Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Not All Change Is Good: Medicaid, Medicare Shifts Are Everyone’s Problem

Opinion

A Senior Man Using A Laptop Computer And Paying Bills With Nurse

H.R. 1 could leave millions uninsured, increase healthcare costs, strain hospitals, and affect even Americans with employer-sponsored health insurance.

miniseries/Getty Images

Like 155 million other Americans, I get my health insurance coverage through my employer. The millions like me who are not on Medicaid or Medicare may not be closely tracking the massive changes coming to public insurance programs because of H.R.1 (also known as President Donald Trump’s “One Big Beautiful Bill Act”).

But over the next decade, it’s estimated that up to 10 million people may lose health insurance because of changes to Medicare and Medicaid.


And everyone is going to pay for it.

As Associate Chief Medical Officer of Covered California, I witness that health insurance coverage gains since the Affordable Care Act have resulted in more affordable healthcare, better health outcomes across a variety of conditions such as cancer and substance use disorder and saved tens of thousands of American lives.

In California, the uninsured rate dropped from 18% before the ACA to below 6% in 2024. Longstanding evidence shows that higher rates of health insurance coverage mean that more people have a front door to the healthcare system, access preventive and primary care, are protected against catastrophic costs from accidents or major diagnoses and are more likely to get the care they need for chronic conditions.

Unsurprisingly, the opposite is true when people lose health insurance coverage. Access to primary care and preventive services are standard and free across health insurance plans thanks to the ACA. Without health insurance, people seek care later, when they’re sicker, and where it’s more costly - in the emergency room.

Before the Affordable Care Act took effect and expanded health insurance access, I was a first year Internal Medicine resident working in the ICU. A woman in her 40s was admitted with a tumor visibly bursting out of her chest.

She had a cancerous breast mass that had grown so large and so destructive it had started to bleed, and the bleeding was finally what prompted her to go to the emergency room. She required extensive hospital care, and had very advanced cancer that, by the time she came to the hospital, could no longer be cured.

When I asked her why she hadn’t come in sooner she said she had nowhere to go and no way to pay for it. Since she had no health insurance coverage, she had ignored the tumor on her body until it had started to weep.

When people without insurance seek care in emergency rooms, emergency rooms are required to care for them, even though no insurance company will pay the hospital for this care.

When doctors and hospitals can’t get reimbursed enough to cover costs for patients without insurance, they rely on public funding sources to fill in the gap. With H.R. 1, these federal funding sources are being stripped away.

If they’re not already doing so, doctors and hospitals may shift their gaze toward commercial health insurance companies to make up these costs. They may be forced to cut services, making it more difficult for those of us with insurance to access care.

On the one-year anniversary of its passage through Congress, over 1 million Californians are projected to lose insurance coverage in 2027 as H.R.1 changes take effect. As a doctor, I fear a regression back to that time in the ICU when patients came in seeking treatment later, when they were sicker.

And as someone with health insurance, I recognize that companies will need to find money to cover the costs for those people. Although H.R. 1 was designed to impact insurance for people with low incomes or certain immigration statuses, the cost will be all of ours to pay.

This issue may seem less pressing for Americans whose employers cover the cost of their health insurance or for those with very high incomes. But even the current healthcare workforce is stretched thin and there are only so many doctor’s offices and hospital beds to go around.

If they cannot keep their doors open, there won’t be anywhere left to go.

And even though they’re paying more each year, a shocking number of people don’t take advantage of the health insurance coverage they have. One in five people with commercial health insurance coverage don’t use it at all-- not one doctor’s visit, flu shot, medication fill, or screening test. And for young men age 18-34, that increases to one in three.

Blood pressure screenings, cancer screening tests, and annual preventive visits are $0 with health insurance, thanks to the Affordable Care Act, but Americans aren’t getting their money’s worth. To hold health insurance companies to account, and to make sure that Americans are getting the value they deserve and the care they need, the easiest, cheapest thing to do is take advantage of the coverage they have.

With changes due to H.R. 1 looming, it’s especially important to vote in November and to understand the consequences today. Though the changes may not have been aimed at all Americans, the cuts to healthcare access and coverage will have a ripple effect on us all.


Barbara Rubino is the Associate Chief Medical Officer at Covered California and a Public Voices Fellow on Public Health with The OpEd Project and Blue Shield California Foundation.


