Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

The Genesis of America’s Debt Problem

Opinion

​Piles of US $1 bills

Piles of US $1 bills split into sections of various hieght, red abstract background

Getty Images

Their [Trump Administration] new budget framework is the most irresponsible in modern history - and will put the American economy on a very dangerous trajectory.

The Brookings Institution, 2025


America’s growing sovereign debt problem threatens living standards.

A first step in crafting solutions to the problem is understanding the policy framework at fault. While partisanship colors that discussion, a consensus of economists places blame primarily on tax cuts over the past 25 years.

The American Sovereign Debt Problem

There is a bright mathematical line nations cross to have a debt problem. When the interest rate for servicing its sovereign debt exceeds the nominal rate of GDP growth, that debt begins compounding faster than a nation’s tax base is expanding, steadily raising debt, interest rates, and inflation.

Few are aware that the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) expects the U.S. to cross that line in 2028 for the first time in its history. One group, however, is keenly aware, as described by the Brookings Institution’s budget expert, Jessica Reidl, in The Atlantic:

“The White House and congressional leaders I regularly brief know that Washington’s debt path is unsustainable. They also expect to be out of government when the bill comes due and see no reason to anger voters in the meantime by ending the tax-cuts-and-spending party.”

This sanguinity of President Trump and Congressional leaders (meaning Republicans since 2025) reflects their obsession with tax cuts. It also reflects comfort with credit-card budgeting - they are financing 25% of federal spending nowadays with new debt. While a financial market reckoning is not imminent, this fiscally irresponsible leadership has put the U.S. on a quite dangerous trajectory – a trajectory established in 2001.

The Genesis

It was a remarkable, auspicious moment in 2001 with CBO projected elimination of the entire national debt by 2006.

Yep, all of it. Zero, zilch.

That remarkable touchstone reflected decades of responsible fiscal policies pursued by most Republican and Democratic Presidents alike since World War II.

That fiscal nirvana was not to be.

In March 2026, the national debt-to-GDP ratio passed 100%. An alarmed CBO worried that the “debt is currently at the highest level in American history and keeps rising,” the CBO Director declaring that the nation’s budget trajectory is not sustainable.

This stunning fiscal collapse reflects 25 years of serial tax cuts and recessions in 2007 and 2020 that sent the national debt soaring. Most impactful were five large tax cuts by George W. Bush and Trump that caused federal tax revenues to decline from an average of 18.6% of GDP from 1995-2001 to only 16.4% of GDP since 2002.

The abandonment of historic Republican Party balanced budget orthodoxy can best be marked by a single moment: January 25, 2001. Alan Greenspan, leading economic strategist for the new President George W. Bush, was testifying before Congress. Thanks to decades of fiscal discipline, experts agreed that America would pay off its entire national debt in six years.

All President Bush had to do was, well … nothing. Just continue President Clinton’s fiscal policies producing budget surpluses.

But Greenspan and the Republicans had another, higher priority. By then, the Republican Party had become dominated by its wealthy donor base. They supported balanced budgets prior to Reagan. But that changed in 1981 with the introduction of trickle-down Reaganomics. As Kansas proved, it was a fantasy popularized by President Reagan that tax cuts magically do not reduce tax revenues or add to the national debt.

Greenspan’s Congressional testimony astonishingly warned of the “peril” of eliminating the national debt - and urged tax cuts.

The consequence has been 25 years of Republican tax cuts - two Bush cuts in 2001 and 2003, and the even larger Trump cuts in 2017, 2020, and 2025. Skewed to benefit elites, the corporate tax rate was cut from 35% in 2000 to 21% now.

Adding to the debt was Greenspan’s ideological decision as Federal Reserve Board Chairman to deregulate Wall Street – especially squirrelly subprime mortgages. That blunder precipitated the 2007 Great Recession, forcing compensatory government spending to spike – which ballooned budget deficits.

Responsibility for the Soaring National Debt

Republicans deflect accountability for the rise in debt due to their tax cuts by blaming demographics (too many baby boomers) plus government spending by Democrats Obama and Biden. However, that additional spending was primarily a consequence of the 2008 and 2020 recessions – temporary one-time counter-cyclical spending to ameliorate the downturns. In contrast to the Democrats, the five Bush and Trump tax cuts were permanent, engineered debt-drivers of choice, financing tax cuts for elites - saddling Federal budgets with permanent structural revenue shortfalls forever.

