Wheat Ridge was inducted into the AAC Hall of Fame in 2024, largely because of resident-led initiatives like Wheat Ridge for Equity and Localworks.
The death of George Floyd in 2020 sparked an extensive conversation in Wheat Ridge focused on systemic racism. Wheat Ridge community members created an organization called Wheat Ridge for Equity and began demonstrating six days a week to support the Black Lives Matter movement. Wheat Ridge for Equity members asked the city to begin ongoing equity training for all city staff and to create an equity task force to review all city departments and policies for racism and bigotry.
In September 2020, the City Council directed staff to implement the suggested actions, and city management scheduled Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion training for all city staff and the City Council. In addition, the city hosted two virtual public conversations in the summer and fall and adopted a resolution condemning racism.
Wheat Ridge for Equity continues as an organization today, advocating for “marginalized groups—LGBTQ+, BIPOC, immigrants, and more—to create a truly inclusive community.” The group organizes marches and other events in Wheat Ridge and beyond. As Terry Gale, Co-Chair for the Wheat Ridge Race and Equity Task Force in 2021, said to the AAC jury, “Wheat Ridge is all about having tough conversations, creating space for all voices, and taking meaningful actions. We are making Wheat Ridge a more inclusive, equitable, and resilient community.”
Localworks was founded in 2005 as a group of residents and businesses whose mission is “to advance Wheat Ridge as a vibrant and sustainable community.” Among the programs supported by the group is a food bank, a seven-week leadership academy, and a Block Party Library, a collection of equipment that residents can borrow for block parties and other neighborhood events, including yard games, electronic equipment, inflatables, and more.
Localworks also sponsors and promotes activities in support of Sustainable Wheat Ridge, a resident-led advisory committee assembled in 2018 that created an action plan to make the city more sustainable. The committee has worked with the local utility company to fund home energy audits and with the Regional Air Quality Council to provide rebates for electric lawnmowers. A Sustainable Neighborhood Network was also formed to convene neighborhood residents to implement sustainability programming tailored to their needs and interests.
Wheat Ridge residents told the All-America Cities jury in 2021 that they recognized that, at one time, Wheat Ridge was not seen as a welcoming city, so they had to “adapt and embrace change, to become more resilient and inclusive.” A citizen activist, turned council member, Rachel Hultin, said, “From grass roots to city hall, we do things together in Wheat Ridge. We needed to disrupt the entrenched civic voices to include people with a diversity of lived experiences to better represent the actual diversity of our city.”
In 2015, Hultin and other residents created a neighborhood leadership program, the Wheaties Academy, to “build the bench of community leaders and to ensure that the diversity of engaged civic voices reflected the actual diversity of the city. This program evolved into Wheat Ridge 101 and 102, leadership academies which are now hosted by Localworks.
Some of the city’s resident leadership and civic engagement efforts stem from outreach efforts in response to economic decline in the early 2000s. At the time, Wheat Ridge began work on a Neighborhood Revitalization Strategy, laying the groundwork for a thriving community with robust housing and bustling commercial centers. However, by 2018, as Wheat Ridge witnessed noticeable shifts and tension arose between its historic roots as a quirky small town and the need to embrace progress, the city began a new planning effort, starting with a community listening process called “Let’s Talk Resident Engagement Program.”
Structured around 10 neighborhoods, the Let’s Talk program conducted engagement blitzes over 4–5 months within a 3-year cycle, leading to budget reallocations and new work plans. Based on these changes, the city completed new action items, but soon discovered the need for new funding to pay for infrastructure enhancements like improved sidewalk connectivity to the expansion of bike lanes. The Let’s Talk process was used to inform a ballot question to extend the .5 cent sales tax to fund critical infrastructure projects, which was adopted by voters with overwhelming support, with 70% of voters in favor.
More recently, the city has created several other civic engagement programs, including What’s Up Wheat Ridge, to enhance online community engagement, and Wheat Ridge Speaks to provide official public comment on city council and planning commission items. Wheat Ridge Speaks hosted 54 meetings on the platform in 2020, and 166 comments were submitted with 5,528 website visits.
