Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

The CLARITY Act

News

White marble exterior of the United States Capitol, often called the Capitol Building, is the home of the United States Congress and the seat of the legislative branch of the U.S. federal government

The CLARITY Act crypto bill failed a procedural vote on Sept. 15, but it could return. Here's what it does, who would regulate crypto, and the Trump angle.

Richard Sharrocks / Getty Images

The CLARITY Act

The CLARITY Act, which failed in a procedural vote on Sept. 15, and a new venture by the Trump family’s World Liberty Financial cryptocurrency company made us think it was time to write about the cryptocurrency legislation. Even though it’s not currently active, the bill could come back.


What does the CLARITY Act do?

The CLARITY Act sets up a regulatory structure for cryptocurrency or digital assets. The latest version of the bill defines a digital asset as “any digital representation of value which is recorded on a cryptographically-secured distributed ledger or other similar technology.” In other words, Blockchain-based cryptocurrencies, stablecoins, and other similar technologies meant to be used as money or investments.

Why do we need any laws about crypto at all?

Right now, there is no comprehensive regulatory structure for cryptocurrency. The CLARITY Act “aims to establish rules governing how digital assets are issued, traded, intermediated, and supervised across the U.S. financial system.”

A major point of contention between legislators within each chamber of Congress and between chambers is how to divide (or if it should be divided at all) oversight between the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Commodities Futures Trading Commission (CFTC). The SEC is much larger than the CFTC and has a reputation for more aggressive oversight than the CFTC. This version of the CLARITY Act gives the CFTC more power than the SEC. But at the same time, “The division would not assign every [cryptocurrency type] permanently to one agency. Classification would depend on the asset’s legal rights, offering structure, network development, issuer involvement, and the activity being regulated, which could leave some questions of regulatory authority involving both the SEC and the CFTC.”

What else is in those 600+ pages?

Punchbowl noted that the current version of the CLARITY Act includes a change to an existing law that would allow for criminal prosecutions related to blockchain issues. Specifically, “A key change would no longer explicitly shield certain decentralized finance developers from 18 USC 1960, the part of the federal criminal code that prohibits unlicensed money transmission. The liability protections are now civil, rather than criminal.”

This provision might be good for users of crypto, but is not popular with developers.

Punchbowl also says “Another provision directs the Treasury secretary to monitor for signs of bank deposit flight tied to stablecoin rewards 18 months after the enactment of the law. “ This is an attempt to address worries of (among others) community banks. NPR described the concerns of community banks in an article yesterday.

Trump and Crypto

President Trump has made truly staggering amounts of money ($1.4 billion reported for 2025) off of his own cryptocurrency and related digital assets through his family-owned World Liberty Financial. Would the CLARITY Act prevent him from further enriching himself while in office?

The answer here tends to depend on who you ask and which party they belong to. The Associated Press reported on September 14 that “Trump agreed to new ethics rules to get a crypto bill across the line”.

However, as Judd Legum of Popular Information noted, the CLARITY Act grandfathers in Trump’s existing business interests.

Nor does it appear to address a move also reported Monday morning by the Washington Sun in which wallets matching known holdings of President Trump and his sons were moved into “vesting contracts”. These contracts require that no sales occur for at least two years, e.g. the end of the President’s legally final term as president. Presumably, because the President already has these tokens and the CLARITY Act grandfathers in existing cryptocurrency ownership, nothing in this move would be affected by the law should it ever pass.

The current version of the CLARITY Act was apparently weak enough with respect to banking industry concerns for four Republicans to join all Democrats in voting no on a procedural vote that, for now, brings progress on the CLARITY Act to a halt.

What does that mean for you if you have opinions about the CLARITY Act?

There’s more time to learn about cryptocurrency if you need to, about the bill if you need to and to contact your members of Congress if you have concerns. You can get contact information for your members from the GovTrack homepage.


The CLARITY Act was originally published by GovTrack and is republished with permission.


Read More

Tattered American flag

Trump's "Restoring Truth and Sanity" order targets how museums and parks present slavery and racism. Why one writer says Americans should push back.

Nisian Hughes/Getty Images

Trump's Mendacious, Deceitful Rewriting of American History

History is made of two parts. One is indisputable facts and the other is the interpretation of those facts. The history of history is filled with varying interpretations of the basic facts, usually tinted by the perspective of the historian or commentator. That perspective can be the writer's political leanings, his philosophy, or any number of personal biases.

All historians, however, whether conservative or liberal, regardless of philosophy generally agree on the basic facts. For example, while there are fringe groups and individuals who deny that the Holocaust happened—that 6 millions Jews were killed by the Nazis—no reputable historian disputes that fact.

Keep Reading Show less
First Amendment being torn

First Amendment text of the US Constitution ripped in half -- Freedom of Speech , Religion or Press unconstitutional concept

Getty Images

Lawsuit Says Press Access Is Essential to Democratic Accountability

When POLITICO, CNN, and MS NOW announced Monday that they were filing a federal lawsuit to restore their reporters’ access to the White House, they challenged more than the sudden and unexplained revocation of press credentials. They underscored a fundamental constitutional principle: a free press does not operate at the government's discretion.

According to their joint statement, the outlets are seeking urgent relief after the Secret Service denied their reporters entry to the White House complex on Saturday and confiscated their credentials. The action followed recent stories by these outlets examining the administration’s handling of classified documents and raising questions about transparency related to policy meetings. They wrote, “Without notice or process, the White House revoked our journalists’ credentials because it objected to our reporting. Left unchallenged, this threatens press freedom and the public’s right to independent journalism free from government interference.”

Keep Reading Show less
The sky clears behind the U.S. Capitol after rainy weather

The sky clears behind the U.S. Capitol after rainy weather on Sept. 2, 2026, in Washington, D.C.

Finn Gomez / Getty Images

We Didn't Get This Angry Because Americans Changed: We Got This Angry Because Washington Did

Something unusual has happened on the opinion pages of The New York Times recently.

Three very different writers have described three seemingly different American problems.

Keep Reading Show less
Gavel on top of binders

A full rundown of this week's congressional action: 7 bills headed to the President, a stalled data center bill, and the votes lawmakers wanted on record.

May Lim / 500px/Getty Images

House Crams in Votes Before Extended Break

The House wasn’t expected to stay in session past this week and, in fact, they left a day early after Rep. Massie (R-KY4) introduced an impeachment resolution against Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth. Nonetheless, they powered through many more votes than usual. We’ll cover the seven soon-to-be new laws and the bills of interest we highlighted in this week’s preview. As is its usual function, the Senate mostly acted as a break on legislation that had passed the House.

New Laws

These bills have all passed both chambers in identical form, so they next go to the President for signing.

Keep Reading Show less