Economists at the Center for American Progress have determined, for instance, that the five tax cuts account for “more than 90 percent of the increase in the debt ratio if the one-time costs of bills responding to COVID-19 and the Great Recession are excluded….Without the Bush and Trump tax cuts, debt as a percentage of the economy would be declining permanently.”

The Tax Cut Reckoning

Any debt crisis for the powerful American economy is years away. However, accruing sizable sovereign debt does portend slower economic growth. CBO calculates that the rising debt is adding about 0.6% (6/10th) of a percentage point to Treasury bond interest rates - raising mortgage and other household interest costs while crowding out private investment. CBO also projects that every additional dollar of government debt reduces private investment by 33 cents in R&D and new, more productive factories and jobs. Consequently, it projects that American living standards will begin deteriorating, with GDP growth declining to only 1.8% in the years ahead from an average of 2.4% since 2016.

That means all of America’s key economic variables – budget deficits, national debt, interest rates, debt servicing costs, GDP growth - are moving in the wrong direction.

Responsible Leadership to Corral Debt

The scale and scope of America’s sovereign debt problem requires a combination of tax hikes and spending cuts. True, America has a window of a few years to craft solutions. A clear understanding that tax cuts have been the primary cause of the fiscal collapse since 2001 is the first building block.

Even so, the political parties are far apart on answers - and crafting remedies in these polarized times could require years. Moreover, history is not particularly encouraging, with the best past solution involving a bipartisan commission that was only a partial success.

George Tyler is a former deputy assistant treasury secretary and World Bank official. He is the author of books including Billionaire Democracy and What Went Wrong.


Read More

A man in a green shirt and a man in a flannel shirt.

A man in a green shirt and a man in a flannel shirt marched and chanted down the street in protest.

Getty Images

Failed Supply-Side Economics Needs Immigrants as Scapegoats

From a political economy perspective, supply-side economics relies on immigrant scapegoating to divert public attention from the structural inequality and wage stagnation caused by its own policies.

By shifting the blame for economic anxiety away from corporate deregulation, underfunded public services, and upward wealth distribution onto a vulnerable out-group, proponents of supply-side policies can protect their core economic agenda.

Keep Reading Show less
battery electrolyte facility

BlueOval, a Ford manufacturing campus in Stanton Tennessee, laid off workers at its battery electrolyte facility in March, as it prepared to transition to SK On Tennessee.

(Adobe Stock)

Canceled Clean Energy Grants Threaten Tennessee Projects, Jobs

The Sierra Club of Tennessee said the Trump administration's decision to scrap $7.6 billion in clean energy grants has affected eight projects in the state.

Court documents confirmed the federal government canceled more than 300 grants in 16 states because they voted for Kamala Harris in the 2024 election.

Keep Reading Show less
American dollars positioned around each other.

With the national debt topping $40.05 trillion, economists across the political spectrum argue that relying exclusively on Supply-Side Economics is damaging the American economy structurally.

dblight/Getty Images

$40 Trillion National Debt & Future of Failed Supply-Side Economics

The U.S. gross national debt has officially surpassed $40 trillion, an unprecedented milestone that marks a critical turning point in the decades-long debate over supply-side economics.

The core promise of supply-side economics—famously popularized by the Laffer Curve—is that tax cuts and deregulation stimulate so much business activity and capital investment that they eventually "pay for themselves" through increased tax revenue. However, the reality of a $40 trillion debt load, accelerated by massive deficit-financed tax packages like the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 and the subsequent 2025 tax cuts under the Trump administration, effectively dismantles this theory.

Keep Reading Show less
 Dollar Bill Sticking Out of Piggy Bank on Yellow Background

A federal court sided with LAHSA, but LA nonprofits are still fronting millions to deliver government-funded homeless and DV services. Time to fix this.

Javier Zayas Photography/Getty Images

When Nonprofits Become the Bank for Government

It is a victory for Los Angeles in LAHSA v. Trump et al. that a federal court has temporarily halted the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development's suspension of the Los Angeles Homeless Services Authority and ordered HUD to execute already-awarded 2025 grants. The court found that HUD's action was arbitrary and unlawful, restoring LAHSA's role as the regional Continuum of Care applicant and protecting critical federal homelessness resources.

That is good news for Los Angeles.

Keep Reading Show less