This combination of resident-led initiatives and open civic engagement has led to a thriving economy in Wheat Ridge, along with improved neighborhood quality, making the town a more inclusive, sustainable place where residents feel a strong sense of belonging. As a member of the city’s delegation told the AAC jury in 2021, “working together, Wheat Ridge strives to be a city where every community member is the key to opening more doors to being a more welcoming, more resilient, and more inclusive, while staying uniquely Wheat Ridge.”
Doug Linkhart is the President of the National Civic League.
Keep ReadingShow less

New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani and US Senator Bernie Sanders (I-VT) speak to supporters during the Mayor's 100-day address on April 12, 2026 in New York City.
Ryan Murphy / Getty Images
Just What Is a Socialist?
Jul 15, 2026
Gertrude Stein famously wrote, "A rose is a rose is a rose is a rose," meaning everyone knows what a rose is. The same cannot be said of a Socialist.
There are many Democratic politicians who proudly call themselves Socialists or Democratic Socialists, and there are many adversaries who brand those individuals as Socialists. Both sides use the same word, but the word means very different things to the two sides.
First, the dictionary/political science definition of socialism is:
"1. any of various egalitarian economic and political theories or movements advocating collective or governmental ownership and administration of the means of production and distribution of goods."
This does not define Bernie Sanders, Zohran Mamdani, or other Democrats who call themselves Socialists. This is despite the fact that the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) has as a goal "to collectively own the key economic drivers that dominate our lives, such as energy production and transportation."
Even the DSA, saying that the end of capitalism is unlikely in the foreseeable future, instead focuses on increasing the power of the people within a democratic capitalist structure. "At the root of our socialism is a profound commitment to democracy, as means and end.... DSA fights for reforms today that will weaken the power of corporations and increase the power of working people. For example, we support reforms that: decrease the influence of money in politics, empower ordinary people in workplaces and the economy, and restructure gender and cultural relationships to be more equitable."
The DSA is thus, from a practical perspective, an organization fighting for a democracy as defined by the Declaration of Independence, a democracy that is all about securing the rights of all people and the equality of all people. Indeed, Thomas Jefferson, in his last letter, stated that the Declaration of Independence gave voice to the truth that the "mass of mankind has not been born with saddles on their backs, nor a favored few booted and spurred, ready to ride them legitimately, by the grace of God."
And that is what Bernie Sanders, Zohran Mamdani, and others are fighting for. They are not arguing for government or collective ownership of any means of production. And thus they are not Socialists—with a capital "S"—even though they are members of the DSA. They are socialists only in the sense that they believe that the government must be focused more on the rights of the people. Neither they nor the DSA present a threat to our capitalist structure—to some of its details, yes, but not the basic structure,
They are Democrats seeking a government that is focused on fulfilling the promises of our founding principles—the equality of all; the right of all to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness; and the role of government being to secure those rights—while recognizing that to do that, creating the conditions for a prosperous economy and industry is essential for government to secure these rights for all.
But Republicans sense the opportunity to create a bogeyman that scares off voters. And so Republicans brand members of the DSA as Socialists—with a capital 'S"—or even Communists—an accusation of being un-American—as Trump has recently done.
But there is nothing communistic about the DSA. As noted above, their commitment to democracy is central. What they are fighting for is a democracy—within our capitalist system—that is truer to the founding principles of our country.
Likewise, the Democratic centrists who recently published their new "Promise to America" and resorted to the trope of calling DSA members "Socialists" are also seeking to negatively brand them. They need to recognize the flaw in their approach, and if they truly want to accomplish what they state in their Promise, they will have to shift to the left and more forcefully support the rights of the people as promised in the Declaration of Independence, knowing that that will mean that they will oppose corporate interests with some regularity.
And I would respectfully suggest that Sanders, Mamdani, and others stop labelling themselves as Socialists because that label is not technically appropriate and gives Trump and his MAGA allies ammunition with which to rouse the very people who they are fighting for to vote against them. Their recent success in election primaries is not a function of this label but of the message that they are advocating.
Ronald L. Hirsch is a teacher, legal aid lawyer, survey researcher, nonprofit executive, consultant, composer, author, and volunteer. He is a graduate of Brown University and the University of Chicago Law School and the author of We Still Hold These Truths. Read more of his writing at www.PreservingAmericanValues.com
Keep ReadingShow less
Load More


