Read More

The All-America City of San Antonio Collaborates to Address Teen Pregnancy and Other Issues
person in green pants sitting on white textile
Photo by Vanessa on Unsplash

The All-America City of San Antonio Collaborates to Address Teen Pregnancy and Other Issues

San Antonio, TX, has been working to reduce teen pregnancy for over two decades, making considerable progress through collaborations among the city, county, nonprofit organizations, and the University of Texas. A nine-time All-America City, one of San Antonio’s key community collaborations, SA 2020, harnessed civic muscle to create and achieve dozens of measurable goals, including a significant reduction in teen pregnancy.

The San Antonio Teen Pregnancy Collaborative (SATPPC) was formed in 2010 in response to news that Bexar County had one of the highest rates of teen births in the United States. The SATPPC brought together an impressive list of cross-sector organizations, including public entities, community-based organizations, and faith-based and secular institutions. The group’s overall goal was to reduce the Bexar County teen birth rate among females ages 15 to 19 by 15% by 2020, and it exceeded this goal even before that date.

Keep Reading Show less
In Milwaukee, J.D. Vance Ties Trump's Fraud Task Force to Medicaid and SNAP Crackdowns

U.S. Vice President JD Vance speaks at the 128th Air Refueling Wing Hangar on July 08, 2026, in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. Vance traveled to Milwaukee to deliver remarks on the Trump administration's anti-fraud initiatives.

(Photo by Scott Olson/Getty Images)

In Milwaukee, J.D. Vance Ties Trump's Fraud Task Force to Medicaid and SNAP Crackdowns

MILWAUKEE, Wisconsin– Vice President J.D. Vance visited Milwaukee on July 8 to promote the Trump administration’s crackdown on fraud at the state and federal levels in programs like Medicare and SNAP.

Speaking inside an aircraft hangar at the Wisconsin Air National Guard’s 128th Air Refueling Wing, in front of a banner reading “Protect Taxpayer Dollars,” Vance cast the anti‑fraud efforts to protect both taxpayers and the programs themselves.

Keep Reading Show less
​U.S. Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.

U.S. Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. participates in a roundtable discussion on efforts to combat per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) with U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Administrator Lee Zeldin at EPA headquarters on May 18, 2026 in Washington, DC.

Heather Diehl/Getty Images

RFK Jr. Received Compassion When He Was Arrested for Heroin, but My Patients Do Not

In 1983, while on a flight to South Dakota, a 29-year-old Robert F. Kennedy Jr. was reported to have developed profuse sweating, pallor, and a weak pulse. Authorities searched his luggage and discovered two-tenths of a gram of heroin. He pled guilty to a felony charge, and the judge ordered him to two years of probation instead of a possible jail sentence. He entered rehabilitation for substance use and shared that since then, he has been in recovery for 43 years.

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is now the U.S. Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS). He has shown tremendous courage in sharing the story of substance use, including his LSD, methamphetamine, and heroin use. I cannot imagine the amount of stigma he has endured. I hope that his success encourages others to seek treatment. Yet as an addiction medicine physician, I am also struck by how different my patients' experiences are from those of Kennedy.

Keep Reading Show less
stethoscope and us dollar bills on blue-colored background.

Millions of Americans face rising healthcare costs and coverage gaps. Learn how strengthening the Affordable Care Act can improve affordability and access.

Getty Images, aaaaimages

When Health Care Becomes a Choice, Something Is Broken

Recently, a nurse told me she had to choose between paying for her husband’s surgery and putting a new roof on their home. “We’re praying for no rain,” she said. In that moment, the distance between political promises and real life collapsed. This is what the economy feels like for millions of Americans — not a graph, not a headline, but a quiet calculation of which basic need they can afford to meet. No family in a nation as wealthy as ours should have to rely on the weather to survive.

For years, Americans were promised that the Affordable Care Act (ACA) would be replaced with something better, cheaper, and available to everyone. That promise never became policy. Congress never passed a comprehensive replacement. The closest attempt, the American Health Care Act (AHCA), collapsed under the weight of its own numbers. The Congressional Budget Office found that it would have left 23 million more Americans uninsured, caused 14 million to lose coverage in the first year alone, cut Medicaid by $834 billion, and raised premiums for older adults to levels many could never pay. A 64‑year‑old making $26,500 a year would have seen premiums jump from $1,700 under the ACA to more than $14,000. Protections for people with pre‑existing conditions would have weakened. That is not “better.” That is not “cheaper.” And it certainly was not “for everyone.”

Keep Reading Show less